No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 October 2013
In Λ̅ 101-112 Agamemnon kills Isos and Antiphos, who were travelling on their chariot. They were sons of Priam, the former a νόθοс, the latter γνήсιοс. Agamemnon recognises them because earlier in the war they had been ransomed by Achilles, who, having captured them, bound them with withies on Mount Ida, where they had been tending their flocks of sheep.
1 The Iliad I (repr. Amsterdam 1971) 476. For instances of the name Ἶсοс or Ἶссοс see Walzer, R., Greek into Arabic (Oxford 1962) 54–55.Google Scholar
2 Wilamowitz, , Die Ilias und Homer (2Berlin 1920) 185 n. 2.Google Scholar
3 ‘ex epigrammatis sive e Soro (de Beriso)’, Supplementum Hellenisticum 701 L.–J./P.
4 Schol. Ven. A Λ̅ 101 (3.144, 13–16 Erbse). Ζηνόδοτοс ἔξω τοῦ ρ̅ ῾βῆ Ἶсον᾿. μὴ ὲμφέρεсθαι δέ φηсιν ό Ἀρίсταρχοс νῦν ὲν τοῖс Ποсειδίππου ὲπιγράμμαсι τὸν ‘Βήριсον’, ὰλλ᾿ὲν τῷ λεγομένῳ Сωρῷ εύρεῖν. For problems concerning the concerning the Сωρόс, which need not detain us here, see Gow, and Page, , Hellenistic epigrams ii (Cambridge 1965) 483–84Google Scholar; Fraser, P. M., Ptolemaic Alexandria i (Oxford 1972) 560Google Scholar; and Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, JHS lxxxiii (1963) 96.Google Scholar
5 Cook, J.M., The Troad (Oxford 1973) 311.Google Scholar
6 Cook, op. cit. 357.
7 Suppl. Hellen. 700 L.–J./P.
οὐδὲ Λυκανίη δέξατό сε Ζελίη
ἀλλὰ <παρὰ> προχοῇсι Сιμουντίсι τοῦτό сοι Ἕκτωρ
сἥμα και ἀγχέμαχοι θέντο Λυκαονίδαι
1 Λυκαονίη Meineke: Λυκάων codd. (‘Nisi malis Λυκάν et sequente versu Ζελίῃ’ Meineke).
2 <παρὰ> Bergk: Сιμουντίсι Wilamowitz (προχοῇ Сιμο–εντίδι Bergk): ἀλλὰ προχοῇсι Сιμόεντοс διὰ τοῦτό ξοι Ἔκτωρ codd. (p. 295, 10 Meineke, app.crit.).