Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:13:58.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dating of Polar Ice By 32Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Henrik B. Clausen*
Affiliation:
Geophysical Isotope Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, DK 2200 København, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

32Si dating of glacier ice has hitherto been complicated by the poor knowledge of the half life. Furthermore, fall-out of bomb-produced 32Si impedes the determination of the specific activity of cosmic-ray produced 32Si in recent precipitation. Measurements on well-dated pre-bomb samples from the Greenland ice sheet establish a calibration for 32Si dating of up to 1 000 year old polar ice samples of the magnitude of 1 metric ton. If the technique is used on temperate glaciers, samples of pre-bomb deposits (or from after 1970) must be collected for comparison with samples of old ice, using an apparent half life of 295±25 years. Due to secular cosmic-ray flux variations, the true half life of 32Si is estimated at the slightly higher value of 330±40 years.

La datation de la glace de glacier au 32Si a, dans le passé, été compliquée par une connaissance imprécise de la période de cet élément. De plus, les retombées de 32Si produites par les bombes nucléaires, gênent la détermination de l’activité spécifique du 32Si produit par le rayonnement cosmique dans les précipitations récentes. Les mesures d’échantillons bien datés, antérieurs à la bombe, provenant de la calotte Groenlandaise, permettent d’établir une échelle pour les datations au 32Si pour des échantillons de glace polaire allant jusqu’à 1 000 ans d’âge, et d’un poids de l’ordre de la tonne métrique. Si la technique est employée sur des glaciers tempérés, il faut recueillir des échantillons issus de dépôts antérieurs à la bombe (ou postérieur à 1970) pour les comparer à des échantillons de vieille glace, et tenir compte d’une période de 295±25 ans. En raison des variations séculaires du flux de rayonnement cosmique, la véritable période du 33Si est estimée à une valeur légèrement supérieure soit 330±40 ans.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Die Datierung von Gletschereis mit 32Si war bisher durch die unvollständige Kenntnis der Halbwertszeit erschwert. Weiter behindern die von Bomben hervorgerufenen 32Si-Ausfälle die Bestimmung der spezifischen Aktivität des durch kosmische Strahlung entstehenden 32Si in rezentem Niederschlag. Messungen an genau datierten Proben des grönländischen Inlandeises aus der Zeit vor den Bombenabwürfen erlauben eine Kalibrierung der 32Si-Datierung für bis zu 1 000- jährigen Polareisproben in der Grössenordnung von einer Tonne. Wenn das Verfahren für temperierte Gletscher verwendet werden soll, müssen zum Vergleich mit Proben alten Eises Proben aus Niederschlägen aus der Zeit vor den Bombenabwürfen (oder aus der Zeit nach 1970) gesammelt werden, wobei eine scheinbare Halbwertszeit von 295±25 Jahren zu verwenden ist. Infolge der säkularen Schwankungen der kosmischen Strahlung wird die wahre Halbwertszeit von 32Si geringfügig höher auf 330±40 Jahre geschätzt.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1973

The use of cosmic-ray produced 32Si for dating of ice and water (Reference Lal and SchinkLal and others, 1960; Reference Clausen, Clausen, Buchmann and AmbachClausen and others, 1968; Reference Lal, Venkatavaradan and OlssonLal and others, 1970) has hitherto been complicated by the poor knowledge of the half life. The literature contains several estimates ranging from 60 to 710 years (Reference Turkevich and SamuelsTurkevich and Samuels, 1954; Reference GeithoffGeithof, 1962; Reference Honda and LalHonda and Lal, 1964; Reference JantschJantsch, 1967), all of which are based on assumptions about unknown cross-sections of nuclear processes leading to the formation of 32Si. Direct measurement of the half life has not been attempted, mainly because of the difficulty in determining the number of 32Si atoms in the small samples obtainable.

This work presents calibration curves for 32Si dating of polar ice, independent of the half life and possible temporal changes in the production rate of 32Si. With reasonable assumptions about the production-rate changes, the calibration curves lead to an estimate of the half life, independent of cross-section considerations.

32Si is cosmic-ray produced in the atmosphere by argon spallations (Reference Lal and SchinkLal and others, 1960) and is scavenged from the atmosphere by rain and snow. The rate of production has been estimated at 1.7 × 10−4 atoms cm−2s−1 (Reference Lal and SchinkLal and others, 1960) and at 1.2 × 10−4 atoms cm−2s−1 assuming a half life of 300 years (cf. Reference Dansgaard, Dansgaard, Clausen and AarkrogDansgaard and others, 1966 [a], p. 5476). At latitudes higher than 30°, the specific 32Si activity of precipitation is expected to be approximately 20 dph/ton, essentially independent of latitude (Reference Dansgaard, Dansgaard, Clausen and AarkrogDansgaard and others, 1966[a], p. 5476, [b], fig. 1).

The snow- and ice-pack in the high-altitude regions of the Greenland ice sheet contains many thousands of annual layers of precipitation, accumulated without run-off or mixing. They can be dated by ice-flow considerations (Reference Dansgaard and JohnsenDansgaard and Johnson, 1969) or by counting 18O/16O summer maxima downwards from the surface (Reference Johnsen, Johnsen, Dansgaard, Clausen and LangwayJohnsen and others, 1972). A total of 13 firn and ice samples were collected, melted and chemically prepared for extraction of 32Si. Data obtained on these samples are listed in Table I. Comments on the individual columns are given below.

Table I

  1. 1. Sites of collection. Sample Nos. 1–5, 10, 12 and 13 originate from a pit and a bore hole at the Dye 3 station in south Greenland. These bore-hole samples are identical to samples collected for 14C dating by Hans Oeschger’s group from the University of Bern (14C data will be reported later). The rest of the samples originate from a 100 m deep trench with slope of 1: 3, at Camp Century, north-west Greenland, but No. 11 is from a bore hole at the same location.

  2. 2. The depth is for Camp Century the distance from the 1966 summer layer to the ice sample in situ, for Dye 3 the distance from the 1971 surface to the sample. In order to exclude contamination with bomb-produced 32Si (Reference Dansgaard, Dansgaard, Clausen and AarkrogDansgaard and others, 1966[a]), the samples were collected from layers below the 1945 horizon, except the surface sample from Dye 3, which represents the accumulation from the summer of 1968 to the summer of 1971. In this period the fall-out of bomb-produced 32Si has dropped to negligible values (Reference Dansgaard, Dansgaard, Clausen and AarkrogDansgaard and others, 1966[a]).

  3. 3. The age T is the time elapsed since the deposition of the samples. As for the Dye 3 samples, the ages are determined by counting summer maxima from the surface in a complete 18O/16O record spanning 741 years. The accuracy of these datings is better than ±10 years. The Camp Century samples are dated by using the formula (Reference Dansgaard and JohnsenDansgaard and Johnsen, 1969)

    H = 1 367.5 m of ice being the total thickness of the ice sheet, and y m of ice being the present distance of the sample from the bottom, both corrected for the low densities in the upper layers. h = 400 m is the distance from the bottom, above which the horizontal velocity profile is considered uniform (below h = 400 m this profile is assumed to vary proportionally to y, which is not essential for this work). λh/τ = 0.35 m of ice/year is the present annual accumulation rate (Reference Crozaz and LangwayCrozaz and Langway, 1966) which has been shown to be representative for the entire depth interval considered here (Reference Johnsen, Johnsen, Dansgaard, Clausen and LangwayJohnsen and others, 1972, fig. 2). The accuracy of these datings is probably better than ±5%.

  4. 4. The time interval ∆ represented in each sample is calculated from the known length of the sample using either the 18O/16O record or the formula above. Each sample is collected so as to represent many years of snow accumulation in order to smooth seasonal variations in the 32Si deposition rate (3.5 times higher in summer than in winter; Reference Dansgaard, Dansgaard, Clausen and AarkrogDansgaard and others, 1966[b]). Furthermore, whenever possible the samples represent two 11 year solar cycles in order to reduce possible influence of short-period variations in the cosmic-ray intensity.

  5. 5. Amount of sample. Field preparation. Due to the low specific activity of snow, huge amounts of ice (hundreds of kilograms) are required for dating purposes. In the field, preliminary chemical concentration of 32Si takes place in drums containing the melt water, acid FeCl3 solution and inactive silica carrier. Addition of ammonia in excess produces a precipitate of Fe(OH)3, which scavenges all silica from the water. The field preparation is completed by concentration of the precipitate by filtration.

