Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:35:21.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The global process of thinking global literature: from Marx’s Weltliteratur to Sarkozy’s littérature-monde

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Jernej Habjan
Jernej Habjan*
Affiliation:
Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article outlines the history of research in global literature as a history that is itself global. This kind of global history of the theorization of global literature demands a departure from the existing accounts and their nascent gap between heated theoreticist debates and pacifying historicist anthologies. A global approach to the problematic can bridge this gap because it considers not only what the most influential studies on global literature say, but also where and when they say it. Whether these be Romantic assertions of world literature, post-war pleas for cosmopolitan literature, Cold War polemics about ‘Third World’ literature, or millennial theories of transnational, post-national, planetary, and, indeed, global literature, the article considers not only the object of these studies but also the studies themselves as an object; not only the text but also the context. Hence, a historicization of literary theories of globalization in effect bleeds into a historicization of globalization itself.

Keywords

global literatureglobalizationliterary studiesthe globalworld literature
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 14 , Special Issue 3: Historicizing the global: an interdisciplinary perspective , November 2019 , pp. 395 - 412
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This article was written at the Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts in the framework of the research project ‘May ’68 in literature and theory: the last season of modernism in France, Slovenia, and the world’ (J6-9384) and the research programme ‘Studies in literary history, literary theory and methodology’ (P6-0024), both of which were financed by the Slovenian Research Agency.

References

1 Whitehead, A. N., Process and reality: an essay in cosmology. Gifford Lectures delivered in the University of Edinburgh during the session 1927–1928, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1929, p. 65 Google Scholar.

2 Kirsch, Adam, The global novel: writing the world in the 21st century, New York: Columbia Global Reports, 2016, p. 10 Google Scholar.

3 In this issue, Béatrice Joyeux-Prunel discusses a similar extra-academic source of the global turn in academic art history, namely the globalization of the art market itself. See Béatrice Joyeux-Prunel, ‘Art history and the global: deconstructing the latest canonical narrative’.

4 D’haen, Theo, Damrosch, David, and Kadir, Djelal, eds., The Routledge companion to world literature, London: Routledge, 2012, p. ii Google Scholar; Hassan, Wail S., ‘World literature in the age of globalization: reflections on an anthology’, in Bayapa Reddy, P., ed., Aspects of contemporary world literature, New Delhi: Atlantic, 2008, p. 3 Google Scholar; D’haen, Theo, Domínguez, César, and Rosendahl Thomsen, Mads, ‘Introduction’, in D’haen, Theo, Domínguez, César, and Rosendahl Thomsen, Mads, eds., World literature: a reader, London: Routledge, 2013, p. x Google Scholar; Damrosch, David, ‘Introduction: world literature in theory and practice’, in Damrosch, David, ed., World literature in theory, Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 2014, p. 2 Google Scholar; and Theo D’haen, David Damrosch, and Djelal Kadir, ‘Preface: Weltliteratur, littérature universelle, vishwa sahitya …’, in D’haen, Damrosch, and Kadir, Routledge companion to world literature, p. xx.

5 That the history of globalization spans a few centuries rather than a few decades is also stressed by Romain Lecler, Gustavo Lins Ribeiro, and Ralph Schroeder early on in their contributions to this issue.

6 Huyssen, Andreas, ‘Geographies of modernism in a globalizing world’, in Brooker, Peter and Thacker, Andrew, eds., Geographies of modernism: literatures, cultures, spaces, London: Routledge, 2005, p. 10 Google Scholar.

7 von Goethe, J. W., ‘On Carlyle’s German Romance’, in von Goethe, J. W., The collected works. Volume 3: essays on art and literature, ed. Gearey, John, trans. von Nardroff, Ellen and von Nardroff, Ernest H., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994, p. 207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Wallerstein, Immanuel, World-systems analysis: an introduction, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004, p. 25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Brown, Nicholas, Utopian generations: the political horizon of twentieth-century literature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005, p. 6 Google Scholar.

