Article contents
Mega-structures of the Middle Ages: the construction of religious buildings in Europe and Asia, c.1000–1500*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 October 2011
Abstract
How did medieval builders manage to construct some of the tallest structures in the world without access to modern engineering theories? Construction drawings were limited to details and, with only a handful exceptions, manuals for builders only appeared in the late fifteenth century. By implication, the relevant knowledge had to be transferred on a personal basis. Its underlying principles must therefore have been reasonably simple. This article shows how a modular design, combined with on-site experimentation, guided much of the construction work on large projects such as European cathedrals, Middle Eastern mosques, Indian temples, and Chinese pagoda towers.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2011
References
1 Scott, Robert A., The Gothic enterprise: a guide to understanding the medieval cathedral, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003, ch. 1Google Scholar. The term ‘Latin West’ is used here because I also discuss the Byzantine empire, which was partly located in Europe. To avoid cumbersome description, I will henceforth use the word ‘Europe’ to stand in for the Latin West.
2 Kimpel, Dieter and Suckale, Robert, Die gotische Architektur in Frankreich 1130–1270, Munich: Hirmer Verlag, 1985, pp. 67–76Google Scholar. Compare Elena Paskaleva, ‘The architecture of the Four-Īwān building tradition as a representation of paradise and dynastic power aspirations’, PhD thesis, Leiden University, 2010.
3 Campbell, James W. P., Brick: a world history, London: Thames & Hudson, 2003, ch. 3Google Scholar.
4 Ibid., p. 92.
5 Dumarçay, Jacques and Royère, Pascal, Cambodian architecture, eighth to thirteenth centuries, trans. and ed. by Michael Smithies, Handbook of Oriental Studies, section 3: South-East Asia, vol. 12, Leiden: Brill, 2001, p. 109Google Scholar.
6 Mark, Robert and Çakmak, Ahmet Ş., eds. Hagia Sophia from the age of Justinian to the present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar; Ousterhout, Robert, Master builders of Byzantium, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999Google Scholar.
7 Michell, George, ed. Architecture of the Islamic world: its history and social meaning, London: Thames & Hudson, 1984, pp. 209–80Google Scholar. Other surveys include Creswell, K. A. C., A short account of early Muslim architecture, revised and supplemented by James W. Allan, Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1989Google Scholar; Hillenbrand, Robert, Islamic architecture: form, function and meaning, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994, pp. 66–128Google Scholar; Shokooy, M., Muslim architecture of South India, London: Routledge, 2002Google Scholar.
8 Referring to Pomeranz, Kenneth, The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000Google Scholar, and the subsequent debate about the argument found in that book, in the pages of this journal, and elsewhere.
9 Other examples include Karel Davids, ‘River control and the evolution of knowledge: a comparison between regions in China and Europe, c. 1400–1800’, Journal of Global History 1, 1, 2006, pp. 59–80, and Finlay, Robert, The pilgrim art: cultures of porcelain in world history, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2010Google Scholar.
10 Epstein, Steven A., An economic and social history of later medieval Europe, 1000–1500, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 190–215Google Scholar.
11 Mokyr, Joel, The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002, ch. 1Google Scholar.
12 Ibid., p. 13.
13 This approach has been particularly inspired by the works of John James and Robert Mark cited in nn. 6, 15, 18, 21, 49, 65, and 94, as well as by Mark, Robert, ed. Architectural technology up to the Scientific Revolution: the art and structure of large-scale buildings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993Google Scholar.
14 Wilson, Christopher, The Gothic cathedral: the architecture of the great church 1130–1530, London: Thames & Hudson, 2000, pp. 69–70Google Scholar; Addis, Bill, Building: 3000 years of design engineering and construction, London: Phaidon, 2007, pp. 95–9Google Scholar.
15 James, John, The template-makers of the Paris Basin, Leura, New South Wales: West Grinstead Nominees, 1989, ch. 9Google Scholar.
16 Wilson, Gothic cathedral, p. 74.
17 Pfefferkorn, Rudolf, Norddeutsche Backsteingotik, Hamburg: Christians, 1984Google Scholar.
18 Mark, Robert, Light, wind, and structure: the mystery of the master builders, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990, ch. 2Google Scholar.
19 Ball, Philip, Universe of stone: a biography of Chartres cathedral, New York: Harper Collins, 2008, ch. 8Google Scholar; also Heyman, Jacques, The stone skeleton: structural engineering of stone masonry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Jean Gimpel, The medieval machine: the industrial revolution of the Middle Ages, London: Victor Gollancz, 1977 (originally published as La révolution industrielle du Moyen Âge), p. 121.
21 Alan Borg and Robert Mark, ‘Chartres cathedral: a reinterpretation of its structure’, Art Bulletin, 55, 1973, pp. 367–72; M. Wolfe and R. Mark, ‘Gothic cathedral buttressing: the experiment at Bourges and its influence’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 33, 1974, pp. 17–26; William Clark and Robert Mark, ‘The first flying buttresses: a new reconstruction of the nave of Notre-Dame de Paris’, Art Bulletin, 66, 1984, pp. 47–65; Mark, Light, ch. 1 and pp. 108–22.
22 Hill, Donald, A history of engineering in classical and medieval times, London: Croom Helm, 1984, p. 99Google Scholar.
23 See Coldstream, Nicola, Masons and sculptors: medieval craftsmen, London: British Museum Press, 1991, p. 60Google Scholar. For modern laboratory experiments on Gothic constructions, see the works of Robert Mark, esp. Light.
24 Ousterhout, Byzantium, p. 12.
25 Vogt-Göknil, Ulya, Die Moschee: Grundformen sakraler Baukunst, Zürich: Verlag für Architektur, 1978, pp. 22, 26Google Scholar; Creswell, Muslim architecture, p. 16.
26 Stierlin, Henri, Islam von Bagdad bis Córdoba: frühe Bauwerke vom 7. bis 13. Jahrhundert, Hong Kong: Taschen, 2009, pp. 28, 32, 48, 52Google Scholar.
27 Metin Ahunbay and Zeynep Ahunbay, ‘Structural influence of Hagia Sophia on Ottoman mosque architecture’, in Mark and Çakmak, Hagia Sophia, p. 180.
28 Kuran, Aptullah, Sinan: the grand old master of Ottoman architecture, Istanbul: Ada Press, 1987Google Scholar; Hillenbrand, Robert, Islamic art and architecture, London: Thames & Hudson, 1999, p. 264Google Scholar.
29 Watson, William, The arts of China 900–1620, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000, pp. 67–72Google Scholar.
30 Watson, China, ch. 5; also Ernst Börschmann, Die Baukunst und religiöse Kultur der Chinesen, vol. 3: Pagoden, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1931.
31 Guo, Qinghua, Chinese architecture and planning: ideas, methods, techniques, Stuttgart: Edition Axel Menges, 2005, ch. 5Google Scholar.
32 Watson, Arts of China, p. 78.
33 Else Glahn, ‘Chinese building standards in the 12th century’, Scientific American, 244, 5, 1981, p. 132; Ledderose, Lothar, Ten thousand things: module and mass production in Chinese art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 106, 110Google Scholar.
34 Guo, Chinese architecture, p. 64.
35 Günther Binding, in collaboration with Annas, Gabriele, Jost, Bettina, and Schunicht, Anne, Baubetrieb im Mittelalter, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1993, pp. 272–6Google Scholar.
36 Scott, Gothic enterprise, p. 40.
37 Spiro L. Kostof, ‘The architect in the Middle Ages, east and west’, in Kostof, Spiro L., ed. The architect: chapters in the history of the profession, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000, p. 83Google Scholar.
38 Binding, Baubetrieb im Mittelalter, pp. 284–5.
39 Kolman, C. J., Naer de eisch van ’t werck: de organisatie van het bouwen te Kampen 1450–1650, Utrecht: Matrijs, 1993, chs. 7 and 9Google Scholar.
40 S. R. Epstein, ‘Transferring technical knowledge and innovation in Europe, c.1200–c.1800’, unpublished paper for the Economic History Association Annual Conference, San Jose, September 2004.
41 Salzman, L. F., Building in England down to 1540: a documentary history, Oxford: Clarendon, 1967, pp. 119, 132–3Google Scholar.
42 Janse, H. and de Vries, D. J., Werk en merk van de steenhouwer: het steenhouwersambacht in de Nederlanden voor 1800, Zwolle: Waanders, 1991, p. 10Google Scholar.
43 Ibid., pp. 10–19.
44 Meischke, R., De gothische bouwtraditie, Amersfoort: Bekking, 1988, pp. 79–84Google Scholar; Merlijn Hurx, ‘Middeleeuwse “pre-fab” in de Nederlanden? De Hollandse kerken van de Antwerpse loodsmeester Evert Spoorwater’, KNOB-Bulletin 106, 2007, pp. 112–34; and Hurx, Merlijn, Architect en aannemer: de opkomst van de bouwmarkt in de Nederlanden, 1350-1530, Nijmegen: Vantilt, 2011Google Scholar.
45 Janse and de Vries, Werk en merk, ch. 5.
46 van Mosselveld, J. H., Keldermans: een architectonisch netwerk in de Nederlanden, The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij, 1987, ch. 1Google Scholar.
47 Fitchen, John, The construction of Gothic cathedrals: a study of medieval vault erection, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961, ch. 2Google Scholar; James W. P. Campbell ‘The carpentry trade in seventeenth-century England’, Georgian Group Journal, 12, 2002, pp. 216–17.
48 Salzman, Building in England, pp. 318–19.
49 James, John, Chartres: the masons who built a legend, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982, p. 41Google Scholar.
50 Barbara Schock-Werner, ‘Bauhütten und Baubetrieb der Spätgotik’, in Legner, Anton, ed. Die Parler und der Schöne Stil 1350–1400: Europäische Kunst unter den Luxemburgern, vol. 3, Cologne: Kunsthalle, 1978, p. 58Google Scholar.
51 Van Tygem, Frieda, Op en om de middeleeuwse bouwwerf: de gereedschappen en toestellen gebruikt bij het bouwen van de vroege middeleeuwen tot omstreeks 1600, Brussels: Paleis der Academiën, 1966, pp. 1–70Google Scholar.
52 Golombek, Lisa, Wilber, Donald, et al., The Timurid architecture of Iran and Turan, 2 vols, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988, vol. 1, pp. 91–2, and vol. 2, pl. 481Google Scholar.
53 Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 65–6; Oleg Grabar and Renata Holod, ‘A tenth-century source for architecture’, in Ihor Sevchenko and Frank E. Sysyn, eds., Eucharisterion: essays presented to Omeljan Pritsak on his sixtieth birthday by his colleagues and students, special issue of Harvard Ukranian Studies 3–4, 1979–80, p. 316.
54 Wulff, Hans E., The traditional crafts of Iran: their development, technology, and influence on Eastern and Western civilizations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966, pp. 102–35Google Scholar.
55 Mayer, L. A., Islamic architects and their works, Geneva: Albert Kundig, 1956, p. 23Google Scholar.
56 Ibid., p. 21; Kostof, ‘Architect’, p. 65; but see also Donald L. Wilber, ‘Builders and craftsmen of Islamic Iran: the earlier periods’, Art and Archaeology Research Papers (AARP), 10, 1976, pp. 31–40.
57 Ronald Lewcock, ‘Architects, craftsmen and builders: materials and techniques’, in Michell, Architecture, pp. 131, 134; Mayer, Islamic architects, p. 28.
58 Shatzmiller, Maya, Labour in the medieval Islamic world, Leiden: Brill, 1994, p. 211Google Scholar.
59 Settar, S., The Hoysala temples, vol. 1: text, Bangalore: Kalā Yātra Publications, 1992, p. 84Google Scholar; Miśhra, Sudhākara Nāth, Gupta art and architecture (with special reference to Madhya Pradesh), New Delhi: Agamkala Prakashan, 1992, pp. 231–6Google Scholar; Foekema, Gerard, Architecture decorated with architecture: later medieval temples of Karnātaka, ad 1000–1300, New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 2003, p. 79Google Scholar.
60 Settar, Hoysala temples, p. 89.
61 Qaisar, Ahsan Jan, Building construction in Mughal India: the evidence from painting, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1988, pp. 11–12Google Scholar.
62 Patel, Alka, Building communities in Gujarāt: architecture and society during the twelfth through fourteenth centuries, Leiden: Brill, 2004, p. 79Google Scholar.
63 Dumarçay and Royère, Cambodian architecture, p. 7.
64 Ruitenbeek, Klaas, Carpentry and building in late imperial China: a study of the fifteenth-century manual Lu Ban Jing, 2nd edition, Leiden: Brill, 1996, pp. 16–17Google Scholar.
65 Lon Shelby and Robert Mark, ‘Late Gothic structural design in the “Instructions” of Lorenz Lechler’, Architectura, 9, 1979, p. 115.
66 Ibid.
67 Lon Shelby, ‘The geometrical knowledge of mediaeval master masons’, Speculum 47, 1972, p. 397.
68 Shelby and Mark, ‘Late Gothic structural design’, p. 117; Paul Frankl, ‘The secret of the mediaeval masons’, Art Bulletin, 27, 1945, p. 49.
69 Scott, Gothic enterprise, p. 106.
70 Shelby and Mark, ‘Late Gothic structural design’, p. 118.
71 Ibid., pp. 118–20.
72 Harvey, John, Mediaeval craftsmen, London: B.T. Batsford, 1975, ch. 5Google Scholar.
73 Radding, Charles M. and Clark, William W., Medieval architecture, medieval learning: builders and masters in the age of Romanesque and Gothic, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992, pp. 37, 48Google Scholar.
74 Scott, Gothic enterprise, pp. 141–2.
75 Mekking, Aart J.J., De dom van bisschop Adalbold II te Utrecht: de architectuur en de rol van een elfde-eeuwse bouwheer, Utrecht: Clavis, 1997, p. 8Google Scholar.
76 François Bucher, ‘Design in Gothic architecture: a preliminary assessment’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 27, 1968, p. 51.
77 Shelby, Lon, ed. Gothic design techniques: the fifteenth-century design booklets of Mathes Roriczer and Hanns Schuttermayer, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977, pp. 84–5Google Scholar.
78 Shelby and Mark, ‘Late Gothic structural design’, pp. 124–6.
79 James S. Ackerman, ‘“Ars sine scientia nihil est”: Gothic theory of architecture at the cathedral of Milan’, Art Bulletin, 31, 1949, pp. 84–111.
80 Kimpel and Suckale, Gothische Architektur, pp. 45–54; Hiscock, Nigel, The symbol at your door: number and geometry in religious architecture of the Greek and Latin Middle Ages, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007Google Scholar; Ball, Universe of stone, ch. 5.
81 Shelby and Mark, ‘Late Gothic structural design’, p. 115.
82 Pacey, Arnold, Medieval architectural drawing: English craftsmen’s methods and their later persistence (c.1200–1700), Stroud: Tempus, 2007, pp. 59, 139Google Scholar; Gerbino, Anthony and Johnston, Stephen, Compass and rule: architecture as mathematical practice in England, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2009, ch. 1Google Scholar; Ackerman, James S., Origins, imitation, conventions: representation in the visual arts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, p. 31Google Scholar. Bucher, ‘Design’, disagrees, but his examples refer to late Gothic.
83 Salzman, Building in England, p. 520. Radding and Clark, Medieval architecture, ch. 7, argue that there was a single individual who designed the whole building, but fail to address the implications of the fact that the execution of that design usually took many generations, and was thus subject to numerous personnel changes among the builders in charge of the project.
84 Meischke, Gothische bouwtraditie, p. 163.
85 James, Template-makers, pp. 119, 198.
86 Pacey, Medieval architectural drawing, esp. ch. 2.
87 Lon Shelby, ‘Medieval mason’s tools: the level and the plumb rule’, Technology and Culture, 2, 1961, pp. 127–30.
88 James, Template-makers, chs. 2 and 7.
89 Ibid.
90 Ibid., 86.
91 Harvey, Mediaeval craftsmen, p. 126; Janse and de Vries, Werk en merk, p. 50.
92 James, Template-makers, p. 34.
93 Clark and Mark, ‘Flying buttresses’; Mark, Light, p. 105.
94 M. Wolfe and R. Mark , ‘The collapse of the vaults of Beauvais cathedral in 1284’, Speculum 51, 1976, pp. 462–76
95 Murray, Stephen, Building Troyes cathedral: the Late Gothic campaigns, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987, p. 36Google Scholar.
96 James, Chartres, ch. 2.
97 Murray, Stephen, Beauvais Cathedral: architecture of transcendence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989, p. 58Google Scholar.
98 David Turnbull, ‘The ad-hoc collective work of building Gothic cathedrals with templates, string, and geometry’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18, 1993, pp. 316–17.
99 Kramrisch, Stella, The Hindu temple, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1976, vol. 1, p. 8Google Scholar.
100 Charalambos Bouras, ‘Master craftsmen, craftsmen, and building activities in Byzantium’, in Laiou, Angeliki E., ed. The economic history of Byzantium: from the seventh through the fifteenth century, Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2002, pp. 546–7Google Scholar.
101 Ousterhout, Byzantium, pp. 44, 58 (quote), and 86.
102 Ibid., pp. 26, 56–7, 116.
103 Ibid., pp. 72, 80–1.
104 Lewcock, ‘Architects’, pp. 130, 132.
105 al-Hassan, Ahmad Y. and Hill, Donald R., Islamic technology: an illustrated history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 265Google Scholar.
106 Lewcock, ‘Architects’, p. 133.
107 Golombek, et al., Timurid architecture, vol. 1, p. 139; Necipoğlu, Gūlru, The Topkapi scroll: geometry and ornament in Islamic architecture, Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities, 1995, p. 44Google Scholar.
108 Golombek, et al., Timurid architecture, vol. 1, pp. 139–40; Yvonne Dold-Samplonius, ‘The volume of domes in Arabic mathematics’, in Folkerts, M. and Hogendijk, J. P., eds. Vestigia mathematica: studies in medieval and early modern mathematics in honour of H. L. L. Busard, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993, pp. 93–106Google Scholar.
109 Necipoğlu, Topkapi scroll, ch. 3.
110 Kramrisch, Hindu temple, vol. 1, parts ii and iii.
111 Sarkar, H., An architectural survey of temples of Kerala, New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India, 1978, p. 63Google Scholar; also Michael W. Meister, ‘Analysis of temple plans: Indor’, Artibus Asiae, 43, 1981–82, pp. 302–20; idem, ‘Geometry and measure in Indian temple plans: rectangular temples’, Artibus Asiae, 44, 1983, pp. 266–96; idem, ‘De- and reconstructing the Indian temple’, Art Journal, 49, 1990, pp. 395–400.
112 Patel, Building communities, pp. 85, 87.
113 Ibid., p. 163.
114 Ledderose, Ten thousand things, ch. 5; see also Zhang, Yuhuan, ed. History and development of ancient Chinese architecture, Beijing: Science Press, 1986, p. 471Google Scholar; Guo, Chinese architecture, p. 93; Watson, Arts of China, p. 85.
115 Guo, Chinese architecture, ch. 7. For other Chinese building manuals, see Ruitenbeek, Carpentry, pp. 24–31.
116 Guo, Chinese architecture, ch. 7.
117 Ibid., pp. 93–6; Zhang, Chinese architecture, pp. 471–2; Ledderose, Ten thousand things, p. 137.
118 Cf. S. R. Epstein and Maarten Prak, ‘Introduction: guilds, innovation and the European economy, 1400–1800’, in idem, eds., Guilds, innovation and the European economy, 1400–1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 14.
119 Guo Chinese architecture, ch. 10. The drawings discussed in Zhang, Chinese architecture, pp. 473–4, seem either to relate to urban planning or to date from a later era. Those pictured in Ruitenbeek, Carpentry, p. 53, are highly stylized, suggesting variations of standard models.
120 De Bisscop, Nicole, Onder dak in China: oude architectuurmodellen uit het Henan museum, exhibition catalogue, Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis, Brussels: Mercatorfonds, 2007, p. 53Google Scholar.
121 Zhang, Chinese architecture, pp. 474–5; Guo, Chinese architecture, pp. 123–4.
122 K. A. Ericsson, ‘The acquisition of expert performance: an introduction to some of the issues’, in Ericsson, K.A., ed. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996, pp. 10–11Google Scholar.
123 S. R. Epstein, ‘Property rights to technical knowledge in premodern Europe, 1300–1800’, American Economic Review, 94, 2004, p. 383.
124 Polanyi, M., The tacit dimension, Gloucester: Peter Smith, 1966, p. 4Google Scholar.
125 Cianciolo, A.C., Matthew, C., Sternberg, R. J., and Wagner, R. K., ‘Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise’, in K. A. Ericsson, et al., eds. Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 623–4Google Scholar.
126 Radding and Clark, Medieval architecture, proposes a more elegant solution, pointing to parallel changes in philosophy and building style in the Paris basin in the first half of the twelfth century as an expression of similar intellectual developments, without claiming a direct impact from one upon the other.
127 Robert Branner, ‘Villard de Honnecourt, Reims and the origin of Gothic architectural drawing’, Gazette des Beaux-Arts, 61, 1963, pp. 137–8; Kimpel and Suckale, Gothische Architektur, p. 44; Wilson, Gothic cathedral, p. 141.
128 Shelby, Gothic design techniques; Shelby and Mark, ‘Late Gothic structural design’.
129 David T. Yeomans, ‘Early carpenters’ manuals 1592–1820’, Construction History, 2, 1986, p. 14.
130 De Munck, Bert, Kaplan, Steven L., and Soly, Hugo, eds. Learning on the shop floor: historical perspectives on apprenticeship, New York: Berghahn, 2007Google Scholar; Coy, Michael W., ed. Apprenticeship: from theory to method and back again, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1989Google Scholar; Marchand, Trevor H. J., The masons of Djenné, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2009, ch. 5Google Scholar.
131 Barbara Schock-Werner, ‘Die Parler’, in Legner, Die Parler, pp. 7–11.
132 Shelby, Gothic design techniques, pp. 7–28.
133 Woodward, Donald, Men at work: labourers and building craftsmen in the towns of northern England, 1450–1750, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 54–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This was true in many other trades as well: see Epstein and Prak, ‘Introduction’, pp. 9–10.
134 Janse and de Vries, Werk en merk, p. 25.
135 Schock-Werner, ‘Bauhütten’.
136 On the financing of cathedral building see Kraus, Henry, Gold was the mortar: the economics of cathedral building, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979Google Scholar; Vroom, Wim, Financing cathedral building in the Middle Ages: the generosity of the faithful, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010Google Scholar.
137 Volker Segers, ‘Studien zur Geschichte der Deutschen Steinmetzbruderschaft: mit besondere Berücksichtigung der für das Strassburger Gebiet geltenden Ordnungen und Bestätigungsurkunden (15. bis 17. Jahrhundert)’, PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 1980.
138 Epstein, Steven A., Wage labor and guilds in medieval Europe, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1991, ch. 2Google Scholar.
139 Knoop, Douglas and Jones, G. P., The mediaeval mason: an economic history of English stone building in the later Middle Ages and early modern times, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1967, pp. 135–6Google Scholar.
140 Goldthwaite, Richard A., The building of Renaissance Florence: an economic and social history, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980, pp. 431–4Google Scholar.
141 Ibid., p. 260.
142 Segers, ‘Studien’, pp. 179–80.
143 Epstein and Prak, ‘Introduction’, p. 8.
144 Quoted from Binding, et al., Baubetrieb, pp. 104–5.
145 Segers, ‘Studien’, pp. 179–80.
146 Schock-Werner, ‘Bauhütte und Zunft’, in Legner, Die Parler, pp. 64–5.
147 Ousterhout, Byzantium, pp. 49–57.
148 Ibid., p. 50.
149 Golombek, et al., Timurid architecture, vol. 1, p. 67.
150 Lewcock, ‘Architects’, p. 133.
151 al-Hassan and Hill, Islamic technology, pp. 267–9.
152 Ferrier, Ronald W., trans. and ed. A journey to Persia: Jean Chardin’s portrait of a seventeenth-century empire, London: I.B. Taurus, 1996, p. 167Google Scholar; also Lewcock, ‘Architects’, p. 133.
153 Settar, Hoysale temples, pp. 86–8.
154 Guo, Chinese architecture, p. 90.
155 Peter J. Golas, ‘Early Ch’ing guilds’, in Skinner, G. William, ed. The city in late imperial China, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1977, pp. 555–80Google Scholar.
156 Christine Moll-Murata, ‘Chinese guilds from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries: an overview’, in Lucassen, Jan, de Moor, Tine, and van Zanden, Jan Luiten, eds. The return of the guilds, International Review of Social History Supplement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 219Google Scholar.
157 Guo Chinese architecture, p. 90.
158 Ibid.
159 Ruitenbeek, Carpentry, pp. 82–9.
160 Ledderose, Ten thousand things.
161 More specific parallels between the Latin West and Central Asia are highlighted in Gūlru Necipoğlu, ‘Geometric design in Timurid/Turkmen architectural practice: thoughts on a recently discovered scroll and its late Gothic parallels’, in Golombek, Lisa and Subtelny, Maria, eds. Timurid art and culture: Iran and Central Asia in the fifteenth century, Leiden: Brill, 1992, pp. 48–66Google Scholar.
162 See also Ingold, Tim, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, London: Routledge, 2000, pt. iiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Pamela H., The body of the artisan: art and experience in the Scientific Revolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004, ch. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sennett, Richard, The craftsman, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008Google Scholar.
163 Epstein, S. R., Freedom and growth: the rise of states and markets in Europe, 1300–1750, London: Routledge, 2000, p. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
164 Gimpel, Medieval machine.
165 Fodor, Jerry A., The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983Google Scholar.
166 Carruthers, Peter, The architecture of the mind: massive modularity and the flexibility of thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006, ch. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
167 Hiscock, Symbol; Padovan, Richard, Proportion: science, philosophy, architecture, London: Routledge, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
168 Rowland J. Maidstone, ‘Structural theory and design before 1742’, Architectural Review, 143, 1968, p. 304.
169 Turnbull, ‘Collective work’.
170 Becker, Howard S., Art worlds, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984Google Scholar; Pamela H. Smith, ‘In a sixteenth-century goldsmith’s workshop’, in Roberts, Lissa, Schaffer, Simon, and Dear, Peter, eds. The mindful hand: inquiry and invention from the late Renaissance to early industrialisation, Amsterdam: KNAW, 2007, pp. 35, 39Google Scholar.
171 Gerbino and Johnston, Compass, p. 98; Addis, Building, chs. 5–6.
172 Pamela O. Long, ‘The contribution of architectural writers to a “scientific” outlook in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 15, 1985, pp. 265–9.
173 Campbell, James W., Building St Paul’s, London: Thames & Hudson, 2007, ch. 12; Gerbino and Johnston, Compass, pp. 100, 164Google Scholar.
- 5
- Cited by