Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:30:05.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Γameσσetai/γe Maσσetai: Homer Iliad 9.394 and the Constitutive Role of Irregularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2021

Matthew Ward
Matthew Ward*
Affiliation:
Christ’s College, Cambridge*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper uses a textual decision at Iliad 9.394 to argue for irregularity as a functional and meaningful principle in the constitution of the Homeric text. In contrast to almost all recent major editions, I argue that the ‘irregular’ MSS γαμέσσεται should be preferred to the Aristarchaean conjecture γε μάσσεται. Aristarchus’ widely adopted emendation, I suggest, is the product of a drive towards standardization that is still operative in Homeric text-critical practice. This paper opposes that standardization with the evidence of ancient, perhaps pre-Alexandrian, responses to Iliad 9.394, in which the ‘irregularity’ of γαμέσσεται is embraced as an interpretive opportunity. The formal disruptions of γαμέσσεται, I propose, can be understood by locating them both within the immediate context of Iliad 9 and within the wider thematics of irregularity that mark the character of Achilles. This paper thus attempts to reframe our approach to the role of irregularity in the Iliad as an integral feature of meaning rather than grounds for suspecting the integrity of the text.

Keywords

Iliadtextual criticismAristarchusirregularityAchilles
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 141 , November 2021 , pp. 224 - 240
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[email protected]. This paper grew out of conversations with Giulia Maltagliati, whose comments on a later draft strengthened the argument and saved me from a number of mistakes. Katharine Shields and Yiming Zhong invited me to speak on this topic at their London ‘Lyceum’ seminar, and I am indebted to them and the audience on that occasion for their questions and comments. I would like to thank Marco Fantuzzi, Ahuvia Kahane and Seth Schein for reading and responding to various drafts of this paper; they all improved it in myriad ways. Tom Nelson read a version of this article at a late stage, and his comments saved me from a number of errors. I would also like to thank the former editor of JHS, Douglas Cairns, the current editor, Lin Foxhall, and the two anonymous readers for the journal for their incredibly detailed, thoughtful and helpful responses. I am responsible, as ever, for the errors that remain.

References

Allan, W. and Cairns, D. (2011) ‘Conflict and community in the Iliad’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H. (eds), Competition in the Ancient World (Swansea) 113–46Google Scholar
Allen, T.W. (1931) Homeri Ilias 2: Libros I–XII Continens (Oxford)Google Scholar
Ameis, K.F. and Hentze, C. (1886) Homers Ilias 1.3: Gesang VII–IX (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Antovic, M. and Cánovas, C.P. (eds) (2016) Oral Poetics and Cognitive Science (Berlin and Boston)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, N. (1975) Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer’s Odyssey (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London)Google Scholar
Bolling, G.M. (1914) ‘The archetype of our Iliad and the papyri’, AJPh 35.2, 125–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzone, C. (2014) Constructions: A New Approach to Formularity, Discourse and Syntax in Homer (Ph.D. Diss. Los Angeles)Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2011) ‘Ransom and revenge in the Iliad’, in S.D. Lambert (ed.), Sociable Man: Essays on Ancient Greek Social Behaviour in Honour of Nick Fisher (Swansea) 87–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, L.G. (2018) Women of Substance in Homeric Epic: Objects, Gender, Agency (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantarella, R. (1969) ‘Aristofane di Bisanzio, Menandro, e la mimesi’, RAL 24.5/6, 189–94Google Scholar
Cantilena, M. (1995) ‘Il ponte di Nicanore’, in M. Fantuzzi and R. Pretagostini (eds), Struttura e storia dell’esametro greco 1 (Rome) 9–67Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1958) Grammaire Homérique 1: phonétique et morphologie (Paris)Google Scholar
Christ, G. (1884) Homeri. Iliadis Carmina: Pars Prior (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Claus, D.B. (1975) ‘Aidôs in the language of Achilles’, TAPhA 105, 13–28 Google Scholar
Cobet, C.G. (1876) Miscellanea critica (Leiden)Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2016) Homer’s Allusive Art (Oxford)Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Finglass, P.J. (2014) Stesichorus: The Poems: Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007) Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period (Oxford)Google Scholar
Dindorf, G. (1901) Homeri Ilias: editio quinta correctior quam curavit C. Hentze 1: Iliadis I–XII (5th edition) (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Donlan, W. (1993) ‘Duelling with gifts in the Iliad: as the audience saw it’, Colby Quarterly 29.3, 155–72Google Scholar
Elmer, D.F. (2013) The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad (Baltimore)Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1969–1988) Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (7 vols) (Berlin)Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2018) Omero: Iliade (Milan)Google Scholar
Fraser, P.M. (1972) Ptolemaic Alexandria 1: Text (Oxford)Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. and Redfield, J. (1978) ‘Speech as a personality symbol: the case of Achilles’, Language 54.2, 263–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1986) ‘Rhetoric and relevance: interpolation at Euripides Electra 367–400’, GRBS 27.2, 157–71Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2012) Sophocles and the Language of Tragedy (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2010) Homer, Iliad: Book VI (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2015) ‘The Homeric text’, Ramus 44.1/2, 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. (1980) Homer on Life and Death (Oxford)Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1986) ‘Homeric words and speakers’, JHS 61, 36–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. (1995) Homer: Iliad Book Nine (Oxford)Google Scholar
Gurd, S.A. (2005) Iphigenias at Aulis: Textual Multiplicity, Radical Philology (Ithaca NY and London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainsworth, J.B. (1968) The Flexibility of the Homeric Formula (Oxford)Google Scholar
Hainsworth, J.B. (1993) The Iliad: A Commentary 3: Books 9–12 (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D. (2002) The Iliad as Politics: The Performance of Political Thought (Norman)Google Scholar
Haslam, M. (1997) ‘Homeric papyri and transmission of the text’, in I. Morris and B. Powell (eds), A New Companion to Homer (Leiden, New York and Cologne) 55–100Google Scholar
Hermann, G. (1805) Orphica (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1990) ‘The Iliad and its editors: dictation and redaction’, ClAnt 9.2, 326–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (1992) The Iliad: A Commentary 4: Books 13–16 (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (1994) ‘Homeri Odyssea by Helmut van Thiel’, Gnomon 66.4, 289–95Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1998) ‘The Homeric poems as oral dictated texts’, CQ 48.1, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (2000) ‘West’s Iliad’, CR 50.1, 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, A. (1994) The Interpretation of Order: A Study in the Poetics of Homeric Repetition (Oxford)Google Scholar
Kahane, A. (2018) ‘The complexity of epic diction’, Yearbook of Ancient Greek Epic Online 2.1, 78–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, A. (forthcoming) ‘Disagreement, complexity and the politics of Homer’s verbal form’, in P. Vasunia (ed.), The Politics of Form in Greek Literature (London)Google Scholar
Katz, M.A. (1991) Penelope’s Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey (Princeton)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. (2007) A Referential Commentary and Lexicon to Homer Iliad VIII (Oxford)Google Scholar
Kirk, G.S. (1990) The Iliad: A Commentary 2: Books 5–8 (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramnick, J. and Nersessian, A. (2017) ‘Form and explanation’, Critical Inquiry 43.3, 650–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2012) ‘Why is everyone so excited about complexity theory in applied linguistics?’, Mélanges CRAPEL 33, 9–24 Google Scholar
Kukkonen, K. (2013) ‘Form as a pattern of thinking: cognitive poetics and new formalism’, in V Theile and L. Tredennick (eds), New Formalisms and Literary Theory (Basingstoke) 159–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lape, S. (2004) Reproducing Athens: Menander’s Comedy, Democratic Culture, and the Hellenistic City (Princeton and Oxford)Google Scholar
Leaf, W. (1900) The Iliad: Edited with English Notes and Introduction 1: Books I–XII (2nd edition) (London)Google Scholar
Levine, C. (2015) Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network (Princeton and Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, J. (2002) ‘Marston’s gorge and the question of formalism’, in M.D. Rasmussen, (ed.), Renaissance Literature and its Formal Engagements (New York and Basingstoke) 89–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwich, A. (1885) Aristarchs Homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos 2 (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Ludwich, A. (1898) Die Homervulgata als voralexandrinisch erwiesen (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Ludwich, A. (1902) Homeri Ilias 1 (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M. (1988) Epos: Word, Narrative, and the Iliad (Basingstoke and London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, P. (tr. H.L. Jones) (1962) Greek Metre (Oxford)Google Scholar
Macleod, C.W. (1983) ‘Homer on poetry and the poetry of Homer’, in C.W. Macleod, Collected Essays (Oxford) 1–15Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad (Ithaca and London)Google Scholar
Mazon, P. (1937) Homère, Iliade 1 (chants I–VI) (Paris)Google Scholar
Mirto, S. (1980) ‘Oreste, Telemaco e una presunta interpolazione: Eur., Or., 588–90’, ASNP 10.2, 383–402Google Scholar
Monro, D.B. and Allen, T.W. (1920) Homeri Opera 1: Iliados Libros I–XII Continens (3rd edition) (Oxford)Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2007) ‘Menandro (e Aristofane) ad Alessandria: qualche riflessione’, in R. Pretagostini and E. Dettori (eds), La cultura letteraria ellenistica: persistenza, innovazione, trasmissione (Rome) 257–69Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2015) ‘Hellenistic scholarship’, in F. Montanari, S. Matthaios and A. Rengakos (eds), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Leiden and Boston) 60–183Google Scholar
Montanari, F. (1979) Studi di filologia omerica antica 1 (Pisa)Google Scholar
Moulton, C. (1977) Similes in the Homeric Poems (Göttingen)Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. (1987) Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey (Princeton)Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2004) Homer’s Text and Language (Urbana and Chicago)Google Scholar
Nimis, S. (1986) ‘The language of Achilles: construction vs representation’, CW 79.4, 217–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omitowoju, R. (2002) Rape and the Politics of Consent in Classical Athens (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Paduano, G. and Mirto, M.S. (1997) Omero: Iliade (Turin)Google Scholar
Pagliaro, A. (1963) Nuovi saggi di critica semantica (2nd edition) (Florence)Google Scholar
Parry, A. (1956) ‘The language of Achilles’, TAPhA 87, 1–7 Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1928a) L’épithète traditionnelle dans Homère: essai sur un problème de style homérique (Paris) = (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse (Oxford) 1–190Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1928b) Les formules et la métrique d’Homère (Paris) = (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse (Oxford) 191–239Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford)Google Scholar
Pierron, A. (1883) ΟΜΗΡΟΥ ΙΛΙΑΣ: l’Iliade d’Homère: chants I–XII (2nd edition) (Paris)Google Scholar
Porter, H.N. (1951) ‘The early Greek hexameter’, Yale Classical Studies 12, 1–63 Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1998) ‘Honor and glory in the Iliad’, in P. Pucci, The Song of the Sirens: Essays on Homer (Lanham) 179–230Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2018) The Iliad: The Poem of Zeus (Berlin and Boston)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, M.D. (ed.) (2002) Renaissance Literature and its Formal Engagements (New York and Basingstoke)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. (1975) Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector (Chicago and London)Google Scholar
Redfield, J. (1979) ‘The proem of the Iliad: Homer’s art’, CPh 79.2, 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.D. (1973) ‘The language of Achilles’, CQ 23.2, 193–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, P. (2013) ‘L’usage du laid: la scène de Thersite dans le chant II de l’Iliade’, in Cottone, R.S. and Rousseau, P. (eds), Diego Lanza, lecteur des œuvres de l’Antiquité: poésie, philosophie, histoire de la philologie (Villeneuve d’Ascq) 23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. (1976) ‘How, and what, does Homer communicate? The medium and message in Homeric verse’, CJ 71.4, 289–99Google Scholar
Rutherford, R.B. (2012) Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, R.B. (2019) Homer, Iliad: Book XVIII (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Sagaser, E.H. (2002) ‘Flirting with eternity: teaching form and meter in a Renaissance poetry course’, in M.D. Rasmussen (ed.), Renaissance Literature and its Formal Engagements (New York and Basingstoke) 185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammons, B. (2008) ‘Gift, list, and story in Iliad 9.115–61’, CJ 103.4, 353–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammons, B. (2010) The Art and Rhetoric of the Homeric Catalogue (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, S.L. (1980) ‘On Achilles’ speech to Odysseus, Iliad 9.308–429’, Eranos 78, 125–31Google Scholar
Schein, S.L. (1984) The Mortal Hero: An Introduction to Homer’s Iliad (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, S.L. (2016) ‘A cognitive approach to Greek metre: Hermann’s Bridge in the Homeric hexameter and the interpretation of Iliad 24’, in S.L. Schein, Homeric Epic and its Reception (Oxford) 93–115Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2009) ‘Theory into practice: Aristotelian principles in Aristarchaean philology’, CPh 104, 279–316 Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2018) The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad (Ann Arbor)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. (2019) ‘EΝ ΑΡΧΗΙ ΗΝ Ο ΛΟΓΟΣ: the long journey of grammatical analogy’, CQ 68.2, 475–97Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1976) Die Erklärung zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias (Munich)Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2008) Epic Facework: Self-presentation and Social Interaction in Homer (Swansea)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, S. (1984) ‘The language of Achilles: the ΟΧΘΗΣΑΣ formulas’, TAPhA 114, 11–27 Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1971) The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad (Leiden)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. and Culpepper, J. (eds) (2002) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis (Amsterdam and Philadelphia)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shive, D. (1987) Naming Achilles (Oxford)Google Scholar
Silk, M. (1987) Homer: The Iliad (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2009) Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading (Edinburgh)Google Scholar
Stoevesandt. M. (2008) Homers Ilias: Gesamtkommentar (Basler Kommentar) 6: Sechster Gesang (Ζ): Faszikel 2: Kommentar (Berlin and New York)Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1992) Homeric Soundings: The Shaping of the Iliad (Oxford)Google Scholar
Thomas, O. (2020) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traill, A. (2008) Women and the Comic Plot in Menander (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R. (1998) Poetic Rhythm: Structure and Performance: An Empirical Study in Cognitive Poetics (Berne)Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (1949) The Textual Criticism of the Odyssey (Leiden)Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (1964) Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad 2 (Leiden)Google Scholar
van Herwerden, H. (1876) Quaestiunculae Epicae et Elegiacae (Utrecht)Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, J.F. (1890) ‘Homerica IV: de caesura quae est post quartum trochaeum’, Mnemosyne 18, 265–76 Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, J.F. (1912) Homeri Carmina: Ilias: cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentariis exegeticis (Leiden)Google Scholar
van Thiel, H. (1991) Homeri Odyssea (Hildesheim, Zürich and New York)Google Scholar
van Thiel, H. (1996) Homeri Ilias (Hildesheim, Zürich and New York)Google Scholar
van Thiel, H. (2014a) Aristarch, Aristophanes Byzantios, Demetrios Ixion, Zenodot: Fragmente zur Ilias gesammelt, neu herausgegeben, und kommentiert 2: Ausgabe und Kommentar Buch Θ (8) – Ο (15) (Berlin and Boston)Google Scholar
van Thiel, H. (2014b) Scholia D in Iliadem: proecdosis aucta et correctior 2014 (Cologne)Google Scholar
Vasunia, P. (ed.) (forthcoming) The Politics of Form in Greek Literature (London)Google Scholar
Ward, M. (2019) ‘Glory and nostos: the ship-epithet ΚΟΙΛΟΣ in the Iliad’, CQ 69.1, 23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M.L. (1982) Greek Metre (Oxford)Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1997) ‘Homer’s metre’, in I. Morris and B. Powell (eds), A New Companion to Homer (Leiden, New York and Cologne) 218–37Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1998) Homeri Ilias 1: Rhapsodias I–XII Continens (Stuttgart and Leipzig)Google Scholar
Whitman, C. (1958) Homer and the Heroic Tradition (Cambridge MA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willcock, M.M. (1998) Homer: Iliad I–XII (2nd edition) (London)Google Scholar
Wilson, D.F. (2002) Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, V. (2015) Euripides and the Politics of Form (Princeton and Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. (1994) The Heart of Achilles: Characterization and Personal Ethics in the Iliad (Ann Arbor)CrossRefGoogle Scholar