Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:14:03.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corpus Inscriptionum Neo-Phrygiarum III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

I have deferred the publication of ten new Neo-Phrygian inscriptions discovered in 1912 and 1913, and of my revisions of some of the known texts, in the hope that further revision might be practicable. Careful revision of more of the texts, e.g. Nos. VI, XII, XV, XXV, XLVIII, is essential to a definitive publication of these inscriptions. Such publication should be accompanied by a discussion of the date of the Neo-Phrygian inscriptions, and by a map showing their distribution in relation to the Imperial estates and their bearing on the boundaries of Galatic Phrygia. A provisional discussion of these and other points has appeared in the Journal of the Manchester Egyptian and Oriental Society, No. X. p. 25 ff. The present paper is another provisional instalment, called for by the publication of Professor Sayce's paper on p. 29 of this issue of the Journal. I have continued the numbering adopted in J.H.S. 1911, p. 161 ff. and 1913, p. 97 ff.; it should be observed that the collection includes several Greek inscriptions. Among the inscriptions first published by myself, Nos. LII and LXVI are in Greek; the second contains at most a Phrygian dative form; the former should be transcribed (ll. 4 ff.) π(ρωτ)οκωμήτης Παρεθθ(ω)ν ϒοῃ Όρονδίῳ εὐχήν. The village was probably Παρεθθα, Βαρεττα, or Βαρδαεττα (Dedeler): see Ramsay in Studies in the Eastern Roman Provinces, p. 250 f.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In Ῥεντόμενος τ, not γ, is certain. In the last word, the third last letter is ‘possibly sibly C but probably ε.’ Between the two parts of the inscription is a space occupied by a table supporting spindle and distaff, wool-basket, and mirror, and a tripod supporting two cooking-pots, with a two-handled amphora beneath it. The stele is broken at the top.