Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:55:33.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Useful knowledge, ‘industrial enlightenment’, and the place of India*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2013

Maxine Berg*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Research is now turning to the missing place of technology and ‘useful knowledge’ in the debate on the ‘great divergence’ between East and West. Parallel research in the history of science has sought the global dimensions of European knowledge. Joel Mokyr's recent The Enlightened Economy (2009) argued the place of an exceptional ‘industrial enlightenment’ in Europe in explaining industrialization there, but neglected the wide geographic framework of European investigation of the arts and manufactures. This article presents two case studies of European industrial travellers who accessed and described Indian crafts and industries at the time of Britain's industrial revolution and Europe's Enlightenment discourse on crafts and manufactures. The efforts of Anton Hove and Benjamin Heyne to ‘codify’ the ‘tacit’ knowledge of a part of the world distant from Europe were hindered by the English East India Company and the British state. Their accounts, only published much later, provide insight into European perceptions of India's ‘useful knowledge’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to thank the European Research Council, under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement no. 249362. Participants in the Third European Congress on World and Global History, London School of Economics, April 2011, and at conferences at the University of Kent, the European University Institute, and the University of Uppsala, and anonymous reviewers for this journal all provided valuable comments on earlier drafts.

References

1 Roy, Tirthankar, ‘Knowledge and divergence in early modern India’, Journal of Global History, 3, 3, 2008, pp. 379385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riello, Giorgio, ‘Asian knowledge and the development of calico printing in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’, Journal of Global History, 5, 1, 2010, pp. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parthasarathi, Prasannan, Why Europe grew rich and Asia did not, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerritsen, Anne and McDowall, Stephen, ‘Material culture and the other: European encounters with Chinese porcelain, c. 1650–1800’, Journal of World History, 23, 1, 2012, pp. 87113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Cook, Harold J., Matters of exchange: commerce, medicine, and science in the Dutch golden age, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, Simon, Roberts, Lissa, Raj, Kapil, and Delbourgo, James, eds., The brokered world: go-betweens and global intelligence, 1770–1820, Sagamore Beach, MA: Watson Publishing, 2009Google Scholar

Klein, Ursula and Spary, E.C., Materials and expertise in early modern Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006Google Scholar

3 Mokyr, Joel, The enlightened economy: an economic history of Britain 1700–1850, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009Google Scholar

4 Ibid., pp. 79–98.

5 Parthasarathi, Why Europe, pp. 185–222Google Scholar

Raj, Kapil, Relocating modern science: circulation and the construction of scientific knowledge in South Asia and Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inkster, Ian, ‘Potentially global: “useful and reliable knowledge” and material progress in Europe, 1474–1914’, International History Review, 27, 2006, pp. 237286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Berg, Maxine, ‘In pursuit of luxury: global history and British consumer goods in the eighteenth century’, Past and Present, 182, 2004, pp. 85142CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Ledderose, Lothar, Ten thousand things: module and mass production in Chinese art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Schäfer, Dagmar, The crafting of the 10,000 things: knowledge and technology in seventeenth-century China, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Mokyr, Joel, The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Mokyr, Joel, ‘The intellectual origins of modern economic growth’, Journal of Economic History, 65, 2, 2005, pp. 285351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Mokyr, Enlightened economy, pp. 29Google Scholar

Mokyr, ‘Intellectual origins’, pp. 296Google Scholar

10 Maxine Berg, ed., ‘Reflections on Joel Mokyr's The gifts of Athena, History of Science, special issue, 45, 2, 2007, pp. 123135Google Scholar

Epstein, S. R., ‘Craft guilds, apprenticeship, and technological change in preindustrial Europe’, Journal of Economic History, 53, 3, 1998, pp. 684713CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Robert, The British industrial revolution in global perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Mokyr, Gifts of Athena, p. 297Google Scholar

Berg, ‘Reflections’, pp. 186–196Google Scholar

12 Mokyr, Enlightened economy, p. 61Google Scholar

13 Washbrook, David, ‘India in the early modern world economy: modes of production, reproduction, and exchange’, Journal of Global History, 2, 2007, pp. 87112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parthasarathi, Why Europe, pp. 203–213Google Scholar

Parthasarathi, Prasannan, ‘Agriculture, labour, and the standard of living in eighteenth-century India’, in Robert C. Allen, Tommy Bengstsson, and Martin Dribe, eds., Living standards in the past: new perspectives on well-being in Asia and Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 99109Google Scholar

14 Desmond, Ray, The European discovery of the Indian flora, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John, Joseph Banks and the English Enlightenment: useful knowledge and polite culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Drayton, Richard, Nature's government: science, imperial Britain, and the ‘improvement of the world’, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia, Colonial botany: science, commerce, and politics in the early modern world, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005Google Scholar

Miller, David and Reill, Peter Hans, eds., Visions of empire: voyages, botany, and representations of nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar

15 Antonella Romano and Stéphane Van Damme, ‘Science and world cities: thinking urban knowledge and science at large (16th–18th century), Itinerario, 33, 1, 2009, p. 80.

16 Schaffer, Simon, ‘The Asiatic enlightenments of British astronomy’, in Schaffer et al., Brokered world, p. 65Google Scholar

17 Roberts, Lissa, ‘Situating science in global history: local exchanges and networks of circulation’, Itinerario, 33, 1, 2009, p. 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delbourgo, James and Dew, Nicholas, eds., Science and empire in the Atlantic world, New York: Routledge, 2008Google Scholar

Mussleman, Elizabeth Green, ‘Indigenous knowledge and contact zones’, Itinerario, 33, 1, 2009, pp. 3144Google Scholar

Raj, Kapil, ‘The historical anatomy of a contact zone: Calcutta in the eighteenth century’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 48, 1, 2011, pp. 5582CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roy, Tirthankar, Journal of Global History, 3, 1, 2008, pp. 129131Google Scholar

Wagoner, Philip B., ‘Precolonial intellectuals and the production of colonial knowledge’, Comparative Study of Society and History, 45, 2003, pp. 783814CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Weber, Andreas, ‘Encountering the Netherlands Indies: Caspar G.C. Reinwardt's field trip to the East 1816–1822’, Itinerario, 33, 1, 2009, pp. 4560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Riello, ‘Asian knowledge’.

20 Bayly, C. A., Empire and information: intelligence gathering and social communication in India 1780–1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 2125Google Scholar

21 Mackay, David, ‘Agents of empire: the Banksian collectors and evaluation of new lands’, in Miller and Reill, Visions of empire, pp. 38–56Google Scholar

22 Ibid., p. 54.

23 Berg, Maxine, ‘Pursuit of luxury’, pp. 130–131Google Scholar

24 Postlethwayt, Malachy, The universal dictionary of trade and commerce, 4th edn, London: W. Strahan, 1744Google Scholar

25 Ibid., vol. 1, ‘Artisans’.

26 Ibid., vol. 2, ‘Porcelain’.

27 Gerritsen and McDowall, ‘Material culture’, pp. 10–15Google Scholar

28 Mackay, ‘Agents of empire’, pp. 45Google Scholar

29 Ibid., p. 45.

30 Bayly, Empire, p. 49Google Scholar

31 Edney, Matthew, Mapping an empire: the geographical construction of British India, 1765–1843, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997, pp. 947CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Angerstein, R. R., Illustrated travel diary, 1753–1755: industry in England and Wales from a Swedish perspective, trans. Torsten and Peter Berg, London: Science Museum, 2001Google Scholar

Harris, J. R., Industrial espionage and technology transfer: Britain and France in the eighteenth century, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998Google Scholar

Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane, L'invention technique au siècle des lumières, Paris: Albin Michel, 2000Google Scholar

Evans, Chris and Rydén, Göran, Baltic iron in the Atlantic World in the eighteenth century, Leiden: Brill, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLeod, Christine, ‘The European origins of British technological predominance’, in Leandro Prados de la Escosura, ed., Exceptionalism and industrialism: Britain and its European rivals, 1688–1815, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 111126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riello, Giorgio and O'Brien, P. K., ‘The future is another country: offshore views of the British industrial revolution’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 22, 2009, pp. 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Unwin, George, Samuel Oldknow and the Arkwrights, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1924, p. 7Google Scholar

Berg, Maxine, ‘Quality, cotton and the global luxury trade’, in Giorgio Riello and Tirthankar Roy, eds., How India clothed the world: the world of South Asian textiles, 1500–1850, Leiden: Brill, 2009, pp. 391414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Daniels, George, The early English cotton industry, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1920, p. 129Google Scholar

35 Parthasarathi, Why Europe, pp. 98–110Google Scholar

36 Subramanian, Lakshmi, ‘The political economy of textiles in western India: weavers, merchants and the transition to a colonial economy’, in Riello and Roy, How India clothed, pp. 253–280Google Scholar

Nadri, Ghulam, Eighteenth-century Gujarat: the dynamics of its political economy, 1750–1800, Leiden: Brill, 2009Google Scholar

37 Subramanian, ‘Political economy’, p. 269Google Scholar

38 Nadri, Ghulam A., ‘Sailing in hazardous waters: maritime merchants of Gujarat in the second half of the eighteenth century’, in Om Prakash, ed., History of science, philosophy and culture in Indian civilization, vol. 3 (7), Delhi: Pearson, 2012, pp. 255284Google Scholar

Bowen, H. V., ‘Britain in the Indian ocean region and beyond: contours, connections, and the creation of a global maritime empire’, in H. V. Bowen, Elizabeth Mancke, and John G. Reid, eds., Britain's oceanic empire: Atlantic and Indian ocean worlds, 1550–1850, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 4566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Subramanian, Lakshmi, ‘Reaping the risks of transition: merchants and trade in Western India, 1750–1818’, in Prakash, History of science, pp. 285–307Google Scholar

Subramanian, Lakshmi, ‘Seths and sahibs: negotiated relationships between indigenous capital and the East India Company’, in Bowen, Mancke, and Reid, Britain's oceanic empire, pp. 311–339Google Scholar

40 Nadri, ‘Sailing’, p. 259Google Scholar

41 Neil Chambers, ed., The Indian and Pacific correspondence of Sir Joseph Banks, 1768–1820, vol. 2, Letters 1783–1782, London: Pickering & Chatto, 2009, p. 290. These are drawn from the correspondence of Banks to Hove held in the British Museum, 7 January 1787, B.M. (N.H.) D.T.C., vol. 5, fols. 124–7. A revised and edited version of Hove's journal was published as Tours for scientific and economic research made in Guzerat, Kattiawar, and the Conkuns in 1787–88 by Dr. Hove, Bombay: Selections from Records of the Bombay Government, no. 16, 1855. Passages used here, where possible, are from ‘Extracts from Dr. Hove's Journal’, BL, IOR, Home Miscellaneous 374, pp. 591–665.

42 Chambers, Indian and Pacific correspondence, vol. 2, letter 104.

43 Mackay, ‘Agents of empire’, p. 38Google Scholar

44 Schaffer, ‘Asiatic enlightenments’, pp. 93–94Google Scholar

45 Chambers, Indian and Pacific correspondence, vol. 2, Letter 209, Hove to Banks, Bombay, 2 February 1788, p. 293.

46 BL, IOR, ‘Extracts from Dr. Hove's Journal’, p. 622.

47 Ibid., pp. 641–2.

48 Ibid., pp. 642–4.

49 Ibid., p. 665.

50 Hove, Tours, pp. 140–141Google Scholar

Haynes, Douglas, Small town capitalism in western India: artisans, merchants, and the making of the informal economy, 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Haynes, Small town capitalism, pp. 31–33Google Scholar

52 King, Brenda M., Silk and empire, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005, p. 66Google Scholar

53 Hove, Tours, pp. 176–178Google Scholar

54 Nadri, Eighteenth-century Gujarat, p. 26Google Scholar

Subramanian, Lakshmi, ‘Power and weave: weavers, merchants and rulers in eighteenth-century Surat’, in Ashin das Gupta, Rudrangshu Mukherjee, and Lakshmi Subramanian, eds., Politics and trade in the Indian Ocean world: essays in honour of Ashin Das Gupta, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 5282Google Scholar

Subramanian, ‘Political economy’, esp. pp. 268–275Google Scholar

Haynes, Small town capitalism, pp. 33–36Google Scholar

55 BL, IOR, H. India Office Home Miscellaneous Series c.1600–1900.

56 See note 41.

57 Hove, Tour, p. 196Google Scholar

58 John Cannon, ‘Jenkinson, Charles, first earl of Liverpool (1729–1808)’, Oxford dictionary of national biography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004Google Scholar

59 Chambers, Indian and Pacific correspondence, vol. 2, Letter 240, Jenkinson to Banks.

60 Ibid., Letter 249, Banks to Hove.

61 Berg, ‘Pursuit of luxury’, pp. 113–120Google Scholar

Riello, ‘Asian knowledge’, pp. 12–14Google Scholar

Irwin, John and Brett, K. B., Origins of chintz, London: HMSO, 1970Google Scholar

Jean Ryhiner, Traité sur la fabrication et le commerce des toiles peintes [1766], not published until 1865Google Scholar

62 Riello, ‘Asian knowledge’, pp. 26–28Google Scholar

63 Nietro-Galen, Augusto, ‘Between craft routines and academic rules: natural dyestuffs and the “art” of dyeing in the eighteenth century’, in Klein and Spary, Materials and expertise, pp. 321–353Google Scholar

64 Roxburgh, William, Plants of the Coromandel coast, London: W. Bulmer, 1795Google Scholar

Schwartz, Paul R., ‘The Roxburgh account of Indian Cotton Painting, 1795’, Journal of Indian Textile History, 4, 1959, pp. 4756Google Scholar

65 Desmond, European discovery, p. 41Google Scholar

Edney, Mapping an empire, p. 176Google Scholar

66 Michael T. Bravo, ‘Mission gardens: natural history and global expansion, 1720–1820’, in Londa Schiebinger and Claudia Swan, Colonial botany: science, commerce, and politics in the early modern world, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005, pp. 4965Google Scholar

Sivasundaram, Sujit, ‘“A Christian Benares”: orientalism, science and the Serampore mission of Bengal’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 44, 2, 2007, pp. 111145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, David, ‘Plant capitalism and company science: the Indian career of Nathaniel Wallich’, Modern Asian Studies, 42, 5, 2008, pp. 899928CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarti, Pratik, Materials and medicine: trade, conquest and therapeutics in the eighteenth century, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Jürgens, Hanco, ‘German Indology avant la lettre: the experiences of the Halle missionaries in southern India, 1750–1810’, in D. T. McGetchin, P. K. J. Park, and D. Sar Desai, eds., Sanskrit and ‘Orientalism’: Indology and comparative linguistics in Germany, 1750–1958, Delhi: Manohar, 2004, pp. 4181Google Scholar

Martin Krieger, ‘Material culture, knowledge, and European society in colonial India around 1800: Danish Tranquebar’, in Michael North ed., Artistic and cultural exchanges between Europe and Asia, 1400–1900, Farnham: Ashgate, 2010, pp. 5372Google Scholar

67 Chakrabarti, Materials, pp. 178–180Google Scholar

68 BL, IOR, Roxburgh MSS, Eur D809, letter from John to Roxburgh, 29 September 1789.

69 Roxburgh, William, Plants of the coast of Coromandel, presented to the Hon. Court of Directors of the East India Company, London: W. Bulmer & Co, 1795Google Scholar

Desmond, European discovery, pp. 39–80Google Scholar

70 Bhattacharya, Bhaswati, ‘Ports of Coromandel and trade in the Bay of Bengal in the eighteenth century’, in Prakash, History of Science, pp. 326–327Google Scholar

71 Heyne, Benjamin, Tracts, historical and statistical, on India: with journals of several tours through various parts of the peninsula: also an account of Sumatra in a series of letters, London: Robert Baldwin, 1814Google Scholar

72 Buchanan, Francis, A journey from Madras through the countries of Mysore, Canara and Malabar, London: W. Bulmer & Co., 1807Google Scholar

73 Vicziany, Marika, ‘Imperialism, botany and statistics in early nineteenth-century India: the surveys of Francis Buchanan (1762–1829)’, Modern Asian Studies, 20, 4, 1986, pp. 625660CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gascoigne, Joseph Banks, pp. 201–208Google Scholar

74 Heyne, Tracts, p. 204Google Scholar

75 Ibid., p. 248.

76 Weber, ‘Encountering’, pp. 41–42Google Scholar

Edney, Mapping an empire, pp. 79–83Google Scholar

77 BL, IOR, Board of Control F/4/1, p. 135.

78 BL, IOR, Roxburgh MSS, Eur D809.

79 Heyne, Tracts, pp. 111–112Google Scholar

80 Ibid., p. 95.

81 BL, IOR, Board of Control F/4/1, p. 135.

82 Heyne, Tracts, ‘Map of the Circars’, facing p. 282.

83 Mentz, Søren, ‘English private trade on the Coromandel Coast, 1660–1690: diamonds and country trade’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 33, 2, 1996, p. 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaggio, Dario, ‘Diamond industry’, in Joel Mokyr, ed., The Oxford encyclopaedia of economic history, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 7682Google Scholar

84 Heyne, Tracts, p. 101Google Scholar

85 BL, IOR, Roxburgh MSS, Eur D809, ‘Report of an excursion to the diamond mines at Mallavilly and iron works at Ramanakapellah near Ellore’, p. 11.

86 A fanam was a gold or silver coin, the latter worth 1/8 of a rupee. See http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fanam (consulted 3 December 2012).

87 Heyne, Tracts, p. 97Google Scholar

88 IOR, BL, Roxburgh MSS, Eur D809, p. 11.

89 Heyne, Tracts, p. 96Google Scholar

90 Ibid., pp. 101, 107.

91 IOR, BL, Roxburgh MSS, Eur D809, p. 24.

92 Heyne, Tracts, p. 190Google Scholar

93 Ibid., p. 218.

94 Ibid., p. 219.

95 Roy, ‘Knowledge’, pp. 381–382Google Scholar

Roy, Tirthankar, ‘Did globalisation aid industrial development in colonial India? A study of knowledge transfer in the iron industry’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 46, 4, 2009, pp. 585587CrossRefGoogle Scholar

96 Heyne, Benjamin, ‘Cursory observations made on a tour from the banks of the Kistna to Timmericatah’, IOR, BL, Eur D809, p. 18Google Scholar

97 Ibid.

98 Heyne, Tracts, p. 364Google Scholar

99 George Pearson, Experiments and observations to investigate the nature of a kind of steel, manufactured at Bombay and there called wootz, read before the Royal Society, 11 June 1795, p. 5Google Scholar

Mushet, David, ‘Experiments on wootz’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 95, 1805, pp. 163175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stodart, J. and Faraday, M., ‘On the alloys of steel’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 112, 1822, pp. 253270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

100 Roy, ‘Knowledge’, pp. 379–385Google Scholar

Roy, ‘Did globalisation’, pp. 593–594Google Scholar

Parthasarathi, Why Europe, pp. 234–239Google Scholar