Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:07:29.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A conjuncture in global history or an Anglo-American construct: the British Industrial Revolution, 1700–1850

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2010

Patrick O’Brien
Patrick O’Brien
Affiliation:
London School of Economics, UK E-mail: p.o’[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 503 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Patrick O’Brien, ‘Provincializing the First Industrial Revolution’, Working Paper 17/06 of the Global Economic History Network (GEHN), London School of Economics, January 2006, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22474/1/wp17.pdf (consulted 7 July 2010).

2 Vide the text by Martin Daunton, Progress and poverty: an economic and social history of Britain 1700–1850, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, and the collection of survey essays edited by Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson, The Cambridge economic history of modern Britain, volume 1: Industrialisation, 1700–1860, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

3 Lyons, John S., Cain, Louis P. and Williamson, Samuel H. (eds.), Reflections on the cliometric revolution, London: Routledge, 2008Google Scholar.

4 McCloskey, Deirdre, The bourgeois virtues: ethics for an age of commerce, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Israel, Jonathan I., Enlightenment contested: philosophy, modernity, and the emancipation of man 1670–1750, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar.

6 Kuznets, Simon, Modern economic growth: rate, structure and spread, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966Google Scholar.

7 Harris, J. R., Essays in industry and technology in the eighteenth century, Aldershot: Variorum, 1992Google Scholar.

8 Wrigley, E. A., Continuity, chance and change: the character of the Industrial Revolution in England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 These ideas and connections have also been explored by two other major and recent projects in European history. Vide Penelope Gouk (ed.), The Achievement Project 1990–95, Oxford, 1996; and Stefan R. Epstein and Maarten Prak (eds.), Guilds, innovation and the European economy, 1400–1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

10 Fox, Celina, The arts of industry in the Age of Enlightenment, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2009Google Scholar.

11 Musson, A. E. and Robinson, Eric, Science and technology in the Industrial Revolution, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1969Google Scholar.

12 These unpalatable and contestable views, which are in line with mainstream views of the period, will appear in a chapter written with Xavier Duran in Richard Unger (ed.), Shipping efficiency and economic growth 1350–1800, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, forthcoming 2010.