Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:31:49.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Life Cycles of Notocotylus triserialis Diesing, 1839, and N. imbricatus (Looss, 1893) sensu Szidat, 1935

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Alan W. Pike
Alan W. Pike
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cardiff and Commonwealth Bureau of Helminthology*, St. Albans, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Redescriptions of the cercaria, metacercaria and adults of N. triserialis and N. imbricatus are given. Cercariae developed in Lymnaea peregra and Bithynia tentaculata respectively and infected snails were collected from the Wentloog level, near Cardiff, South Wales. The characters adopted by Dubois for distinguishing species of this genus are more reliable than any alternative and the number of ventral glands is considered to be a reliable diagnostic feature in spite of suggestions to the contrary. The possibility of using chemical differences between the metacercarial cysts and other stages as a means of speciation is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 43 , Issue 1-2 , March 1969 , pp. 145 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beverley-Burton, M., 1961.—“Studies on the trematoda of British freshwater birds.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 137, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cort, W. W., 1914.—“Larval trematodes from North American fresh-water snails. Preliminary report.” J. Parasit., 1, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, C. M. 1839.—“Neue Gattungen von Binenwürmern nebst einem Nachtrage zur Monographie der Amphistomen.” Annln Wiener Mus. Naturg. Wien, 2, 221–242.Google Scholar
Dönges, J., 1962.—“Entwicklungsgeschtliche und morphologische Untersuchungen an Notocotyliden (Trematoda).” Z. ParasitKde. 22, 43–67.Google Scholar
Dubois, G., 1928.—“Étude des cercaires de Ia région de Neuchâtel.” Bull. Soc. neuchâtel Sci. nat., 52, 14–32.Google Scholar
Dubois, G., 1951.—“Étude des trématodes nord-américains de la collection E. L. Schiller et revision du genre Notocotylus Diesing, 1839.” Bull. Soc. neuchâtel Sci. nat., 74, 41–76.Google Scholar
Erkina, N. G.. 1954.—“The life-cycle of the trematode Notocotylus chionis, parasite of aquatic birds.” Translated title. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 97, 559–560.Google Scholar
Harrah, E. C.. 1922.—“North American monostomes primarily from freshwater hosts.” Illinois biol. Monogr., 7, 225–324.Google Scholar
Herber, E. C., 1942.—“Life history studies on two trematodes of the subfamily Notocotylinae.” J. Parasit., 28, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herber, E. C., 1955.—“Life history studies on Notocotylus urbanensis (Trematoda: Notocotylinae).” Proc. Pa Acad. Sci., 29, 267–275.Google Scholar
Ito, J., Papasarathorn, T. and Tongkoom, B., 1962.—“Studies on cercariae from freshwater snails in Thailand.” Jap. J. med. Sci. Biol., 15, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, W., 1911.—“Über Monostomiden.” Zool. Jb. Abt. Syst., 31, 491–590.Google Scholar
Looss, A., 1893.—“Zur Frage nach der Natur des Körperparenchyms bei den Trematoden nebst Bemerkungen über einige andere, zur Zeit noch offene Fragen.” Ber. sãchs. Akad. Wiss., 45, 10–34.Google Scholar
Nate, D. and Pande, B. P., 1963.—“On a monostome parasite of Indian domestic fowl with remarks on the genus Notocotylus Diesing, 1839.” Parasitology, 53, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odening, K., 1963.—“Das Exkretionssystem monostomer Cercarien (Trematoda: Notocotylidae) aus Gewässern von Berlin und Umgebung.” Limnologica, 1, 365–373.Google Scholar
Odening, K., 1966.—“Physidae und Planorbidae als Wirte in den Lebenszyklen einheimischer Notocotylidae (Trematoda: Paramphistomida).” Z. ParasitKde, 27, 210–239.Google ScholarPubMed
Odening, K., and Bockhardt, I., 1965.—“Der Entwicklungszyklus des Trematoden Notocotylus noyeri Joyeux, 1922, im Raum Berlin.” Mber. dt. Akad. Wiss. Berl., 7, 51–52.Google Scholar
Pike, A. W. and Erasmus, D. A., 1967.—“The formation, structure and histochemistry of the metacercarial cyst of three species of digenetic trematodes.” Parasitology, 57, 683–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudolphi, C. A., 1809.—Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis. Vol. 2, 457 pp. Amstelaedami.Google Scholar
Singh, K. S. and Lewert, R. M., 1959.—“Observations on the formation and chemical nature of metacercarial cysts of Notocotylus urbanensis.” J. infect. Dis., 104, 138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D., 1966.—The physiology of Trematodes. Edinburgh & London: Oliver & Boyd Ltd.Google Scholar
Szidat, Y., 1935.—“Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematoden der Monostomidengattung Notocotylus Diesing.” Zentbl. Bakt. ParasitKde, 133, 265–270.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1934.—“Contributions to the development of the Trematoda Digenea. Part II. The biology of the freshwater cercariae in Danish fresh waters.” K. danske Vidensk Selsk. Skr., 9, 223 pp.Google Scholar
Wikgren, B-J., 1956.—“Studies on Finnish larval flukes with a list of known Finnish adult flukes (Trematoda: Malacocotylea).” Acta zool. Fenn., 91, 106 pp.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A. and Bennett, M. S., 1964.—“The life cycle of Notocotylus attenuatus.” Parasitology, 54, 14 P.Google Scholar