Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:10:22.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Last Athenian Historian: Laonikos Chalkokondyles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

From The Roman to the Turkish conquest of Greece, a period of sixteen centuries, Athens produced only three historians: Dexippos, Praxagoras and Laonikos Chalkokondyles. Of the two first only meagre fragments have come down to us; indeed, of the three treatises of Praxagoras, The Kings of Athens, composed when he was only nineteen, his History of Constantine the Great, written at the age of twenty-two, and his maturer study of Alexander, King of Macedon, only a summary of the second, amounting to two pages, has been preserved by that omnivorous reader, Photios, in his Library. Such juvenile histories cannot, however, have had much greater value than prize essays, conspicuous rather for their correctness of style than for any seasoned judgment. But we may regret that only thirty-five pages of the three works of Dexippos, The Events after the Death of Alexander, The Historical Epitome, which went as far as the time of Claudius II. in 268, and The Scythian Affairs, have survived. For Dexippos was an author of a very different type, a man of affairs as well as of letters, the type of historian of which we have familiar examples in England in Grote and Macaulay, in Clarendon and Bryce. A worse writer, but a better general, than his model, Thucydides, he defeated the Goths when they invaded Athens, on which occasion a Gothic leader urged the sparing of the Athenian libraries, in order that the Athenians might unfit themselves for the arts of war by much study of books! After these two historians, who flourished, Dexippos in the third, and Praxagoras in the fourth centuries, no Athenian took their place till, in the second half of the fifteenth, Laonikos Chalkokondyles composed the extant ten books of his history, one of the most interesting and valuable productions of the mediaeval Greek intellect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Historici Graeci Minores, i. 165–200, 438–40; Photios, , Bibliotheca, codd. 62, 82.Google Scholar

2 Miscellanea Ceriani (Milano, 1910), pp. 203–4.

3 P. 320 (ed. Bonn).

4 P. 343.

5 P. 344, ἐθεασάμεθα.

6 Apud Sathas, , Μνημεῖα Ἑλληνικῆς Ἱστορίας ix. 261.Google Scholar

7 Pp. 132, 208, 565.

8 Apud Hopf, , Chroniques gréco-romanes, p. 243.Google Scholar

9 Voyage, [Ital. trans.], p. 425.

10 Kampouroglos, , Μνημεῖα τῆς Ἱστορίας τῶν Ἀθηναίων (ed. 2), i. 305–8Google Scholar; Ἀθηναϊκὸν Ἀρχοντολόγιον, 11.

11 P. 8.

12 Pp. 248–49, 531, 533, 534, 540, 543.

13 Bk. i. ch. 33; Galdós, Pérez, Trafalgar, p. 5.Google Scholar

14 P. 549.

15 P. 4.

16 Pp. 361, 383, 435, 504.

17 Pp. 35, 319.

18 Sp. Moraïtis, in Revue des études grecques (1888), i. 9498Google Scholar, who shows that κύσαντα is aorist participle of κυνεῖν (‘to kiss’) and κύεσθαι passive infinitive of κύειν (also ‘to kiss’).

19 The second book of the travels of Nicander Nucius of Corcyra (Ed. Cramer, J. A., London, 1841), p. 10.Google Scholar

20 Epist. 65. To Anderlin (Ed. Froude, 1895).

21 P. 91, τῷ λύπης πεδίῳ.

22 Pp. 133, 419, 425, 468. English Historical Review (1892), vii. 235–52.