1. Introduction

Glaciers and ice caps often lie in remote areas, are difficult to access and can have vast surface areas. Direct observation of the mean specific mass balance (B _m) and related quantities, such as the equilibrium-line altitude (ELA) and the accumulation–area ratio, is therefore a time-consuming and often costly procedure. As a consequence, these quantities have been measured on relatively few glaciers worldwide. Larger parts of the cryosphere can be studied on a regular basis with satellite sensors. Reference ØstremØstrem (1975) proposed that the often-found linear relation between B _m and ELA can be used to infer B _m by using satellite-derived ELA. In recent years, much work has been devoted to inferring the snowline at the end of the melting season. Note that we define firn as snow that has survived at least one summer, which implies that the equilibrium line equals the snow-line at the end of the melting season (if there is no superimposed ice). Some authors successfully applied Østrem’s method by using satellite albedo images (e.g. Reference Rott and MarklRott and Markl, 1989) or synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images (e.g. Reference Demuth and PietroniroDemuth and Pietroniro,1999), but the method often fails. This can occur when the equilibrium line lies above its position of the previous year(s). In such cases the snow-line is sometimes visible (e.g. Reference Rott and MarklRott and Markl, 1989), but often the difference in albedo (α) between firn and snow several months old is too small to be detectable (e.g. Reference Rott and MarklRott and Markl, 1989; Reference Hall, Williams and SigurðssonHall and others, 1995; Reference De Ruyter de Wildt, Oerlemans and BjörnssonDe Ruyter de Wildt and others, 2002). Then, only the firn line can be detected. Reference De Ruyter de Wildt, Oerlemans and BjörnssonDe Ruyter de Wildt and others (2002) developed a method that does not suffer from this problem. The net potential shortwave radiation, defined as the net shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere, can be calculated from albedo images. This quantity, integrated over the glacier surface and over the melting season, is a measure of the amount of absorbed shortwave radiation. Consequently, it both influences and depends on summer melt (due to ageing of snow and firn and meltwater effects) and also depends on summer snowfall. It also depends on winter mass balance and was found to be linearly related to B _m for Vatnajökull, Iceland. Unfortunately, in some years high cloudiness limited the availability of albedo images and hence introduced uncertainty into this linear relationship.

Clouds do not pose a problem when SAR backscatter images are used. Backscatter (σ ₀) images can display several boundaries, which correspond to surface or subsurface facies transitions. Microwaves penetrate through dry snow, so the main signal over dry snow surfaces originates from subsurface material (e.g. Reference Rott, Domik, Mätzler, Miller and LenhartRott and others, 1985). The underlying material in the ablation area is ice, which produces less backscatter than the underlying firn in the accumulation area. Firn contains scattering elements such as ice structures and internal surfaces. SAR images acquired in winter or early spring can therefore be used to detect the boundary between ice and snow/firn (e.g. Reference Fahnestock, Bindschadler, Kwok and JezekFahnestock and others, 1993; Reference Hall, Williams and SigurðssonHall and others, 1995; Reference PartingtonPartington, 1998; Reference König, Winther, Knudsen and GuneriussenKönig and others, 2001). When the surface is melting, the σ ₀ signal is much lower and stems from the top few cm (e.g. Reference Stiles and UlabyStiles and Ulaby, 1982), meaning that only surface features can be observed. It also means that the boundary between dry and wet snow is detectable (e.g. Reference Steffen, Abdalati and StroeveSteffen and others, 1993), as well as the boundary between bare ice and wet snow or firn (e.g. Reference Rott and MätzlerRott and Mätzler, 1987; Reference Adam, Pietroniro and BrugmanAdam and others, 1997). Reference Smith, Forster, Isacks and HallSmith and others (1997) also observed a fourth zone, marked by high backscatter over wet snow (phase 2 melt or P2), which is most likely caused by roughness due to suncups (Reference Ramage, Isacks and MillerRamage and others, 2000). These four zones (dry snow, wet snow, metamorphosed wet snow and ice) were seen to move up-glacier and replace each other during the melting season. In spite of these observations, SAR images have been compared to in situ mass-balance observations only a few times (e.g. Reference Demuth and PietroniroDemuth and Pietroniro, 1999; Reference Hall, Williams, Barton, Sigurðsson, Smith and GarvinHall and others, 2000; Reference König, Winther, Knudsen and GuneriussenKönig and others, 2001), while a comparison of radar images with mass-balance measurements and/or albedo images from a number of years has yet to be made. From the latter two studies it appears that, as is often the case for albedo images, the σ ₀ signal cannot distinguish between snow and firn. Consequently, the snow-line appears only to be visible on radar images when no firn is present at the surface.

For Vatnajökull, one of the largest temperate ice caps in the world, a wealth of information is available with which SAR images can be analyzed and interpreted. A digital elevation model (DEM) is available (Fig. 1) and its mass balance has been regularly measured (e.g. Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and HaraldssonBjörnsson and others, 1998c). Recently a mass-balance model was developed and calibrated to the conditions on the ice cap (Reference De Ruyter de Wildt, Oerlemans and BjörnssonDe Ruyter de Wildt and others, 2003). The mass-balance measurements have been compared to U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) images (Reference De Ruyter de Wildt, Oerlemans and BjörnssonDe Ruyter de Wildt and others, 2002). In situ mass-balance measurements, NOAA AVHRR images and a long-term modelled mass-balance series form a unique dataset with which SAR images can be compared. In this paper we do so for eight melting seasons in the 1990s. We also use some images that were acquired during freezing conditions. First we directly compare SAR images with AVHRR images to identify glacier facies. Then we reconstruct the stratigraphy of a part of Vatnajökull from measured and modelled mass-balance values, in order to explain several boundaries and structures that are visible on SAR and AVHRR images. On the basis of these investigations, we discuss some possible ways of retrieving the mass balance from SAR images.

Fig. 1. Map of Vatnajokull, based on the DEM used for image processing.The DEM has a horizontal resolution of 500 m. Height contours are shown for each 250 m interval. Outlets where the mass balance has been regularly measured are indicated.The black circles represent sites where the mass balance has been measured. Over western Bruarjokull and over Dyngjujokull, transects through measurement sites are shown.

2. Data

2.1. Mass-balance observations

The mass balance of Vatnajökull has been measured with good spatial resolution since 1992 (Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and HaraldssonBjörnsson and others, 1997, Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and Haraldsson1998a, Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and Haraldssonb, Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and Haraldssonc, Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and Haraldsson1999; Reference SigurðssonSigurðsson, 1999; personal communication from O. Sigurðsson). The data have mainly been obtained over the drainage basins of Eyjabakkajökull, Brúarjökull, Dyngjujökull, Köldukvíslarjökull and Tungnaárjökull (Fig. 1). For Eyjabakkajökull, data from 1991 are also available. Most measurements were taken at the end of September or the beginning of October. On each outlet, the mass balance has been measured along one or two profiles that capture the altitudinal variation. Because most of Vatnajökull is quite flat, the profiles can be used together with a few additional measurement sites to describe the lateral variation.We obtain the mean specific balances of the drainage basins and the ELAs by interpolating between the measurement sites. For this interpolation, we developed an algorithm that takes into account vertical gradients in the mass balance, even when these are not resolved by the measurement sites. A DEM is needed for this feature to work. For each gridpoint of the DEM, the algorithm determines the n closest measurement sites within 500 m altitude of the gridpoint.Then, because of the limited height differences, a linear relation between mass balance and altitude is found for the n measurement sites, with which the mass balance at the grid point can be calculated.To smooth discontinuities inthe resulting mass-balance field, the contribution of each measurement site is weighted with the inverse of its distance to the gridpoint. The resulting values of B _m are not very sensitive to the value of n. We therefore use a value of 6, which is the lowest value that gives smooth mass-balance fields.Table 1 displays the resulting values of B _m.The data include years with a highly positive B _m (1992, 1993) and years with a highly negative B _m (1997,1998). We estimate the uncertainty in B _m to be 0.25 m w.e.

Table 1. Mean specific mass balance of various drainage basins of Vatnajökull (in m w.e.)

2.2. ERS SAR images

The European Space Agency (ESA) launched the first European Remote-sensing Satellite, ERS-1, in 1991 and the second, ERS-2, in 1995. Both satellites carry a C-band (5.3 GHz) SAR with vertical transmit-and-receive (VV) polarization. We use PRecision Image (PRI) SAR data which are three-look (speckle-reduced) and are calibrated and corrected for the SAR antenna pattern and range-spreading loss (Reference LaurLaur and others, 1998). The strength of the σ ₀ signal depends upon the local incidence angle, but as most of Vatnajökull is almost flat we do not need to take the surface slope into account. The σ ₀ signal is dimensionless and given in dB (i.e. on a logarithmic scale). In total we purchased 59 images, which are listed inTable 2. They were acquired year-round during much of the period 1991–99 and often display only a part of Vatnajökull. Table 2 shows which drainage basins are visible on each image. The horizontal resolution of the images is 33 m in range and 30 m in azimuth, while the pixel size is 12.5 m. We upscale the pixel size of the ERS scenes with a factor of 10 (up to a pixel size of 125 m) in order to facilitate the processing of large numbers of SAR scenes. The upscaling is allowed by the fairly large size (8200 km²) and low surface slopes (2.8° on average) of Vatnajökull. Furthermore, the resulting resolution is still smaller than those of the DEM (500 m) and the AVHRR images (1.1 km). The upscaling also takes care of the additional speckle filtering that is usually required for PRI images. ESA provides the horizontal coordinates of the images with an accuracy of 100 m in range and 200 m in azimuth. These coordinates refer to points that are projected on a reference geoid, and differ from the actual coordinates on the ice-cap surface (which lies above the reference geoid). We therefore localized a number of control points on each image, like nunataks and glacier margins, and compared their ESA-supplied coordinates with those of the DEM. For each image, this resulted in nearly linear relations between the displacement and the altitude. With these linear relations we could correct the coordinates of the image pixels. Judging by the uncertainties of the linear relations, we estimate that the uncertainties of the corrected coordinates are equal to one DEM element (500 m) in both the longitudinal and latitudinal direction.

Table 2. ERS SAR images and NOAA AVHRR images used in this work

Table 2. ERS SAR images and NOAA AVHRR images used in this work

3. Interpretation of Radar Boundaries

A first and direct way to interpret the different σ ₀ signatures observed on the SAR images of Vatnajökull is to make a scatter plot of σ ₀ against α (Fig. 2). In this plot we clearly see three clusters of data points, representing three kinds of surface facies. Dry snow has high α and high σ ₀ signatures. The difference between dry snow lying directly on top of glacier ice and dry snow lying on firn is small (3–4 dB) and the two groups merge in Figure 2 (note that the two subclusters of dry snow in this figure represent two different days, not the difference between ice and firn below the dry snow). Melting snow and firn have somewhat lower α values, but drastically lower σ ₀ values. Some authors (Reference Smith, Forster, Isacks and HallSmith and others, 1997; Reference Ramage, Isacks and MillerRamage and others, 2000) observed melting snow with high σ ₀ (>–12 dB), which they called the P2 (phase 2) melt facies. On five out of 43 SAR images of Vatnajökull with melting surfaces, we can observe such facies with high σ ₀, but for only one of these is a simultaneous AVHRR image available.This facies is not identifiable in Figure 2 because it represents only a small part of this one pair of images. A third cluster represents bare glacier ice with much lower α values and rather high σ ₀ values. For melting surfaces, there is a tendency for higher σ ₀ values at lower α values (i.e. when the snow is wetter and/or grows older and becomes more metamorphosed). This corresponds to earlier observations that increasing surface wetness and roughness produces higher backscatter (e.g. Reference Jezek, Drinkwater, Crawford, Bindschadler and KwokJezek and others, 1993; Reference Rott and DavisRott and Davis,1993).

Fig. 2. Radar backscatter against satellite-derived surface albedo. Each point represents an AVHRR pixel; for this plot the backscatter images have been resampled up to the same resolution as the AVHRR images (1.1 km). The maximum time gap between radar and albedo images used to make this plot is 3 days. Seventeen such pairs were found, distributed randomly over the spring and summer of five years (Table 2). Two of the pairs are not used because the corresponding SAR images displayed unusual radiometric distortions.

Figure 3 shows two of the images that display high σ ₀ over what we believe to be melting snow. All zones in these images follow the height contours of the ice cap (Fig. 1). The lowermost zone is bare glacier ice, as confirmed byAVHRR images acquired at most 1 week later. The uppermost zone (only in Fig. 3a) lies in the highest part of Vatnajökull, approximately above the 1600 m contour. From the daily mean temperature in Kirkjubæjarklaustur on the same day and assuming a lapse rate of 6°C km⁻¹, we find the daily mean 0°C isotherm to be at 1700 m. The close correspondence of these two heights and the high σ ₀ values suggest that the uppermost zone represents dry snow. If this is the case, then zones I–III probably consist of melting snow and/or melting firn. Zone I has low backscatter and corresponds to the initial-melt zone (“M”) of Reference Smith, Forster, Isacks and HallSmith and others (1997). Zone II has high σ ₀ (−6 to −10 dB), but in both images it is bounded on both sides by zones of low σ ₀. If the high backscatter in zone II is caused by roughening elements like suncups (Reference Ramage, Isacks and MillerRamage and others, 2000), then these must be absent in zone III. In this respect, zone II differs from the P2 zone found by Reference Smith, Forster, Isacks and HallSmith and others (1997), which lies directly above the bare-ice zone. In any case, most images that we purchased do not display zone II, and Reference Hall, Williams, Barton, Sigurðsson, Smith and GarvinHall and others (2000), who studied many SAR images of Hofsjökull, Iceland, do not mention such a zone either. The reason for this absence may be the regular occurrence of snowfall in the accumulation area during the summer, which may prevent the formation of suncups.

Fig. 3. ESA ERS σ₀ images of part of Vatnajokull, acquired on 20 September, 1993 (a) and 2 August 1998 (b).The latter image was cut off because it displayed much of the surrounding terrain. Latin numerals indicate different zones of surface facies. © ESA 2002.

For further interpretation of the different boundaries that are present in the SAR images of Vatnajökull, we compare σ ₀ profiles with α profiles and, following Reference König, Winther, Knudsen and GuneriussenKönig and others (2001), with modelled stratigraphy. We do so for the western part of Bruarjokull, one of the large northern outlets, because this outlet mostly displays a rather sharp firn line. On other outlets the situation is more complicated, with a gradual and patchy firn–ice transition which makes it difficult to compare SAR images with model results.

3.2. Comparison of SAR data with AVHRR data and stratigraphy

In Figure 4 we compare backscatter profiles and albedo profiles along a flowline of western Brúarjökull with the reconstructed stratigraphy along the same flowline. Note that in each stratigraphy plot, the equilibrium line is given by the lower boundary of the most recent annual layer (the upper-most layer). Also note that annual-layer thickness is given in m w.e., which means that the compaction of firn into ice is not taken into account. On a temperate ice cap like Vatnajökull, the compaction process is complicated by melting and strong metamorphism of firn layers, which is very difficult to model. However, on other temperate glaciers the firn–ice transition often occurs in layers 4–13 years old, at depths of 13–32 m (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1994). On the stratigraphy plots, we can observe that in 1991 the ELA was very high and the long-term firn line was present at the surface. In 1992, and to a lesser extent in 1993, the ELA was very low, and the long-term firn line was obscured by snow. It did not reappear until 1997, when most surface firn from 1992 had melted away. In 1997 and 1998 the firn-line altitude (FLA) at the end of the melting season was slightly higher than in 1991 due to melting of the lowermost surface firn layers in these two years.

Fig. 4. Modelled stratigraphy, backscatter profiles (σ₀, solid lines) and albedo profiles (α, dashed lines) along the transect over Brúarjökull shown in Figure 1. For each of the years 1991–98, annual layering at the end of the melting season (21 September) is shown.The σ₀ and α profiles are named by year and day of the year. For each year the profiles that display the highest firn line are shown. Some additional σ₀ profiles acquired in freezing conditions are shown as bold lines. 10 m in surface altitude approximately corresponds to 800 m in horizontal distance.

In all years, the late-summer σ ₀ and α profiles display a transition at the same altitude as the firn line (note that in 1993, 1996 and 1997 the SAR images were acquired some days before the AVHRR images). We therefore believe that the transitions on the summer σ ₀ profiles coincide with the boundary between firn and ice to a good approximation. In all years except 1992, the equilibrium line lies above the firn line and cannot be seen on the σ ₀ profiles. The α profiles only display the equilibrium line in 1997 and 1998. Note that in 1993 and 1994 the ELA was relatively low but nevertheless obscured by firn from 1992 (when the ELA was even lower).

Only at the end of the melting season in 1992 was all firn covered by snow, and for this year it should be possible to detect the snow-line on satellite images acquired at the end of the melting season. Unfortunately, we have no radar images for this year and we found no cloud-free AVHRR images for the end of the melting season. Images from the winter and spring of 1993 might also display the snow-line from 1992, because C-band microwaves can penetrate several metres through refrozen stratified dry snow and firn (e.g. Reference MätzlerMätzler, 1987). However, the late-summer firn line is not visible on the image from 18 January 1993 (Fig. 4, panel for 1992). Near the end of August 1992, there was a considerable amount of snowfall, which contributed to the low ELA in 1992 (Reference Björnsson, Pálsson, Guðmundsson and HaraldssonBjörnsson and others, 1998c). This is confirmed by the modelled cumulative mass balance near the equilibrium line, shown in Figure 5. The mass-balance model is forced with daily mean temperatures from Kirkjubæjarklaustur, and Figure 5 shows that there was no significant melting afterAugust. Just abovethe1992 equilibrium line, only a relatively thin layer of snow was present which did not experience significant melting during the autumn and formed the beginning of the winter snowpack. During the winter, the snowpack was nearly as thick just below the equilibrium line as just above it. It therefore seems unlikely that the late-summer snow can be distinguished from winter snow on the images from the winter and spring of 1993.

Fig. 5. Modelled cumulative mass balance at a site near the long-term firn line on western Bruarjokull. At day100, a few weeks before the start of the melting season, the cumulative mass balance has been set to zero.

Although the image from 18 January 1993 does not display the equilibrium line from 1992, it does display two other boundaries: one at 1220 m and, somewhat less clear, one at 1150–1170 m (see Fig. 6). The lower most boundary corresponds to the FLA from 1991 (which, according to Figure 5, was captured on days 248 and 249 at its highest position). We therefore assume that this boundary is the surface firn line.The uppermost boundary lies significantly higher and is also present in most other images that were acquired during freezing conditions (bold lines in Fig. 4). For example, images from the winters of 1997/98 and 1998/99 also display a boundary at 1220 m, which in both cases is higher than the FLA from the preceding summer. Again, Figure 5 shows that there was no substantial melting after the late-summer images were taken. Furthermore, the stratigraphy plots in Figure 4 display an increase in subsurface firn age at nearly the same altitude of 1225 m.This increase may well correspond to an increase in density and we suppose that 1220 m is the lowest altitude where, during freezing conditions, the SAR sensor only“sees”firn and no ice. If this is correct, then just below this altitude the firn–ice transition lies closer to the surface and there the σ ₀ signal stems both from ice and from the overlying firn. The winter σ ₀ profiles for late 1993 and early 1995 do not show the transition at 1220 m. On these images, it may be obscured by the thick pack of relatively recent firn. It is important to realize that the actual annual layers, especially the young layers, are thicker than shown in the stratigraphy plots because the stratigraphy in Figure 4 is displayed in m w.e.

Fig. 6. ESA ERS σ₀ image of the northern part of Vatnajökull, acquired on18 January1993. © ESA 2002.

Winter images from November 1993 (day 333; see panel for1993) and April 1995 (day 118; see panel for 1994) do not display the late-summer firn line. The late-summer images from 1993 and 1994 display (nearly) the highest FLA, because according to Figure 5 there is no melting after 20 September 1993 (day 263) and very little after 26 August 1994 (day 238).The σ ₀ profiles display a somewhat gradual transition, but in both years this begins above the FLA and ends at about1160 m (the FLA from1991). For both winters, this corresponds to a zone where the firn pack was relatively shallow. We therefore suggest that, in these two winters, above 1160 m only firn is detected, while below this altitude the influence of ice gradually increases.

During the winters of 1997/98 and 1998/99 there was no shallow young firn pack to obscure the firn line, and the SAR images therefore display the surface firn line. The FLA in 1997 is almost the same as in 1991, and the image from 18 September 1997 (day 261, which was acquired during freezing conditions) displays a boundary close to this firn line.The image from 23 January1999 (Fig.7a) displays the same two boundaries as the other wintertime images, but the late-summer firn line from 1998 (3 September) lies midway between these two boundaries (Fig. 7b). Possibly the firn line moved up-glacier after 3 September, although little melt occurred after that date (Fig. 5).

Fig. 7. ESA ERS σ₀ images of the northern part of Vatnajokull, acquired on 23 January 1999 (a) and 3 September 1998 (b). (b) is compared with σ₀ boundaries from (a). © ESA 2002.

4. Mass-Balance Retrieval

It follows from Section 3 that SAR images are of limited use for annual detection of the equilibrium line. As a consequence, B _m can often not be inferred from radar images by using the linear relation between the ELA and B _m (Fig. 8). SAR images display the long-term firn line, but this is not related to B _m on an annual basis (Fig.8). However, B _m may be related to other quantities that can be inferred from SAR images. Recent work (Reference De Ruyter de Wildt, Oerlemans and BjörnssonDe Ruyter deWildt and others, 2002) has shown that the average surface albedo of the ice cap during the melting season correlates well with B _m. On the other hand, melting snow and firn tend to have higher σ ₀ values when the albedo is lower (Fig. 2). In addition, Figure 9 showsthat inyearswith apositive massbalance(e.g.1993), the transient snow-line (TSL) rises more slowly and later in the melting season than in years with a negative mass balance (e.g. 1997), resulting in a larger area of low σ ₀ and hence a lower average σ ₀. These observations suggest that during the melting season the average σ ₀ over the glacier surface (〈σ ₀〉) may be inversely proportional to B _m. This can of course only be the case when dry snow and firn, and the P2 facies, are excluded from the analysis, as these facies disturb the negative correlation between σ ₀ and α over melting glacier surfaces. Figure 10 shows that, for western Brúarjökull, 〈σ ₀〉 generally increases during the summer, corresponding to increasingly high TSLs and/or snow and firn surfaces that are increasingly wet and rough. Only in 1993 was there no obvious increase and did 〈σ ₀〉 remain relatively low during the summer. In this year, the summer was cold with regular snowfalls. In general, the signal strength changes with surface wetness and roughness, which are both highly dependent on temporal circumstances. This is shown, for example, by the data from 1998. In 1995 also 〈σ ₀〉 was quite high in summer, while B _m had an intermediate value (Table 1). No suitable images are available for a large part of summer 1995, and the high 〈σ ₀〉 values may not be representative.We can estimate the mean value of 〈σ ₀〉 over the summer by interpolating 〈σ ₀〉 between the successive images.We do so for days195–245, which is the longest period for which 〈σ ₀〉 values are available from each year.We then find a correlation coefficient of 0.72 between 〈σ ₀〉, averaged over the summer, and B _m. There is no significant correlation between 〈σ ₀〉 and B _m for Dyngjujökull and Köldukvíslarjökull.This may be due to the short-term variability of the σ ₀ signal or, alternatively, to the small number of SAR images for some years.

Fig. 8. Mean transient-snow-line–firn-line (TSL–FL) altitude at the end of the melting season, and ELA, as a function of the mean specific mass balance for western Bruarjokull and Dyngjujokull. Both radar and albedo images were used to deriveTSL–FL altitudes. ELAs are derived from the mass-balance measurements.

Fig. 9. TSL–FL altitude along the transect shown in Figure 1 (western Bruarjokull) as a function of the day of the year. Both backscatter images (solid symbols) and albedo images (open symbols) were used to obtainTSL–FL altitudes. Each TSL–FL altitude was manually determined as the altitude at which the change in backscatter or albedo was largest. Low TSL–FL altitudes in the latter part of the summer, indicative of summer snowfalls, are not shown.

Fig. 10. Average σ₀ over western Bruarjokull as a function of day of the year, for each of the ERS SAR images. Only images that do not display dry snow and firn are used.

The most obvious feature on summertime SAR images is the boundary between the areas of high and low backscatter. This boundary closely corresponds to the boundary between the areas of low albedo (ice) and high albedo (snow/firn). It is formed by either the TSL or by the firn line (FL), and the position of this line contains, at least theoretically, information about B _m. There are two arguments for this statement. First, the TSL–FL separates the low- and high-albedo areas, while the albedo strongly determines the amount of surface melt and hence the mass balance. Second, the position of the TSL–FL reflects the accumulation history of the preceding winter and the melt history of the current melting season. Figure 9 shows that the course of the TSL during the summer varies each year. During some melting seasons it rises faster and/or earlier than during others. As a result, the long-term firn line is exposed in some years and remains covered by snow in others. The position of the TSL can always be detected before it retreats to regions above the long-term firn line, so, for each year, much of the information about the accumulation and melt history that is present in the position of the TSL can be extracted. A simple way to quantify this is to compute the average altitude of the TSL–FL. We compute it for the second half of the melting season (days 200–264) because, in the year with the lowest B _m (1993), no ice was visible and hence no TSL existed before day 200. Dips in the altitude of the TSL–FL in the later part of the summer, indicative of summer snowfalls, are not used. These are often highly temporal events that are not representative of the previous and following weeks. When no images for the end of the melting season are available (e.g. 1992 and 1994), we linearly extrapolate the TSL altitude from those earlier in the melting season. In such cases the long-term firn line (as seen during other years) forms an upper limit to the extrapolated TSL. Figure 11 shows that the resulting average altitudes of the TSL–FL during the second half of the melting season correlate well with B _m for several drainage basins.

Fig. 11. MeanTSL–FL altitude during the second half of the melting season (days 200–264) as a function of the mean specific mass balance for western Bruarjokull, Dyngjujokull and Eyjabakkajokull. Both radar and albedo images were used to derive theTSL–FL altitude.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

We have analysed many ERS SAR images by comparing them with AVHRR images, mass-balance observations and modelled firn stratigraphy. Both SAR and AVHRR images detect the TSL–FL as a distinctive boundary because the reflective and backscattering properties of melting snow and firn are different from those of bare glacier ice. However, we found no differences in backscatter and mostly no differences in reflectance between snow and firn. Therefore, when surface firn is present below the equilibrium line, the equilibrium line is not visible on SAR images and only occasionally visible on AVHRR images. We expect that the equilibrium line is visible on SAR images when no surface firn is present, but we have no SAR images available for the one year of the mass-balance series when this was the case (1992). Nevertheless, we can conclude that mass-balance retrieval through detection of the equilibrium line is often not possible. For seven years we have SAR images acquired near the end of the melting season, but on none of these could the equilibrium line of western Brúarjökull be detected. In two of these years the ELAwas low, but it could not be detected because firn from a previous year was present at an even lower altitude. On AVHRR images, we could identify the equilibrium line of western Brúarjökull for only three out of nine years.The equilibrium line of other drainage basins of Vatnajökull could be seen on AVHRR images for even fewer years (Reference De Ruyter de Wildt, Oerlemans and BjörnssonDe Ruyter de Wildt and others, 2002).

As well as the boundary between ice and melting snow and firn, SAR images can detect several boundaries that are not visible on albedo images.The intensity of the σ ₀ signal is highly sensitive to the liquid-water content of snow, which makes it possible to detect the extent of surface melt (e.g. Reference Steffen, Abdalati and StroeveSteffen and others, 1993). For Vatnajökull this is of little use because all snow quickly starts to melt in late spring. A boundary between newly melting snow and roughened melting snow has been found elsewhere (Reference Smith, Forster, Isacks and HallSmith and others, 1997; Reference Ramage, Isacks and MillerRamage and others, 2000). Although it may be present on some SAR images of Vatnajökull, most images do not display such a boundary. All of the boundaries mentioned above are surface boundaries. Subsurface boundaries can be detected when the surface is not melting, because then microwaves can penetrate several metres into the snow and scatter on subsurface structures. This is, for example, the case on images that display a dry winter snowpack. These images generally display the late-summer firn line, and also a distinctive boundary that lies at a somewhat higher elevation and seems to represent the subsurface continuation of the firn/ice transition. The late-summer surface firn line cannot be detected on some winter images, probably because in these cases the firn line lies below the long-term firn line. As a consequence, the firn pack is shallow just above the firn line (in other words, the firn/ice transition slopes only slightly with respect to the surface). This allows the penetrating microwaves to reach the underlying ice in the area directly above the firn line. On glaciers with steeper slopes than Brúarjökull, the surface firn line and any subsurface firn/ice transitions that may exist are probably inseparable. Such glaciers will tend to have a firn/ice transition that dips more with respect to the surface.

The equilibrium line is often not visible on SAR images, but nevertheless SAR images may be used in other ways to infer the mass balance. The intensity of the σ ₀ signal is related to surface wetness (and roughness) and therefore to the amount of surface melt. For western Brúarjökull, we found a correlation between B _m and the mean σ ₀ over the surface area and during part of the melting season, but for two other drainage basins no good correlation was found. It seems that, due to variable surface roughness and/or wetness, σ ₀ is too variable in time to be a good proxy for B _m, but no firm conclusion is possible until data from more years are available. At present, we have three to five years with both mass-balance and SAR data for each drainage basin. In any case, the interannual variation of the SAR signal within the accumulation area is not as clearly related to B _m as the albedo. Hence, SAR images of Vatnajökull contain less information about B _m than albedo images.

The mean TSL–FL altitude during part of the melting season is found to be a better estimator of B _m. This is the case for western Brúarjökull, Eyjabakkajökull and Dyngjujökull. On Tungnaárjökull, the transition from ice to snow and/or firn is often extremely patchy and gradual, making it impossible to derive aTSL-FL altitude. For Köldukvíslarjökull, we found too few usable images to obtain a usable correlation with B _m. The reason is its hypsometry: the ice margin lies relatively high and bare ice appears relatively late in the summer. The period when the TSL lies between the ice margin and the long-term firn line is therefore short; once the TSL lies above the firn line, it is largely undetectable, while the detectable upper ice boundary is unrelated to the annual mass balance. On the other hand, in 1992 the TSL remained at a low altitude all summer and hardly reached the ice margin.