10 Ludwig Schlözer, August, Isländische Literatur und Geschichte: erster Teil, Göttingen: Johann Christian Dieterich, 1773, p. 2 Google Scholar.

11 See, respectively, Kristmannsson, Gauti, ‘The Nordic turn in German literature’, Edinburgh German Yearbook, 1, 2007, pp. 63–72 Google Scholar; Schamoni, Wolfgang, ‘“Weltliteratur” – zuerst 1773 bei August Ludwig Schlözer’, Arcadia, 43, 2, 2008, pp. 288–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Schamoni, Wolfgang, ‘Ein Postscriptum zu “‘Weltliteratur’ – zuerst 1773 bei August Ludwig Schlözer”’, Arcadia, 46, 2, 2012, pp. 515–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For von Lempicki, Sigmund, see his book Geschichte der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts, Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Rupprecht, 1920, p. 418 Google Scholar.

12 See, respectively, Casanova, Pascale, La république mondiale des lettres, Paris: Seuil, 1999 Google Scholar (translated as The world republic of letters, trans. M. B. DeBevoise, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004); Damrosch, David, What is world literature?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moretti, Franco, La letteratura vista da lontano, Turin: Einaudi, 2005Google Scholar (translated by the author as Graphs, maps, trees: abstract models for literary history, London: Verso, 2005); Pizer, John, The idea of world literature: history and pedagogical practice, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 2006 Google Scholar; Said, Edward W., Humanism and democratic criticism, New York: Columbia University Press, 2004; and Chakravorty Spivak, Gayatri, Death of a discipline, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

13 See, respectively, Apter, Emily, ‘Untranslatables: a world system’, New Literary History, 39, 3, 2008, pp. 591–8Google Scholar; Beecroft, Alexander, ‘World literature without a hyphen: towards a typology of literary systems’, New Left Review, 54, 2008, pp. 87–100 Google Scholar; Cheah, Pheng, ‘What is a world? On world literature as cosmopolitanism’, Daedalus, 137, 3, 2008, pp. 26–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ganguly, Debjani, ‘Deathworlds, the world novel and the human’, Angelaki, 16, 4, 2011, pp. 145–58Google Scholar; Hayot, Eric, ‘On literary worlds’, Modern Language Quarterly, 72, 2, 2011, pp. 129–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; B. Venkat Mani, ‘Bibliomigrancy: book series and the making of world literature’, in D’haen, Damrosch, and Kadir, Routledge companion to world literature, pp. 283–96; Mufti, Aamir R., ‘Orientalism and the institution of world literatures’, Critical Inquiry, 36, 3, 2010, pp. 458–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walkowitz, Rebecca L., ‘Comparison literature’, New Literary History, 40, 3, 2009, pp. 567–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Warwick Research Collective, ‘Peripheral modernisms’, 2008, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/english/research/currentprojects/collective/wrec_papers/ (consulted 4 April 2018).

For the books based on these essays, see, respectively, Apter, Emily, Against world literature: on the politics of untranslatability, London: Verso, 2013; Beecroft, Alexander, An ecology of world literature: from antiquity to the present day, London: Verso, 2015 Google Scholar; Cheah, Pheng, What is a world? On postcolonial literature as world literature, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ganguly, Debjani, This thing called the world: the contemporary novel as global form, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hayot, Eric, On literary worlds, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Venkat Mani, B., Recoding world literature: libraries, print culture, and Germany’s pact with books, New York: Fordham University Press, 2017 Google Scholar; Mufti, Aamir R., Forget English! Orientalisms and world literatures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walkowitz, Rebecca L., Born translated: the contemporary novel in an age of world literature, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Warwick Research Collective, Combined and uneven development: towards a new theory of world-literature, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

14 Quoted in Strich, Fritz, Goethe and world literature, trans. Sym, C. A. M., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1949, p. 350 Google Scholar.

