No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
It is by no means uncommon to find in Turkish, as in other Mahommedan lands, two or even more tombs attributed to the same person. The development of the supernumerary tomb or tombs is susceptible of several explanations, which are worth setting forth both for their intrinsic interest and as contributing to the knowledge of similar phenomena in other religions.
Duplicated tombs of perfectly historical persons are not unknown. Murad I., for instance, has authentic tombs at Brousa, his capital, and at Kossovo, where he fell. Tradition, which is probably in this case true, says that the latter contains his heart and bowels and the former his embalmed body. The grave of Suleiman Pasha, son of Orkhan, who died and was buried at Bulair, is claimed also by Yenishehr in Bithynia. The explanation here may be the same as in the case of Murad I.'s two graves, or it may be that Suleiman established a pious foundation at Yenishehr with a turbe intended to enshrine his remains. Similarly, the official grave of Osman, the founder of the dynasty, is at Brusa, though Sugut, his father's seat, lays claim to the honour.
1 Ippen, , Novi Bazar, p. 147.Google Scholar
2 Hammer-Hellert, , Hist. Emp. Ott. i. 202Google Scholar; d'Ohsson, , Tableau de l'Emp. Ott. i. 101Google Scholar; Seaman, , Orchan, p. 90.Google Scholar
3 Leake, , Asia Minor, p. 15.Google Scholar
4 Seligmann, in Ridgeway Essays, p. 451.Google Scholar
5 Strange, Le, E. Caliphate, p. 154.Google Scholar
6 Hadji Khalfa, tr. Armain, p. 660.
7 Polites, , παραδόσεις, Nos. 73 ff.Google Scholar
8 Skene, , Anadol, p. 146Google Scholar: Le Strange, , E. Caliphate, p. 146.Google Scholar
9 Le Strange, op. cit., p. 152, n. 2.
10 See e. g. my ‘Stone Cults’ in B.S.A. xix. 72.
11 F. W. H.
12 See my ‘Studies in Turkish History and Folk Legend’ in B.S.A. xix. 203.
13 See my ‘Ambig. Sanct. and Bektashi Propaganda’ in B.S.A. xx. 110.