Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:17:29.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tidewater glacier beds: insights from iceberg debris in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Neil F. Glasser  and
Michael J. Hambrey
Neil F. Glasser
Affiliation:
Centre for Glaciology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Ceredigion, Wales
Michael J. Hambrey
Affiliation:
Centre for Glaciology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Ceredigion, Wales
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sediment in icebergs offers an opportunity to sample the otherwise inaccessible beds of modern tidewater glaciers. This paper presents a discussion of the benefits and problems of using iceberg debris to make inferences about the nature of the beds of modern tidewater glaciers. As an example, we present data obtained from icebergs calved from fast-flowing tidewater glaciers in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Sediment samples obtained from 12 icebergs show that clast-rich muddy diamicton is the dominant facies, although muddy gravel and mud are also present in some debris layers. Sediment texture and clast-shape analyses indicate that most debris in the icebergs is of basal origin. Micro-morphological analyses of thin sections of the diamicton also indicate pervasive deformation of the sediment. Although individual icebergs only represent small samples of the bed of a tidewater glacier, and problems remain in linking iceberg sediments to their precalving transport history beneath the glacier, this method provides a potentially fruitful way of linking sediments to glacier dynamics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 47 , Issue 157 , 2001 , pp. 295 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2001

Introduction

The inaccessibility of most glacier beds hinders detailed studies of the sedimentological and rheological properties of modern subglacial sediments. The nature of modern glacier beds can only be determined by obtaining samples from deep boreholes (Reference Tulaczyk, Kamb, Scherer and EngelhardtTulaczyk and others, 1998), from geophysical methods (Reference Anandakrishnan, Blankenship, Alley and StoffaAnandakrishnan and others, 1998; Reference BellBell and others, 1998; Reference Gades, Raymond, Conway and JacobelGades and others, 2000), by simulation in the laboratory (Reference Iverson, Hooyer and HookeIverson and others, 1996, Reference Iverson, Baker and Hooyer1997, Reference Iverson, Hooyer and Baker1998) and from theoretical modelling experiments (Reference Alley, Blankenship, Bentley and RooneyAlley and others, 1987a; Reference Boulton and HindmarshBoulton and Hindmarsh 1987; Reference KambKamb, 1991). Determining the precise properties of these sediments is, however, critical to understanding subglacial sediment deformation because the behaviour of subglacial sediment greatly influences glacier motion (Reference Alley, Blankenship, Bentley and RooneyAlley and others, 1986, Reference Alley, Blankenship, Rooney and Bentley1987b; Reference Blankenship, Bentley, Rooney and AlleyBlankenship and others, 1986). One potentially fruitful method of investigating the nature of subglacial sediments that has yet to be fully explored is the idea that the inaccessible bed of tidewater glaciers might be sampled by examining the nature of the debris contained in icebergs. In this paper we: (1) describe the methods that can be used to sample icebergs in order to characterize the nature of debris transported into the fjord environment; (2) present data on the sedimentary characteristics of icebergs collected from a northwest Svalbard fjord as a case-study; and (3) discuss the benefits and problems of this technique for establishing the nature of the bed beneath the tidewater glaciers that produce these icebergs.

Sampling Icebergs in the Fjord Environment

There are two principal methods that can be used to sample intact the debris in icebergs calved by tidewater glaciers. The first of these is to obtain samples from floating icebergs in open water that can be approached safely by boat (Reference Hunter, Powell and LawsonHunter and others, 1996; Reference Ashley and SmithAshley and Smith, 2000). Samples obtained in this way can be used to infer the volumes of ice-rafted sediment and to calculate the sediment fluxes transported by icebergs (Reference Powell and MolniaPowell and Molnia, 1989; Reference Hunter, Powell and LawsonHunter and others, 1996). However, icebergs approached in this way are far from ideal for sedimentological studies since it is neither practical nor safe to board the iceberg to undertake detailed sedimentary descriptions or sample collection. A second method is to study those icebergs in fjords or lakes that are frozen into place by seasonal lake or sea ice. The advantage of this method is that icebergs can be approached safely and therefore used for detailed sedimentary descriptions and sampling. Travel between individual icebergs is also facilitated across the ice on ski or by skidoo, allowing a large number of icebergs to be visited relatively quickly. Studies of iceberg sedimentation are possible by submersible remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), but these can only be used beneath the surface of a fjord or lake (e.g. to study sedimentary processes at the grounding line), where the original iceberg/debris structure has been lost (Reference Dowdeswell and PowellDowdeswell and Powell, 1996). Traditional coring methods and sediment traps can also be used to investigate sedimentation in iceberg-dominated depositional settings, but again these provide little information about the nature of the debris in the icebergs prior to reworking in the water column. In this paper we present sedimentary observations obtained from icebergs frozen by sea ice in a Svalbard fjord and illustrate how his method can provide insight into the dynamics of the glacier that calved the icebergs.

Application of the Technique: A-Case Study From Svalbard

Field area

The Svalbard archipelago spans an area from 77° N to 80° N, is currently 60% glacierized (Reference Hagen, Liestol, Roland and JørgensenHagen and others, 1993) and is dominated by a maritime Arctic climate. The data presented in this paper are from Kongsfjorden, one of the large fjords (26 km long, 8 km wide, maximum water depth of 428 m) that dissect the northwest Spitsbergen coast (Fig. 1). Some 78% by area of the fjord drainage basin is glacierized, of which the greater proportion (94% by area) comprises tidewater glaciers. Sea ice is uncommon in the open fjord in most years, but a stable sea-ice cover often develops around the edges and inner areas of the fjord (Reference ElverhøiElverhøi, 1984; Reference Ito and KudohIto and Kudoh, 1997). The principal glaciers that supply sediment to the fjord are Kronebreen, Conwaybreen and Blomstrandbreen, all ofwhich reach the sea and calve icebergs (Fig. 1). Kronebreen is divided by Colletthøgda to form two separate tidewater calving fronts in Kongsfjorden and is particularly active, with measured centre-line velocities of 700–800 m a−1 (Reference MelvoldMelvold, 1992). Although reliable quantitative data are lacking for the other calving glaciers in Kongsfjorden, a calving rate of 0.25 km3 a has been calculated for Kronebreen (Reference Lefauconnier, Hagen and RudantLefauconnier and others, 1994). Tidewater calving in Kongsfjorden is characterized by the production of numerous small (<10 m wide) icebergs (Reference Dowdeswell and DowdeswellDowdeswell and Dowdeswell, 1989; Reference Dowdeswell and ForsbergDowdeswell and Forsberg, 1992).

Fig. 1. Location map of Kongsfjorden, showing major tidewater glacier termini and the position of the icebergs sampled. Simplified bedrockgeology in the catchments of the glaciers is taken from Reference HjelleHjelle (1993). The Proterozoic rocks consist of schist, psammite and marble; the Devonian rocks are sandstone and siltstone; and the Carboniferous and Permian rocks consist of sandstones, limestone and chert.

Like many other glaciers in Svalbard, the glaciers of the Kongsfjorden area are in recession. Kronebreen is receding at rates of between zero and 300 m a−1, with an average of 200 m a−1 (Reference Lefauconnier, Hagen and RudantLefauconnier and others, 1994). Exposed bedrock geology in the hinterland of the mainbranch of Krone-breen (south) is primarily Devonian sandstone and siltstone in the upper part, and Permo-Carboniferous limestone and chert in the lower reaches (Reference HarlandHarland, 1997). The true right bank of Kronebreen Central comprises Proterozoic schist, psammite and marble (Fig. 1). The other tidewater glaciers also flow mainly over Proterozoic metamorphic rocks. These geological data allow the provenance of clasts, and thus the source glacier of the icebergs, to be constrained.

Methods

Twelve upturned debris-rich icebergs (referred to as icebergs KF01–KF12) were examined and sampled in spring 1999, at a time when the sea ice in Kongsfjorden was frozen fast (Fig. 2a). The icebergs were frozen into position in February 1999 during sea-ice formation and, at the time of sampling, the sea ice was 0.5–0.7 m thick. The position of the icebergs within the fjord was determined with a handheld satellite global positioning system (GPS) (Garmin GPS-45). Descriptions of sediment facies are based on the Reference HambreyHambrey (1994) modification of the classification proposed by Reference MoncrieffMoncrieff (1989). Ice-debris facies were characterized in the laboratory by measurement of particle shape, including for each clast the dimensions of the three orthogonal axes; the clast roundness on a modified Reference PowersPowers (1953) scale; and clast lithology. These data were analyzed using the approach of Reference Benn and BallantyneBenn and Ballantyne (1994) in which the RA index (% of angular and very angular clasts) is plotted against the C40 index (% of clasts with c/a axial ratio ≤0.4) on a covariant plot. This method has been shown to provide good discrimination between glacial facies in the high-Arctic environment (Reference Bennett, Hambrey and HuddartBennett and others, 1997). Clasts were also analyzed for lithology to determine their provenance and potential transport paths through the glaciers.

Fig. 2. (a) Photograph of debris in iceberg KF06 in Kongsfjorden, showing debris melting out of the iceberg and streaking the surface below. The tidewater front of Kronebreen can be seen in the background. (b) Close-up of debris in iceberg KF02. Note the sharp contact between the coarse clear ice (left) and the debris layer (right). The debris layer is about 0. 4 m thick.

Matrix samples of each of the ice-debris facies were collected for particle-size analysis, involving dry sieving of the coarse fraction (gravel and sand) and analysis of the fine fraction (silt and clay) using a SediGraph 5000 D Particle-size Analyzer. Sorting coefficients for the matrix samples were calculated using the statistical measure (D84–D16)/2. Ice samples were taken for detailed description of crystal structure and ice-debris structures in the laboratory, where positive temperatures allowed etching-out of crystal boundaries. Two impregnated thin sections were made of the debris layer in one of the icebergs (KF07) in order to examine in detail the microstructures in the sediment. Recent developments in thin-section (“micromorphological”) analysis of tills have provided new insights concerning the movement of particles within a deforming bed. According to Reference Van der MeerVan der Meer (1997), particles in a deforming bed are subject to two types of movement: (i) planar displacements, which are reflected by the shape of intraclasts and discrete shears; and (ii) rotation, which is indicated by rounded intraclasts, matrix concentrations and matrix reorientations in relation to coarse particles; rotational structures have been termed galaxy or turbate structures, and comprise a nucleus of a grain surrounded by a spiral of finer grains. Using a structural geological approach, Reference Van der WaterenVan der Wateren (1998) has recognized a variety of structures indicative of simple shear in the deforming bed, including cleavages, transposed foliations and sheath folds. Further evidence of subglacial shearing is in the form of fractured grains observable in thin section (Hiemstra and Reference Van der MeerVan der Meer, 1997).

Results

All 12 icebergs possessed a prominent layered structure comprising different types of ice and debris-bearing horizons (Table 1). In all icebergs except three (KF02, KF10, KF12), the sediment was a clast-rich muddy or sandy diamicton. In icebergs KF10 and KF12, only mud was present, and in iceberg KF02 the sediment was muddy gravel (Fig. 2b). Debris layers ranged from being entirely composed of sediment with no interstitial ice, through sharply defined, debris-rich ice layers, to ice layers in which the debris was sparsely disseminated. Folding on the sub-metre scale was also evident. The most common lithologies in the iceberg debris included sandstone, chert, cherty limestone and limestone, siltstone, schist/psammite, quartzite and vein quartz, with minor microgranite, gneiss and marble (Table 1). Most samples contained a distinctive red sandstone and siltstone of Carboniferous and Devonian age, which originate from the Kronebreen catchment (Fig. 1).

Table 1. Principal characteristics of the icebergs and associated debris in Kongsfjorden. Clast lithologies are based on samples of 50 clasts: C chert; CL, cherty limestone; SP, schist/psammite; L, limestone; SA, sandstone; VQ vein quartz; Q quartz; SI, siltstone; MG, microgranite; G, gneiss; MA, marble; O, others

Clast shapes within the diamicton facies show a degree of clustering on an RA/C40 plot but are distinct from those in the muddy gravel facies (Fig. 3). In general, clast shapes show a tendency towards subangular and subrounded classes (Table 2). Striated and faceted clasts were present in all those icebergs that contain sediment in the gravel fraction, although the proportion varies between individual icebergs (Table 1). Iceberg KF07 contained an exceptionally thick (0.3–1 m), well-preserved debris layer, which was in sharp, slightly folded contact with coarse clear ice, with about 1 m2 of its planar basal surface exposed. This surface was covered by “slickensides” (representing the imprint of striations or an interface within the till) and grooved (Fig. 4a). These linear grooves have a uniform orientation and pervaded the entire surface. They were crossed by a sinuous groove about 0.01 m wide, and up to 0.05 m deep, with small “levees” on either side (Fig. 4b). A patch of striated surface, measuring about 0.25 m by 0.3 m, was brecciated (Fig. 4b). The diamicton was dry, ice-free and fractured, with a friable, open-work texture and a planar fabric. Matrix samples from the diamicton facies show high proportions of sand in comparison with the silt and clay fractions (KF01–KF11, Fig. 5). Calculated sorting coefficients for the diamicton and muddy-gravel matrix samples are 2.63–3.14 (very poorly sorted). The matrix sample from the mud facies is, by comparison, relatively rich in silt and clay. The calculated sorting coefficient for the mud facies sample is 1.42 (poorly sorted). Overall, the particle-size determinations indicate that the diamicton facies are composed of a relatively sandy matrix.

Fig. 3. Covariant plots of the RA index (% of angular and very angular clasts) against the C40 index (% of clasts with c/a axial ratio ≤0.4) for clast-shape data obtained from debris-rich icebergs in Kongsfjorden. Each symbol represents a sample of 50 clasts. The subglacial, supraglacial and glaciofluvial facies envelopes are from Reference Bennett, Hambrey and HuddartBennett and others (1997). The moraine-complex envelope contains 44 samples of clasts in diamicton emplaced on land by the 1948 surge of the Kongsvegen/Krone-breen tidewater glacier (Reference Bennett, Hambrey, Huddart, Glasser and CrawfordBennett and others, 1999).

Fig. 4. Iceberg KF07 displaying the nature of part of the bed beneath Kronebreen. (a) Close-up of the iceberg showing slick-ensides and grooves on the base of the diamicton. (b) The diamicton and its texture, showing dispersed clasts and brecciation.

Fig 5. Histograms showing particle-size data for the 11 debris-rich icebergs sampled in this study. Intervals are in half Samples KF01–KF11 are diamicton, whilst KF12 is mud.

Table 2. Clast-shape data (in%) for samples of 50 clasts from each of the debris-rich icebergs (VA, very angular; A, angular; SA, subangular; SR, subrounded; R, rounded; WR, well rounded)

Two thin sections of the diamicton from iceberg KF07 were made in the original vertical plane, one parallel and one normal to the ice-flow direction, as indicated by reference to the slickensides on one surface. A variety of deformational features were evident in the flow-parallel thin section. In order of formation, they are:

  1. (i) Well-developed “galaxies” (Reference Van der MeerVan der Meer, 1997) of subangular and subrounded silt grains forming rings or partial rings around sand-sized and larger grains (Fig. 6a).

  2. (ii) A pervasive fabric of variable strength observable both in hand specimen and under the microscope, defined by the diffuse alignment of inequant particles, especially muscovite, and less commonly quartz and small pebblesized clasts. This fabric is equivalent to the S-cleavage of Reference Van der WaterenVan der Wateren (1998) observable in basal tills.

  3. (iii) Numerous chipped and broken grains of sand and larger-sized grains (Hiemstra and Reference Van der MeerVan der Meer, 1997) (Fig. 6b).

  4. (iv) A set of irregular anastomosing open fractures parallel to the aligned fabric in (ii).

  5. (v) Several sets of open fractures unrelated to the pervasive structure in (ii).

In the transverse section, the same structures are evident, except for the pervasive aligned fabric and associated fractures. Although on a microscopic scale there are zones of aligned grains, these are inconsistent on the scale of the whole specimen.

Fig. 6. Microstructures observed in thin sections of diamicton from iceberg KF07, interpreted as representing the presence of a deformable bed. Photomicrographs are taken from the flow-parallel section, and both images show a field of view measuring 16 mm across. (a) Galaxy structure, comprising silt grains arranged around a small pebble (cross-polarized light). (b) Fractured clast, centre left of photograph (normal light).

Interpretation

Sedimentary characteristics of the iceberg debris

The iceberg debris in Kongsfjorden is predominantly a clast-poor or clast-rich diamicton, interpreted here as basal glacial sediment on the basis of the sediment texture (predominantly diamicton), clast shape (predominantly subangular and subrounded clasts) and clast surface features (the presence of striated and faceted clasts). In addition, the slickensided, grooved and brecciated debris layer in iceberg KF07 provides strong evidence of subsole transport at the base of one of the tidewater glaciers. The matrix of the debris in the icebergs can be compared with data on modern fjordal sediments in Kongsfjorden. These typically show variable proportions of sand, silt and clay, with a tendency towards the finer of these fractions (Reference Elverhoi, Liestøl and NagyElverhøi and others, 1980; Reference Boulton, Dowdeswell and ScourseBoulton, 1990). Reference Bennett, Hambrey, Huddart, Glasser and CrawfordBennett and others (1999) have analyzed the particle size of matrix in fjord-bottom sediments raised in the thrust-moraine complexes on the margins of Kongsfjorden. These sediments were emplaced by the rapid advance of the Kronebreen/Kongsvegen tidewater glacier complex around 1948 and show a tendency for sandy matrices, in keeping with our particle-size determinations for the modern icebergs (Fig. 5).

Three main lines of evidence are present in the thin sections to indicate that the diamicton in iceberg KF07 has deformed:

  1. (i) The pervasive flow-parallel aligned fabric of consistent orientation (and associated fractures), at ∼45° to the slickensided surface. This suggests that the sediment has been subject to simple shear, but has not been subject to large cumulative strain.

  2. (ii) “Galaxy” structures are common, which indicate rotation of larger grains within the matrix, typical of the deformable beds described by Reference Van der MeerVan der Meer (1997).

  3. (iii) Fractured grains, also indicative of a deforming bed as particles impact on one another (Hiemstra and Reference Van der MeerVan der Meer, 1997).

The variably orientated fractures, which bear no relationship to earlier structures, are apparently extensional features resulting in void space in the sediment. The sediment, being dry when sampled, is believed to have cracked as a result of desiccation. Dry, freezing conditions since the sediment was exposed would have facilitated fracturing.

The nature of the bed beneath the tidewater glaciers

It is tempting to suggest that the sediment in the icebergs directly reflects the nature of the bed beneath the tidewater glaciers in Kongsfjorden. If this is the case, the sediment preserved in any individual iceberg represents a small snapshot of the glacier bed. So, for example, the slickensided and deformed till layer attached to iceberg KF07 might be taken to indicate rapid basal motion and pervasive deformation of a till layer beneath the tidewater glacier that calved the iceberg. In order for this inference to be correct, the sediment would have to survive unmodified during the calving process and then be protected from ablation until the iceberg became frozen into place within the sea ice. However, interpretation of the transport history of the subglacial sediment prior to the calving that produced the icebergs is complex, and the following alternative explanations and limitations must be borne in mind.

  1. 1. The iceberg sediment could have been entrained at the grounding line. The grounding line of many tidewater glaciers rests on a marine shoal, and these areas are possible locations for sediment deformation (Reference MenziesMenzies, 2000). It is therefore possible that the sediment contained in the icebergs was entrained at or near to the terminus immediately prior to calving. If this is the case, then the iceberg debris demonstrates only late-stage deformation during calving and offers less insight into the processes of glacier motion further up-glacier. However, geophysical data suggest that the Kongsfjorden glaciers are not generally receding from marine shoals (Reference Elverhoi, Liestøl and NagyElverhøi and others, 1980).

  2. 2. Glacier beds are spatially and temporally heterogeneous. Even if the iceberg sediment does truly represent the nature of the glacier bed prior to iceberg calving, it is difficult to assess the overall extent of this type of rapid basal motion and deformation of a till layer. This is because it is possible that the sediment in the 12 icebergs sampled is not representative of basal conditions across the entire length or width of the glacier. Some areas of the bed may be deforming at any one time whilst others are not, or the processes of deformation may be temporally variable (Reference Fischer and ClarkeFischer and Clarke, 1997).

  3. 3. Individual icebergs contain only a small proportion of the glacier bed. The 12 icebergs sampled in Kongsfjorden represent a sample of approximately 30 m2 of the glacier bed. Icebergs in Kongsfjorden are produced by five tidewater glaciers with a combined width of 10 km and terminus flow speeds of up to 800 m a−1. The 12 icebergs therefore represent only a small proportion of the total ice discharge of these glaciers in any given year. The icebergs sampled, however, contain high proportions of diagnostic clast lithologies, such as Carboniferous and Devonian sandstone (e.g. KF08 and KF11), which can be traced directly from the tidewater front of Kronebreen. This means that the icebergs can be related directly to a source glacier, thus increasing the proportion of the bed that they represent. However, if we are to regard their sedimentary characteristics as representative of an individual tidewater glacier, a large number of samples are required in order to establish with confidence the nature of the glacier bed. In the absence of this large sample population, the Kongsfjorden icebergs are best viewed as snapshots of the glacier bed.

Conclusions

  1. 1. Although an imperfect technique, the analysis of debris in icebergs provides information about the beds of tidewater glaciers where there is a paucity of information available by other means. The sampling of debris in icebergs provides a potentially valuable method of examining the otherwise inaccessible bed beneath tidewater glaciers, although care is required in making inferences about glacier dynamics from their sedimentary characteristics. This is because (a) calving processes at the grounding line can alter the sedimentary content of ice-bergs, and (b) there is no guarantee that individual icebergs are representative of the conditions beneath the entirety of the glaciers that calved them.

  2. 2. Debris layers in a sample of 12 debris-bearing icebergs in Kongsfjorden ranged from being entirely composed of sediment with no interstitial ice, through sharply defined, debris-rich ice layers, to ice layers in which the debris was sparsely disseminated. Folding on the submetre scale was also evident. The dominant sedimentary facies in the icebergs examined is a clast-rich muddy diamicton, although muddy gravel and mud were also present in some debris layers.

  3. 3. Sediment texture and clast-shape analyses show that the diamicton is of basal origin (basal till). The debris in one iceberg revealed a slickensided base, interpreted as the imprint of striations from the bed of the glacier or as an interface within the till. Micromorphological structures within the till indicate strong evidence of deformation.

  4. 4. This study represents a first step in using the sedimentary characteristics of iceberg debris to interpret subglacial conditions beneath tidewater glaciers. Although we recognize that large populations of icebergs are required in order to make meaningful inferences about tidewater glacier dynamics, this is a potentially promising avenue for future research.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) grant (GST022192) under the ARCICE Thematic Programme. We thank N. Cox and B. Newham at the NERC Arctic Research Station in Ny-Ålesund for logistical support and safeguarding travel on sea ice, and J. Moore for use of the GPS system. B. P Hubbard and two anonymous referees provided useful comments on an early draft of this paper. A.J. Maltman advised on the interpretation of microstructures in the thin sections of diamicton.

References

Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Bentley, C. R. and Rooney, S. T.. 1986. Deformation of till beneath Ice Stream B, West Antarctica. Nature, 322(6074), 57–59.Google Scholar
Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Bentley, C. R. and Rooney, S. T.. 1987a. Till beneath Ice Stream B. 3. Till deformation: evidence and implications. J. Geophys. Res., 92(B9), 8921–8929.Google Scholar
Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Rooney, S. T. and Bentley, C. R.. 1987b. Till beneath Ice Stream B. 4. A coupled ice–till flow model. J. Geophys. Res., 92(B9), 8931–8940.Google Scholar
Anandakrishnan, S., Blankenship, D. D., Alley, R. B. and Stoffa, P. L.. 1998. Influence of subglacial geology on the position of a West Antarctic ice stream from seismic observations. Nature, 394(6688), 62–65.Google Scholar
Ashley, G. M. and Smith, N. D.. 2000. Marine sedimentation at a calving glacier margin. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 112(5), 657–667.Google Scholar
Bell, R. E. and 6 others. 1998. Influence of subglacial geology on the onset of a West Antarctic ice stream from aerogeophysical observations. Nature, 394(6688), 58–62.Google Scholar
Benn, D. I. and Ballantyne, C. K.. 1994. Reconstructing the transport history of glacigenic sediments: a new approach based on the co-variance of clast form indices. Sediment. Geol., 91(1–4), 215–227.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., Hambrey, M. J. and Huddart, D.. 1997. Modificationofclast shape in high-Arctic glacial environments. J. Sediment. Res., 67, 550–559.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., Hambrey, M. J., Huddart, D., Glasser, N. F. and Crawford, K. R.. 1999. The landform and sediment assemblage produced by a tidewater glacier surge in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Quat. Sci. Rev., 18(2), 1213–1246.Google Scholar
Blankenship, D. D., Bentley, C. R., Rooney, S. T. and Alley, R. B.. 1986. Seismic measurements reveal a saturated porous layer beneath an active Antarctic ice stream. Nature, 322(6074), 54–57.Google Scholar
Boulton, G. S. 1990. Sedimentary and sea level changes during glacial cycles and their control on glacimarine facies architecture. In Dowdeswell, J. A. and Scourse, J. D., eds. Glacimarine environments: processes and sediments. London, Geological Society, 15–52. (Special Publication 53).Google Scholar
Boulton, G. S. and Hindmarsh, R. C. A.. 1987. Sediment deformation beneath glaciers: rheology and geological consequences. J. Geophys. Res., 92(B9), 9059–9082.Google Scholar
Dowdeswell, J. A. and Dowdeswell, E. K.. 1989. Debris in icebergs and rates of glaci-marine sedimentation: observations from Spitsbergen and a simple model. J. Geol., 97(2), 221–231.Google Scholar
Dowdeswell, J. A. and Forsberg, C. F.. 1992. The size and frequency of icebergs and bergy bits derived from tidewater glaciers in Kongsfjorden, northwest Spitsbergen. Polar Res., 11(2), 81–91.Google Scholar
Dowdeswell, J. A. and Powell, R. D.. 1996. Submersible remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) for investigations of the glacier–ocean–sediment interface. J. Glaciol., 42(140), 176–183.Google Scholar
Elverhøi, A. 1984. Glacigenic and associated marine sediments in the Weddell Sea, fjords of Spitsbergen and the Barents Sea: a review. Mar. Geol., 57(1/4), 53–88.Google Scholar
Elverhoi, A., Liestøl, O. and Nagy, J.. 1980. Glacial erosion, sedimentation and microfauna in the inner part of Kongsfjorden, Spitsbergen. Nor. Polarinst. Skr., 172, 33–61.Google Scholar
Fischer, U. H. and Clarke, G. K. C.. 1997. Stick–slip sliding behaviour at the base of a glacier. Ann. Glaciol., 24, 390–396.Google Scholar
Gades, A. M., Raymond, C. F., Conway, H. and Jacobel, R. W.. 2000. Bed properties of Siple Dome and adjacent ice streams, West Antarctica, inferred from radio-echo sounding measurements. J. Glaciol., 46(152), 88–94.Google Scholar
Hagen, J. O., Liestol, O., Roland, E. and Jørgensen, T.. 1993. Glacier atlas of Svalbard andjan Mayen. Nor. Polarinst. Medd. 129.Google Scholar
Hambrey, M. J. 1994. Glacial environments. London, University College Press.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1997. The geology of Svalbard. London, The Geological Society. (Memoir 17.)Google Scholar
Hiemstra, J. F. and van der Meer, J. J. M.. 1997. Pore-water controlled grain fracturing as an indicator for subglacial shearing in tills. J. Glaciol., 43(145), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjelle, A. 1993. Geology of Svalbard. Nor. Polarinst. Polarhåndbok 7.Google Scholar
Hunter, L. E., Powell, R. D. and Lawson, D. E.. 1996. Flux of debris transported by ice at three Alaskan tidewater glaciers. J. Glaciol., 42(140), 123–135.Google Scholar
Ito, H. and Kudoh, S.. 1997. Characteristics of water in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Proc. NIPR Symp. Polar Meteorol. Glaciol. 11, 253.Google Scholar
Iverson, N. R., Hooyer, T. S. and Hooke, R. LeB.. 1996. A laboratory study of sediment deformation: stress heterogeneity and grain-size evolution. Ann. Glacial., 22, 167–175.Google Scholar
Iverson, N. R., Baker, R. W. and Hooyer, T. S.. 1997. A ring-shear device for the study of till deformation: tests on tills with contrasting clay contents. Quat. Sci. Rev., 16(9), 1057–1066.Google Scholar
Iverson, N. R., Hooyer, T. S. and Baker, R. W.. 1998. Ring-shear studies of till deformation: Coulomb-plastic behavior and distributed strain in glacier beds. J . Glaciol., 44(148), 634–642.Google Scholar
Kamb, B. 1991. Rheological nonlinearity and flow instability in the deforming bed mechanism ofice stream motion. J. Geophys. Res., 96(B10), 16,585–16,595.Google Scholar
Lefauconnier, B., Hagen, J.O. and Rudant, J.-P.. 1994. Flow speed and calving rate of Kongsbreen glacier, Svalbard, using SPOT images. Polar Res., 13(1), 59–65.Google Scholar
Melvold, K. 1992. Studie av brebevegelse pa Kongsvegen og Kronebreen, Svalbard. Oslo, Universitetet i Oslo. (Rapportserie i Naturgeografi 1.)Google Scholar
Menzies, J. 2000. Microstructures in diamictites of the Lower Gowganda Formation (Huronian), near Lake Elliot, Ontario; evidence for deforming-bed conditions at the grounding line? J. Sediment. Res., 70(1), 210–216.Google Scholar
Moncrieff, A. C. M. 1989. Classification of poorly sorted sedimentary rocks. Sediment. Geol., 65(1–2), 191–194.Google Scholar
Powell, R. D. and Molnia, B. F.. 1989. Glacimarine sedimentary processes, facies and morphology of the south-southeast Alaska Shelf and fjords. Mar. Geol., 85(2/4), 359–390.Google Scholar
Powers, M. C. 1953. A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J. Sediment. Petrol., 23(2), 117–119.Google Scholar
Tulaczyk, S., Kamb, B., Scherer, R. P. and Engelhardt, H. F.. 1998. Sedimentary processes at the base of the West Antarctic ice stream: constraints from textural and compositional properties of subglacial debris. J. Sediment. Res., 68(3A), 487–496.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, J. J. M. 1997. Particle and aggregate mobility in till: microscopic evidence of subglacial processes. Quat. Sci. Rev., 16(8), 827–831.Google Scholar
Van der Wateren, F. M. 1998. Structural analysis of micro- and macro-fabrics in tills — kinematic indicators of subglacial shearing. Workshop on Glacial Debris Transport and Deposition: Processes and Products, University of Leeds, 9–11 January 1998. Leeds, University of Leeds. School of Geography.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map of Kongsfjorden, showing major tidewater glacier termini and the position of the icebergs sampled. Simplified bedrockgeology in the catchments of the glaciers is taken from Hjelle (1993). The Proterozoic rocks consist of schist, psammite and marble; the Devonian rocks are sandstone and siltstone; and the Carboniferous and Permian rocks consist of sandstones, limestone and chert.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Photograph of debris in iceberg KF06 in Kongsfjorden, showing debris melting out of the iceberg and streaking the surface below. The tidewater front of Kronebreen can be seen in the background. (b) Close-up of debris in iceberg KF02. Note the sharp contact between the coarse clear ice (left) and the debris layer (right). The debris layer is about 0. 4 m thick.

Figure 2

Table 1. Principal characteristics of the icebergs and associated debris in Kongsfjorden. Clast lithologies are based on samples of 50 clasts: C chert; CL, cherty limestone; SP, schist/psammite; L, limestone; SA, sandstone; VQ vein quartz; Q quartz; SI, siltstone; MG, microgranite; G, gneiss; MA, marble; O, others

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Covariant plots of the RA index (% of angular and very angular clasts) against the C40 index (% of clasts with c/a axial ratio ≤0.4) for clast-shape data obtained from debris-rich icebergs in Kongsfjorden. Each symbol represents a sample of 50 clasts. The subglacial, supraglacial and glaciofluvial facies envelopes are from Bennett and others (1997). The moraine-complex envelope contains 44 samples of clasts in diamicton emplaced on land by the 1948 surge of the Kongsvegen/Krone-breen tidewater glacier (Bennett and others, 1999).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Iceberg KF07 displaying the nature of part of the bed beneath Kronebreen. (a) Close-up of the iceberg showing slick-ensides and grooves on the base of the diamicton. (b) The diamicton and its texture, showing dispersed clasts and brecciation.

Figure 5

Fig 5. Histograms showing particle-size data for the 11 debris-rich icebergs sampled in this study. Intervals are in half Samples KF01–KF11 are diamicton, whilst KF12 is mud.

Figure 6

Table 2. Clast-shape data (in%) for samples of 50 clasts from each of the debris-rich icebergs (VA, very angular; A, angular; SA, subangular; SR, subrounded; R, rounded; WR, well rounded)

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Microstructures observed in thin sections of diamicton from iceberg KF07, interpreted as representing the presence of a deformable bed. Photomicrographs are taken from the flow-parallel section, and both images show a field of view measuring 16 mm across. (a) Galaxy structure, comprising silt grains arranged around a small pebble (cross-polarized light). (b) Fractured clast, centre left of photograph (normal light).