Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:49:33.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecology of Acanthocephalus lucii (Müller, 1776) in perch, Perca fluviatilis, in the Serpentine, London, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

R. L. G. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology. Imperial College, London, S.W.7, UK.

Abstract

In each month for one year 30 perch. Perca fluriutilis L., 1758. were examined for infection with Acanthocephalus lucii (Müller. 1776): 7·78°, of the population was infected with a mean intensity of 2·61 worms/infected fish. No seasonality of occurrcncc of maturation was observed owing to limited data. In older fish the incidence and intensity of infection was greater than in younger specimens. The parasite was significantly over-dispersed within the perch population, k = 00395...P(x2 = 9·07)>0·05. All specimens of A. lucii were found in the third quarter of the intestine from the pyloric caeca to the rectum. Evidence is presented in favour of mutual exclusion between A. lucii and the cestode Proteocephalus percae (Müller, 1780) and the nematode, Camallanus lacustris (Zoega, 1776).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M. (1971) A quantitative ecological study of the helminth parasites of the bream Abramis brama (L). PhD Thesis: University of London.Google Scholar
Awachie, J. B. E. (1966) The development and life history of Echinorhynchus truttae Schrank, 1788 (Acanthocephala). Journal of Hehninthology, 40, 1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awachie, J. B. E. (1972a) Experimental studies on some host-parasite relationships of the Acanthocephala. Effects of primary heavy infection and superimposed infection olSalmo trutta L. by Echinorhynchus truttae Schrank, 1788. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 20, 375382.Google Scholar
Awachie, J. B. E. (1972 b) Experimental studies on some host-parasite relationships of the Acanthocephala. Effect of host size and starvation on Echinorhynchus truttae Schrank, 1788, in the defensive host. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 20, 383388.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J., 1969: Statistical Methods in Biology. English Universities Press: London, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. & Fisher, R. A.(1953) Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data with a note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics, 9, 176200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykhovskii, B. E. (Ed.) (1964) Key to parasites of freshwater fish of the U.S.S.R. Jerusalem: I.P.S.T., 919 pp.Google Scholar
Canning, E. U., Cox, F. E. G., Croll, N. A. & Lyons, K. M. (1973) The natural history of Slapton Ley Nature Reserve: VI. Studies on the parasites. Field Studies, 3, 681717.Google Scholar
Chappell, L. H. (1969) Competitive exclusion between two intestinal parasites of the three-spined stickleback, Gastcrostcus aculeatus L. Journal of Parasitology, 55, 775778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, J. C. (1964) Occurrence of Echinorhynchus claitila (Dujardin, 1945) nee Hamann, 1892. (Acanthocephala) in the fish of Llyn Tegid (Bala Lake) Merionethshire. Journal of Parasitology, 50, 5259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, J. C. (1967) Host specificity of some Acanthocephala of freshwater fishes. Helminthologia, 8, 6370.Google Scholar
Chubb, J. C. (1970) The parasite fauna of British freshwater fish. In: Aspects of Fish Parasitology. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, 8, 119144.Google Scholar
Crofton, H. B. (1971) A quantitative approach to parasitism. Parasitology, 62, 179193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. X. (1934) A probable case of non-specific immunity between two parasites of ciscos of the Trout Lake region of northern Wisconsin. Journal of Parasitology, 20, 244245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogiel, V. A. (1961) Ecology of the parasites of freshwater fish, p. 148. In: Dogiel, V. A, Petrushevski, G. K. & Polyanski, Yu. I. (Editors): 1961: Parasitology of Fishes. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh & London, 384 pp.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. M. (1971) Some methods for the Statistical Analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Association, Scientific Publication, Number 25, 144 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, J. E. (1972) The immune response of a cyprinid fish to infections of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis. International Journal for Parasitology, 2, 459469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, P. M. & Kennedy, C. R. (1974) The population biology of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis (Muller) in the River Avon. Journal of Fish Biology, 6, 665679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1974) A checklist of British and Irish freshwater fish parasites with notes on their distribution. Journal of Fish Biology, 6, 613644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. L. G. (1977) The Serpentine fish and their parasites. London Naturalist, 56, 5770.Google Scholar
Mishra, T. N. & Chubb, J. C. (1969) The parasite fauna of the fish of the Shropshire Union Canal, Cheshire. Journal of Zoology, London, 157, 213225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paperna, I. (1964) Competitive exclusion of Dactylogyrus extensus by Dactylogyrus vastator (Trematoda: Monogenea) on the gills of reared carp. Journal of Parasitology, 50, 9498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedla, S. & Fernando, C. H. (1970) Some remarks on the ecology of Echinorhynchus salmonis Muller 1784. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 48, 317321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, J. D. (1964) Studies on population of helminth parasites in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 8395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar