Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:53:09.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural and anthropogenic levels of tritium in a Canadian Arctic ice core, Agassiz Ice Cap, Ellesmere Island, and comparison with other radionuclides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Thomas G. Kotzer ,
Akira Kudo ,
James Zheng  and
Wayne Workman
Thomas G. Kotzer
Affiliation:
Environmental Research Branch, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario K0J 1J0, Canada
Akira Kudo
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Chemistry, Mational Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada Reactor Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kumatori, Osaka 590-04, Japan
James Zheng
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Chemistry, Mational Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada
Wayne Workman
Affiliation:
Environmental Research Branch, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario K0J 1J0, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous studies of the ice caps in Greenland and Antarctica have observed accumulations of transuranic radionuclides and fission products from nuclear weapons testing, particularly during the period 1945–75. Recently, the concentrations of radionuclides in the annually deposited surface layers of Agassiz Ice Cap, Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic, from 1945 to the present have been measured and have demonstrated a continuous record of deposition of 137Cs and 239,240Pu in ice and snow. In this study, 3He-ingrowth mass spectrometry has been used to measure the low levels of tritium (3H) in some of these samples. Pre-nuclear-bomb tritium levels in ice-core samples were approximately 12 TU in high-latitude meteoric waters and 3–9 TU in mid-latitude meteoric waters. Comparisons of 3H levels and 3H/137Cs + 239,240Pu ratios, which were quite low during the earliest fission-bomb detonations (1946–51) and substantially higher during thermonuclear hydrogen-fusion bomb testing (1952–64), provide a clear indication of the type of nuclear device detonated. This finding accords with the results from other ice-core studies of the distribution of anthropogenic radionuclides from bomb fallout.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 46 , Issue 152 , 2000 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2000

Introduction

Permanent ice sheets can be used as a proxy to provide a detailed record of fallout materials from the atmosphere to the Earth’s surface at any latitude (e.g. Reference ThompsonThompson and others, 1989; Reference Cecil and VogtCecil and Vogt, 1997). A long period of research on glacier ice cores has indicated that, with noted exceptions (Reference Koerner and TaniguchiKoerner and Taniguchi, 1976; Reference Goto-Azuma, Koerner, Nakawo and KudoGoto-Azuma and others, 1997), summer melting and the effects of ice scouring may be negligible to non-existent; hence, the continuous yearly accumulations will be largely undisturbed, with the snow or ice and dissolved and particulate matter remaining largely intact. Numerous studies of annual ice layers in ice caps in Greenland and Antarctica have observed the fallout deposition of transuranic radionuclides and associated fission products from nuclear weapons testing (Reference Koide and HerronKoide and Herron, 1977; Reference Jouzel, Merlivat, Pourchet and LoriusJouzel and others, 1979; Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others, 1979, Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and Langway1982; Reference ElmoreElmore and others, 1982; Reference Cecil and VogtCecil and Vogt, 1997; Reference LevchenkoLevchenko and others, 1997), particularly during the period 1945–75. Similar studies have been carried out to a limited extent on lower-latitude, higher-altitude glaciers, such as those by Reference Cecil and VogtCecil and Vogt (1997) and Reference Naftz, Michel, Miller, Swart, Lohmann, McKenzie and SavinNaftz and others (1993) who measured 36Cl and tritium (3H) on the Wind River alpine glaciers in Wyoming, Colorado, U.S.A.

Concentrations of radionuclides (137Cs and 239,240Pu) have been measured on the annual ice layers of Agassiz Ice Cap, Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic, and indicate a continuous record of deposition of anthropogenic nuclides between 1945 and the present. Kudo and others have documented the record of fallout from the earliest fission weapons test and nuclear detonations in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and elsewhere starting in 1945, and also from subsequent worldwide fusion-bomb testing beginning in the early 1950s (Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977). In this study we have used 3He-ingrowth mass spectrometry to measure the tritium concentrations in 1935–64 ice horizons in spatially associated core samples, and comment on: (1) the tritium concentrations in high-latitude, pre-1945 precipitation and in precipitation from the earliest nuclear detonations, and (2) correlations between transuranic radionuclides and tritium in the high-latitude snowpack.

Materials and Methods

Ice samples supplied for tritium analysis were collected from a site located at the dome of Agassiz Ice Cap (∼81° N; 1740 ma.s.l.). Details of the ice-core drilling and sampling can be found in Reference ZhengZheng (1996), Reference Zheng, Kudo, Fisher, Blake and GerasimoffZheng and others (1998) and Reference KudoKudo and others (1998). Samples equivalent to 6 months’ snow accumulation were taken from depths of 13.7–7.0 m, representing the time interval 1935–64, and were predominantly firn with some interlayers of ice (Reference KudoKudo and others, 1998). Frozen ice-core samples (∼180–530 g) were sealed in Nalgene containers, were allowed to melt at Canadian National Research Council laboratories in Ottawa, and were then transported to the Low Background Laboratories at Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, Chalk River, Ontario, for tritium measurements.

Determination of 3H in the ice-core samples was primarily carried out using 3He-ingrowth mass spectrometry (Reference Clark, Jenkins and TopClarke and others, 1976) utilizing a noble-gas mass spectrometer (MAPL 215-50 Mass Spectrometer; Reference Lynch and KayLynch and Kay, 1981) and a high, vacuum (<10−7 torr) stainless-steel gas-in-let and helium-cryogenic gas-separation system (Reference Lott and JenkinsLott and Jenkins, 1984; Reference Bayer, Schlosser, Bonisch, Rupp, Zaucker and ZimmekBayer and others, 1989; Reference Kotzer, Brown, Selkirk and CornettKotzer and others, 1994; Reference MaharaMahara, 1995). For He-ingrowth mass spectrometry, the prepared water standards and melted ice waters were transferred using N2 gas and capillary transfer, evacuated to remove all atmospheric gas components and stored at low temperatures (–20oC) for up to 9 months in specialized vessels constructed of Al-Si glassware (Dow Corning 1720/1724; Reference Suckow, Schlosser, Rupp and BayerSuckow and others, 1990). Tritium concentrations in some of the ice-core samples were also determined by direct liquid- scintillation counting methods using a Wallac 1220 scintillation counter and equal volumes (∼10 mL) of Packard Picofluor LLT scintillator and sample waters in Packard low- diffusion polyethylene vials. Tritium concentrations are given in tritium units (TU) where 1 TU = 13H per 1018 H atoms.

Duplicate and triplicate measurements using 3He-in-growth mass spectrometry on selected ice samples and previously measured International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Chalk River Laboratories(CRL) intercomparison waters were combined with the results from liquid-scintillation counting on several of the ice samples (Nos. 1–4 and 14–19; Table 1). Good agreement was obtained for the measurements, with maximum errors of ±25% for the lowest-level samples (<1 TU) and ±2–10% for higher levels (>1 TU).

Table 1. Sampling depths, descriptions and tritium concentrations for prepared standard waters and ice-core samples from Agassiz Ice Cap

Results and Discussion

Tritium results

The range of tritium concentrations in ice-core samples at depths of 7.5–13.92 m below the Agassiz Ice Cap surface is 0.35–474 TU (Table 1; Fig. 1). These depths represent deposition of snow between 1935 and 1964 and are discussed in the sequence oldest to youngest. The ice cores measured for tritium were from the same location as several other ice cores which were analyzed for other transuranic nuclides as reported by Reference KudoKudo and others (1998). Where applicable, the samples have been decay-corrected using a half-life for tritium of 12.39 years.

Fig. 1. Measured tritium-depth profile for ice-core samples from Agassiz Ice Cap, 1930–64. (Numbers beside data points correspond to sample numbers from Table 1; tritium values not decay-corrected.)

(a) Pre-bomb ice samples

Triplicate analyses on the deepest ice samples (13.77 and 13.92 m; ∼1935) yield tritium concentrations of 0.35–0.53 TU, which, when decay-corrected, result in an average tritium concentration of 12.2 TU (Table 1; Fig. 1). Duplicate analyses on ice samples from 11.5–11.7 m depth (∼1944–45) have concentrations of 0.63–0.86 TU (Table 1) and decay-corrected tritium values of 11.4–14.7 TU. Combined, the ice samples for the time interval 1935–44 indicate a decay-corrected tritium value of 12.5±1.9 TU (samples 10–13; Table 1).

(b) 1945–64 ice samples

Tritium levels were measured in two ice-core samples at 10.5–11.0 m depth, which represents snow accumulation between approximately 1946 and 1949. During this period, initial detonation of U-fission bombs occurred (Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977). Measured tritium values for these depths are 4.55 and 5.08 TU, with decay-corrected tritium values of 61.5 and 82.2 TU (Table 1; Fig. 1).

Ice-core samples from 7.5–10.2 m depth have measured tritium concentrations in the range 2.24–474 TU, with decay-corrected tritium values of 27.4–2976 TU (Table 1; Fig. 1). These depths represent snow accumulations during the period 1950–64, when substantial testing of thermonuclear hydrogen-fusion bombs occurred (Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977).

Discussion

Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others (1982) and Reference Koerner and TaniguchiKoerner and Taniguchi (1976) have reported on tritium concentrations in ice samples from the Greenland ice cap (Dye-3) and from Devon Island, Canadian Arctic, although no tritium determinations were carried out on samples of ice older than 1950. As some of the ice-core samples in this study are from snow-accumulation periods on Agassiz Ice Cap beginning as early as 1935, the measured tritium levels have been used to estimate the natural, cosmogenic levels and production rates of tritium in high-latitude precipitation over North America before detonation of nuclear devices started in 1945.

Tritium levels for snow deposited between 1935 and 1945 (pre-bomb) on Agassiz Ice Cap are approximately 12.5 TU, which is higher than the tritium levels for mid- to northern-latitude North American and European meteoric waters and wines during the period 1927–45 (Fig. 2). The measured tritium values for high-latitude, Agassiz precipitation agree well with pre-nuclear values of <20 TU in snow sampled in 1944 and 1945 from Thule, Greenland (Reference BegemannBegemann, 1958). Reference KoernerKoerner (1970) found that melting on Devon Ice Cap diminished during the 1940s, so it is not considered that tritium concentrations in the Agassiz ice over this same time interval (samples 10–13; Table 1) have been affected to any great extent by processes associated with ice ablation. Higher tritium levels are expected in pre-bomb, meteoric precipitation for the Canadian Arctic and Greenland than in precipitation at lower latitudes, as the natural production of tritium varies as a function of geomagnetic latitude, with greater cosmogenic tritium production and maximum stratospheric–tropospheric water-vapor transfer occurring at higher latitudes.

Fig. 2. Comparison between (i) tritium levels measured in precipitation and wine samples from mid-latitude meteoric waters, and (ii) tritium levels measured in precipitation and ice-core samples from higher-latitude precipitation. Mid-latitude tritium data adapted from Reference Clark and FritzClark and Fritz (1997). Other symbols used: ■, tritium measurements from this study; ◊, tritium data for Resolute Bay (Canadian Arctic) rain (IAEA Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation database); ×, tritium data on Greenland ice core (Dye-3) from Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others (1982); +, tritium data for snow from Thule, Greenland (Reference BegemannBegemann, 1958). Small arrows on bottom of diagram refer to Japan: Nagasaki atom bomb and earliest atmospheric tests of thermonuclear devices, namely, 1. George (75 kilotons, U.S.A.); 2. Ivy-Mike (10 megatons, U.S.A.); 3. RDS-6s (400 kilotons, U.S.S.R.); 4. Castle series, (total 47 megatons, U.S.A); 5. second Soviet test (2 megatons ) (from Reference Clark and FritzClark and Fritz, 1997).

Using the tritium contents along with the annual accumulation rates of precipitation for pre-bomb Agassiz samples (Nos. 10–13; Table 1), a value for the natural production rate of tritium has been estimated. Here, an average tritium concentration of 12.5 TU, and an upper limit for the accumulation rate of 18 g we. cm−2a−1, results in a calculated natural production rate of 0.54±0.05 tritons cm−2s−1. This value is of the same order of magnitude as empirical observations for Greenland (1.05±0.15 tritons cm−2s−1; Reference BegemannBegemann, 1958) and calculated worldwide values (0.16–0.20±0.09 tritons cm−2s−1; Reference Nir, Kruger, Lingenfelder and FlammNir and others, 1966).

During the period 1946–49, tritium concentrations which have been measured in the Agassiz ice-core samples are elevated and, although still quite low, are up to five times greater than the decay-corrected, pre-bomb tritium levels in deeper ice-core samples (Nos. 8 and 9; Table 1; Figs. 1 and 2). There are several possible explanations for this. One is that isolated periods of intense summer ablation and melting on the snowpack have resulted in percolation of snowmelt waters into the underlying layers (Reference KoernerKoerner, 1970). Such processes have been documented for mid-latitude alpine glaciers (Reference Naftz, Michel, Miller, Swart, Lohmann, McKenzie and SavinNaftz and others, 1993; Reference Cecil and VogtCecil and Vogt, 1997) and during select time intervals for Canadian Arctic glaciers (Reference Koerner and TaniguchiKoerner and Taniguchi, 1976; Reference Fisher and KoernerFisher and Koerner, 1994). Although melting would be expected to be minimal at the high elevations and latitudes of some Arctic glaciers, several periods of melting have been documented on Agassiz Ice Cap, the early 1950s being amongst the most significant (cf. Reference Fisher and KoernerFisher and Koerner, 1994, fig. 10). This observation may suggest that the 1946–49 snow layers, which are within 0.5–1 m of the early 1950 depositional intervals (samples 5–9; Table 1), may have been affected by percolation of snowmelt waters from the 1950s, which would have contained more tritium from initial testing of hydrogen-fusion bombs (Reference BrownBrown, 1970; Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977). Concentrations of NO3, SO4 and Cl− in annual layers from Agassiz Ice Gap suggest limited post-depositional changes to the ice layers as a result of melting and percolation in the early 1950s (Reference Goto-Azuma, Koerner, Nakawo and KudoGoto-Azuma and others, 1997), although this may not have been the case for tritium in the ice core, which would be more mobile in the vapor phase (as tritiated water vapor), and may also serve to explain the immobile behavior of some of the other radionuclides (239+240 Pu, 137Cs) during these time periods, as they, like the anion complexes, would exist as particulate phases (Reference KudoKudo and others, 1998).

A second possibility is that the elevated tritium levels measured in the 1945–49 Agassiz ice-core samples (Nos. 8 and 9; Table 1) represent a record of the deposition of anthropogenic tritium fallout from the earliest fission-bomb detonations between late 1945 and 1950 (Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Bikini, Eniwetok; Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977), as the small increases in tritium levels coincide with increasing amounts of 137Cs and 239+240Pu in the ice horizons, which have been interpreted as fallout transuranics from the earliest fission-bomb detonations (Fig. 3; Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others, 1982; Reference KudoKudo and others, 1998). The absence of an adequate mechanism to produce substantial concentrations of tritium in the earliest fission-bomb detonations, and the lack of data reflecting increased tritium levels in Greenland snow samples and in lower-latitude meteoric precipitation during the earliest period of nuclear fission-bomb testing (Reference Brown and GrummitBrown and Grummitt, 1956; Reference BegemannBegemann, 1958), does not support this interpretation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 3. Comparison between tritium levels (this study) and the concentrations of 137Cs and 239,240 Pu previously measured by Kudo and others (in press) on annually deposited ice samples from several other ice cores taken at the same site on Agassiz Ice Cap. Note units used for tritium levels (Bq L−1) relative to those for transuranic radionuclides (mBq cm−2). For tritium 1 TU = 0.1184 Bq L−1.