15 Ibid. , p. 351.

16 See Etiemble, René, Essais de littérature (vraiment) générale, Paris: Gallimard, 1975, p. 13 Google Scholar.

17 See Apter, Emily, ‘Global translatio: the “invention” of comparative literature, Istanbul, 1933’, Critical Inquiry, 29, 2, 2003, pp. 260–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 See, respectively, Moretti, Franco, ‘More conjectures’, New Left Review, 20, 2003, p. 80, n. 15; and Orsini, Francesca, ‘India in the mirror of world fiction’, New Left Review, 13, 2002, pp. 81–2Google Scholar.

19 See, respectively, Moretti, Franco, Distant reading, London: Verso, 2013, p. 122, and Apter, Against world literature, pp. 54–6.Google Scholar

20 René Etiemble, ‘Do we have to revise the notion of world literature?’, trans. Theo D’haen, in D’haen, Domínguez, and Thomsen, World literature, pp. 99–100.

21 Meltzl, Hugo, ‘Vorläufige Aufgaben der vergleichenden Literatur, III: der Dekaglottismus’, Acta Comparationis Litterarum Universarum, 2, 10, 1878, pp. 494 Google Scholar.

22 Apter, Against world literature, p. 3.

23 Eckermann, J. P., Conversations with Goethe, ed. Kohn, Hans, trans. O’Brien, Gisela C., New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., 1964, p. 94 Google Scholar.

24 Apter, Against world literature, p. 3.

25 Damrosch, David and Chakravorty Spivak, Gayatri, ‘Comparative literature/world literature: a discussion with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and David Damrosch, Comparative Literature Studies, 48, 4, 2011, p. 483 Google Scholar.

26 Tagore, Rabindranath, ‘Visva Sahitya’, trans. Das, Rijula and Paranjape, Makarand R., in Banerji, Debashish, ed., Rabindranath Tagore in the 21st century: theoretical renewals, New Delhi: Springer, 2015, pp. 286 Google Scholar.

27 See Makarand R. Paranjape, ‘Tagore’s idea of “world literature”’, in Banerji, Rabindranath Tagore, p. 63.

28 Rabindranath Tagore, ‘Visva Sahitya’, pp. 285–6.

29 Ibid., p. 286.

30 Arrighi, Giovanni, Hopkins, Terence K., and Wallerstein, Immanuel, ‘1968: the great rehearsal’, in Boswell, Terry, ed., Revolution in the world-system, New York: Greenwood Press, 1989, p. 19 Google Scholar.

31 See Cheah, What is a world?, p. 63.

32 Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, The communist manifesto, trans. Moore, Samuel, London: Verso, 1998, p. 39 Google Scholar.

33 Romain Lecler also cites Marx and Engels’ paragraph in this issue, suggesting no less than a profound analogy between it and some of the key definitions of the current stage of globalization. See Romain Lecler, ‘What makes globalization really new? Sociological views on our current globalization’, p. 358.

34 Scherr, Johannes, Bildersaal der Weltliteratur: dritte, neu bearbeitete und stark vermehrte Auflage: erster Band, Stuttgart: Kröner, 1885, p. 5 Google Scholar (my translation).

35 Scherr, Johannes, Bildersaal der Weltliteratur: zweite, umgearbeitete, vervollständigte und bis zur Gegenwart fortgeführte Auflage: erster Band, Stuttgart: Kröner, 1869, p. 5 Google Scholar (my translation).

36 Brandes, Georg, ‘World literature (1899)’, trans. Saussy, Haun, in Damrosch, David, Melas, Natalie, and Buthelezi, Mbongiseni, eds., The Princeton sourcebook in comparative literature: from the European Enlightenment to the global present, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009, p. 66 Google Scholar.

37 Hugo Meltzl, ‘Present tasks of comparative literature (1877)’, trans. Hans-Joachim Schulz and Phillip H. Rhein, in Damrosch, Melas, and Buthelezi, Princeton sourcebook, p. 46.

