Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T01:12:58.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(H.) Dohm Mageiros: die Rolle des Kochs in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. (Zetemata, 32.) Munich: C. H. Beck. 1964. Pp. xv + 294. DM 38.

Review products

(H.) Dohm Mageiros: die Rolle des Kochs in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. (Zetemata, 32.) Munich: C. H. Beck. 1964. Pp. xv + 294. DM 38.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

W. Geoffrey Arnott
W. Geoffrey Arnott*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 85 , November 1965 , pp. 182 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 The fragments are Antiphanes, fr. 222; Sotades, 1; Euphron, 1; Anaxippus, 1; and Damoxenus, 2. In discussing the last of these (161 ff.), Dohm produces an unmetrical conjecture (v. 31, p. 174 and n. 1), and fails to note Alciphron, 3.19.8 (from comedy? cf. Meineke, , FCG 4.334 Google Scholar; Kock, , Rh. Mus. 43 [1888] 40 ff.Google Scholar) as a parallel for comic ridicule of the Epicurean term καταπύκνωσις (p. 165).

2 Though Dohm's references to ‘Pythodicus’ in his Aulularia discussion now need altering: cf. Handley, E. W., Philol. 107 (1963) 316 f.Google Scholar