Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:16:42.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Some Proteocephalid Cestodes from Freshwater Fishes in the Sudan*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

L. F. Khalil
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygieneand Tropical Medicine

Extract

Investigators up to the time of Monticelli (1891), with the exception of Weinland (1858), considered the proteocephalan group of fish cestodes to belong to the genus Taenia. It was Weinland (1858) who removed them from this genus, and erected the genus Proteocephalus for them.

Linstow (1891), was the first to point out that the fish species made a closely related group within the genus Taenia on account of certain constantly occurring characters. In the same year, Monticelli pointed out that in these fish “Taenias”, as then known, some showed marked differences from the rest, notably in the cortical position of the testes, and that these justified their separation as the genus Tetracotylus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Essex, H. E. 1927.—“The structure and development of Corallobothrium”. Illinois biol. Monogr., 11, 257328.Google Scholar
Fritsch, G., 1880.—“Die Parasiten des Zitterwelses”. S.B. breitss. Akad. Wiss., 99108.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., 1910.—“Eigentllmliche Fischcestoden”. Zool. Am., 46, 385398.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., AND Baer, J. G., 1925.—“Zoological results of the third Tanganyika expedition conducted by Dr. W. A. Cunnington, 1904–1905. Report on cestoda”. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 79100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. W., Kerlev, C. and Sneed, K. R., 1954.—“New species in the genus Corallobothrium Fritsch, 1886”. J. Parasit., 40 (Sect. 2, Supplement), 41.Google Scholar
Khalil, L. F., 1900.—“On a new genus Sandonella, for Proteocephalus sandoni Lynsdale, 1960, (Protcocephalidae) and the erection of a new subfamily, Sandonellinae”. J. Helminth., 34, 4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaptocz, B., 1906.—“Ergebnisse der mit Subvention aus der Erbschaft Trietl unternommenen zoologischen Forschungsreise Dr. Franz Werner's in den agyptischen Sudan und nach Nord-Uganda. Cestoden aus Fischen, aus Varanus und Hyrax”. S.B. Ahad. Wiss. Wien., 115, 121144.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E., 1941.—“Corallobothrium parva n. sp., a cestode from the common bullhead, Ameiurus nebulosus”. J. Parasit., 27, 221227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Rue, G. R. 1911.—“A revision of the cestode family Protcocephalidae”. Zool. Anz., 38, 473482.Google Scholar
La Rue, G. R., 1914.—“A revision of the cestode family Protcocephalidae”. Illinois biol. Monogr., 1, 1350.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1927.—“Remarks on the cestode families Monticelliidae and Ichthyotaeniidae”. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 21, 6987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1942.—“Zur Helminthfauna der Süsswasserfische Schweden. II. Die Cestoden des Welses”. Göteborgs VetenskSamh. Handl., (Sen B), 1, 124.Google Scholar
Southwell, T., 1930.—Fauna of British India. Cestodes. Vol. I.—Taylor and Francis. London.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. and Mcleod, J. A., 1952.—The Zoology of Tapeworms.—University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F., 1925.—“On some remarkable new Monticellia-like and other cestodes from Sudanese Siluroids”. Quart. J. micr. Sci., 69, 703729.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F., 1925.—“On three new Proteocephalids (Cestoda) and a revision of the genera of the family”. Parasitology, 17, 370394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1959.—Systema Helminthum. Vol. II. The Cestodes of Vertebrates.—Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar