Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:56:49.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mating behaviour of Echinostoma paraensei grown in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

P. M. Nollen
P. M. Nollen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adults of Echinostoma paraensei grown in mice were exposed to 3-H-tyrosine and transplanted to uninfected mice singly or with unexposed worms. The presence of sperm labelled with the radioactive tyrosine in the seminal receptacles of labelled and unlabelled worms recovered after 5 days indicated the mating pattern of this species. Of nine isolated, labelled worms recovered, four had self-inseminated (44%). Of the 39 unlabelled found with eight labelled worms, only eight exhibited labelled sperm for a cross-insemination rate of 21%. Six of these eight labelled worms had self-inseminated (75%) in addition to the cross-insemination. This pattern of mating is termed unrestricted, unlike the restricted mating seen in three species of eyeflukes, which will not self-inseminate in groups. In contrast to the other species of echinostomes investigated, very little sperm was found in the seminal receptacles of the serially sectioned E. paraensei. Adults were always found in the duodenum, even when transplanted in the ileum.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 43 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christennsen, N., Fried, B. & Kanev, I. (1990) Taxonomy of 37-collar spined Echinostoma (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) in studies on the population regulation in experimental rodent hosts. Angewandt Parasitologie 31, 127–130.Google Scholar
Kanev, I. (1985) On the morphology, biology, ecology, and taxonomy of the E. revolutum group (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae: Echinostoma). PhD dissertation, University of Sophia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Meece, J.K. & Nollen, P.M. (1995) A comparison of the adult and miracidial stages of Echinostoma paraensei and E. caproni. International Journal for Parasitology (in press).Google Scholar
Morgan, J.A.T. & Blair, D. (1995) Nuclear rDNAITS sequence variation in the trematode genus Echinostoma: an aid to establishing relationships within the 37-collar-spine group. Parasitology (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, C. & Nollen, P.M. (1973) Autoradiographical studies on the reproduction system of Philophthalmus hegeneri Penner and Fried, 1963. Journal of Parasitology 59,650–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollen, P.M. (1968) Autoradiographic studies on reproduction in Philophthalmus megalurus (Cort, 1914) (Trematoda). Journal of Parasitology 54, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollen, P.M. (1978) Studies on the reproductive system of Philophthalmus gralli using techniques of transplantation and autoradiography. Journal of Parasitology 64, 613–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollen, P.M. (1990) Echinostoma caproni: mating behavior and the timing of development and movement of reproductive cells. Journal of Parasitology 76, 784–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollen, P.M. (1993) Echinostoma trivolvis: mating behavior of adults raised in hamsters. Parasitology Research 79, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollen, P.M. (1994) The mating behavior of Zygocotyle lunata adults grown in mice. Journal of Helminthology 68, 327–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollen, P.M. & Pyne, J.E. (1979) Observations on spermatogenesis and inseminative behavior of Megalodiscus temperatus adults in frogs. Journal of Parasitology 65, 35–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloss, B., Meece, J., Romano, M.A. & Nollen, P. M. (1995) The genetic relationships between Echinostoma caproni, E.paraensei, and E. trivolvis as determined by electrophoresis.Journal of Helminthology 69, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar