Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:17:52.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Further Description of Nematodirus battus Crofton and Thomas, 1951

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

H. D. Crofton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
R. J. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol

Extract

A brief description of Nematodirus battus has been given elsewhere (Crofton and Thomas, 1951), but this included only sufficient details for specific diagnosis. A more detailed account is given below.

The worms are long, slender and more or less straight. The cuticle is smooth except in the cephalic region where it is inflated and is lightly striated. The cephalic inflation extends 0.12 mm. from the anterior end and is 0.06 mm. in diameter (see Fig. 1). In some specimens the cephalic inflation may be reduced and relatively inconspicuous. Although this variation may be due to fixation, it occurs in members of a batch which have been fixed simultaneously. The head is 0.03 mm. in diameter and bears six papillae round the mouth. The “mouth capsule” is small and bears a tooth on the dorsal side. This tooth is not easily visible in Fig. 1 because of contraction of the oesophagus. (The term mouth capsule is retained because it has been used by other workers (see Rajewskaja, 1918, Travassos, 1987) but if the definitions of Baylis and Daubney (1926) are adopted it would be more correct to refer to the tooth as lying in an oesophageal funnel). The oesophagus is relatively short, 0.35–0.54 mm. in length.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R., 1926.—“A synopsis of the families and genera of Nematoda.” British Museum Publication (London).Google Scholar
Boughton, R. V., 1932.—“The influence of helminth parasitism on the abundance of the snow shoe rabbit in Western Canada.” Canad. J. Res., 7, 524. (W.L. 5898a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1935.—“Studies on the endoparasitic fauna of Trinidad mammals. I. Some parasites of Trinidad deer.” Canad. J. Res, 14, 25.Google Scholar
Crofton, H. D. and Thomas, R. J., 1951.—“ A new species of Nematodirus in sheep.” Nature, Loud., 168; 559. (W.L. 14900.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dikmans, G., 1937.—“ Two new species of the nematode genus Nematodirus (Trichostrdngylidae) from rabbits.” Prod. Helminth. Soc. Urash.4, 65. (W.L. 16747a)Google Scholar
Rajewskaja, S. A., 1931.—“ Zur charakteristik der Nematoden der Gattuhg Nematodirus Ransom 1907.” Z. Infekt-Kr. Hausiiere, 40, 112. (W.L. 23460.).Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1937.—“Revisao da. familia Trichostrongylidae Leiper, 1912.” Motwgr. do Inst. OswaIdo Cruz., No. 1.Google Scholar