Article contents
A Black-figured Hydria of the Polygnotan Period1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
Extract
In 1903 the Russian Archaeological Commission purchased a hydria from a dealer at Olbia which is now in the collection of ancient vases in the Hermitage (Fig. 1). Being considered by some authorities a forgery, the vase was not published in the Report of the Commission. I can assert that there is no doubt as to the authenticity of the vase. Apart from small injuries there are no important parts broken off or restored. The shape, but for some slight variations, is that of a typical late archaic hydria; sharp divisions are avoided, the shoulder being connected with the body by a soft curve and the same profile used for the foot. The ring above the foot is quite flat and not separated from the foot. On the lip of the vase there are two sharp projecting tongues instead of the “rotelle” of the archaic type (Fig. 2).
The handles are round and curved slightly upwards. The varnish is very bad and dull, being laid on very thin, so that the surface of the clay shows through. There are spots where the fire has turned the black varnish red. The clay is of a dull yellow colour, badly cleansed, with holes in the polished surface, evidently in consequence of small stones and pieces of glimmer which have broken away. The surface of the clay, in the panel reserved for the design, is of a reddish colour. The greater part of the foot, the stripes under the horizontal handles, the inner parts of all three handles and the outer part of the lip are left unvarnished. Judging from the quality of the clay and the special character of the varnish, the vase appears to be Etruscan work.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1923
References
2 Inv. No. 3145 (Olbia, 1903, No. 69); h. 45 cm. Reproduced from drawing by Miss Ukhanova.
3 It is not the lustre used on Attic vases in order to give brilliancy to the clay, but a reddish colour like that on late Corinthian craters.
4 In the Hermitage collection there are specimens of Lucanian and Apulian vases bought from dealers as having been found in South Russia. Scientific excavations have never brought to light any piece of local Italic ware.
5 The form of the holder proves that the object is a thunderbolt represented in the form of a flower, and not a flower. I do not know exact analogies. In a less developed form the type occurs on the kylix of Oltos and Euxitheos at Corneto, Mon. X. Pls. 23–4; Jacobsthal, , Der Blitz, II. p. 50.Google Scholar Cf. p. 13 sq.
6 Roscher's Lex., s.v. Kyknos, p. 1692.
7 Unless the same myth is intended on the bronze chariot from Perugia, a good analogy to the present scene, as rightly suggested by Mr.Boroffka, , Ant. Denkm. II. Pl. 14Google Scholar; Petersen, , Röm. Mitt., 1894, p. 281.Google Scholar
8 Oesterr. Jahresh., 13 (1910), pp. 150 ff. Pls. V.–VIII.
9 Beitr. zur. jon. Vasenmalerei, pp. 29 sq.
10 See Klein, l. c. p. 151. Studniczka and Klein prefer to assume an Ionian fabric.
11 Jahrb., 1896, p. 268.
12 Beitr. zur. jon. Vasenmalerei, p. 33.
13 Furtwängler-Reichhold. Pll. 26–28.
14 Ibidem, pp. 117–18.
- 1
- Cited by