Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:19:52.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Book titles in the Suda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

Barry Baldwin
Affiliation:
The University of Calgary

Extract

In his generally admirable account of the poets of early Byzantine Egypt, Alan Cameron reconstructs some of their (in his words) journalistic warfare on the basis of a supposed distinction between the use of εἰς and πρός in the titles of books and poems: εἰς denotes a work written in someone's honour, πρός something by way of discredit or refutation.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wandering Poets: a literary movement in Byzantine Egypt’, Historia xiv (1965) 505–6Google Scholar.

2 Pfeiffer, R., History of Classical Scholarship (Oxford 1968) 133Google Scholar.

3 Jones, C. P., Plutarch and Rome (Oxford 1971) 35Google Scholar.

4 The Patriarchal School at Constantinople in the Twelfth Century’, Byzantion xxxii (1962) 167201Google Scholar; xxxiii (1963) 11–40, repr. in the author's Studies on Byzantine History, Literature, and Education (London 1977)Google Scholar.

5 Similar indifference from an earlier Byzantine period can be seen in the titles of consecutive eulogies by George of Pisidia (Poems 3 and 4, ed. L. Sternbach, WS xiii [1891] 1–62).

6 Cf. Suda E 3046 for the expression ἀποσκώπτων εἰς in reference to contemporary attacks on Hermogenes of Tarsus.

7 So regarded by Browning, R., ‘Ignace le diacre et la tragédie classique à Byzance’, REG lxxx (1968) 404–5Google Scholar; cf. Lemerle, P., ‘Thomas le Slave’, Travaux et Mémoires i (Paris 1965) 268Google Scholar, repr. in the author's Essais sur le monde byzantin (London 1980)Google Scholar. As possible convenience to other scholars, I may as well point out that Adler's ascription of the Suda's source for Ignatius to Hesychius of Miletus is, for obvious chronological reasons, absurd.