Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:37:50.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Pythais of 355 B.C. and the Third Sacred War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

H. W. Parke
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin

Extract

In the seventh speech of Isaeus (§27) there occurs one of the few references to the Pythais, the occasional sacred pilgrimage from Athens to Delphi. This allusion used to be misinterpreted as a reference to the Pythian games, and was used to date the speech. Elsewhere (§38) the same speaker alludes to the system of trierarchies organised in symmories, and as this was established by the law of Periander, dateable to 357–6 B.C., it is clear that the speech was delivered after that date. Hence it was taken that the Pythian games intended were those of 354 B.C., as it seemed unlikely that Isaeus' speech was written as late as the subsequent festivals of 350 B.C. or thereafter.

In 1918 Boethius (Die Pythais, pp. 19 ff.) showed conclusively that the reference was not to the celebration of the Pythian games, but to the special form of sacred pilgrimage known as the Pythais. In the fourth century B.C. this procession used to be dispatched from Athens in response to certain omens of lightning-flashes which were looked for on certain days during the three summer months. The priestly observers were stationed at the precinct of Zeus Asteropaeus near the Pythion, and watched in the direction of Harma on Mount Parnes. Only if the proper omen was reported, was the Pythais prepared and sent off. But the irregularity and infrequency of the manifestation had become proverbial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Blass, , Attische Beredsamkeit, II 2, 552Google Scholar. Kirchner, P.A. no. 7336.

2 Loeb edition, 1927, p. 247.

3 JHS, lvii, 1937, pp. 44 ffGoogle Scholar. I have to thank Mr. Hammond for reading the draft of this article which I sent to him and for kindly offering some comments.

4 .

5 Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. (CAH vi, pp. 213 ff.Google Scholar) puts the seizure of Delphi in the summer of 355, but admits much doubt as to the chronology. The seizure is fixed to the early summer of 356 by the equation between the Delphic archon Heracleius and the Athenian archon Agathocles. For a discussion see Hammond, op. cit. pp. 63 ff.

6 Xenophon, (de Vectigalibus, V, 9)Google Scholar in a pamphlet which he published in this summer suggested a compromise. The Athenians were to rally international support for a solution whereby the Phocians should evacuate Delphi, but the place should be guaranteed against any consequent encroachment from Thebes and Locris.

7 Ditt. Syll. 3 296 and cf. RE iv, 2567, etc.