Ablation

Ablation readings were taken from many stakes on Qamanârssûp sermia (Reference Braithwaite and OlesenBraithwaite and Olesen, 1989b), but the present paper refers only to measurements from stake 751 (790m a.s.l., 64 °28’N) about 100 m from the glacier margin (Fig. 2). This is the so-called “daily stake” which was measured almost every day (late afternoon or early evening) from late May to early September for seven summers, 1980–86 (Reference Olesen, Braithwaite and OerlemansOlesen and Braithwaite, 1989).

Fig. 2. Sketch map of Qamanârssûp sermia with locations of the base camp and ablation stakes.

The observations involved measuring the distance from the top of an ablation stake to a 1 m ruler placed on the glacier surface downstream of the stake, i.e. the “straight edge” method. The difference in successive measurements, multiplied by an assumed ice density of 900 kg m⁻³, gave the ice ablation in the period between the two readings, i.e. usually 1 d. The straight edge allowed the determination of an “average” ice level around the stake, and thereby reduced the error caused by the “ablation hollow” at the stake. A constant ice density is not quite correct as the ice surface often has a “weathering crust” of varying depth and density (Reference Müller and KeelerMüller and Keeler, 1969). This error is correlated to some degree with the prevailing weather type and tends to compensate over periods of many days; it does not significantly affect the monthly and seasonal ablation totals discussed here.

There were actually three stakes within a few metres of each other, so the ablation data are three-stake averages. Despite their close proximity, the stakes seldom registered the same ablation because of measurement errors and differences in micro-topography. The inter-stake difference has standard deviations of +13 to ±19 mm water d⁻¹ for daily ablation (Reference BraithwaiteBraithwaite, 1985b). These errors also tend to compensate over periods of many days.

The monthly ablation for June, July and August at stake 751 (Table 1), together with corresponding winter ablation totals for September-May, refers to net ablation (or ice ablation), as there is apparently little or no snow accumulation on the lower part of the glacier, i.e. up to stake 8 (Fig. 2) which is generally snow-free when the station is re-occupied in May. This means either that the winter snow has blown away before melting starts (no snow melt) or that the snow has melted away before the arrival of the observer (unmeasured snow melt); these possibilities are discussed below. Traces of new snow occur occasionally in cold periods during the summer, with an average frequency of 3 d per month.

Table 1. Ablation at Qamanârssûp sermia (mm water)

Although there are substantial variations between years, the general pattern is for maximum ice ablation in July, high ablation in June and August, and low ice ablation over the rest of the year. The summer months June-August account for 81% of the average annual ablation for the 7 years, whereas the total ice ablation for the 9 months from September to May only account for 19% of the average annual ice ablation.

Air Temperature

Climate recordings, including air temperature, were made concurrently with the glaciological measurements. This involved (1) the summer operation of simple recorders by the Geological Survey of Greenland (GGU) supplemented by hand observations, and (2) the year-round operation of a Danish-built automatic climate station by the Greenland Technical Organization (GTO). The GGU and GTO stations were located about 200 m apart at base camp and approximately 1 km from stake 751 on the glacier margin (Fig. 2), which is about 30 m higher in elevation than the climate stations. After September 1986, the field programme was reduced to twice-yearly measurements of ablation at a few stakes, but the GTO automatic climate station continued to operate for a further 4 years until it was dismantled in the summer of 1990.

The thermograph records from the GGU station were checked and corrected by twice-daily (morning and evening) manual readings of present temperature as well as maximum and minimum temperatures. The records were generally reliable, but corrections of up to 1 ° were occasionally indicated by the hand readings. The automatic climate station was operated entirely unsupervised, but the temperature data for the summer period were found to be highly correlated with the hand-collected data, although there is a systematic difference of +0.63 ° (mean value with standard deviation ±0.18 °) between the two records. The latter is assumed to be a systematic error of the automatic climate station, e.g. caused by faulty adjustment, and the data are corrected accordingly.

The monthly mean temperatures estimated at stake 751 for the 11 years are shown in Table 2. Data for June to August for 1980–86 are extrapolated from the GGU station with a reduction of 0.2 ° to account for the 30 m higher elevation of stake 751 compared with the climate station. Data for September-May in all years, and June-August after 1986, are taken from the GTO station, corrected by 0.63 ° in addition to the 0.2 ° reduction already mentioned.

Table 2. Monthly mean temperatures at Qamanârssûp sermia (°C)

The amount of temperature data collected is a tribute to the technical quality of the automatic station, which functioned at low temperatures and in high winds. In particular, complete temperature data are available for 4 out of the 7 years with detailed ablation records (Table 1), whereas data for three of the years are incomplete (1979–80 and 1980–81 due to electronic failures, 1984–85 due to physical damage, presumably by high winds).

Missing Temperature Data

Monthly mean temperatures at Nuuk for 1961–81 are published in “provisional” annual summaries by the Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen. Unpublished data for 1982–90 were kindly provided by the Danish Meteorological Institute.

Monthly mean summer temperatures at Qamanârssûp sermia are roughly the same as those in Nuuk despite the higher elevation, i.e. 790 m compared with 48 m a.s.l. Using a vertical lapse rate of about −0.006 to −0.01 ° m⁻¹, equivalent-elevation temperatures at Qamanârssûp sermia are 4.5–7.4 ° warmer than at Nuuk in the summer, although winter temperatures at Qamanârssûp sermia are much lower. This reflects the greater continentality of the interior of Godthåbsfjord compared with the coast, first described by Reference RinkRink (1877). The comparison of temperatures between Qamanârssûp sermia and Nuuk must, therefore, include a seasonal term to take account of this continentality effect.

Reference BruntBrunt (1924) proposed a continentality index which included the seasonal variation of solar radiation. This prompted us to include the monthly extraterrestrial radiation Q ₀ in our analysis, calculated for 64 ° Ν using the formula in Reference SellersSellers (1965, p. 232). The temperature difference between Qamanârssûp sermia and Nuuk is plotted against extraterrestrial radiation in Figure 3 for all available temperature data 1979–90 (107 months). The correlation is far from perfect, but the seasonal variation in the temperature differences is clear.

Fig. 3. Temperature difference between Qamanârssûp sermia and Nuuk versus extraterrestrial radiation. Data refer to monthly means.

Correlations between monthly mean temperatures at Qamanârssûp sermia T _Q and at Nuuk T>_N, and extra-terrestrial radiation Q ⁰ are shown in Table 3. There is a very high correlation (r = 0.98) between temperatures in Qamanârssûp sermia and at Nuuk, but this is partly “forced” by the common annual cycle in both sets of data, as shown, for example, by the fairly strong correlations r = 0.79 and r = 0.69 between temperatures at the respective stations and the extraterrestrial radiation. The multiple regression equation for temperatures at Qamanârssûp sermia in terms of temperature in Nuuk and the extraterrestrial radiation is:

(3)

with a sample size of 107 months. Although the equation accounts for a very large proportion of the temperature variance, as indicated by the high value of R² , the temperature variance is also large. The root mean square error of the equation is ±1.2 °, which indicates the accuracy with which missing temperatures can be estimated.

Table 3. Correlations between monthly temperature at Qamanârssûp sermia T_Q, and at Nuuk T_N and extraterrestrial radiation Q₀ (sample size 107 months)

Ablation and Degree-Day Totals

The positive degree-day total was calculated for each month (Table 4) from monthly mean temperature according to the method of Reference BraithwaiteBraithwaite (1985a) which uses a probability model instead of the time summation in Equation (2). The corresponding degree-day factor is found by dividing the ablation by the positive degree-days for the same period, i.e. the winter ablation for September-May, monthly ablation for June, July and August, and ablation for the year September-August (Table 5).

Table 4. Monthly degree-day totals at Qamanârssûp sermia (degree-days)

Table 5. Degree-day factors at Qamanârssûp sermia (mm water d⁻¹ deg⁻¹ )

Degree-day factors for the summer months June-August are generally similar, with an apparent maximum in July. It is noteworthy that degree-day factors are higher for the winter than for the summer (i.e. an average of 9.43 compared with 7.32–7.96mm water d⁻¹ deg⁻¹). This seems surprising because the average radiation balance is highly negative during the winter. However, ablation is usually zero during most winter months and the relatively small amount of winter ablation evidently occurs under rare weather conditions. The degree-day factor describes ablation in these cases when it occurs. For example, short periods with Föhn-type weather involve high temperatures and high wind speeds, resulting in high sensible-heat fluxes. This produces relatively high ablation in relation to the temperature, i.e. a high degree-day factor, as already shown for Föhn conditions in the summer (Reference Braithwaite and OlesenBraithwaite and Olesen, 1990c). Another possibility is that the daily mean temperature in Equation (2) underestimates the daily degree-day total for days with temperatures close to the freezing point so that the degree-day factor is correspondingly overestimated (personal communication from G. Wendler).

As a snow surface has a much lower degree-day factor than an ice surface, e.g. summer values of 2.5 and 72. mm d⁻¹ deg⁻¹, respectively, for Nordbogletscher in south Greenland (Reference Braithwaite and OlesenBraithwaite and Olesen, 1988), the high winter degree-day factors found here are indirect evidence against the hypothesis mentioned above, of snow melt before the arrival of the observer in mid- or late-May.

Seasonal Ablation Variations

Monthly ablation is calculated for each winter month from monthly degree-day totals (Table 4) and degree-day factors (Table 5). The results (Table 6) can only be approximate, as the real degree-day factors must be different for individual months, but they show the main pattern of ablation which reflects the large variation in degree-day totals.

Table 6. Monthly ablation at Qamanârssûp sermia (mm water)

Average temperatures for September and May are below 0 °, so that freezing conditions predominate, although there is still substantial ablation during these months (i.e. about 0.4 m water on average in both months, which accounts for 17% of average annual ice ablation for the 7 years studied). By contrast, there is little or no ablation in the months October-April, which only account for about 2% of average annual ice ablation. There are year-to-year variations in this pattern. For example, slightly above average ablation in May 1983 was offset by low ablation in summer 1983, whilst high ablation in May 1985 was reinforced by high ablation the following summer.

Effects of Temperature

The monthly ablation distribution for present climate, as well as for higher temperature, is plotted in Figure 4. Higher temperature causes higher ablation for the present ablation season (with average temperature over 0 °) of June-August, but there is a proportionally greater increase of ablation in May and September, which quickly join the ablation season for a temperature increase of only +1 °. However, the other months, October-April, are presently so cold that even a +5 ° temperature increase is not enough to bring them into the ablation season. Naturally, ablation in these months increases, especially in October and April, but days with ablation will still be comparatively rare.

Fig. 4. Simulated monthly distribution of ice ablation at the margin of Qamanârssûp sermia for different climates.

The increase of ice ablation with temperature is plotted in Figure 5, assuming that all months have the same temperature change. The increase in annual ice ablation is about 1 m water a⁻¹ per degree temperature rise; ablation will more than double with a +5 ° temperature change.

Fig. 5. Simulated ice ablation at the margin of Qamanârssûp sermia as a function of temperature change.

According to the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change (WMO/UNEP, 1990), the global annual mean temperature may rise by about 0.3 ° per decade. Making the somewhat dubious assumption that this applies to Greenland, ablation at the margin of the ice sheet will increase by about 0.3 m water a⁻¹ per decade. As there will still be little or no ablation in the coldest months, this ablation increase will involve mainly a larger amplitude for seasonal variations in ablation. However, there are some indications from global climatic models (Reference Mitchell, Manabe, Meleshko, Tokioka, Houghton, Jenkins and EphraumsMitchell and others, 1990) that greenhouse warming may involve much smaller increases for summer temperatures than for winter temperatures. The result, in this case, will be a smaller increase in total ablation than shown in Figure 5. For example, annual ablation will hardly increase at all in the extreme case of higher temperatures only in the coldest months.

Discussion exists in the literature as to whether the main effect of temperature change is to increase the amount of ablation during the ablation season or to increase the length of the ablation season (Reference HoinkesHoinkes, 1955; Reference AmbachAmbach, 1972). The present results agree with Reference AhlmannAhlmann (1953, p. 14) that “High spring and autumn temperatures prolong the ablation period, high summer temperatures intensify it”.

Effects of Accumulation

It is not clear whether or not the patterns in Figures 4 and 5 represent conditions over a larger area. This is a legitimate question, as the present data come from the margin of the ice sheet, which has relatively high temperatures and little or no snow accumulation compared with the greater part of the ablation area. In particular, the present results could be modified by the effects of snow accumulation. For example, Reference Braithwaite and OlesenBraithwaite and Olesen (1988) proposed a modified degree-day relationship for the ice ablation a_i which occurs after the ablation of a snow cover:

(4)

where c is the water equivalent of the snow accumulation (equal to the snow ablation in this case) and k_i and k_s are the degree-day factors for ice and snow, respectively. According to Equation (4), ice ablation depends upon the degree-day factors for ice and snow, as well as the accumulation. The hypothetical reduction in ice ablation caused by increasing accumulation is plotted in Figure 6 for different values of the degree-day factor for snow ablation, assuming PDD = 577 degree-day from Table 4.

Fig. 6. Simulated ice ablation at the margin of Qamanârssûp sermia as a function of snow accumulation.

Under the present climate, it is most likely that any winter snow at the margin of Qamanârssûp sermia would be blown away again, and therefore not participate in the ablation process. A similar situation exists on the lower part of the Greenland ice sheet near Ilulissat (Reference Thomsen, Thorning and BraithwaiteThomsen and others, 1988). In the future, warmer winter temperatures at these sites may result in an increase in the amount of snowfall by increasing precipitation and wetting the snow so that it cannot be blown away. The snow would therefore be forced to stay on the ground to suffer ablation, i.e. to use ablation energy and thereby reduce the energy available for ice ablation. The opposite could occur at a site where there is already substantial accumulation and ablation of snow under present climate conditions, e.g. Nordbogletscher in south Greenland (Reference Braithwaite and OlesenBraithwaite and Olesen, 1988). In this case, higher temperatures in the winter may change snowfall into rainfall to reduce snow accumulation and thereby increase the energy available for ice ablation.