Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:22:48.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ananke in Herodotus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Rosaria Vignolo Munson
Rosaria Vignolo Munson
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines Herodotus' use of words of the ἀνάγκη family in order to determine which external or internal constraints the historian represents as affecting the causality of events. M. Ostwald's Ἀνάγκη in Thucydides (1988) provides a foundation for examining the more restricted application of these terms in Herodotus (85 occurrences vs. 161 in Thucydides). In Herodotus, divine necessity (absent in Thucydides) refers to the predictable results of human wrongdoings more often than to a force constraining human choices. This represents an especially ambiguous Herodotean category, however, and is expressed by a wider range of terms than those with ἀνάγκη-stems. The analysis of natural ἀνάγκη yields more clear-cut results. (1) In Herodotus (and not in Thucydides) ἀνάγκη often qualifies an aggressive compulsion applied by a personal agent. (2) Victims of this despotic ἀνάγκη are partially excused, but those who resist it earn Herodotus' praise. (3) Most importantly, Herodotus (unlike Thucydides) never in turn applies ἀνάγκη words to circumstances that motivate imperialistic actions, especially starting a war. (4) Whereas in Thucydides agents are ‘compelled’ to act also by fear and other internal impulses, the only psychological factor to which Herodotus applies ἀνάγκη words (and this time mostly in a positive sense) is moral obligation.

Herodotus' concept of ἀνάγκη is moralistic, and consistent with his unwillingness to justify imperialism, his practice of assigning responsibility, and his high regard for nomos, on the one hand, and freedom on the other. The narrator's involvement in these principles is reflected in Herodotus' use of ἀνάγκη terms in self-referential statements of the type ‘I am compelled/not compelled to say x.’ These statements represent the narrator as the opposite of an imperial subject and analogous to the most admirable of his characters on the receiving end of compulsion. He is a free agent, who disregards political pressure and is exclusively compelled by the rules that apply to him as researcher and truthful recorder.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 121 , November 2001 , pp. 30 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benardete, S. (1965) ‘ΧΡΗ and ΔΕΙ in Plato and others’, Glotta 43, 285–301Google Scholar
Benardete, S. (1969) Herodotean Inquiries (The Hague)Google Scholar
Cheshire, K. (1998) ‘The semantic differences of ἀνάγκη and ἀναγκαίη in Homer and Herodotus’, Paper delivered at the 1998 APA meeting in ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Christ, M.R. (1994) ‘Herodotean kings and historical inquiry’, CA 13/2, 167–202Google Scholar
Connor, W.R. (1976) ‘A post modernist Thucydides?’, CJ 72, 289Google Scholar
Corcella, A. (1993) Erodoto: La Scizia e la Libia. Libro IV delle Storie (Milan)Google Scholar
Craik, E.M. (ed.) (1998) Hippocrates: Places in Man (Oxford)Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. (1987) Le discours du particulier. Essai sur l'enquête Hérodotéenne (Paris)Google Scholar
Demand, N. (1987) ‘Herodotus' encomium of Athens: science or rhetoric’, AJP 108, 746–58Google Scholar
Dewald, C. (1985) ‘Practical knowledge and the historian's role in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers presented to A.E. Raubitschek (Saratoga, CA) 47–63Google Scholar
Dewald, C. (1987) ‘Narrative surface and authorial voice in Herodotus' Histories’, in Boedeker, D. (ed.), Herodotus and the Invention of History, Arethusa 20 (1/2), 147–70Google Scholar
Dewald, C. (ed.) (1998) Herodotus. The Histories. Trans. by Waterfield, Robin, with an introduction and notes by Dewald, C.. (Oxford)Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1956) ‘Der erste Satz im Werke Herodots’, in Festschrift B. Snell (Munich) 209–22Google Scholar
Evans, J.A.S. (1961) ‘The dream of Xerxes and the nomoi of the Persians’, CJ 57, 109–11Google Scholar
Evans, J.A.S. (1965) ‘Despotes nomos’, Athenaeum 43, 145–53Google Scholar
Evans, J.A.S. (1979) ‘Herodotus and Athens: the evidence of the encomium’, AC 48, 112–18Google Scholar
Fornara, C.W. (1971) Herodotus. An Interpretative Essay (Oxford)Google Scholar
Fornara, C.W. (1981) ‘Herodotus' knowledge of the Archidamian War’, Hermes 109, 149–56Google Scholar
Fornara, C.W. (1990) ‘Human history and the constraint of fate in Herodotus’, in Allison, J.W. (ed.), Conflict, Antithesis and the Ancient Historians (Columbus, OH)Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. (1996) ‘Herodotus and his contemporaries’, JHS 116, 62–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, P. (1968) Die Traüme bei Herodot (Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 27, Meisenheim am Glam)Google Scholar
Gould, J. (1989) Herodotus (London)Google Scholar
Grene, D. (ed.) (1987) Herodotus. The History (Chicago)Google Scholar
Harrison, T. (2000) Divinity and History: The Religion of Herodotus (Oxford)Google Scholar
Hohti, P. (1974) ‘Freedom of speech in the speech sections in the Histories of Herodotus’, Arctos 8, 19–27Google Scholar
Hohti, P. (1975) ‘Über die Notwendigkeit bei Herodot’, Arctos 9, 31–7Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1987) Thucydides (Baltimore)Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1991) A Commentary on Thucydides, Vol. 1: Books I–III (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immerwahr, H.R. (1956) ‘Aspects of historical causation in Herodotus’, TAPA 87, 247–80Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H.R. (1966) Form and Thought in Herodotus (Cleveland)Google Scholar
Kirchberg, L. (1965) Die Funktion der Orakel im Werke Herodots (Göttingen)Google Scholar
Knox, B. (1952) ‘Lion in the house’, CPh.47 reprinted in B. Knox, Word and Action. Essays on the Ancient Theater(Baltimore and London 1979) 27–38Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G. (1979) Mythologies, religion, et philosophic de l'histoire dans Hérodote (Lille and Paris)Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1982) ‘The perils of prosperity in Herodotus’, Rh. Mus. 125/2, 97–101Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1986) ‘The empirical element in the methods of early Greek medical writers and Herodotus: a shared epistemological response’, Antichthon 20, 1–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lateiner, D. (1989) The Historical Method of Herodotus (Toronto, Buffalo and London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. (1939) ‘The wise adviser in Herodotus’, CPh. 34, 24–39Google Scholar
Linforth, I.M. (1924) ‘Herodotus's avowal of silence in his account of Egypt’, UCPCPh 9, 269–92Google Scholar
Linforth, I.M. (1926) ‘Greek gods and foreign gods in Herodotus’, UCPCPh 9, 1–25Google Scholar
Linforth, I.M. (1928) ‘Named and unnamed gods in Herodotus’, UCPCPh 9, 201–43Google Scholar
Lloyd, A.B. (1976) Herodotus Book II. Commentary 1-98 (Leiden)Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1987) The Revolutions of Wisdom. Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London)Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1986) The Invention of Athens: the Funeral Oration in the Classical City, tr. Sheridan, A. (Cambridge, MA; originally published in French, Paris 1981)Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (ed.) (1996) Herodotus. The Histories, tr. by Sélincourt, A. de and Marincola, J. (London)Google Scholar
Moles, J. (1996) ‘Herodotus warns the Athenians’, Papers of the Leeds International Seminar 9, 259–84Google Scholar
Momigliano, A.D. (1966) ‘On the causes of war in ancient historiography’, in Studies in Historiography (New York) 112–126 reprinted from Acta Congressus Madvigiani, Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Classical Studies 1 (1954) 199-211Google Scholar
Munson, R.V. (1988) ‘Artemisia in Herodotus’, CS 7/1, 91–106Google Scholar
Munson, R.V. (2001) Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus (Ann Arbor, MI)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past (Baltimore and London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostwald, M. (1988) Ἀνάγκη in Thucydides (Atlanta, GA)Google Scholar
Pearson, L. (1952) ‘Prophasis and aitia’, TAPA 83, 205–23Google Scholar
(reprinted in D. Lateiner and S. Stephens (eds.), Selected Papers of Lionel Pearson (Chico, CA 1983))Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (forthcoming) ‘Causes, scientific and other: Hippocratics and historians’Google Scholar
Powell, J.E. (1938) A Lexicon to Herodotus (reprinted Hildesheim 1950)Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K.A. (1987) ‘Herodotus, political thought, and the meaning of history’, in Boedeker, D. (ed.), Herodotus and the Invention of History (Arethusa, 20 (1/2)) 221–48Google Scholar
Rawlings, H.R. III (1975) A Semantic Study of PROPHASIS to 400 BC (Hermes Einzelschriften 33, Wiesbaden)Google Scholar
de Ste. Croix, G.E.M. (1972) The Origins of the Peloponnesian War (Ithaca and New York)Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1974) ‘Two crucial decisions in Herodotus’, Mededelingen der Koninkiijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde n.s. 37/6, 139–69Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (1992) ‘Herodotus and the Athenian arche’, ASNP 22/3, 781–809Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1955) ‘Herodot und das perikleische Athen’, Historia 4, 1–25Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (1997) ‘Ethnography, proof and argument in Herodotus' Histories’, PCPS 43, 128–48Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1993) Shame and Necessity (Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar