Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T21:32:04.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The thirteenth oration of Dio Chrysostom: complexity and simplicity, rhetoric and moralism, literature and life*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

John Moles
John Moles
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper takes the Thirteenth Oration as a test case of many of the questions raised by the career and works of Dio Chrysostom. The speech's generic creativity and philosophical expertise are demonstrated. Historical problems are clarified. Analysis shows how Dio weaves seemingly diverse themes into a complex unity. New answers are given to two crucial interpretative problems. Exploration of Dio's self-representation and of his handling of internal and external audiences and of temporal and spatial relationships leads to the conclusion that he has a serious philosophical purpose: the advocacy of Antisthenic/Cynic paideia in place of the current paideia both of Romans and Athenians. Paradoxically, this clever, ironic and sophisticated speech deconstructs its own apparent values in the interests of simple, practical moralizing.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 125 , November 2005 , pp. 112 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arnim, H. von (ed.) (1893) Dionis Prusaensis quem vocant Chrysostomum quae exstant omnia 1 (Berlin)Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von (1898) Leben und Werke des Dion von Prusa (Berlin)Google Scholar
Billaut, A. (1999) ‘Dion Chrysostome avait-il une théorie de la sculpture?’, BAGB 1999, 211–29Google Scholar
Blomqvist, K. (1989) Myth and Moral Message in Dio Chrysostom. A Study in Dio's Moral Thought, with a Particular Focus on his Attitudes towards Women (Lund)Google Scholar
Blomqvist, K. (1995) ‘Chryseïs and Clea, Eumetis and the Interlocutress. Plutarch of Chaeronea and Dio Chrysostom on women's education’, Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok 60, 173–90Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. (1970), ‘The Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, P&P 46, 3–41; revised version (1974) in M.I. Finley (ed.), Studies in Ancient Society (London)Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G.R. (2001) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. A Study of its Development from the Stoics to Origen (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancacci, A. (1992) ‘Struttura compositiva e fonti della terza orazione Sulla Regalità di Dione Crisostomo: Dione e l'Archelao di Antistene’, ANRW 2.36.5, 3308–34Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. (2000) ‘Dio, Socrates, and Cynicism’, in Swain (2000) 240–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branham, R.B. (1996) ‘Diogenes’ rhetoric and the Invention of Cynicism’, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (eds) (1996) 81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branham, R.B. and Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (eds) (1996) The Cynics. The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and its Legacy (Berkeley)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenk, F.E. (2000) ‘Dio on the simple and self-sufficient life’, in Swain (2000) 261–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.S. (1949) Onesicritus (Berkeley)Google Scholar
Brunt, P. (1973) ‘Aspects of the social thought of Dio Chrysostom’, PCPS 19, 9–34Google Scholar
Caizzi, F.D. (ed.) (1966) Antisthenis fragmenta (Milan)Google Scholar
Claassen, J.M. (1999) Displaced Persons. The Literature of Exile from Cicero to Boethius (London)Google Scholar
Cobet, C.G. (1878) Collectanea critica quibus continentur observationes criticae in scriptores Graecos (Leiden)Google Scholar
Cohoon, J.W. and Lamar, Crosby H. (trans., eds) (1932–1951) Dio Chrysostom (5 vols, Cambridge, MA and London)Google Scholar
Denniston, J.D. (1954) The Greek Particles (2nd edn, Oxford)Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (ed.) (2001) Plato. Alcibiades (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1978) Dione di Prusa. Un intellettuale greco nell'impero romano (Messina and Florence)Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1991) ‘Tipologia e varietà di funzione comunicativa degli scritti dionei’, ANRW 233.5, 3903–59Google Scholar
Doblehofer, E. (1987) Exil und Emigration. Zum Erlebnis der Heimatferne in der römischen Literatur (Darmstadt)Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1995) ‘Diogenes und Antisthenes’, in Giannantoni, G.et al. (eds), La tradizione Socratica (Naples) 125–50Google Scholar
Douglas, A.E. (1966) Cicero. Brutus (Oxford)Google Scholar
Dudley, D.R. (1937) A History of Cynicism from Diogenes to the Sixth Century A.D. (London)Google Scholar
Dümmler, F. (1882) Antisthenica (Bonn)Google Scholar
Dümmler, F. (1889) Akademica (Giessen)Google Scholar
Emperius, A. (1847) Opuscula Philologica et Historica (Göttingen)Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1995) ‘Rome in the Greek world: the significance of a name’, in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World (London) 368–79Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery (Toronto)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontenrose, J.E. (1978) The Delphic Oracle, its Responses and Operation, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, K. von (1926) Quellen-Untersuchungen zu Leben und Philosophie des Diogenes von Sinope (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Fuchs, H. (1938) Der geistige Widerstand gegen das Römertum (Berlin)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geytenbeek, A.C. van (1963) Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe (Assen)Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1990) Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae (4 vols, Naples)Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1993) ‘Antistene fondatore della scuola cinica?’, in Goulet-Cazé and Goulet (eds) (1993) 15–34Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. and Goulet, R. (eds) (1993) Le cynisme ancien et ses prolongements (Paris)Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1993) ‘Le mouvement cynique et les Romains: attraction et répulsion’, in Goulet-Cazé and Goulet (1993) 241–58Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1996) ‘Cynicism and the Romans: attraction and repulsion’, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996) 190–204Google Scholar
Haake, M. (2003) ‘Warum und zu welchem Ende schreibt man peri basileias? Überlegungen zum historischen Kontext einer literarischen Gattung im Hellenismus’, in Piepenbrink (2003) 83–138Google Scholar
Hagen, P. (1891) ‘Zu Antisthenes’, Philologus 4, 381–4Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. (1993) ‘Le cynisme littéraire à l'époque impériale’, in Goulet-Cazé and Goulet (1993) 399–418Google Scholar
Häsler, B. (1935) Favorin über die Verbannung (Berlin)Google Scholar
Hawley, R. (2000), ‘Marriage, gender, and the family in Dio’, in Swain (2000) 125–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highet, G. (1983) ‘Mutilations in the text of Dio Chrysostom’, in Ball, R.J. (ed.), The Classical Papers of Gilbert Highet (New York) 74–99Google Scholar
Höistad, R. (1948) Cynic Hero and Cynic King. Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man (Uppsala)Google Scholar
Houser, J.S. (1998) ‘Eros and aphrodisia in the works of Dio Chrysostom’, ClAnt 17, 235–58Google Scholar
Jones, B.W. (1990) ‘Domitian and the exile of Dio of Prusa’, La Parola del Passato 45, 348–57Google Scholar
Jones, C.P. (1973) ‘The date of Dio of Prusa's Alexandrian Oration’, Historia 22, 302–9Google Scholar
Jones, C.P. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom (Cambridge, MA and London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouan, F. (1977) ‘Les thèmes romanesques dans l'Euboïcos de Dion Chrysostome’, REG 90, 38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouan, F. (1993a) ‘Le Diogène de Dion Chrysostome’, in Goulet-Cazé and Goulet (1993) 381–97Google Scholar
Jouan, F. (1993b) ‘Les récits de voyage de Dion Chrysostome’, in Basiez, M.-F., Hoffmann, P. and Pernot, L. (eds), L'Invention de l'autobiographie d'Hésiode à Saint Augustin (Paris) 189–98Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J.F. (1976) Bion of Borysthenes (Uppsala)Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J.F. (1978) ‘The date of Dio of Prusa's Alexandrian Oration: a reply’, Historia 27, 378–83Google Scholar
Kitto, H.D.F. (1961) Greek Tragedy (3rd edn, London)Google Scholar
Klaucke, H.-J. and Bäbler, B. (eds) (2000) Dion von Prusa. Olympische Rede oder über die erste Erkenntis Gottes (Darmstadt)Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (2002) Epictetus. A Stoic and Stoic Guide to Life (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.P. (1996) ‘The Scythian accent: Anacharsis and the Cynics’, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996) 136–55Google Scholar
Mason, H. (1974) Greek Terms for Roman Institutions (Toronto)Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1978) ‘The career and conversion of Dio Chrysostom’, JHS 98, 79–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1983a) ‘The date and purpose of the Fourth Kingship of Dio Chrysostom’, ClAnt 2, 251–78Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1983b) ‘“Honestius quam ambitiosius?”: an exploration of the Cynic's attitude to moral corruption in his fellow men’, JHS 103, 103–23Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1983c) ‘Dio Chrysostom: exile, Tarsus, Nero and Domitian’, LCM 8, 130–4Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1984) ‘The addressee of the Third Kingship Oration of Dio Chrysostom’, Prometheus 10, 65–9Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1990) ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, PLLS 6, 297–375Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1993) ‘Le cosmopolitisme cynique’, in Goulet-Cazé and Goulet (1993) 259–80Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1995a) ‘The Cynics and politics’, in Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds), Justice and Generosity. Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy (Cambridge) 129–58Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1995b) ‘Dio Chrysostom, Greece, and Rome’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds), Ethics and Rhetoric. Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-fifth Birthday (Oxford) 177–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1996) ‘Cynic cosmopolitanism’, in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996) 105–20Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2000a) ‘The Dionian Charidemus’, in Swain (2000) 187–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2000b) ‘The Cynics’, in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought (Cambridge) 415–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2001) ‘Cynicism in Dio Chrysostom’, unpublished paper from the conference ‘Purse and Paideia: Money in Plutarch and the Second Sophistic’, Liverpool, 30 June 2001Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2003a) ‘Dio und Trajan’, in Piepenbrink (2003) 186–207Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2003b) ‘Antisthenes, Dio and Virgil on the education of the strong’, unpublished paper delivered at Newcastle upon Tyne, 12 September 2003Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1951), review of C. Wirszubski, Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate (Cambridge), in JRS 41, 146–53Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1969) ‘Dio Chrysostomus’, in idem, Quarto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome) 257–69Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1975) Quinto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome)Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1869) ‘Zur Lebensgeschichte des Jüngeren Plinius’, Hermes 3, 31–139Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2000) ‘Wandering philosophers in Classical Greece’, JHS 120, 86–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G., Bäbler, B., Forschner, M. and de Jong, A. (eds) (2003) Dion von Prusa: Die Borysthenes-Rede (Darmstadt)Google Scholar
Nock, A.D. (1933) Conversion. The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo (Oxford)Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1893), ‘Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie’, Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, Suppl. 19, 365–462Google Scholar
Olmstead, A.T.E. (1948), History of the Persian Empire (Chicago)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, H.W. and Wormell, D.E.W. (1956) The Delphic Oracle (Dublin)Google Scholar
Pender, E.E. (1999) ‘Plato's moving logos’, PCPS 45, 75–107Google Scholar
Petrochilos, N.K. (1974) Roman Attitudes to the Greeks (Athens)Google Scholar
Piepenbrink, K. (ed.) (2003) Philosophie und Lebenswelt in der Antike (Darmstadt)Google Scholar
Powell, J.E. (1938) Lexicon to Herodotus (Oxford)Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1989) ‘Roman rulers and the philosophic adviser’, in Griffin, M., and Barnes, J. (eds), Philosophia Togata I (Oxford) 233–57Google Scholar
Redfield, J. (1985) ‘Herodotus the tourist’, CPh 80, 97–118Google Scholar
Reiske, I.I. (1798) Dionis Chrysostomi orationes I–II (2nd edn, Leipzig)Google Scholar
Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds) (2000) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. (ed.) (1990) Antonine Literature (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. (1992) Dio Chrysostom, Orations 7, 12, 36 (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2000) ‘Dio's use of mythology’, in Swain (2000) 161–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmeri, G. (2000) ‘Dio, Rome, and the civil life of Asia Minor’, in Swain (2000) 53–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, W. (1903) ‘Dion (18)’, RE 5, 848–77Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991) The Stoic Idea of the City (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2000) ‘Gorgias and Menexenus’, in Rowe and Schofield (2000) 192–99Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2004) ‘Epictetus: Socratic, Cynic, Stoic’, Philosophical Quarterly 54.216, 448–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, A.R.R. (1982) ‘A dissident in Tarsus? (Dio Chrysostom, Or. 66)’, LCM 7, 149–50Google Scholar
Sheppard, A.R.R. (1984) ‘Dio Chrysostom: the Bithynian years’, AC 53, 157–73Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (1996) ‘Dio of Prusa and the Flavian dynasty’, CQ 46, 447–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slings, S.R. (ed.) (1999) Plato, Clitophon. Introduction, Translation and Commentary (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Starr, C. (1982) The Roman Empire 27 B.C.-A.D. 476. A Study in Survival (Oxford)Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250 (Oxford)Google Scholar
Swain, S. (ed.) (2000) Dio Chrysostom. Politics, Letters, and Philosophy (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, M.B. (1990) ‘Plato's Phaedrus in second-century Greek literature’, in Russell (1990) 141–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, M.B. (2000) ‘Plato in Dio’, in Swain (2000) 213–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrengia, A. (ed.) (2000) Dione di Prusa. In Atene, sull'esilio (or. XIII). Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento (Naples)Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1997) ‘L'identité grecque devant Rome et l'empereur’, REG 112, 510–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. (1887) De Dione Chrysostomo Xenophontis sectatore (Leipziger Studien 10) 79–268Google Scholar
Wegehaupt, I. (1896) De Dione Chrysostomo Cynicorum sectatore (Göttingen)Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation (Cambridge)Google Scholar