Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:21:40.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Peripatetic Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

James H. Oliver
Affiliation:
Baltimore, Maryland

Extract

An Athenian inscription, engraved with letters suggestive of the first sixty years of the first century B.C. and published by D. J. Geagan, Hesperia xl (1971) 101-8 with photograph, contains a decree proposed to the demos by Demeas son of Demeas to strengthen a revision of the city's constitution. On its publication it struck me that the revision was democratic and that Geagan's date 84/3 B.C., reached via the uncertainties of the secretary cycle, could not stand. Since repercussions from what was occurring at Rome to Sulla's arrangements might well have been felt in Athens, a different date,equally compatible with the assumed secretary cycle, 70/69 B.C., came to mind, but in the meanwhile the assumed secretary cycle itself has disappeared.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On p. 188 of Meritt's, B. D.Athenian Archons 347/6–48/7 B.C.’, Historia xxvi (1977) 161–91Google Scholar.

2 These fragments, probably from the Laws of Theophrastus, are cited by the writer's edition, ‘The Vatican Fragments of Greek Political Theory’, GRBS xviii (1977) 321–39.

3 MacDowell, D. M., ‘Law-making at Athens in the Fourth Century B.C.’, JHS xcv (1975) 6274CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hansen, M. H., ‘Nomos and Psephisma in Fourth Century Athens’, GRBS xix (1978) 315–30Google Scholar.

4 For the nomophylakia of the Areopagus and its connection with Solon see Arist., Ath. Pol. 8.4Google Scholar.