The proliferation of hydrogen-fusion bomb tests between 1952 and 1962 produced large inventories of tritium which were injected into the stratosphere and significantly increased the tritium levels observed in mid- to higher-latitude, Northern Hemispheric meteoric precipitation (Fig. 2; Reference Brown and GrummitBrown and Grummitt, 1956; Reference BrownBrown, 1970; Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977). As has been observed in ice cores from Dye-3 and elsewhere (Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others, 1979, Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and Langway1982), detonation of the earliest fission bombs, followed by testing of hydrogenfusion bombs, resulted in increases in the deposition of tritium relative to other radionuclides. These changes were particularly evident for the years 1958 and 1961–64, during which significant thermonuclear testing took place. On Agassiz Ice Gap, annual ice layers deposited over the same time periods record increases in the levels of tritium (Fig. 2) which are comparable to those in synchronous ice-core samples from Greenland (Dye-3; Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others, 1982). A limitation here is that, because of the discontinuous nature of the 1952–64 samples available for tritium measurements, the data do not define two distinct peaks for 1958 and 1963, as observed for ice cores at the Dye-3 site (Reference Koide, Michel, Goldberg, Herron and LangwayKoide and others, 1982). Rather, for these data, there is an overall trend of increasing tritium in the early 1950s (samples 3–6; Figs. 1 and 2), with a slight decrease around 1958–59 (sample 2; Fig. 1) and a subsequent substantial increase in tritium in the 1964 sample (No. 1; Fig. 1). Although less precisely defined than in other studies, these tritium concentrations reflect increases in Northern Hemispheric, atmospheric tritium as a result of the earliest Soviet and U.S. (Ivy–Castle–Redwing series) hydrogen-fusion bomb tests and the subsequent large infusion of atmospheric tritium following increased hydrogen-fusion bomb tests in the early 1960s (Reference Carter and MoghissiCarter and Moghissi, 1977). Despite the lack of a detailed tritium profile for the Agassiz core, the decay-corrected tritium values are consistent with those in temporally equivalent snow layers for the Dye-3 core and for snow samples collected near Thule (Fig. 2), suggesting equivalent transport mechanisms for both of these high-latitude areas.

The data from Agassiz Ice Cap indicate increasing 3H, 137Cs and 239,240Pu concentrations and 3H/137Cs + 239,240Pu activity ratios, trending from low activity ratios and tritium concentrations between 1935 and 1952, and substantial increases between 1958 and 1964 (Table 1; Fig. 3). Thus, similar to what has been recorded for deposition of tritium and other radionuclides in other ice-core sites worldwide, the changes in radionuclide concentrations and their deposition ratios in the Agassiz ice-core samples are a reflection of the type of nuclear device detonated, providing an isotopic “fingerprint” to characterize these depositions in the natural environment and to aid in establishing the ice-layer chronology.

Conclusions

Measurement of tritium in ice cores from Agassiz Ice Cap using 3He-ingrowth mass spectrometry has yielded accurate data which are comparable to the chronologic distribution of anthropogenic tritium on other polar ice caps and in meteoric precipitation, even after several decades of radioactive decay. The following conclusions have been drawn from these measurements of tritium and from comparison of these data with previously measured radionuclides in several ice-core samples taken from the same area (Reference KudoKudo and others,1998).

  1. (1) With the exception of two ice-core samples (10.9–11.0 and 10.5–10.6 m; Table 1), the record of tritium deposition for annual layers on Agassiz Ice Cap indicates that the site is a suitable archive for delineating the fallout patterns of cosmogenic and anthropogenic radionuclides in high-latitude meteoric waters.

  2. (2) Pre-nuclear-bomb tritium levels in high-latitude meteoric waters were approximately 12.5 TU, compared to values of 3–9 TU in mid-latitude meteoric waters (Fig. 2).

  3. (3) The record of the timing of tritium fallout on Agassiz Ice Cap is similar to that observed by measuring fission-product 137Cs and 239,240Pu (Fig. 3). As elsewhere, the nature of the nuclear detonation can be estimated from the ratio of 3H/137Cs + 239,240Pu which was quite low during the earliest fission-bomb detonations and substantially higher during subsequent thermonuclear hydrogen-fusion bomb testing.

Acknowledgements

T.G.K. would like to thank G. Waito for conducting tritium analyses on several of the ice cores using direct liquid-scin- tillation counting methods. T.G.K. and A.K. acknowledge the expertise and assistance of M. Vandenhoff and the Canadian National Research Council for the construction of the Al-Si glass vessels used for the 3He-ingrowth measurements.

