Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:21:04.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of praziquantel on the ultrastructure of Schistosoma margrebowiei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

A. H. H. Awad  and
A. J. Probert
A. H. H. Awad
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of WalesBangorGwyneddLL57 2UW, UK
A. J. Probert
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of WalesBangorGwyneddLL57 2UW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of various concentrations of praziquantel at different time intervals post-treatment on the ultrastructure of Schistosoma margrebowiei using scanning and transmission electron microscopy has been examined. The major changes involved blebbing of the entire surface tegument of both sexes (although more marked in males) together with vacuolation of the basal membrane accompanied by the development of membraneous whorls. These effects were progressively more marked with increased concentration and time of exposure resulting in severe erosion of the tubercles and collapse of the sensory organelles. Exposure of the underlying tegumental tissue resulted and paralysis and contraction of the suckers and neck region was apparent. Disruption of the subtegumental musculature and the appearance of vacuolation and membraneous whorl formation were seen. The gastrodermis was similarly affected and the S4 cells of the vitelline gland showed protein disruption of the vitelline droplets. Host cells were seen adhering to the surface of the worms following drug treatment and the synergism between PZQ and the action of the hosts immune system has been discussed.

Keywords

Schistosoma margrebowieipraziquantelscanning electron microscopytransmission electron microscopychemotherapy
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 79 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberts, B. L., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. & Watson, J. D. (1983) Molecular Biology of the cell. Garland Publishing Inc. New York and London.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. (1978) Effect of praziquantel on the free-living stages of Schistosoma mansoni. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 56, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, P., Thomas, H., Pohlke, R. & Seubert, J. (1983) Praziquantel. Medical Research Reviews, 3, 147–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, P., Thomas, H. & Weber, H, (1980) The in vitro uptake of C14 praziquantel by cestodes, trematodes. and a nematode. Journal of Parasitology. 66, 920–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, A. H. H. & Probert, A. J. (1989) Transmission and scanning electron microscopy of the male reproductive system of schistosoma margrebowiei Le Roux, 1933. journal of Helminthology. 63, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, A. H. H. & Probert, A. J, (1990) Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of the female reproductive system of Schistosoma margrebowiei Le Roux, 1933. Journal of Helminthology. 64, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, B., Mehlhorn, H., Andrews, P., Thomas, H. & Eckert, J. (1980) Light and electron microscopic studies of the effect of praziquantel on Schistosoma mansoni, Dicrocoelium dendriticum and Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda) in vitro. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 63, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brindley, P. J. & Sher, A. (1987) The chemotherapeutic effect of praziquantel against Schistosoma mansoni is dependent on host antibody response. Journal of Immunology. 139, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E., Bensted-Smith, R., Capron, A., Capron, M., Dalton, P. R., Dunne, D. W., Grzych, J. M., Kariuki, H. C., Khalife, J. & Koech, D. (1967) Immunity in human schistosomiasis mansoni: prevention by blocking antibodies of the expression of immunity in young children. Parasitology. 94, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doenhoff, M., Harrison, R., Sabah, A., Murare, H., Dunne, D. & Hasseunah, O. (1982) Schistosomiasis in the immunosuppressed host: Studies on the host-parasite relationship of Schistosoma mansoni and S. bovis in T-cell deprived and hydrocortisonetreated mice. In: Animal Models in Parasitology (ed. Owen, D. G) 155–169. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvall, R. H. & Dewitt, W. B. (1967) An improved perfusion technique for recovering adult schistosomes from laboratory animals. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 16, 483–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonnert, R. & Andrews, P. (1977) Praziquantel, a new broad spectrum antischistosomal agent. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 52, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnett, W. (1988) The anthelmintic action of praziquantel. Parasitology Today. 4, 144–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harnett, W. & Kusel, J. R. (1966) Increased exposure of parasite antigens at the surface of male Schistosoma mansoni exposed to praziquantel in vitro. Parasitology. 93, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C., Webbe, G. & Nelson, G. S. (1977) The susceptibility to praziquantel of Schistosoma haematobium in the baboon (Papio anubis) and of S. japonicum in the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 52, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitch, B. (1985) Studies on the ultrastructure of Schistosoma haematobium and the effects of drug treatment. Ph.D. Thesis University of Wales. UK.Google Scholar
Leitch, B. & Probert, A. J. (1983) Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of praziquantel treated Schistosoma haematobium. Parasitology. 87, LVIIV.Google Scholar
Leitch, B. & Probert, A. J. (1984) Schistosoma haematobium: Amoscanate and adult worm ultrastructure. Experimental Parasitology. 58, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitch, B. & Probert, A. J. (1990) Schistosoma haematobium: The effect of Astiban on the cell composition and ultratructure of the vitelline gland and the ultrastructure of the tegument and gastrodermis. Journal of Helminthology. 64, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlhorn, H., Beckers, B., Andrews, P., Thomas, H. & Frenkal, J. K. (1981) In vivo and in vitro experiments on the effects of praziquantel on Schistosoma mansoni. A light and electron microscopic study. Arzneimiuel Forschung. 31, 544–554.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehlhorn, H., Kojima, S., Rim, H. J., Ruenwongsa, P. & Andrews, P. (1983) Ultrastructural investigations on the effects of praziquantel on human trematodes from Asia: Clonorchis sinensis, Metagonimus yokagawi, Opisthorchis viverrini, Paragonimus westermani and Schistosoma japonicum. Arzneimiuel Forschung. 33, 91–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Modha, J., Lambertucci, J. R., Doenhoff, M. J. & Mclaren, D. J. (1990) Immune dependence of schistosomicidal chemotherapy: an ultrastructural study of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms exposed to praziquantel and immune serum in ivvo. Parasite Immunology. 12, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. V., Yolles, T. K. & Meleney, H. E. (1949) A comparison of common laboratory animals as experimental hosts or Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology. 35, 156–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyerinde, J. P. O. (1976) The effects of 1.7-bis (p-aminophenoxy) heptane on adult Schistosoma mansoni in mice. Nigerian Medical Journal. 6, 392–397.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, J., Lima-Costa, F. F., Carlos, M. A. & Mello, R. T. (1977) Experimental chemotherapy of Schistosoma mansoni. XIII. Activity of praziquantel, or isoquinoline-pyrazino derivitive. on mice, hamsters, and Cebus monkeys. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 52, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez, H. & Terry, R. J. (1973) The killing of adult Schistosoma mansoni in vitro in the presence of antisera to host antigenic determinants and peritoneal cells. International Journal for Parasitology. 3, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popiel, I. & Erasmus, D. A. (1984) Schistosoma mansoni: Ultrastructure of adults from mice treated with oxamniquine. Experimental Parasitology. 58, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Probert, A. J. & Awad, A. H. H. (1987) Scanning electron microscopy of the tegument of adult Schistosoma margrebowiei Le Roux. 1933 with particular reference to the structure of the tubercles. Parasitology. 95, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. K. & Erasmus, D. A. (1983) Schistosoma mansoni: dose related tegumental surface changes after in vivo treatment with praziquantel. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 69, 643–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, M. K. & Erasmus, D. A. (1968) Schistosoma mansoni: Praziquantel-induced changes to the female reproductive system. Experimental Parasitology. 65, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965) Infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of adult worms. Parasitology. 55, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturrock, R. F., Doenhoff, M. J. & Webbe, G. (1986) Schistosomiasis. Experimental Models in Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 3, 241–279.Google Scholar
Watts, S. D. M., Orpin, A & Maccormick, C. (1979) Lysosomes and tegument pathology in the chemotherapy of schistosomiasis with 1.7-his (p-aminophenoxy heptane) (153 C51). Parasitology. 78, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webbe, G. & James, C. (1977) A Comparison of the susceptibility to praziquantel of Schistosoma haematobium, S. japonicum, S. mansoni, S. intercalatum and S. mattheei in hamsters. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 52, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. H. G. (1984) The profile of the trematocidal compound praziquantel. Arzneimittel Forschung. 34, 1132–1136.Google Scholar
Xiao, S., Wang, C., Jiao, P., Yu, Y. & Yuan, X. (1981) Effect of praziquantel on glycogen content and (1-C14) glucose uptake in Schistosoma japonicum. Acta Pharmacologia Sinica. 2, 204–211.Google Scholar