38 Maxim Gorky, ‘World’s literature’, in Katalog izdatel’stva ‘Vsemirnaya literatura’ pri Narodnom komissariate po prosveshcheniyu: vstupitel’naya stat’ya M. Gor’kogo / Catalogue des éditions de la ‘Littérature mondiale’ paraissant sous le patronnage du Commissariat de l’instruction publique: préface de M. Gorky, St Petersburg: Vsemirnaya literatura, 1919, pp. 21–2 (English translation in original publication).

39 Zheng Zhenduo, ‘A view on the unification of literature (1922)’, trans. Guangchen Chen, in Damrosch, World literature in theory, pp. 58–67.

40 Robert Curtius, Ernst, European literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. Trask, Willard R., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013, p. 589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Strich, Goethe and world literature, p. vii.

42 Ibid. , p. viii.

43 Ibid. , pp. viii–ix.

44 Strich, Fritz, Goethe und die Weltliteratur, Bern: Francke Verlag, 1957, p. 9 Google Scholar (my translation).

45 Auerbach, Erich, ‘Philology and Weltliteratur ’, trans. Maire, and Said, Edward, Centennial Review, 13, 1, 1969, p. 3 Google Scholar.

46 Béatrice Joyeux-Prunel notes in this issue how, in Auerbach’s time, his kind of understanding of Weltliteratur found a way both into North American literary departments and into French state policies of art history. See Joyeux-Prunel, ‘Art history and the global’.

47 Bloom, Harold, The Western canon: the books and school of the ages, New York: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1994, p. 203 Google Scholar.

48 See Arrighi, Hopkins, and Wallerstein, ‘1968: the great rehearsal’, pp. 19–30; and Arrighi, Giovanni, Hopkins, Terence K., and Wallerstein, Immanuel, ‘1989, the continuation of 1968’, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 15, 2, 1992, pp. 221–42Google Scholar.

49 Wallerstein, Immanuel, ‘Structural crises’, New Left Review, 62, 2010, p. 136 Google Scholar.

50 Etiemble, Essais de littérature (vraiment) générale, p. 13 (my translation).

51 Ibid. , p. 10.

52 Etiemble, René, ‘Faut-il réviser la notion de Weltliteratur?’, in Jost, François, ed., Actes du IVe Congrès de l’Association internationale de la littérature comparée / Proceedings of the IVth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, 2 vols., The Hague: Mouton, 1966, vol. 1, p. 5–16 Google Scholar; for the English translation, see Etiemble, ‘Do we have to revise?’, pp. 93–103.

53 See Wallerstein, ‘Structural crises’, p. 135.

54 Arrighi, Hopkins, and Wallerstein, ‘1989, the continuation of 1968’, p. 221.

55 Jameson, Fredric, ‘Third-world literature in the era of multinational capitalism’, Social Text, 15, 1986, p. 68 Google Scholar.

56 Ibid.

57 Ahmad, Aijaz, ‘Jameson’s rhetoric of Otherness and the “national allegory”’, Social Text, 17, 1987, p. 4 Google Scholar.

58 Ibid. , p. 3.

59 See Ahmad, Aijaz, In theory: classes, nations, literatures, London: Verso, 1992, pp. 10–11 Google Scholar.

60 D’haen, Theo, The Routledge concise history of world literature, London: Routledge, 2011, p. 68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 See Lawall, Sarah, ed., Reading world literature: theory, history, practice, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1994.Google Scholar

62 See Ďurišin, Dionýz, Čo je svetová literatúra?, Bratislava: Obzor, 1992Google Scholar; see also Ďurišin, Dionýz, ‘World literature as a target literary-historical category’, Slovak Review, 2, 1, 1993, pp. 7–15 Google Scholar.

63 Quoted in Etiemble, ‘Do we have to revise?’, p. 94.

64 D’haen, Routledge concise history of world literature, p. 68. For the impact of 9/11 on the methodological globalization of art history, see Joyeux-Prunel in this issue, ‘Art history and the global’.

65 Moretti, Distant reading, p. 43.

66 For an extreme example of how a single academic unit can impact an entire scholarly discipline, see, in this issue, Katja Naumann’s discussion of the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago in ‘Long-term and decentred trajectories of doing history from a global perspective: institutionalization, post-colonial critique, and empiricist approaches, before and after the 1970s’.

67 Akeel Bilgrami, ‘Foreword’, in Said, Humanism and democratic criticism, p. ix.

68 Said, Humanism and democratic criticism, p. 7.

69 Ibid. , p. xvi.

70 Casanova, World republic of letters, p. 351.

71 Moretti, Distant reading, p. 43.

72 Franco Moretti, ‘Conjectures on world literature’, New Left Review, 1, 2000, pp. 55, 57, emphasis in original.

73 Ibid. , p. 57.

74 Moretti, ‘More conjectures’, p. 81.

75 See Spivak, Death of a discipline, pp. 107–9, n. 1.

76 Ibid. , p. xii.

77 Ibid. , p. 84.

78 Eric Hayot, ‘World literature and globalization’, in D’haen, Damrosch, and Kadir, Routledge companion to world literature, p. 226.

79 Damrosch, What is world literature?, p. 299, emphasis in original.

80 Beecroft, ‘World literature without a hyphen’, pp. 87–91.

81 Ibid. , p. 98.

82 Besides Beecroft and Hayot, see especially Cheah, What is a world?, pp. 31–7; Ganguly, This thing called the world, pp. 22, 78; Mufti, Forget English!, pp. 32–4; and Warwick Research Collective, Combined and uneven development, pp. 6–10.

83 Hayot, ‘World literature and globalization’, p. 225.

84 Ibid. , p. 226.

85 See Gupta, Suman, Globalization and literature, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009, pp. 142–5; and Juvan, Marko, Literary studies in reconstruction: an introduction to literature, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2011, pp. 73–86 Google Scholar.

86 Damrosch, What is world literature?, pp. 4–6, 281.

87 Warwick Research Collective, Combined and uneven development, pp. 2–3.

88 Damrosch, David et al., ‘First responses’, Comparative Literature Studies, 53, 3, 2016, p. 528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 See, for instance, Melissa Dinsman, ‘The digital in the humanities: an interview with Franco Moretti’, Los Angeles Review of Books, 2 March 2016, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-digital-in-the-humanities-an-interview-with-franco-moretti/ (consulted 4 April 2018); and Arno Widmann, ‘Vom Lesen ohne zu lesen: Interview Franco Moretti’, Frankfurter Rundschau, 5 February 2015, https://www.fr.de/kultur/literatur/lesen-ohne-lesen-11688754.html (consulted 27 June 2019).

90 Apter, Against world literature, pp. 45–56.

91 See, respectively, Apter, ‘Global translatio, pp. 255–6, 280–1; Apter, ‘Untranslatables’, pp. 590–7; and Apter, Against world literature, pp. 52–6.

92 Apter, Against world literature, p. 18.

93 ‘Toward a “world-literature” in French’, trans. Daniel Simon, World literature today, 83, 2, 2009, pp. 54, 56.

94 Le Bris, Michel and Rouaud, Jean, eds., Pour une littérature-monde, Paris: Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar

95 Nicolas Sarkozy, ‘For a living and popular francophonie (2007)’, trans. Delia Ungureanu, in Damrosch, World literature in theory, pp. 276, 277.

96 Ibid. , p. 277.

97 David Damrosch, introduction to Sarkozy, ‘For a living and popular francophonie’, in Damrosch, World literature in theory, p. 276.

98 D’haen, Domínguez, and Thomsen, ‘Introduction’, p. xi, emphasis in original.

99 Foucault, Michel, ‘What is Enlightenment?’, trans. Porter, Catherine, in Foucault, The Foucault reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul, trans. Bouchard, Donald F. et al., New York: Pantheon Books, 1984, pp. 37–9Google Scholar.

100 Bakhtin, Mikhail, ‘Epic and novel’, in The Dialogic Imagination, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981, pp. 13–38Google Scholar.