Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:18:19.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological variability in Fasciola hepatica eggs in ruminants, rodents and lagomorphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

M. Abrous ,
A.M. Comes ,
N. Gasnier ,
D. Rondelaud ,
G. Dreyfuss ,
A. Chauvin ,
A. Ménard ,
A. Agoulon  and
J. Cabaret
M. Abrous
Affiliation:
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire d'Histopathologie Parasitaire, 2 rue Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges, France
A.M. Comes
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Pathologie Aviaire et de Parasitologie, 37380 Nouzilly, France
N. Gasnier
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Pathologie Aviaire et de Parasitologie, 37380 Nouzilly, France Parasitologia, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo 27080, Spain
D. Rondelaud
Affiliation:
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire d'Histopathologie Parasitaire, 2 rue Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges, France
G. Dreyfuss
Affiliation:
Faculté de Pharmacie, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, 2 rue Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges, France
A. Chauvin
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, BP 40706, 44307 Nantes Cédex 03, France
A. Ménard
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, BP 40706, 44307 Nantes Cédex 03, France
A. Agoulon
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, BP 40706, 44307 Nantes Cédex 03, France
J. Cabaret*
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Pathologie Aviaire et de Parasitologie, 37380 Nouzilly, France
*
*Author for correspondence. Fax: 33 2 47427774 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The length and width of 1297 Fasciola hepatica eggs shed in cattle hosts, 337 in sheep and 199 in nutria, were measured from several parts of France. The data were compared with those obtained from other studies in Spain, France (where rats were also investigated), Germany and the Netherlands. One way analysis of variance and discriminant analysis were used to assess differences between host origins. The distribution of length and width of eggs were analysed using skewness and kurtosis Fisher coefficients. The eggs recovered from sheep, cattle, rodents and lagomorphs were different in size: the eggs found in rodents (length L × width W in μm: 8592) and lagomorphs (L × W in μm: 9100) were smaller than those found in sheep and cattle (L×W in μm: 10,000). These morphological differences in F. hepatica eggs were host-induced in rats (L×W in μm: 9709 in cattle to 8949 in rats) and rabbits (L×W in μm: 9709 in cattle to 8432 in rabbits). These differences in size of eggs might correspond to their being less able to develop into miracidia in less frequent hosts such as rodents and rabbits.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 313 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeda, J., Ascaso, C., Marçal, G.A., Corachan, M., Southgate, V.R. & Rollinson, D. (1996) Morphometric variability of Schistosoma intercalatum eggs: a diagnostic dilemna. Journal of Helminthology 70, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boray, J.C. (1969) Experimental fasciolasis in Australia. Advances in Parasitology 7, 96–210.Google Scholar
Comes, A.M. (1994) Estudio de la cronobiología de emisión, embrionación y morfometría del huevo de Fasciola hepatica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Trematoda: Fasciolidae) en parasitaciones naturales y experimentales. 380 pp. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias biologicas, Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Delecole, J.P. (1981) Le ragondin et la douve. Bulletin de la Société Vétérinaire Pratique 64, 391–392.Google Scholar
Düwel, D. (1972) Aussergewöhnlich grosse Eier eines Fasciola hepatica Stammes. Second International Symposium of Helminthology (Tatranska Lomnica, 1970) Helminthologia. 9.Google Scholar
Haroun, E.M. & Hillyer, G.V. (1986) Resistance to fasciolasis. A review. Veterinary Parasitology 20, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, H.D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology, in May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. (Eds) Oxford series in Ecology and Evolution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R.G. (1962) Fasciolasis in coypus (Myocastor coypus). Veterinary Record 74, 1552.Google Scholar
Jansen, J. (1972). New cases of Fasciola hepatica with large eggs. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 281–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, J. & Over, J.H. (1963) On a remarkable strain of Fasciola hepatica in Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 88, 770–775.Google Scholar
Jimenez, M. & Guevara, D. (1977) Estudios experimentales sobre biologia de Fasciola hepatica. 1. Numero y viabilidad de los huevos de Fasciola hepatica hallados en vesicula biliar de vaca, oveja y cabra. Revista Ibérica de Parasitologia 37, 291–300.Google Scholar
Lee, C.G., Zimmerman, G.L. & Bishop, J.K. (1992) Host influence on the banding profiles of whole-body protein and excretory-secretory product of Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda) by isoelectric focusing. Veterinary Parasitology 41, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas-Coma, S., Fons, R., Feliu, C., Bargues, M.D., Valero, M.A. & Galan Puchades, M.T. (1987) Conséquences des phénomènes liés à l'insularité dans les maladies parasitaires. La grande Douve du Foie (Fasciola hepatica) et les Muridés en Corse. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise de Sciences Naturelles 110, 57–62.Google Scholar
Olsen, O.W. (1948) Wild rabbits as reservoir hosts of the common liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, in southern Texas. Journal of Parasitology 2, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, J. (1977) Host-induced morphological variations in the strigeoid trematode Posthodiplostomum (Trematoda: Diplostomatidae). IV: Organs of reproduction (ovary and testes), vitelline gland and egg. Great Basin Naturalist 37, 475–482.Google Scholar
Perez Ponce de Leon, G. (1995) Host-induced morphological variability in adult Posthodiplostomum minimum (Digenea: Neodiplostomidae). Journal of Parasitology 81, 818–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddington, J.J., Leid, R.W. & Westcott, R.B. (1986) The susceptibility of the goat to Fasciola hepatica infections. Veterinary Parasitology 19, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rondelaud, D. & Dreyfuss, G. (1995) Fasciola hepatica: the influence of the definitive host on the characteristics of infection in the snail Lymnaea truncatula. Parasite 2, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalhausen, I.I. (1949) Factors of evolution. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H.W. (1957) Intraspecific variation in parasitic flatworms. Systematic Zoology 6, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinar, R. (1984) Differentiation of Fasciola gigantica and Fasciola hepatica according to the dimensions of their eggs. Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Ankara Universitesi 31, 207–229.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1975) A synoptical review of life-histories of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Keigaku Publishing Co, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Yoccoz, N. (1993) Morphométrie et analyses multidimensionnelles. in Lebreton, J.D. & Asselain, B. (Eds) Biométrie et environnement. Masson éditeur, Paris.Google Scholar