Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:11:06.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empedocles' Account of Breathing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

N. B. Booth
N. B. Booth
Affiliation:
London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Empedocles' Fragment 100 contains an account of ‘the way that all things breathe in and out’. It may conveniently be divided into three sections:

A. Lines 1–5, the apparatus of breathing.

B. Lines 6–8, the manner in which breathing takes place.

C. Lines 8–25, an illustration taken from the working of the klepsydra.

I shall discuss the fragment under thesethree headings.

A. The Apparatus of Breathing

These lines (1–5) are translated as follows by Diels-Kranz: ‘Also aber atmet alles ein und aus: Allen sind blutarme Fleischröhren über die Oberfläche des Körpers hin gespannt, und an ihren Mündungen ist mit vielen Ritzen durchweg durchbohrt der Haut äusserste Oberfläche, so dass zwar das Blut drinnen geborgen bleibt, der Luft aber freier Zutritt durch die Öffnungen gebahnt ist.’ Thus the picture which Diels gives us is of tubes running out to the skin all over the body, and at the ends of the tubes perforated flaps of skin which will allow the passage of air but not of blood. The tubes are, furthermore, only partly filled with blood.

This line of interpretation has been followed by most scholars since, and it appears to derive some reinforcement from Aristotle, who in his comment on the passage at de respiratione 7, p. 473, b 1 ff., says: ‘They have passages through to the outer air.’ The ‘outer air’ would appear to mean the outer air outside the body, and we might therefore be tempted to suppose that Aristotle meant to say that these tubes ended up at the surface of the skin.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 80 , November 1960 , pp. 10 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The most recent example is Furley, D. J. in JHS lxxvii 1 (1957) 31–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Burnet, J., Early Greek Philosophy (4th ed.) 219–20Google Scholar; Zafiropulo, , Empedocle D'Agrigente 142 n. 561, 158Google Scholar; Bignone, E., Empedocle 581, 621 n. 5.Google Scholar A notable exception is Traglia, Antonio, Studi sulla Lingua di Empedocle (Bari, n.d.) 25 n. 43Google Scholar, to which Mr Furley refers.

2 See ProfLast, in CQ. xviii (1924) 169–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Regenbogen, O., ‘Eine Forschungsmethode antiken Naturwissenschaft’, Quell, u. Stud. z. Gesch. d. Mathematik i 180 ff.Google Scholar; Guthrie, W. K. C., Aristotle on the Heavens (Loeb) 228Google Scholar; D. J. Furley, loc. cit.

3 A major point at issue in this matter is the validity of Aristotle's evidence about the early philosophers. On this general subject, see Guthrie, W. K. C. in JHS lxxvii 1 (1957) 35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a particular application, see my article on Zeno, in JHS lxxvii 2 (1957) 187–201.Google Scholar

I am indebted to Mr D. J. Furley for some generous help in private discussion.

I have only just seen, at the moment of going to press, Cardini, Maria Timpanaro's ‘Respirazione e Clessidra’, La Parola del Passato xii (1957) 250–70.Google Scholar This writer and I, working independently, have reached very much the same conclusions about the meaning of this fragment.