References

Bayer, R., Schlosser, P., Bonisch, G., Rupp, H., Zaucker, G. and Zimmek, G.. 1989. Performance and blank components of a mass spectrometric system for routine measurement of helium isotopes and tritium by the 3He ingrowth method. Berlin, etc., Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Begemann, F. 1958. New measurements on the worldwide distribution of natural and artificially produced tritium. In Proceedings of the Second United Nations International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, 1–13 September 1958 Geneva. Vol. 18. Waste Treatment and Environmental Aspects of Atomic Energy. Geneva, UN Publication, 545–550.Google Scholar
Brown, R. M. 1970. Distribution of hydrogen isotopes in Canadian waters. In Isotope Hydrology . Vienna. International Atomic Energy Agency, 3–21. (Report SM-129/1.)Google Scholar
Brown, R. M. and Grummit, W. E.. 1956. The determination of tritium in natural waters. Can. J. Chem, 34(3), 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. W. and Moghissi, A. A.. 1977. Three decades of nuclear testing. Health Phys, 33, 55–71.Google Scholar
Cecil, L. and Vogt, S.. 1997. Identification of bomb-produced chlorine-36 in mid-latitude glacial ice of North America. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Ser. B, 123, 287–289.Google Scholar
Clark, I. D. and Fritz, P.. 1997. Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. New York, CRC Lewis.Google Scholar
Clark, W. B., Jenkins, W. and Top, Z.. 1976. Determination of tritium by mass spectrometric measurement of 3He. Int. J. App. Rad. Isot., 27, 515–522.Google Scholar
Elmore, D. and 8 others. 1982. The 36Cl bomb pulse measured in a shallow ice core from Dye-3, Greenland. Nature, 300(5894), 735–737.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. A. and Koerner, R. M.. 1994. Signal and noise in four ice-core records from the Agassiz Ice Cap, Ellesmere Island, Canada: details of the last millennium for stable isotopes, melt and solid conductivity. Holocene, 4(2), 113120.Google Scholar
Goto-Azuma, K., Koerner, R. M., Nakawo, M. and Kudo, A.. 1997. Snow chemistry of Agassiz Ice Cap, Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. J. Glaciol, 43(144), 199–206.Google Scholar
Jouzel, J., Merlivat, L., Pourchet, M. and Lorius, C.. 1979. A continuous record of artificial tritium fallout at the South Pole (1954–1978). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 45(1), 188–200.Google Scholar
Koerner, R. M. 1970. The mass balance of the Devon Island ice cap, North-west Territories, Canada, 1961–66. J. Glaciol, 9(57), 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, R. M. and Taniguchi, H.. 1976. Artificial radioactivity layers in the Devon Island ice cap, Northwest Territories. Can. J. Earth Sci., 13(9), 1251–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koide, M. and Herron, M. M.. 1977. Transuranic depositional history in south Greenland firn layers. Nature, 269(5624), 137–139.Google Scholar
Koide, M., Michel, R., Goldberg, E. D., Herron, M. M. and Langway, C. C. Jr. 1979. Depositional history of artificial radionuclides in the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 44(2), 205–223.Google Scholar
Koide, M., Michel, R., Goldberg, E. D., Herron, M. M. and Langway, C. C. Jr. 1982. Characterization of radioactive fallout from pre- and postmoratorium tests to polar ice caps. Nature, 296(5857), 544–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzer, T., Brown, R., Selkirk, E. and Cornett, R.. 1994. Noble gas mass spectrometer system for low-level 3H determinations and groundwater studies. Program with Abstracts. 19th Joint Annual Meeting, Geological Association of Canada and Mineralogical Association of Canada, 10, A59.Google Scholar
Kudo, A. and 6 others. 1998. Global transport rates of 137Cs and 239+240Pu originating from the Nagasaki A-bomb in 1945 as determined from analyses of Canadian Arctic ice cores. J. Environ. Radioactivity, 40(3), 289–298.Google Scholar
Levchenko, V. and 12 others. 1997. Measurements of the14CO2 bomb-pulse in ice and ice at Law Dome, Antarctica. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Ser. B, 123, 290–295.Google Scholar
Lott, D. and Jenkins, W.. 1984. An automated cryogenic trap system for helium isotope mass spectrometry. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 55(12), 1982–1988.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Kay, D.. 1981. Performance of a mass spectrometer system for determining low tritium levels from 3He/4He measurements. In Methods of low-level counting and spectrometry. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 511–523. (SM-252/47)Google Scholar
Mahara, Y. 1995. Noble gases dissolved in groundwater in a volcanic aquifer: helium isotopes in the Mumamoto Plain. Environ. Geol., 25, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftz, D. L., Michel, R. L. and Miller, K. A.. 1993. Isotopic indicators of climate in ice cores, Wind River Range, Wyoming. In Swart, P. K., Lohmann, K. C., McKenzie, J. A. and Savin, S., eds. Climate change in continental isotopic records. Washington, DC, American Geophysical Union, 55–56. (Geophysical Monograph 78.)Google Scholar
Nir, A., Kruger, S. J., Lingenfelder, R. E. and Flamm, E. J.. 1966. Natural tritium. Rev. Geophys., 4, 441–456.Google Scholar
Östlund, G., Scott, E. and Taylor, C.. 1995. 5th IAEA Intercomparison of Low-Level Tritium measurements in H2O. Proceedings. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency. Divisions of Physical and Chemical Sciences. Isotope Hydrology Section. (CT-2133.)Google Scholar
Suckow, A., Schlosser, P., Rupp, H. and Bayer, H.. 1990. Diffusion and permeation of helium in various glasses. Glass Technol., 31(4), 160–164.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. G. and 9 others. 1989. Holocene–Late Pleistocene climatic ice core records from Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Science, 246(4929), 474–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, J. 1996. Electrical conductivity measurements on ice cores from the Canadian Arctic: an analysis of signal variation within and between ice cores. (M.Sc. thesis, University of Ottawa. Ottawa–Carleton Geoscience Center.)Google Scholar
Zheng, J., Kudo, A., Fisher, D. A., Blake, E. W. and Gerasimoff, M.. 1998. Solid electrical conductivity (ECM) from four Agassiz ice cores, Ellesmere Island, N.W.T., Canada: high resolution signals and noise over the last millennium and low resolution over the Holocene. Holocene, 8(4), 413–421.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Sampling depths, descriptions and tritium concentrations for prepared standard waters and ice-core samples from Agassiz Ice Cap

