Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:07:41.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The industrial revolution, an unintended consequence of self-defence?

Part of: The Industrial Revolution as a Global Conjuncture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

Leandro Prados de la Escosura
Leandro Prados de la Escosura*
Affiliation:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Spain
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rejoinder
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 159 - 164
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R.C. Enclosures and the Yeomen. The Agricultural Development of the South Midlands 1450–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Allen, R.C. ‘Engels’ Pause: Technical Change, Capital Accumulation, and Inequality in the British Industrial Revolution.’ Explorations in Economic History 46 (2009b): 418–35.10.1016/j.eeh.2009.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R.C. The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, J. The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783. New York: Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar
Brezis, Elise S. ‘Foreign Capital Flows in the Century of Britain’s Industrial Revolution: New Estimates, Controlled Conjectures.’ Economic History Review 48, no. 1 (1995): 46–67.10.2307/2597870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S.N. and de Pleijt, A.. Capital and Economic Growth in Britain, 1270–1870: Preliminary Findings, CEPR Discussion Paper 15889, 2021.Google Scholar
Capie, F. ‘Money and Economic Development in Eighteenth-century England.’ In Exceptionalism and Industrialisation. Britain and its European Rivals, 1688–1815, edited by Prados de la Escosura, L., 216–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. The First Industrial Revolution: A Guided Tour for Growth Economists.’ American Economic Review 86, no. 2 (1996): 197–201.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. ‘The Sources of the British Economic Growth since the Industrial Revolution: Not the Same Old Story.’ Journal of Economic Surveys 35, no. 3 (2021): 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. and Mills, T.C. ‘Six Centuries of British Economic Growth: A Time-Series Perspective.’ European Review of Economic History 21 (2017): 141–58.10.1093/ereh/hew020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. and Mills, T.C.. Consider the Counterfactual: Real Wages in the First Industrial Revolution, CAGE Working Paper 502, 2020. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/manage/publications/wp502.2020.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P.A. and Wright, G., ‘Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance.’ Industrial and Corporate Change 6, no. 2 (1997): 203–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, S.L. ‘Institutional Change and British Supremacy, 1650–1850: Some Reflections.’ In Exceptionalism and Industrialisation. Britain and Its European Rivals, 1688–1815, edited by Prados de la Escosura, L., 261–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernihough, A. and O’Rourke, K.H., ‘Coal and the European Industrial Revolution.’ Economic Journal 131 (2021): 1135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C.K. ‘Reassessing the Industrial Revolution: a Macro View’, in The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, edited by Mokyr, J. 171–226, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harley, C.K. ‘Foreign Trade: Comparative Advantage and Performance.’ In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, I, edited by Floud, R. and McCloskey, D., 1994, 300–331.Google Scholar
Humphries, J. and Weisdorf, J.. ‘Unreal Wages? Real Income and Economic Growth in England, 1260–1850.’ Economic Journal 129 (2019): 2867–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M., Gráda, C. Ó., and Mokyr, J.. The Mechanics of the Industrial Revolution, UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper 20-16, 2020. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/228196/1/1701742233.pdf Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. Modern Economic Growth. Rate, Structure, and Spread. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Landes, D. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Ch. ‘The European Origins of British Technological Predominance.’ In Exceptionalism and Industrialisation. Britain and its European Rivals, 1688–1815, edited by Prados de la Escosura, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathias, P. and O’Brien, P.K.. ‘Taxation in England and France, 1715–1810.’ Journal of European Economic History 5 (1976): 601–50.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.N. and Thomas, R.P. ‘Overseas Trade and Empire.’ In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, edited by Floud, R. and McCloskey, D., I, 1981, 87–102.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. ‘Bottom-up or Top-down? The Origins of the Industrial Revolution.’ Journal of Institutional Economics, 14, no. 6: 1003–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, J., The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Neal, L. The Rise of Financial Capitalism: International Capital in the Age of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Neal, L. ‘The Monetary, Financial and Political Architecture of Europe, 1648–1815.’ in Exceptionalism and Industrialisation. Britain and its European Rivals, 1688–1815, edited by Prados de la Escosura, L., 173–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
North, D.C. and Weingast, B.R. ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice.’ Journal of Economic History 49 (1989): 802–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. ‘The Political Economy of British Taxation, 1660–1815.’ Economic History Review 41, no. 1 (1988): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. ‘The Impact of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars, 1793–1815, on the Long Run Growth of the British Economy.’ Review 12, no. 3 (1989): 335–95.Google Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. ‘Path Dependency, or Why Britain became an Urbanized and Industrialized Economy Long Before France.’ Economic History Review 49 (1996): 213–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. ‘A Conjuncture in Global History or an Anglo-American Construct: The British Industrial Revolution, 1700–1850.’ Journal of Global History 5 (2010): 503–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. ‘The Costs and Benefits of Mercantilist Warfare.’ Financial History Review 25, no. 1 (2018): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. and Engerman, S.L.. ‘Exports and the growth of the British economy, 1688–1802.’ in Slavery and the Rise of the Atlantic System, edited by Solow, B., 177–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P.K. and Keyder, Ç.. Two Paths to the 20th Century: Economic Growth in Britain and France 1789–1914. London: Allen & Unwin, 1978.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, K. The Great Divergence: Europe, China and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. and Rodríguez-Caballero, C.V.. ‘Growth, War, and Pandemics: Europe in the Very Long-run.’ EHES Working Paper in Economic History no. 185, 2020. http://www.ehes.org/EHES_185.pdf Google Scholar
Rostow, W.W. The Stages of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Williamson, J.G. Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality? London: Allen and Unwin, 1985.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. ‘Continuity, Chance, and Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. ‘The Classical Economists, the Stationary State, and the Industrial Revolution.’ In Was the Industrial Revolution Necessary?, edited by Snooks, G. 27–42, London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar