Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:34:22.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Investigation into the Method of Dispersal of Panagrellus silusiae, with Particular Reference to its Desiccation Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

E. Lees
E. Lees
Affiliation:
Huddersfield Technical College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. P.silusiae is shown to be unable to resist desiccation on a microscope slide for periods above half an hour, although larvae within the uterus of the mother can survive for somewhat longer periods.

2. When “protected” by a colloidal gel, the worms are shown to resist desiccation for several months. Such “protected” worms are more resistant to temperature extremes than “non-protected” ones.

8. P. silusiae is immobilized in glucose solutions above 1M strength, although it can resume mobility on dilution of the solution, even after fourteen days in 4 M glucose solution.

4. P. silusiae is shown to be positively chemotactic towards oxygen, in addition the gravid females are negatively geotactic.

5. Drosophila fimcbr is is shown to act as a dispersal agent for P. silusiae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 27 , Issue 1-2 , August 1953 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aubertot, M., 1923.—“Sur la dissémination et lc transport du genre Rhabditis Par Les Dipteres.” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 176, 1257–1260. (W.L. 6628.)Google Scholar
Aubertot, M.. 1925.—“NéMatodes d'Alsace. observations sur L'Anguillule de la bière (Anguillula silusiae De Man, 1914).” Bull. Ass. Philom. Als. Lorr., 6, 333–342. (W.L. 3878a.)Google Scholar
Bovien, P., 1937.—“Some types of association between nematodes and insects.” Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturh. Foren. Kbh., 101, 1–114. (W.L. 22535.)Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1945.—“A note on the subfamily Turbatricinae and the genus Turbator goodey. 1943.” J. Helminth., 21, 69–70. (W.L. 112246.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, E., 1951.—“On the possibility of Panagrellus silusiae parasitizing the mouse under experimental conditions.” J. Helminth., 25, 97–104. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyet, B. J. and Hartnung, M. C., 1941.—“Survival of Anguillula aceti after solidification in liquid air.” Biodynamica, 3, 353–362.Google Scholar
Menzel, R., 1920.—“Übcr freilebende Nematoden aus der Arktis.” Festschr. F. Zschokke., 17, 15 Pp.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., 1942.—“On the culturing of Rhabditis terrestris n. sp.” Parasitology, 34, 246–52. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J. and Oldham, J. N.T 1927.—“Observations on the morphology and bionomics of Rhabditis coardata Leuck., Occurring On Dung Beetles.” J. Helminth., 5. 33–16. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar