Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:21:06.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a New Cestode, Anthobothrium taeniuri n.sp., (Tetraphyllidea) from the Red Sea Sting Ray and the Relationship between Anthobothrium van Beneden, 1850, Rhodobothrium Linton, 1889 and Inermiphyllidium Riser, 1955

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

M. F. A. Saoud
M. F. A. Saoud
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A new species, Anthobothrium taeniuri n.sp., has been described from the spiral intestine of the sting ray, Taeniura lymma from the Red Sea and compared with related species.

2. The two genera Rhodobothrium Linton, 1889 and Inermipyllidium Riser, 1955 are considered to be synonyms of Anthobothrium van. Beneden, 1850.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 37 , Issue 1-2 , March 1963 , pp. 135 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beneden, P. J. Van, 1861.—“Memoire sur Ies vers intestinaux.” Suppl. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 2, 1–376.Google Scholar
Crowcroft, P. W., 1947.—“Note on Anthobothrium hickmani, a new cestode from the Tasmanian electric ray (Narccine tasmaniensis Richardson).” Pap. roy. Soc. Tasm., (1946), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euzet, L., 1959.—“Recherches sur Ics Cestodes Tctraphyllides des Selaciens des c6tes de France.” Thesis, University of Monlpellier, 1–263.Google Scholar
Guiart, J., 1935.—“Cestodes parasites provenant des campagne scientifiques du Prince Albert Ier de Monaco.” Result. Camp. Sci. Monaco, 3, 1–115.Google Scholar
Linton, E 1889 “Notes on Entozoa of Marine Fishes of New England.” Amer. J. Sci., 37, 239–240.Google Scholar
Linton, E, 1890—“Notes on Entozoa of Marine Fishes of New England Part 2, Cestodes.” Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish. (1887), 719–899.Google Scholar
Linton, E, 1924.—“Notes on Cestode Parasites of Sharks and Rays.” Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 64, 1–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, F. G., 1943.—“The Anatomy of Anthobothrium auriculatum (Rud.) from Raja batis L.” Parasitology, 35, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riser, N. W., 1955.—“Studies on cestode parasites of sharks and skates.” J. Tenn. Acad. Sci., 30, 265–311.Google Scholar
Southwell, T., 1925.—“A monograph on the Tetraphyllidea with notes on related cestodes.” Mem. Lpool. Sch. trop. Med., 2, 1–368.Google Scholar
Southwell, T.,1930—“Cestoda, VI.I.Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, London.Google Scholar
Sudhapradiia, C. K., 1957.—”Cestode parasites of fishes of Madras coast.“ Indian J. Helminth., 7, (1955), 41–132.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F., 1934.—”On six new cestodes from Amazon fishes.“ Proc. zool. Soc. London, (1934), 33–44.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F., 1935.—”Some more remarkable cestodes from Amazon Siluroid fish.“ Parasiiology, 27, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1934.—”Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan, Part 4. Cestodes of Fishes.“ Jap. J. Zool., 6, 1–112.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1952.—”Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan, Part 49. Cestodes of Fishes.“ Ada Med. Okayama, 8, 1–76.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1959.—Systema Helminthum—Cestodes. New York.Google Scholar
Young, R. T., 1954.—”Cestodes of Sharks and Rays in Southern California.“ Proc. helm. Soc. Wash., 21, 106–112.Google Scholar