Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:07:42.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Further Observations on the Behavior of an Ice-Dammed Self-Draining Lake, Glacier Bay, Alaska, U.S.A.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

John R. Moravek
John R. Moravek*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, State University College of Arts and Science, Plattsburgh, New York 12901, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an effort to ascertain the drainage mechanism of ice-dammed self-draining lakes, the author made observations on the behavior of the small Casement Glacier Lake in 1967. On 22 July when the first outburst of the lake occurred the water level dropped 31.92 m, leaving approximately 35 m of water remaining. Then, following a 2 week period of stability, the lake level fell gradually but steadily during the rest of the summer. Whereas a second rapid discharge occurred in 1965, one never did in 1967. The initial discharge was subglacial and resulted from flotation of the dam; the slow late-summer drainage, however, cannot be attributed to that mechanism and thus remains to be explained.

Dans un effort pour éclaircir le mécanisme de la vidange d’un lac auto-drainant à digue de glace, l’auteur fait des observations sur le comportement du petit lac du Casement Glacier en 1967. Le 22 juillet lors de la première vidange du lac, le niveau baissa de 31,92 m laissant subsister environ 35 m d’eau. Puis, après une période de deux semaines de stabilité, le niveau du lac baissa graduellement mais continûment pendant le reste de l’été. Tandis qu’une seconde vidange rapide était survenue en 1965, il n’y en eut pas en 1967. La vidange initiale était sous-glaciaire et résultait de ce que le barrage s’est mis à flotter. Le drainage lent de fin d’été ne peut cependant etre attribué à ce mécanisme et reste donc à expliquer.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Im Zuge der Anstrengungen, den Abflussmechanismus von eisgedämmten Seen mit selbsttätiger Abflussregelung zu ermitteln, stellte der Autor 1967 Beobachtungen über das Verhalten des kleinen Casement-Gletschersees an. Am 22. Juli, dem Tage des ersten Ausbruches des Sees, fiel der Wasserspiegel um 31,92 m; die Wassertiefe sank damit auf etwa 35 m ab. Nach einem zweiwöchigen Zeitraum der Stabilität fiel dann der Wasserspiegel allmählich und gleichmässig während des restlichen Sommers. Ein zweiter Ausbruch, wie er sich 1965 ereignet hatte, trat 1967 nicht ein. Der erste Ausbruch war subglazialer Natur und ist auf ein Aufschwimmen des Dammes zurückzuführen. Der langsame Abfluss im Spätsommer hingegen kann nicht diesem Mechanismus zugeschrieben werden; seine Erklärung steht noch aus.

Type
Short Notes
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 12 , Issue 66 , 1973 , pp. 505 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1973

During the summer of 1967, a small ice-dammed lake on the west side of Casement Glacier, Glacier Bay, Alaska, was investigated in an effort to ascertain the mechanism of self-drainage. The lake is formed in a steep-walled, ice-free tributary valley, blocked by lower Casement Glacier. This study is a continuation of the earlier work of Reference LindsayLindsay (1966). A comparison between his observations taken in 1965 and the writer’s in 1967 reveals some important variations in the behaviour of the lake following its initial outburst.

As shown in Figure 1, in 1965 the initial discharge occurred on 8 July when the lake level fell 36 m. A period of stability set in subsequently until 29 July. The lake level fell slowly from 29 July until 5 August, when a second rapid discharge occurred. The lake was nearly emptied by this event and it continued to drop slowly, reaching its lowest point on 25 August. At an unknown time after the latter date, however, the ice-dammed basin began to refill. When observed for the final time on 8 November, the water surface was only 7 m below its highest level in July (Reference LindsayLindsay, 1966).

Fig. 1. The fluctuating water level of Casement Glacier self-draining lake in the summers of 1965 and 1967. In each instance, the level is given in meters below the 8 July and 21 July maximum levels. (The upper graph from Reference LindsayLindsay (1966).)

In 1967, the first sudden discharge of the lake occurred on 22 July, exactly 2 weeks later in the summer than in 1965. The lake level dropped 31.92 m but approximately 35 m of water still remained. As in 1965, the lake stabilized at its post-outburst level, displaying only minor fluctuations for the next 2 weeks or so. On 9 August, the water level began to drop again but this time at a gradual rate (Fig. 2). A second rapid discharge never did come to pass in 1967—thus, an important contrast with 1965. The final observation, on 10 September, revealed only a few meters of water remaining in the glacier-blocked basin. A delta at the head of the lake was exposed and numerous large chunks of ice had been left stranded on newly emerged lake terraces. It is not known if complete drainage ever occurred before the onset of freezing winter temperatures.

Fig. 2. Condition of the lake on 17 August 1967. Note forward slump and concentric crevasse pattern of blocks of the retaining lobe in the wake of initial catastropic outburst. (Photograph by courtesy of D. N. Peterson.)

Drainage Mechanism

The drainage mechanism of glacier-dammed lakes is not wholly understood. The writer favors the dam-flotation hypothesis first suggested by Reference ThorarinssonThorarinsson (1939) as the most plausible explanation for the periodic emptying of Casement Glacier Lake, as did Reference PetersonPeterson (unpublished) and Reference LindsayLindsay (1966). Thorarinsson suggested that the water level of an ice-dammed lake rises until it attains nine-tenths of the height of the retaining ice barrier; further rise results in flotation of the dam, thereby permitting the water to gain egress subglacially. This is indeed what apparently happened during the summers of 1965, 1966 and 1967. In each instance the water was well above the required level. This hypothesis, however, fails to account for the second outburst of 1965 when the water line was far below the required level; further, it does not explain the steady but gradual drainage which occurred during the post-outburst period of 1967. Moreover, the writer has been unable to account for the differences in the behaviour of the lake between 1965 and 1967. Thus, major problems concerning the drainage mechanism of ice-dammed lakes remain unsolved.

Acknowledgements

The writer wishes to express thanks to Dr Colin Bull, Dean of the College of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, for his critical reading of the manuscript. This study was undertaken as part of the field work on Casement Glacier supported by the United States Atomic Energy Commission Project AT (11-1)-1473 (Ohio State University Research Foundation Project No. 2017-A).

Footnotes

*

Contribution No. 247 of the Institute of Polar Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A.

References

Lindsay, J. F. 1966. Observations on the level of a self-draining lake on the Casement Glacier, Alaska. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 6, No. 45, p. 443–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. N. Unpublished. Results of studies on the Casement Glacier, southeast Alaska. [Reports to the United States Atomic Energy Commission, 1966.]Google Scholar
Thorarinsson, S. 1939. The ice dammed lakes of Iceland with particular reference to their values as indicators of glacier oscillations. Geografiska Annaler, Årg. 21, Ht. 3–4, p. 216–42.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The fluctuating water level of Casement Glacier self-draining lake in the summers of 1965 and 1967. In each instance, the level is given in meters below the 8 July and 21 July maximum levels. (The upper graph from Lindsay (1966).)

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Condition of the lake on 17 August 1967. Note forward slump and concentric crevasse pattern of blocks of the retaining lobe in the wake of initial catastropic outburst. (Photograph by courtesy of D. N. Peterson.)