Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:16:18.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nematodes from the Banks of Still and Running Waters. VI. Rhabditida from Sewer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

S. Khera
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Extract

Four new genera (each containing one new species) belonging to the order Rhabditida have been described from Jodhpur Sewer. Mesodiplogasteroides n.g. (subfamily Diplogasterinae) is distinguished from the closely allied genus Butlerius by the absence of setose papillae on the head and the presence of a rudimentary bursa in male. Operculorhabditis n.g. (subfamily Rhabditinae) is characterized by the presence of a flap-like, deciduous, cuticular operculum covering the vulva which is well posterior. Praeputirhabditis n.g. (subfamily Rhabditinae) is unique in possessing prepuce-like loose cuticle through which the tail can be protruded. Saprorhabditis n.g. (sub-family Protorhabditinae) has neither a glottoid apparatus nor a median oesophageal bulb but possesses an oesophageal collar. The genus Matthesonema is transferred to the subfamily Rhabditinae. Rhabditis (Rhabditella) octopleura is being recorded for the first time from India.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrássy, I., 1958.—“Erd- und Süsswassernematoden aus Bulgariaen.” Acta zool. Hung., 4, 188.Google Scholar
Andrássy, I., 1966.—“Erd und Süsswasser-Nematoden aus Ghana Kiasse Secernen-tea (Phasmiclia).” Annis Univ. Scient. bpest. Rolando Eölvös Sect. Biol., 8, 524.Google Scholar
Baker, A. D., 1962.—Check lists of the nematode superfamilies Dorylaimoidea, Rhabditoidea, Tylenchoidea, and Aphelenchoidea. Leiden, Brill, 261 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, E. C., 1953.—“The genera of the subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky, 1922 (Nematoda).” Thapar Commemoration Volume, 6976.Google Scholar
Dougherty, E. C., 1955.—“The genera and species of the subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky, 1952 (Nematoda): A nomenclatorial analysis—including an addendum on the composition of the family Rhabditidac Ö1ey, 1880.” J. Helmiuth., 29, 105152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T., 1929.—“On some new and little known free-living nematodes.” J. Helmiuth., 7, 2762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T., 1963.—Soil and freshwater nematodes. London, Methuen, 544 pp. Revised by J. B. Goodey.Google Scholar
MicoLetzky, H., 1922.—“Die freilebenden Erd-Nematoden mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Steiermark und der Bukowina, zugleich mit euler Revision samtlicher nicht mariner, freilebender Nematoden in Form von Genus-Beschreibungen und Bestimmungsschlüsseln.” Arch. Naturg. Berlin, Abt. A, 87, 1650.Google Scholar
Osche, G., 1952.—“Systematik und Phylogenie der Gattung Rhabditis (Nematoda).” Zool. Jb., (Abt. Syst)., 81, 175312.Google Scholar
Osche, G., 1955.—“Über die Vergesellschaftung von Nematoden und Crustaceen, mit einer Beschreibung von Matthesonema tylosa n.g., n.sp. (Nematoda) aus dem Kiemenarum einer Assel.” Zool. Anz., 155, 253262.Google Scholar
Sanwal, K. C., 1959.—“Cuticonema vivipara n.g., n.sp. a new saprophagous nematode of the subfamily Panagrolaiminae Thorne, 1937, from Canada, with a note on the genus Brevibucca Goodey, 1935.” Can. J. Zool., 37, 223229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, G., 1929.—“Rhabditis octopleura n.sp., a new Rhabditis (Rhabditidae, Nematodes) living in the bark of diseased elm (Ulmus americana).” Zool. Airs., 80, 146148.Google Scholar