Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:34:09.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early description of pro-talus ramparts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen C. Porter*
Affiliation:
Quaternary Research Center AK-60, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1987

Sir,

Reference ButlerButler (1986) rightly pointed out that Reference DalyDaly (1912), early in the present century, drew attention to the distinctive alpine land form that Reference BryanBryan (1934) subsequently named “protalus rampart”. However, Daly was not the first to describe and discuss the origin of these features. Reference Cross, Howe, Cross, Cross, Howe and RansomeCross and Howe (1905, p. 25) described pro-talus ramparts in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado which were forming at the front of snow banks, mainly at the base of north-facing cliffs, and referred to them as “snowbank accumulations”. In their words, the “snowbanks would form highways down which rocks loosened by frost would travel from the cliffs to the floors of the amphitheaters, and the effect would be to deposit waste at a greater distance from the cliffs than ordinary talus, and to protect a zone at the very foot of the cliffs from excessive talus accumulations."Reference HoweHowe (1909, p. 35–36, fig. 3) subsequently described them in more detail and illustrated their inferred origin by a diagram that is both clearer and more informative than the one which Reference DalyDaly (1912, fig. 41) later published. In this report, they were referred to as “snowbank deposits”. Although Daly referenced several U.S. Geological Survey publications in his memoir, he did not cite Howe’s observations; apparently that work was unavailable to him at the time of his writing. The Cross and Howe folio was published 7 years before Daly’s report appeared, but he may not have seen the brief description it contained.

In addition to Cross and Howe’s description of protalus ramparts, I have come across an even earlier discussion of these land forms in a paper that apparently escaped the attention of geologists working in the American west during the early years of this century. In describing the varied surficial deposits of the upper Indus River basin in the regions of Gilgit, Baltistan, and Ladakh, Reference DrewDrew (1873, p. 445) described different forms of talus along the valley walls and provided a description of what is clearly a pro-talus rampart:

“sometimes it happens that a talus of snow forms first, in much such position and form as the stone-heap itself might acquire; and then upon this snow-heap rolls down the loosened stuff, which therefore finds rest only at the foot, round the edge, of the snow-talus; the melting of this in summer leaves a heap of stones which may be of considerable height, though it is not very likely to increase by additions in successive seasons. Such circumstances as these should be borne in mind when one meets with isolated heaps, not far from the mountain-side, which might otherwise be taken for moraine-heaps … the heap at the foot of the snow talus is not unlikely to take the form of part of a ring abutting at its ends against the mountain, and thus enclosing a hollow …”.

This description, which antedates Daly’s by more than a third of a century, may constitute the earliest mention of these alpine land forms by a geologist.

Reference ButlerButler (1986) argued that Daly’s term “winter-talus ridge” takes precedence over the term “protalus rampart” later introduced by Bryan. One could argue equally well that Cross and Howe’s term “snowbank accumulation” (or Howe’s subsequent “snowbank deposit”) should take precedence over Daly’s term. However, I find neither of these terms very satisfactory, for they are imprecise and ambiguous. Daly’s term can also be faulted, for it implies that the talus ridge forms in winter. Although this may be true in some cases, I know of no definitive studies showing that sliderock production and accumulation at the toe of a snow bank occurs exclusively, or even predominantly, during the winter season. Some studies have shown that release of rock debris from mountain slopes reaches maximum frequency during mid- to late spring (May–June) when rapid thawing of frost-rived cliff faces takes place (Reference RappRapp, 1960); in polar latitudes, such activity may peak during the summer (e.g. Åkerman, 1984). Rock debris generated during the height of the accumulation season tends to become buried within the growing snow bank and would be unlikely to slide or roll down the unconsolidated snow surface to its toe. Bryan’s term “protalus rampart” avoids these problems, for it is a descriptive, non-genetic designation. Until more is learned about how and when these land forms develop under different geographic conditions, the widely used term proposed by Bryan remains a viable and preferred one.

References

Åkerman, H.J. 1984. Notes on talus morphology and processes in Spitsbergen. Geografiska Annaler, Vol. 66A, No. 4, p. 26784.Google Scholar
Bryan, K. 1934. Geomorphic processes at high altitudes. Geographical Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, p. 65556.Google Scholar
Butler, D.R. 1986. Winter-talus ridges, nivation ridges, and pro-talus ramparts. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 32, No. 112, p. 543.Google Scholar
Cross, W., and Howe, E. 1905. Geography and general geology of the Quadrangle. (In Cross, W., and others. Description of the Silverlon Quadrangle, by Cross, W., Howe, E., and Ransome, F.L.. Washington, DC, U.S. Geological Survey, p. 125. (Folio 120.))Google Scholar
Daly, R.A. 1912. Geology of the North American Cordillera at the forty-ninth parallel. Geological Survey of Canada. Memoir, No. 38.Google Scholar
Drew, F. 1873. Alluvial and lacustrine deposits and glacial records of the Upper-Indus Basin. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, Vol. 29, p. 44171.Google Scholar
Howe, E. 1909. Landslides in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado, including a consideration of their causes and their classification. U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper, No. 67.Google Scholar
Rapp, A. 1960. Recent development of mountain slopes in Kärkevagge and surroundings, northern Scandinavia. Geografiska Annaler, Vol. 42, Nos. 23, p. 65200.Google Scholar