Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T17:06:54.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Infection of the Rabbit with Capillaria hepatica (Bancroft, 1893)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

D. O. Morgan
D. O. Morgan
Affiliation:
(Senior Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although several records now exist of the occurrence of Capillaria (Hepaticola) hepatica (Bancroft, 1893) as a natural infection of the wild rabbit the attempts which have been made to infect this host with eggs obtained from an infection in the rat have not been completely successful. Nishigori (1925) states that although this parasite can infect the rabbit and shew some development it does not reach maturity, while Saito (1925), in the English account of his paper given in The Japan Medical World states that “In the rabbit the larva might develop into maturity and cause pathological changes but do not multiply.”

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 10 , Issue 2-3 , June 1932 , pp. 65 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylis, H. A., 1931.—“On the Structure and Relationships of the Nematode Capillaria [Hepaticola] hepatica (Bancroft),” Parasitology, XXII (4), pp. 533–543. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishigori, M., 1925.—“On the Life History of Hepaticola hepatica (Second Report).” J. Med. Ass. Formosa, No. 247, English Summary, pp. 3–4. (W.L. 11337.)Google Scholar
Saito, M., 1925.—“Development of Hepaticola hepatica—A Supplementary Report,” J. Formosan Med. Soc., No. 247. Summanzed in Japan Med. Wld., 1926, VI (6), pp. 153–154.Google Scholar