Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:44:12.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imperial Bureau of Agricultural Parasitology: Notes and Memoranda

The Helminth Parasites of Marsupials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Extract

ALTHOUGH some marsupials are insectivorous or carnivorous in diet many others are vegetarian in diet and frequently cause appreciable damage to pastures and crops and therefore are of considerable economic importance. Recently, during the course of searching the literature for references to helminth infections in marsupials it was observed that, in certain cases, hosts other than marsupials were involved and in some instances were of economic importance in that they were domesticated animals. Whether or not marsupials assist in the spread of parasitic infection is somewhat inadequately dealt with in the literature but one cannot lose sight of their acting as reservoir hosts.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariola, V., 1900.—“Revisione della Famiglia Bothriocephalidaesstr”. Arch. Parasit. Paris, iii (3), 369484, 3 pls. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Baer, J. G., 1925.—“Some Cestoda described by Beddard, 1911–1920”. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit., xix (1), 122, 15 figs., 1 tab., 17 refs. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1925.—“Notes on some Australian parasitic nematodes”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, xv (85), 112115, 1 fig. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1927.—“Some new parasitic nematodes from Australia”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, xx (116), 214225, 9 text-figs., 5 refs. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1930a.—“Four new Trichostrongylid nematodes from Queensland”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, vi (31), 118, 23 figs., 8 refs. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1930B.—“A nomenclatural correction”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, vi (34), p. 550. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1932.—“A new species of the nematode genus Trichuris from Queensland”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, ix (49), 3132, 1 fig., 1 ref. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A. & Lane, C., 1920.—“A revision of the nematode family Gnathostomidae.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 245310, 40 text-figs., 8 pls., 65refs. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E., 1911.—“Contributions to the anatomy and systematic arrangement of the Cestoidea. II. On two new genera of cestodes from mammals.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 9941018, 12 figs., 9 refs. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E., 1912.—“On a new genus (Dasyurotaenia) from the Tasmanian Devil Dasyurus ursinus, the type of a new family.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 677695. (W.L. 16737.)Google Scholar
Beddard, F. E., 1914.—“Contributions to the anatomy and systematic arrangement of the Cestoidea. xiii. On two new species belonging to the genera Oochoristica and Linstowia, with remarks upon those genera.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 263283. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E., 1915.—“Contributions to the anatomy and systematic arrangement of the Cestoidea. xvi. On certain points in the anatomy of the genus Amabilia and of Dasyurolaenia.Proc Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 175192. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1891.—“Notices helminthologiques (deuxième série)”. Mém. Soc. zool. Fr., iv (3/4), 420489, 38 figs. (W.L. 13343.)Google Scholar
Boas, J. E. V., 1902.—“Triplotaenia mirabilis.Zool. Jahrb., Abt., Syst. xvii, 329334, 1 p1. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Bourquin, J., 1905.—“Cestodes de mammifères. Le genre Bertia.Rev. suisse Zool., xiii, 415503. (W.L. 19288.)Google Scholar
Brandes, G., 1888.—“Die Familie der Holostomeae. Ein Prodromus zu einer Monographie Derselben. Leipzig, 72 pp.Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1893.—“Vermes.” Bronn's Klassen, Abt. Ia, iv (28/30), 817925, 13 figs., 3 pis. (W.L. 3592.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1899.—“Über Clinostomum Leidy.” Zool. Anz., xxii (602), 484488; (603), 489–493, 19 refs. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1900a.—“Die Arten der Gattung Clinostomum Leidy”. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst., xiv (1), 148, 2 pls. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1900b.—“Bemerkungen über die Fascioliden-Gattung Rhopalias”. Zool. Anz., xxiii (605), 2729. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1901.—“Zur Kenntniss der Trematoden der Saugethiere.” Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst., xiv (4), 311348, 2 pls. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1915.—“Naturgeschichte der tierischen Parasiten des Menschen. Würzburg, 5th Edit., x+559 pp., 407 figs.Google Scholar
Breinl, A., 1913.—“Nematodes observed in North Queensland. Report for 1911.Rep. Aust. Inst. Trop. Med., pp. 3941. (W.L. 17930a).Google Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1926.—“On a new species of Trichostrongyle worm from the Bennett's Wallaby”. J. Helm., iv (1), 2326, 3 text-figs., 1 ref.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1931.—“On a species of Trichostrongyle from the Tasmanian Devil”. J. Helm., ix (3), 153156, 3 figs., 1 ref.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1924.—“A new genus of Trichostrongylid worms from the kangaroo”. Parasitology, xvi (2), 160163. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1930.—“Specific characters in the genus Trichuris, with a description of a new species, Trichuris tenuis, from a camel”. J. Parasit., xvi (4), 198206, 2 pls. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1932.—“Notes on the helminth parasites of the opossum (Didelphis virginiana) in Southeast Texas, with descriptions of four new species.Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., lxxxi, Art. 16 (No. 2939), 115, 5 figs., 15 refs. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1898.—“Extract from MS report on the parasites of stock”. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., ix (3), 296321; (4), 419–454. (W.L. 268.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1905.—“The tapeworms of Australia.Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., xvi 619631. (W.L. 268.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1879.—“Parasites: A treatise on the entozoa of man and animals, including some account of the ectozoa. London, 508 pp., 85 figs.Google Scholar
Dickerson, L. M., 1930.—“A new variety of Harmostomum opisthotrias from the North American opossum, Didelphys virginiana, with a discussion on its possible bearing on the origin of its host.Parasitology, xxii, 3746, 3 figs. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1850.—“Systema Helminthum. Vienna, Vol. i, 679 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1851“Systema Helminthum. Vienna, Vol. ii, 588 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1855.—“Neunzehn Arten von Trematoden.Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-nat. Ki., Abt. 1, x, 5970, 3 pls. (W.L. 7134.)Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1861.—“Revision der Nematoden.SitzBer. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-nat. Kl., xlii, 595736, 1 p1. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Dikmans, G., 1931.—“A new nematode worm Viannaia bursobscura, from the opossum, with a note on other parasites of the opossum.Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., lxxix, Art. 31, (No. 2897), 14, 2 pis., 3 refs. (W.L. 16944.)Google Scholar
Douthitt, H., 1915.—“Studies on the cestode family Anoplocephalidae”. Illinois Biol. Monog., i (3), 351446, 6 pls., 56 refs. (W.L. 9822.)Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux. Paris, xvi + 648 pp., 12 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisig, H., 1869.—“Beschreibung einer Filaria aus Halmaturus”. Z. wiss. Zool., xx (1), 99102, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. J., 1883.—In “Notes and Exhibits”. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., viii (3), 388. (W.L. 16790a.)Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., 1899.—“Ueber Taenia depressa v. Sieb. (Mittheilungen über Vogeltänien 1.)”. Zbl. Bakd., Abt. 1, Orig., xxvi (2/3), 8386, 2 figs. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., 1902.—“Sur un nouveau bothriocéphalide d'oiseau (Ptychobothrium armalum)”. Arch. Parasit. Paris, v (3), 440448, 6 figs. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Gemmill, J. F. & Linstow, O. von. 1902.—“Ichthyonema Grayi Gemmill u. v. Linstow”. Arch. Naturgesch., Jahrg. 68, i (2), 113118, 1 pl. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1919.—“The adult taenioid cestodes of dogs and cats, and of related carnivores in North America”. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., lv (No. 2258), 194, 80 figs., 154 refs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, P., 1900.—“Beiträge zur Anatomie und Histologie der Trichocephalen, insbesondere des Trichocephalus affinis”. Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Orig., xxviii (22), 779787. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Ihering, H. Von. 1902.—“Die Helminthen als Hilfsmittel der zoogeographischen Forschung.Zool. Anz., xxvi, 4251. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C. Von. 1904a.—“Weitere Angaben über Triplotaenia mirabilis J. E. V. Boas”. Zool. Anz., xxvii (7/8), 243247, 1 fig. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C. Von. 1904b.—“Zur Kenntnis einiger Säugetiercestoden”. Zool. Anz., xxvii (25), 770782. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C. Von. 1905.—“Beutlercestoden der Niederländischen Neu-Guinea-Expedition. Zugleich einiges Neue aus dem Gescfilechtsleben der Cestoden”. Zool. Anz., xxix (4), 127131, 2 text-figs. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C. Von. 1906A.—“Studien an Saugetiercestoden”. Z. wiss. Zool., lxxxi (2/3), 505597, 6 pls., 69 refs. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Janicki, C. Von. 1906A.—“Die Cestoden Neu Guineas. Nova Guinea. Resultats de I'Expedition scient. Néerl à Ia Nouvelle-Guinée en 1903. v, Livr. 1, 181200, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. J., 1913.—“On some trematode parasites of marsupials and of a monotreme”. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., xxxvii (4), 727740, 3 pis., 16 refs. (W.L. 16790.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1909.—“The Entozoa of Monotremata and Australian Marsupialia. No. I”. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., xxxiv (3), 514523, 45 refs. (W.L. 16790.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1910.—In “Abstract of Proceedings”. J. Roy. Soc. N.S.W., xliv (1), pp. xii and xvii. (W.L. 11492.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1911a.—“The Entozoa of Monotremata and Australian Marsupialia. No. II”. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., xxxvi (1), 4757, 1 p1., 16 refs. (W.L. 16790.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1911b.—“Cestoda and Acanthocephala.Rep. Aust. Inst. Trop. Med., 757–96. (W.L. 17930a.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1912.—“On a re-examination of the types of Krefft's species of Cestoda in the Australian Museum, Sydney. Part.I.Rec. Aust. Mus., ix, 135, 6 pis., 75 refs. (W.L. 17736.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1913.—“Note on some Entozoa.Proc. Roy. Soc. Qd., xxiv 6391, 5 pls. (W.L. 16903.)Google Scholar
Krefft, G., 1871.—“On Australian Entozoa, with descriptions of new species”. Trans. Ent. Soc. N.S.W., ii (3), 206232, 3 pls.Google Scholar
LaRue, G. R. & Bosma, N. J., 1927.—“Studies on the trematode family Strigeidae (Holostomidae)”. “Society Proceedings,” in J. Parasit., xiv (2), 124125. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1856.—“A synopsis of entozoa and some of their ectocongeners observed by the author”. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., viii (1), 4258. (W.L. 16590.)Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1875a.—“Notes on some parasitic worms”. [Secretary's abstract.] Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., xxvii (1), 1416, 2 figs. (W.L. 16590.)Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1875b.—“Notes on some parasitic worms”. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., xxvii (1), 1718. (W.L. 16590.)Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1886.—“Notices of nematoid worms”. Proc. A cad. Nat. Sci. Philad., xxxviii (3), 308313, 1 fig. (W.L. 16590.)Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1904.—“Researches in helminthology and parasitology arranged by J. Leidy, Junr.Smithson. Misc. Coll., xlvi, 1281, 27 figs. (W.L. 20256.)Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1911.—“A demonstration of nematode parasites obtained from animals in the Zoological Gardens.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 620621. (W.L. 16737.)Google Scholar
Lewis, R. C., 1914.—“On two new species of tapeworms from the stomach and small intestine of a wallaby, Lagorchestes conspicillatus, from Hermite Island, Monte Bello Islands.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 419433, 3 figs., 10 pis., 31 refs. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1878.—“Compendium der Helminthologie. Hannover, xxii + 382 pp.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1889.—“Compendium der Helminthologie. Nachtrag. Die Litteratur der Jahre 18781889. Hannover, xvi + 151 pp.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1897.—“Zur Systematik der Nematoden nebst Beschreibung neuer Arten”. Arch. mikr. Anat., xlix (3), 608622, 1 pl. (W.L. 1780.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1898a.—“Nemathelminthen gesammelt von Herrn Prof. Dr. F. Dahl im Bismarck-Archipel”. Arch. Naturgesch, Jahrg. 63, I (3), 281291, 2 pls. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1898B.—“Nemathelminthen von Herrn Richard Semon in Australien gesammelt.” [In Semon, R. Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien, etc. v (4).] Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena, viii, 469472, 1 p1. (W.L. 7137.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1903.—“Entozoa des Zoologischen Museums der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu St. Petersburg. II.Annu. Mus. zool. Aced. St. Pétersb., viii, 265294, 3 pls., 7 refs. (W.L. 8168.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1905.—“Helminthologische Beobachtungen”. Arch. mikr. Anat., lxvi (3), 355366, 1 pl. (W.L. 1780.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1906a.—“Neue und bekannte Helminthen”. Zool. Jahrb., xxiv (1), 120, 1 p (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von. 1906b.—“Neue Helminthen.Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Orig., xli, 749752, 1 pGoogle Scholar
Luehe, M., 1899.—“Zur Kenntnis einiger Distomen.Zool. Anz., xxii 524539. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Luehe, M., 1905.—“Geschichte und Ergebnisse der Echinorhynchen-Forschung bis auf Westrumb (1821). Mit Bemerkungen über alte und neue Gattungen der Acanthocephalen.Zool. Ann., i, 139353. (W.L. 23828.)Google Scholar
Lutz, A., 1895.—“Distoma opisthotrias um nuovo parasita do gambá.Rev. Mus. paul., i, 181199, 4 figs. (W.L. 18925.)Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1924.—The cestodes of mammals. London, 282 pp.Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1860.—“Una monografia del genere Dispharagus ed una monografia del genere Histiocephalus”. SitzBev. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math-nat. Kl., xxxix (3), 479516. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Mönnig, H. O., 1926.—“Three new helminths.Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr., xiii 291298, 12 figs. (W.L. 21653.)Google Scholar
Mönnig, H. O., 1927.—“On a new Physaloptera from an eagle and a Trichostrongyle from the cane rat, with notes on Polydelphis quadricornis and the genus Spirostrongylus.Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr., xiv, 261265, 6 figs. (W.L. 21653.)Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G., 1905.—A treatise on the parasites and parasitic diseases of the domesticated animals. London, 2nd Edit., xvi + 697 pp., 365 figs.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1912.—Parasitologie des animaux domestiques: maladies parasitaires non bactériennes. Paris, 1257 pp., 770 figs.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1917.—“Results of Dr. E. Mjöberg's Swedish Scientific Expedition to Australia, 1910–1913. Pt. xiv. Australische Cestoden”. K. svensha VetenshAkad. Handl., lii (14), 148, 3 pls. (W.L. 11870.)Google Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J., 1922.—“A new Davaineid cestode—Raillietina (Paroniella) macropa, sp. n., from a wallaby”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, ix (53), 602612, 4 figs., 22 refs. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A., 1871.—“Ueber Echinococcus bei Macropus major.Verh. naturh.-med. Ver. Heidelberg, v, 181186. (W.L. 22295.)Google Scholar
Parona, C., 1896.—“Intorno ad alcuni distomi nuovi o poco noti”. Atti Soc. ligust. Sci. nat. geogr., vii (3), 162180, 7 figs. (W.L. 2189.)Google Scholar
Parona, C., 1900.—“Di alcuni elminti del Museo Nacional di Buenos Aires”. Comun. Mus. nac. B. Aires, i (6), 190197, 1 fig. (W.L. 6678.)Google Scholar
Parona, C., 1901.—“Di alcuni Cestodi brasiliani, raccolti dal Dott. Adolfo Lutz.Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. comp. Genova, No. 102 [Reprint 12 pp.], 1 ref. (W.L. 3324.)Google Scholar
Plimmer, H. G., 1912a.—“On the blood-parasites found in animals in the Zoological Gardens during the four years 1908–1911.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 406419, 7 pls. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimmer, H. G. 1912b.—“The President's address: On certain blood parasites.J. R. Micr. Soc., pp. 133150, 2 pls. (W.L. 11360.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, A., 1908.—“Gli Acantocefali dei mammiferi. Nota prev.Arch. Parasit. Paris, xii, 268282. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Porta, A., 1909.—“Gli Acantocefali dei mammiferi.Arch. zool. (ital.) Napoli, Iv, 239285. (W.L. 1949.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1893.—Traité de zoologie médicale et agricole. Paris, 2nd Edit., 736 pp., 494 figs.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. & Henry, A., 1910.—“Les Onchocerques, nématodes parasites du tissu conjonctif.C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, Lxviii, 248251. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A. & Henry, A., 1911.—“Sur une filaire péritonéale des porcins”. Bull. Soc. Path. exotique, iv (6), 386389. (W.L. 5310.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A. & Henry, A., 1912.—“Quelques nématodes parasites des reptiles”. Bull. Soc. Path. exotique, v (4), 251259. (W.L. 5310.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A. & Henry, A., 1914.—“Essai de classification des Heterahidae.” 9th Int. Cong. Zool. Monaco, pp. 674682. (W.L. 23998.)Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H., 1907.—“Tapeworm cysts (Dithyridium cynocephali n. sp.) in the muscles of a marsupial wolf (Thylacinus cynocephalus).Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc., xxvii, 3132, 1 p1. (W.L. 21400a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—Entozoorum Synopsis. Berlin, 811 pp.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., 1866.—Monographie der Nematoden. Berlin, viii + 357 pp., 122 figs., 28 pls.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E., 1902.—“On a collection of parasites from the Soudan”. Arch. Parasit. Paris, vi (4), 604612, 1 pl., 9 refs. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Solomon, S. G., 1933.—“A note on a new species of Breinlia (FILARIIDAE), from a Tree-Kangaroo.J. Helm., xi (2), 101104, 5 figs., 1 ref.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spengel, J. W., 1905.—“Die Monozootie der Cestoden.Z. wiss. Zool., Festschr. Ehlers, lxxxii, 252287. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., 1906.—“Illustrated key to the cestode parasites of man.Bull. U.S. Hyg. Lab., No. 25, 104 pp., 166 figs., 19 refs. (W.L. 4295.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. & Hassall, A., 1893.—“A revision of the adult cestodes of cattle, sheep, and allied animals.Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., No. 4, 101 pp., 16 pls., 75 refs. (W.L. 5642.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. & Hassall, A., 1894.—“A preliminary catalogue of the parasites contained in the collections of the United States Bureau of Animal Industry, United States Army Medical Museum, Biological Dept. of the University of Pennsylvania (Coll. Leidy) and in Coll. Stiles and Coll. Hassall.Vet. Mag., i (4), 245253; 331354.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., 1898.—“An inventory of the genera and subgenera of the trematode family Fascioidae. [Notes on parasites. 48].” Arch. Parasit. Paris, i (1), 8199. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., 1905.—“The determination of generic types, and a list of roundworm genera, with their original and type species.Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., No. 79, 150 pp. (W.L. 5642.)Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1889.—“Il genere Physaloptera Rudolphi. Lavoro monografico.Boll. Soc. adriat. Sci. nat., xi, 3659, 3 pls. (W.L. 3359.)Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1892.—“I distomi dei mammiferi.” Program. civ. scuola r. sup., Trieste, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1902.—“Sopra alcuni nematodi deila collezione elmintologica del prof. dott. Corrado Parona.Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. comp. Genova, No. 116 [Reprint 16 pp.], 3 pls. (W.L. 3324.)Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1904.—“Una nuova specie del genere Plagiorchis Lüthe”. Annu. Mus. zool. Univ. Napoli, n.s., i (16), 12, 1 fig., 1 tab. (W.L. 1535.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1913.—“Sobre as especies brazeiras da subfamilia Heterakinae Railliet & Henry”. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, v (3), 271318, 5 pls. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1914a.—“Tricostrongylideos brazilieros. (3a Nota prévia).Brazil-med., xxviii, 325327. (W.L. 3494.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1914b.—“Sobre as especies brazileiras do genero Capillaria Zeder 1800. (Nota prévia.)Brazil-med., xxviii, p. 429. (W.L. 3494.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1915a.—“Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica brasileira. V. Sobre as especies brasileiras do genero Capillaria Zeder, 1800”. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, vii (2), 146172. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1915b.—“Revisão dos Acantocephalos brazileiros. I. Farn. Gigantorhynchidae Hamann 1892. (Nota prévia).Brazil-med., xxix, p. 105. (W.L. 3494.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1915c.—“Revisão dos Acantocephalos brazileiros. I. Fam. Gigantorhynchidae Hamann, 1892. (2a Nota prévia).Brazil-med., xxix, p. 137. (W.L. 3494.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1917.—“Alguns helminthos da collecçãgo do Instituto Bacteriologico de S. Paulo.Brazil-med., xxxi, 99100. (W.L. 3494.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1919.—“Trichostrongylidae brazileiras.Rev. Soc. Brasil. Sci. Rio, iii, 191205.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1920.—“Contribuição para conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica brasileiro. IX. Sobre as especies da sub-familia Microphalinae Ward, 1901”. Arch. Esc. Agric. Med. vet. Nictheroy, iv (2), 8591, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1921.—“Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica brasileira. XIII. Ensaio monografico da famiia Trichostrongylidae Leiper, 1909”. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, xiii (1), 5135, 56 pls., 203 refs. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1922.—“Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica brasileira. XVI. Cruzia tentaculata (Rud., 1819)”. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, xiv (1), 8894, 4 pls. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1925.—“Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica brasileira. XVIII. Sobre as especies brasileiras do genero Gnathostoma Owen, 1836”. Sciencia Medica, iii (7), 312, 13 text-figs., 8 refs.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1928.—“Fauna helminthologica de Matto Grosso. (Trematodeos—I parte)”. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, xxi (2), 309341, 13 pls. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viana, L., 1924.—“Tentativa de catalogação das especies brazileiras de trema todeos”. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, xvii (1), 95227, 524 refs. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westrumb, A. H. L., 1821.—De helminthibus acanthocephalis. Hanoverae, 85 pp. 3 pls.Google Scholar
Witenberg, G., 1925.—“Versuch einer Monographie der Trematodenunterfamilie Harmostominae Braun.Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst., li, 167254, 2 pls., 128 refs. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Wood, W. A., 1929a.—“On a new species of Labiostrongylus”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, xv (24), 550551, 1 ref. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W. A., 1929b.—“A note on Rugopharynx australis (Monnig 1926)”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, iv (24), 552554. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W. A., 1930.—“Some new parasitic nematodes from Western Australia.” 1st Rep. Direct. Inst. Anim. Path. Cambridge, pp. 209219, 3 refs.Google Scholar
Yorke, W. & Maplestone, P. A., 1926.—The nematode parasites of vertebrates. London, 536 Pp., 307 figs., 684 refs.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1896.—“Die Taenien der aplacentalen Säugethiere”. Zool. Anz., xix (519), 481482. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1898a.—“Weitere Untersuchungen an Cestoden aplacentaler Säugethiere”. Zool. Anz., xxi (567), 477479. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1898b.—“Die Cestoden der Marsupialia und Monotremata.Denkschr. med. naturw. Ges. Jena, viii, 357380, 1 p 29 refs. (W.L. 7137.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1899.—“Neue Studien an Cestoden aplacentaler Säugethiere”. Z. wiss. Zool., lxv (3), 404445, 2 pls., 30 refs. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1904a.—“Die Cestoden der südamerikaniscben Beuteltiere”. Zool. Anz., xxvii (9), 290293, 1 ref. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1904b.—“Die Darmcestoden der amerikanischen Beuteltiere”. Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Orig., xxxv (1), 5162, 1 p1., 14 refs. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1905.—“Das Genus Oocliovistsca Lüthe.Z. wiss. Zool., lxxxiii, 5367, 1 p1., 11 refs. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1907.—“Moniezia diaphana n. sp. Ein weiterer Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cestoden aplacentaler Säugetiere”. Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Orig., XLIV (3), 261264, 1 fig. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar