1 Marc, Bloch, ‘Serf de la glèbe: histoire d’une expression toute faite’, Revue Historique, 36, 1921, pp. 220–42.Google Scholar

2 Guy, Bois, La Crise du féodalisme, Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, 1980Google Scholar; George, Duby, Les trois ordres ou l’imaginaire du féodalisme, Paris: Gallimard, 1978Google Scholar; Pierre, Bonnassie, From slavery to feudalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991Google Scholar; Tom, Scott, ed., The peasantries of Europe: from the fourteenth to the eighteenth centuries, London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

3 Edgar Melton, ‘Population structure, the market economy and the transformation of Gutsherrschaft in East Central Europe, , 1650–1800: the cases of Brandenburg and Bohemia’, German History, 16, 3, 1998, pp. 297–324; William, Hagen, Ordinary Prussians: Brandenburg Junkers and villagers, 1500–1840, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

4 Stanley, Engerman, ed., Terms of labor: slavery, serfdom and free labor, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999Google Scholar; Robert, Steinfeld, The invention of free labor: the employment relation in English and American law and culture, 1350–1870, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1991Google Scholar; Bush, Michael L., Servitude in modern times, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar

5 Steinfeld, Invention.

6 Ehud, Toledano, Slavery and abolition in the Ottoman Middle East, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998Google Scholar; Omer Lutfi, Barkan, ‘Le servage existait-il en Turquie?’, Annales ESC, 11, 1956, pp. 54–60Google Scholar.

7 Jerome, Blum, Lord and peasant in Russia: from the ninth to the nineteenth century, New York: Atheneum, 1964Google Scholar; Alexander, Gerschenkron, Economic backwardness in historical perspective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962Google Scholar; Richard, Hellie, Enserfment and military change in Muscovy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1971Google Scholar; Peter, Kolchin, Unfree labor: American slavery and Russian serfdom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987Google Scholar; Daniel, Field, The end of serfdom: nobility and bureaucracy in Russia, 1855–1861, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976Google Scholar; Steven, Hoch, Serfdom and social control in Russia: Petrovskoe, a village in Tambov, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

8 Koval’chenko, Ivan D., Russkoe krepostnoe krest’ianstvo v pervoi polovine 19th v. (The Russian serf economy during the first half of the nineteenth century), Moscow: Nauka, 1967Google Scholar; Ian, Blanchard, Russia’s age of silver: precious metal production and economic growth in the eighteenth century, London: Routledge, 1989Google Scholar; David, Moon, The abolition of serfdom in Russia, 1762–1907, London: Pearson Education, 2001Google Scholar; Dennison, Tracy K., ‘Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750–1860’, Historical Research, 79, 203, 2003, pp. 74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Edgar, Melton, ‘Proto-industrialization, serf agriculture, and agrarian social structure: two estates in nineteenth-century Russia’, Past and Present, 115, 1987, pp. 73–81Google Scholar; Edgar, Melton, ‘Enlightened seignorialism and its dilemmas in serf Russia, 1750–1830’, Journal of Modern History, 62, 4, 1990, pp. 675–708Google Scholar; Evsey Domar and Michael Machina, ‘On the profitability of Russian serfdom’, Journal of Economic History, 44, 4, 1984, pp. 919–55.

9 Larry, Wolff, Inventing eastern Europe: the map of civilization on the mind of enlightenment, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994Google Scholar; Alessandro, Stanziani, ‘Free labor–forced labor: an uncertain boundary? The circulation of economic ideas between Russia and Europe from the 18th to the mid-19th century’, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 9, 1, 2008, pp. 27–52Google Scholar;

10 Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiskoi Imperii (Full collection of laws of the Russian Empire – henceforth PSZ), three series: I: 1649–1825, 46 vols., St Petersburg, 1830; II: 1825–81, 55 vols., St Petersburg, 1830–84; III: 1881–1913, 33 vols., St Petersburg, 1885–1916.

11 Stanley, Engerman, ‘Slavery at different times and places’, American Historical Review, 105, 2, 2000, pp. 480–4Google Scholar;

12 Clarence-Smith, William G., Islam and the abolition of slavery, London: Hurst, 2006, p. 13.Google Scholar

13 Halil Inalcik, ‘Servile labour in the Ottoman Empire’, in Abraham Ascher, Tibor Halasi-Kun, and Bela Kiraly, eds., The mutual effects of the Islamic and Judeo-Christian worlds: the east European patterns, Brooklin, NY: College Press, 1979, pp. 39–40; Yvonne, Seng, ‘Fugitives and factotums: slaves in early sixteenth-century Istanbul’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 39, 2, 1996, pp. 136–69Google Scholar;

14 Alan, Fisher, ‘Muscovy and the Black Sea trade’, Canadian–American Slavic Studies, 6, 4, 1972, pp. 582–93Google Scholar;

15 Materialy po istorii Uzbeskoi, Tadzhikskoi I (Materials for the history of Soviet Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan), part 1, Leningrad: AN SSSR, 1932, pp. 386–97, cited in Richard Hellie, Slavery in Russia, 1450–1725, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982, p. 25, n. 43.

16 Clarence-Smith, Islam pp. 118–19;

17 Sbornik Imperatorskogo Russkogo Istoricheskogo Obshchestvo (Collected works of the Imperial Russian historical society), vol. 41, St Petersburg, 1884, pp. 42–3, 52–3, 104–7, 115–21, 146–57.

18 Toledano, Slavery, p. 8.

19 Thomas, Barrett, ‘Lines of uncertainty: the frontier of the north Caucasus’, Slavic Review, 54, 3, 1995, pp. 578–601Google Scholar; Clarence-Smith, Islam, pp. 13–14.

20 Toledano, Slavery, p. 81; Barkan, ‘Le servage’.

21 Hellie, Slavery, pp. 68–69.

22 Paul of, Aleppo, The travels of Macarius: extracts from the diary of the travels of Macarius, Patriarch of Antioch, ed. by Lady Laura Ridding, London: Oxford University Press, 1936, pp. 28, 76.Google Scholar

23 Khoroshkevich, Aleksandr’ L., Russkoe gosudarstvo v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii kontsa XV–nachala XVI v. (The Russian state in the system of international relations towards the end of the fifteenth and the beginning of the sixteenth century), Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 30–2Google Scholar;

24 David Brion, Davis, Slavery and human progress, New York: Oxford University Press, 1984Google Scholar; Robert Crummey, The formation of Muscovy, 1304–1614, London: Longman, 1987.

25 Vladimirskii-Budanov, Mikhail F., Obzor istorii russkogo prava (Summary of the history of Russian law), sixth edn, Kiev: Izdanie knigoprodstva N. Ia. Oglobina, 1909.Google Scholar

26 Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ Brokgauz-Efron (Encyclopaedia Brokgauz-Efron), vol. 16, St Petersburg: Brokgauz, 1895, entry for krest’ianie (peasant), p. 681. See also Slovar’ russkogo iazika XVIII veka (Dictionary of the Russian language of the eighteenth century), vol. 10, St Petersburg: Sorokin, 1998, entry for krepostnoi.

27 Hellie, Slavery; Kolycheva, Elena I., Kholopstvo i krepostinichestvo, konets XV–XVI vek (The kholopy and enserfment, end of the fifteenth century to sixteenth century), Moskow: Nauka, 1971;Google ScholarViktor M., Paneiakh, Kholopstvo v pervoi polovine XVII veke (Kholopstvo in the first half of the seventeenth century), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984.Google Scholar

28 Richard, Hellie, ‘Recent Soviet historiography on medieval and early modern Russian slavery’, Russian Review, 35, 1, 1976, pp. 1–36Google Scholar; Herbert, Leventer, ‘Comments on Richard Hellie’s ‘Recent Soviet historiography on medieval and early modern Russian slavery’, Russian Review, 36, 1, 1977, pp. 64–7Google Scholar; Richard, Hellie, ‘Reply’, Russian Review, 36, 1, 1977, pp. 68–75Google Scholar;

29 Marshall, Poe, ‘What did Russians mean when they called themselves “slaves of the tsar”?’, Slavic Review, 57, 3, 1998, pp. 585–608Google Scholar;

30 Out of 2,499 documents with the words kholop or kholopostvo, 2,116 refer to the kabal’noe variety (Hellie, Slavery, p. 33). Examples of contracts are in the Saltykov-Shchedrin Library in St Petersburg, manuscript section, Obshchee sobranie gramot, nos. 1727, 1937, 1941, 2017, 2019, 2348, 2406, 2635, 2672, 3026, 3081, 3392, 3475, 3486.

31 Cherepnin, L. V. and Bakhrushin, S. V., eds.,Dokumenty i dogorovnye gramoty velikikh i udel’nykh kniazei XIV–XVI vv. (Documents and acts decreed by princes, fourteenth to sixteenth centuries), Moskow: Nauka, 1950, p. 409–n. 98Google Scholar;

32 Paneiakh, Kholopstvo; Viktor, Paneiakh, ‘Ulozhenie 1597 g. o kholopstve’ (‘Ulozhenie of 1597 on kholopstvo’), Istoricheskie Zapiski, 77, 1955, pp. 154–89.Google Scholar

33 In 1609, this was reduced from six to five months, and was further reduced to three months in 1649: Akty istoricheskie, sobrannye i izdannye arkheograficheskoiu kommissieiu (Historical acts, collected and published by the Archaeographical Commission), 5 vols., St Petersburg, 1841–2, vol. 2, no. 85.

34 Paneiakh, ‘Ulozhenie 1597’, p. 161.

35 Paneiakh, Viktor M., Kabal’noe kholopstvo na Rusi v XVI veke (Temporary limited servants in Russia in the sixteenth century), Leningrad: Nauka, 1967, pp. 127–8Google Scholar;

36 Vladimirskii-Budanov, Mikhail F., Khristomatiia po istorii russkogo prava (Compendium of the history of Russian law), St Petersburg: Izdanie knigoprodstva N. Ia. Oglobina, 1875, vol. 3, pp. 29–30, 41Google Scholar;

37 Paneiakh, Kabal’noe; Iakovlev, Aleksandr’ I., Kholopstvo i kholopy v moskovskom gosudarstve XVII v. (Kholopstvo and kholopy in the Russian state in the seventeenth century), Moskow: Nauka, 1943.Google Scholar

38 Hellie, Slavery, p. 75; Iakovlev, Kholopstvo, p. 316.

39 Opisanie dokumentov i bumag, khraniashchikhsia v moskovskom arkhive ministerstva iustitsii (Inventory of documents and papers kept in the Moscow Archives of the Ministry of Justice), vol. 15, St Petersburg, 1908.

40 Petr Ivanovich, Ivanov, Alfavitnyi ukazatel’ familii i lits, upominaemykh v boiarkikh knigach, khraniashchikhsia v l-m otdelenii moskovskogo arkhiva ministerstva iustitsii, (Alphabetical index of families and persons named in the boyari books, conserved in the first section of the Moscow Archives of the Ministry of Justice), Moskow: Ministerstvo Iustitsii, 1853.Google Scholar

41 Hellie, Slavery, p. 211.

42 Kolycheva, Kholopstvo; Paneiakh, Kholopstvo.

43 Hellie, Slavery, pp. 423–4.

44 Anne, Kussmaul, Servants in husbandry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

45 Gyan, Prakash, ‘Terms of servitude: the colonial discourse on slavery and bondage in India’, in Martin, Klein ed., Breaking the chains: slavery, bondage and emancipation in modern Africa and Asia, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986, pp. 131–49Google Scholar; Zurndorfer, Harriet T., Change and continuity in Chinese local history: the development of Hui-chou Prefecture, 800 to 1800, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1989, notably ch. 5.Google Scholar

46 Clarence-Smith, Islam, pp. 74–80; Toledano, Slavery.

47 Steinfeld, Invention, p. 11; David Galenson, White servitude in colonial America: an economic analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

48 Emmer, Pieter C., ed.,Colonialism and migration: indentured labour before and after slavery, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Klein, Breaking the chains.

49 Steinfeld, Invention; Galenson, White servitude; David, Northrup, Indentured labor in the age of imperialism, 1834–1922, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

50 Hellie, Slavery; Hellie, Enserfment.

51 Emmer, Colonialism; Klein, Breaking the chains.

52 Daniel, Kaiser, The growth of law in medieval Russia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980Google Scholar; Dmitri, Grekov, Sudebniki XV–XVII vekov, Moskow: Akademia Nauk SSSR, 1952.Google Scholar

53 Archives of Ancient Russia (henceforth RGADA), pistsovye knigi (cadastral documents) in numerous collections, including: fond 1239, opis’ 3, chast 17, 69–72, 74, 76, 86–7; fond 396, opis’ 2, chast 5 (1616–1732); fond 1209, opis’ 1, chast 1–3, opis’ 2, chast 1–2, opis’ 16–72.

54 Hellie, Enserfment, p. 142; Daniel Morrison, Trading peasants and urbanization in eighteenth-century Russia: the central industrial region, London: Longman, 1987. RGADA, fond 294, opis’ 2.

55 RGADA, fond 615. John Bushnell, ‘Did serf owners control serf marriage? Orlov serfs and their neighbours, 1773–1861’, Slavic Review, 52, 3, 1993, pp. 419–45.

56 David, Moon, ‘Peasant migration and the settlement of Russian frontiers, 1550–1897’, Historical Journal, 40, 4, 1997, pp. 859–93Google Scholar; Williard, Sunderland, ‘Peasants on the move: state peasant resettlement in imperial Russia, 1805–1830’, Russian Review, 52, 4, 1993, pp. 472–85Google Scholar; Bruk, Serguei I. and Kabuzan, Vladimir M., ‘Dinamika chislennosti i rasselenie russkogo etnosa, 1678–1917’ (‘Quantitative dynamics of Russian ethnic groups, 1678–1917’), Sovetskaya Istoriografiya, 4, 1982, pp. 9–25Google Scholar;

57 Ulozhenie, ch. 11, n. 10.

58 Thousands of certificates were delivered every year: RGADA, fond 615; Bushnell, ‘Serf owners’.

59 Governors’ reports detail the regional specialization: RGADA, fond 1281, in particular of St Petersburg area: opis’ 6; Smolensk: opis’ 6; Moscow: opis’ 5; Vladimir: opis’ 4; Kaluga: opis’ 6.

60 Indova, Elena I., ‘O rossiskikh manufakturakh vtoroi poloviny XVIII v.’ (‘On Russian manufacturing during the second half of the eighteenth century’), in Istoricheskaia geografiia Rossii: XIX–nachalo XX v. Moscow: Nauka, 1975, pp. 248–345Google Scholar;

61 RGADA, fond 291, several files; also in Elise Kimerling Wirtschafter, Structures of society, Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois Press, 1994, p. 181, n. 85. On trading serfs, see RGADA, fond 1287, opis’ 3.

62 RGADA, fond 615 (‘krepostnye knigi mestnyjh uchrezhdenii XVI–XVIII v’ – ‘register of the deeds of local institutions, sixteenth–eighteenth century’, opis’ 1; fond 294, opis’ 1–3.

63 PSZ, series I, vol. 8, no. 5633. See also Blum, Lord and peasant, pp. 358–62.

64 PSZ, series I, vol. 12, nos. 9332, 9367.

65 François-Xavier, Coquin, La Grande commission législative 1767–1768: les cahiers de doléances urbains, province de Moscou, Paris: Publication de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Paris-Sorbonne, 1972, pp. 110 and 161–3Google Scholar;

66 Moscow Archives (henceforth TsGIAM), fond 54. See also Wirtschafter, Structures, pp. 71–4.

67 Otchet ministerstvo iustitsii za 1845, St Petersburg, 1846, p. xix.

68 Steinfeld, Invention.

69 Lauren, Benton, Law and colonial culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002Google Scholar; Michael, Craton, Empire, enslavement and freedom in the Caribbean, Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle, 1997Google Scholar; Marc, Galanter, Law and society in modern India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1989Google Scholar; Douglas, Hay and Paul, Craven, Masters, servants and magistrates in Britain and the Empire, 1562–1955, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2004Google Scholar; Alan, Watson, Slave law in the Americas, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1989.Google Scholar

70 Wirtschafter, Structures; Virginia, Martin, Law and custom in the steppe: the Kazakh of the Middle Horde and Russian colonialism in the nineteenth century, Richmond: Curzon Press, 2001Google Scholar; Jane, Burbank, Russian peasants go to court: legal culture in the countryside, 1906–1917, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2004Google Scholar; Kritika, special issues, 6, 1, 2005 and 7, 1, 2006. Russian historiography offers more on the pre-emancipation period: Natalia.N. Efremova, Sudoustroistvo Rossii v XVIII–pervoi polovine XIXe v (The judicial organization of Russia, eighteenth century to first half of the nineteenth century), Moscow: Nauka, 1993; Ekaterina A. Pravilova, Zakonnost’ I prava lichnosti: administrativnaia iustitsiia v Rossii, vtoraia polovina XIX v.–oktiabr’ 1917 (Legality and the rights of the person: administrative justice in Russia, second half of the nineteenth century to October 1917), St Petersburg: SZAGS, 2000.

71 Hellie, Slavery, pp. 194–8; Russkaia istoricheskaia biblioteka, 17, 1898, pp. 106–7, nn. 298–9.

72 A.K. Leont’ev, Obrazovanie prikaznoi sistemy upravleniia v russkom gosudarstve. Iz istorii sozdaniia tsentralizovannogo gosudarstvennogo apparata v kontse XV–pervoi polovine XVI v. (The formation of a chancellery system in the Russian state: history of the formation of the centralized state, fifteenth–sixteenth century), Moscow: Moskovskii Universitet, 1961, pp. 179–92.

73 TsGIAM, fond 54 (Moskovskoe gubernskoe upravlenie), 1783–1917, opis’ 1: for example, delo 56, 284, 966, 1509. Rossiskie Gosudarstvennoie Imperialskie Arkhivi (Russian Imperial Archives – henceforth RGIA), fond 1149, opis’ 2, delo 20 and delo 44. Gosudarstvennie Arkhivi Rossiskoi Federatsii (State Archives of the Russian Federation – henceforth GARF), fond 109, opis’ 3, delo 1885.

74 Moon, Abolition; Blum, Lord and peasant; Hoch, Serfdom; Daniel Saunders, Russia in the age of reaction and reform, 1801–1881, London: Longman, 1992.

75 RGIA, fond 1149, opis’ 2, delo 90. See also Wirtschafter, Structures, p. 84.

76 PSZ, series II, vol. 20, no. 19283, vol. 22, no. 20825; RGIA, fond 1149, opis’ 3, delo 125.

77 Svod zakonov rossiskoi imperii (Collection of laws of the Russian Empire), St Petersburg, 1832, vol. 9, art. 674–80, 1833, art. 1148–84, 1857.

78 P. V. Keppen (P. V. Köppen), Deviataia reviziia: issledovanie o chisle zhitelei v Rossii v 1851 godu (The ninth census: study on the population of Russia in 1851), St Petersburg, 1857, pp. 6, 7, 21, 88, 95–100, 127, 142–4, 152, 159.

79 RGIA, fond 1149, opis’ 2, delo 20. See also Wirtschafter, Structures, pp. 79, 119.

80 Law of 1847, in PSZ, series II, vol. 22, no. 20825.

81 Steven Hoch and Wilson Augustine, ‘The tax census and the decline of the serf population in imperial Russia, 1833–1858’, Slavic Review 38, 3, 1979, pp. 403–25.

82 Hoch and Augustine, ‘Tax census’; Moon, Abolition.

83 Field, End of serfdom, pp. 77–83.

84 Hoch, Serfdom, Peter, Gatrell, The tsarist economy, 1850–1917, London: Longman, 1986Google Scholar; Moon, Abolition; Paul, Gregory, Before command: an economic history of Russia from emancipation to the first five-year plan, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

85 Edgar Melton, ‘The decline of Prussian Gutsherrschaft and the rise of the Junker as rural patron’, German History, 12, 1994, pp. 334–50; William Hagen, ‘Village life in East-Elbian Germany and Poland, 1400–1800’, in Tom Scott, Peasantries, pp. pp. 145–90; Sheilagh, Ogilvie, ‘Communities and the second serfdom in early modern Bohemia’, Past and Present, 187, 2005, pp. 69–119.Google Scholar

86 Hagen ‘Village life’, p. 149.

87 Robert, Frost, ‘The nobility of Poland-Lithuania, 1569–1795’, in Hamish, Scott, ed., The European nobilities in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, vol. II: Northern, Central and Eastern Europe, London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 183–222Google Scholar; Hagen, ‘Village life’; W. Hagen, ‘Capitalism and the countryside in early modern Europe: interpretations, models, debates’, Agricultural History, 62, 1988, pp. 13–47.

88 Hagen, ‘Village life’, p. 175.

89 Hartmut, Harnisch, ‘Bäuerliche Ökonomie und Mentalität unter den Bedingungen den ostelbischen Gutsherrschaft in den letzten Jahrzehenten vor Beginn der Agrarreformen’, Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 24, 3, 1989, pp. 87–108Google Scholar;

90 Hartmut, Harnisch, Kapitalistische Agrarreform und Industrielle Revolution, Weimar: Böhlau, 1989.Google Scholar