Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:32:56.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Postglacial”—A Term with Three Meanings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Nils-Axel Mörner
Nils-Axel Mörner*
Affiliation:
Geologiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitét, S-113 86 Stockholm, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Postglacial”, with a capital “P”, is a chrono-stratigraphical unit starting with the Preboreal at 10 000 B.P. De Geer used the same name for a period covering approximately the last 8 900 years. The same word “postglacial”, with a small “p”, is a genetic facies term telling us that the sediments were deposited without influence of the receding ice (in contrast to glacial deposits).

Résumé

Résumé

“Postglaciaire” avec un “P” majuscule est une unité chrono-stratigraphique commençant avec le Préboréal à 10 000 ans avant nos jours. De Geer use de la même expression pour une période couvrant, approximativement les 8 900 dernières années. Le même mot “postglaciaire” avec un “p” minuscule est un terme génétique de faciès qui nous indique que des sédiments se sont déposés sans intervention du retrait des glaces (en opposition avec les dépôts glaciaires).

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

“Postglazial” — mit grossem “P” — ist eine chronologische-stratigraphische Einheit, die mit dem Präboreal 10 000 Jahre vor der Gegenwart beginnt. De Geer gebrauchte denselben Namen für eine Periode, die etwa die letzten 8 900 Jahre umfasst. Dasselbe Wort “postglazial” — mit kleinem “p” — ist ein Begriff für genetische Facies mit der Bedeutung, dass die Sedimente ohne den Einfluss des zurückgehenden Eises abgelagert werden (im Gegensatz zu glazialen Ablagerungen).

Type
Short Notes
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 12 , Issue 64 , 1973 , pp. 139 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1973

“POSTGLACIAL” is a term with three different meanings. However, the term has been widely used without regard to these different meanings. This has lead to great confusion.

The only way of avoiding confusion is to make a clear definition of and distinction between the three meanings. This is easily done, and has consciously been done in papers and lectures by the author (e.g. Mörner, 1969).

  1. “Postglacial” is a chrono-stratigraphical unit starting with the Preboreal at 10 000 radiocarbon years B.P. This is the general usage in northern Europe of “Postglacial” today (e.g. Reference NilssonNilsson, 1965), and we may therefore add “sensu stricto”.

  2. “Postglacial” is a chrono-stratigraphical unit used by De Geer (e.g. 1940) in his varve chronology of Sweden to denote the period after his zero varve, i.e. after about 8 900 years B.P. Today, “Postglacial” is very seldom used in this sense. This usage should be avoided, and if used, “sensu De Geer” has to be added.

  3. “postglacial” (with a small “p”) is a genetic facies term saying (in contrast to glacial deposits) that the sediments were deposited without influence of the receding ice. This usage is commonly used in geotechnical literature.

Consequently, we have to distinguish clearly between “Postglacial” with a capital “P” and “postglacial” with a small “p”. This is the fundamental point, which has so often been neglected. If this distinction is not made, we cannot avoid a total confusion. Therefore, we should not start a sentence with “postglacial”, as it then might be impossible to know whether it is the facies term or the chrono-stratigraphical term.

In the Kattegatt sea, postglacial clay started to be deposited already in Late Glacial time. In the Baltic, glacial clay continued to be deposited in Postglacial time. Outside present glaciers, glacial sediments are still being deposited.

Similarly, small letters should be used on “glacial”, “late glacial” and “postglacial” when these words are used to describe the type of flora or fauna, and not the chrono-stratigraphical units (e.g. glacial and late glacial pollen floras of Postglacial age). The time transgressive change from late glacial to postglacial pollen flora in northern Europe has recently been discussed by Reference NeustadtNeustadt (1971).

In Figure 1, the global epoch, age and subage systems (e.g. Reference MörnerMörner, 1971) are compared to the north European chrono-stratigraphical systems here discussed and the facies usage of “glacial” and “postglacial”.

Fig. 1. The global epoch (column 1), age (2) and subage (3) systems compared to the common north European chrono-stratigraphical system (4) with the Postglacial pollen zones inserted, De Geer’s varve chronological system (5) and the facies usage of glacial / postglacial (6) with the main Baltic stages marked.

Summing up, there are three variants of “postglacial”:

  1. “Postglacial” or “Postglacial (sensu stricto)”; a chrono-stratigraphical unit.

  2. “Postglacial” (sensu De Geer)”; a chrono-stratigraphical unit.

  3. “postglacial”; a facies term.

However, Postglacial is not an adequate chrono-stratigraphical term according to the stratigraphical nomenclature rules. The Flandrian Interglacial Age is an adequate chrono-stratigraphical term which covers the same period as Postglacial. Flandrian can therefore be used for preference instead of Postglacial.

References

Do Geer, G. 1940. Geochronologia Suecica. Principles. Kungliga Suenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Tredje Ser., Bd. 18, No. 6.Google Scholar
Mönter, N.-A. 1969. The late Quaternary history of the Kattegatt sea and the Swedish west coast: deglaciation, shorelevel displacement, chronology, isostasy and eustasy. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Avhandlingar och Uppsatser, Ser. C, No. 640, Årsbok 63, No. 3.Google Scholar
Mörner, N.-A. 1971. Subdivision of the Late Glacial and Postglacial sediments of the Kattegatt sea. Marine Geology (Amsterdam), Vol. 10, p. M17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, M. I. 1971. Über die Lage der Untergrenze des Holozäns nach den Vorstellungen der sowjetischen Wissenschaftler. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, Vol. 93, Pt. 1, No. 544, p. 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, T. 1965. The Pleistocene–Holocene boundary and the subdivision of the late Quaternary in southern Sweden. INQUA. International Association on Quaternary Research. Report of the VIth International Congress on Quaternary, Warsaw, 1961, Vol. 1, p. 479–94.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The global epoch (column 1), age (2) and subage (3) systems compared to the common north European chrono-stratigraphical system (4) with the Postglacial pollen zones inserted, De Geer’s varve chronological system (5) and the facies usage of glacial / postglacial (6) with the main Baltic stages marked.