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Measured tritium-depth profile for ice-core samples from Agassiz Ice Cap, 1930–64. (Numbers beside data points correspond to sample numbers from Table 1; tritium values not decay-corrected.)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Comparison between (i) tritium levels measured in precipitation and wine samples from mid-latitude meteoric waters, and (ii) tritium levels measured in precipitation and ice-core samples from higher-latitude precipitation. Mid-latitude tritium data adapted from Clark and Fritz (1997). Other symbols used: ■, tritium measurements from this study; ◊, tritium data for Resolute Bay (Canadian Arctic) rain (IAEA Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation database); ×, tritium data on Greenland ice core (Dye-3) from Koide and others (1982); +, tritium data for snow from Thule, Greenland (Begemann, 1958). Small arrows on bottom of diagram refer to Japan: Nagasaki atom bomb and earliest atmospheric tests of thermonuclear devices, namely, 1. George (75 kilotons, U.S.A.); 2. Ivy-Mike (10 megatons, U.S.A.); 3. RDS-6s (400 kilotons, U.S.S.R.); 4. Castle series, (total 47 megatons, U.S.A); 5. second Soviet test (2 megatons ) (from Clark and Fritz, 1997).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Comparison between tritium levels (this study) and the concentrations of 137Cs and 239,240 Pu previously measured by Kudo and others (in press) on annually deposited ice samples from several other ice cores taken at the same site on Agassiz Ice Cap. Note units used for tritium levels (Bq L−1) relative to those for transuranic radionuclides (mBq cm−2). For tritium 1 TU = 0.1184 Bq L−1.