Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:49:38.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Attachment and Penetration Apparatus of the Miracidium of Schistosoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

G. K. Kinoti
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Extract

Preliminary electron microscope observations have shown that in the miracidium of Schistosoma mattheei the surface of the apical epidermal plate consists of branching and anastomosing microvilli. It is suggested that this arboreal arrangement serves to attach the miracidium to the body surface of snail hosts during attempts to penetrate; the apical papilla can therefore be regarded as an attachment organ, functionally analogous to the suckers of the adult schistosome. It is also suggested that the degree of ‘fit’ between the attachment organ and the snail body surface may be an important factor determining the success of attempts by the miracidium to penetrate.

Electron microscopy has also shown that the so-called penetration and apical glands are single flask-shaped cells. No endoplasmic reticulum and very few ribosomes were seen in these cells and it is therefore suggested that, in the mature (free-swimming) miracidium, the “glands” are not functional as such; they are simply sacs full of fluid. If they contain histolytic substances they must either have been synthesized at an earlier stage in the life history of the organism or they are synthesized elsewhere and passed into the “glands”.

Histochemical attempts to identify leucine aminopeptidase and mucin in the contents of the “glands” of S. mansoni miracidia were unsuccessful. It is concluded that these substances probably do not play any role in the penetration into or attachment on snail intermediate hosts by S. mansoni miracidia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbosa, F. S. and Barreto, A. C., 1960.—“Differences in susceptibility of Brazilian strains of Australorbis glabratus to Schistosoma mansoni.” Expl Parasit., 9, 137140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barka, T. and Anderson, P. J., 1963.—Histo-chemistry: theory, practice and bibliography. New York. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. P., 1953.—“A comparative study of Schistosoma mansoni in Tropicorbis havanensis and Australorbis glabratus.” J. Parasit., 39, 159165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawes, B., 1960.—“A study of the miracidium of Fasciola hepatica and an account of the mode of penetration of the sporocyst into Lymnaea iruncatula.” In: Sobretiro del Libro Homenaje al Dr. Eduardo Caballero y Caballero. Mexico.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D. A. and Ohman, C., 1963.—“The structure and function of the adhesive organ in strigeid trematodes.” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 113, 735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isserhoff, H., 1964.—“Fine structure of the eyespot of the miracidium of Philopthalmus megalurus (Cort, 1914).”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoti, G. K., 1970.—“Observations on the infection of bulinid snails with Schistosoma mattheei. II. The mechanism of resistance to infection.” Parasitology, 62, 161170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1960.—Histochemistry: theoretical and applied. (2nd Edition.) London. J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. P., 1883.—“The life history of the liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica).” Q. Jl. microsc. Sci., 23, 99133.Google Scholar
Wajdi, N., 1966.—“Penetration by miracidia of Schistosoma mansoni into the snail host.” J. Helminth., 40, 235244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed