No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
On travelling through Sicily in the spring of last year, I studied as carefully as my time allowed the classical remains in the museums of Palermo, Girgenti, Catania and Syracuse, and in the lack of any general catalogue of those antiquities and of any accessible information concerning them, the following notices accompanied by a few sketches from photographs I was able to take may be of slight service. I only wish to speak of the more important objects that, as far as I know, have not yet been at all or sufficiently published. Valuable as these objects are, I have been greatly surprised at the paucity of literary reference to them. The coin-collections and the architecture of the island have been carefully studied and written on: but an Englishman might seek in vain for much enlightenment in the archaeological publications of Sicily itself concerning its other antiquities. The art-journal entitled La Sicilia artistica ed archeologica refers almost entirely to mediaeval and modern paintings; and has published nothing classical except the Venus of Syracuse with two or three other statues of the goddess. Possibly the Bulletino della commissione di Antiquità e belle arti di Sicilia may have contributed much to classical archaeology, but unfortunately nothing of this publication is to be found in England except an isolated number of the year 1864 in the British Museum Library.
page 49 note 1 This inscription is strangely omitted by Kaibel in his Inscriptiones Graecae Siciliae ct Italiae. I cannot find any publication of it.
page 51 note 1 Revue Archéologique, 1889 and 1890.
page 51 note 2 Baumeister, No. 235.
page 51 note 3 Revue Archeolog. 1889, p. 19.
page 51 note 4 The central figure kneeling beneath a horseman, vide Pl. xxii, xxiii. in Revue Archéologique, 1888.
page 52 note 1 When Schöne saw the Roman work in 1869 it was in the Villa Albani, and was neither designated nor restored as Milo; it was then transferred to the Villa Torlonia, and defaced by the evil genius of restoration that has presided over that collection. The absurdity has since been exposed by Schreiber, , Arch. Zeit. 1879, p. 63.Google Scholar
page 52 note 2 Cf. also the head at Hannover, sketched in Mitth. d. deutsch. Inst. 1889, p. 163Google Scholar, recognised by G. Treu as belonging to the representation of the same subject.
page 54 note 1 The description of the bronze statue of Scylla in the epigram Anth. Pal. ix., 
would apply to such a work as we might expect from the Pergamene school.
page 54 note 2 No. 2894, Beschreibung der Vasensammlung im Antiquarium.
page 54 note 3 Vide Mon. dell. Inst. iii. 53, and Baumeister, , No. 1762Google Scholar.
page 55 note 1 Vide Annali dell' Inst. 1839, p. 63, and Overbeck, , Kunst.-Mythologic, Bd. i. p. 132 (with sketch)Google Scholar.
page 56 note 1 Given in Overbeck, , Geschichte des Griech. Plastik, vol. i. p. 179.Google Scholar
page 56 note 2 1871, p. 126.