  6. 6. The silicic acid is recovered from the precipitate in the laboratory. After drying, the iron and silicon components are separated in boiling hydrochloric acid. To bring all silica into a soluble state, the remaining precipitate is melted in liquid sodium hydroxide (at c. 320° C) containing a few per cent of sodium nitrate to oxidize possible organic contaminants. After recovering the silicon components as silicic acid by adding hydrochloric acid to the melt dissolved in water, it is heated to 800° C in an electric oven.

  7. 7. The net counting rate. The radioactivity measurements are carried out on the daughter 32P, because it is better suited for detection due to its high β energy 1.7 MeV (compared with 0.1 MeV for 32Si), and for identification due to the short and well-known half life of 14.3 d. During 2 months of storage, the ignited silicic acid builds up 32P to more than 95% of the equilibrium value. The chemical extraction of 32P from the silicic acid has been described in detail by Reference Lal and SchinkLal and others (1960). The β measurement is carried out on approximately 15 mg of Mg2P2O7 in a small counter of the Reference Lal and SchinkLal type (Lal and Schink, 1960) modified by S. J. Johnson. The counter background is ≈1.5 cph for a counting area of 0.5 cm2. The counting efficiency is approximately 50% for a 2π geometry with 0.1 mm tungsten backscattering. Figure 1 gives an example of the total counting rate of sample 6 plotted as a function of exp (–λT), λ being the decay constant of 32P and T the time since separation of 32P from the silica. The straight line is determined by the method of least squares. The difference between the intersection of this line with ordinates for T = 0 and T = ∞ gives the net counting rate of the sample at the time of isolation. The ordinate for T = ∞ gives the background of the counter plus the contribution of possible long-lived impurities.

    Fig. 1. Total counting rate (cph) of a phosphate sample isolated from the silicates. The net counting rate is due to the 32Si daughter 32P that is built up close to equilibrium after 2 months. The 32Si activity of the ice sample is calculated from the net counting rate for T = 0 after correction for counter efficiency, etc.

  8. 8. The specific activity is obtained from columns 5 and 7 after correction for counter efficiency and chemical yield. The stated uncertainties include the uncertainties on the latter parameters.

  9. 9. The weighted mean specific activities are plotted versus age T in Figure 2. The (extrapolated) surface value is 23±2 dph/ton at Camp Century and 16.5±1.5 dph/ton at Dye 3. The former value may be representative for north and north-west Greenland, because another sample from mid north Greenland (Inge Lehmann) indicates 27±3 dph/ton. Similarly, the Dye 3 value may be representative for East and south Greenland, because a sample from mid East Greenland (Jarl Joset) indicates 19±3 dph/ton.

    Fig. 2. The specific 32Si activity (disintegrations per hour per ton) of firn and ice samples plotted as a function of the time since deposition. Dating of old ice should be based on the apparent half life of 295 years and on the specific activity of a sample of recent deposits.

The two lines are calculated by the method of least squares. The slopes of the two lines correspond to apparent half lives of 260±40 and 330±35 years for 32Si. The difference is not significant and 295±25 years is adopted as the best estimate of the apparent half life of 32Si for dating of ice in Greenland. As to west Antarctic ice, the same apparent half life can probably be used along with a specific 32Si activity of recent precipitation of 25±2 dph/ton, as indicated by a preliminary measurement on pre-bomb firn from “Byrd” station.

When used on up to 1 000 year old ice samples of the order of 1 ton, the technique described above gives datings with an estimated uncertainty of ±60 years. Ice older than 1 000 years may be dated by using correspondingly higher amounts (a factor of 2 higher for each 300 years beyond 1 000 years).

Measurements on recent material from temperate glaciers in Norway (Reference Dansgaard, Dansgaard, Clausen and AarkrogDansgaard and others, 1966[b]) and Austria (Reference Clausen, Clausen, Buchmann and AmbachClausen and others, 1968) gave somewhat higher values (28 and 50 dph/ton). These samples were collected in 1962 and 1966 respectively and were probably contaminated with bomb-produced 32Si. Therefore, if the technique is applied outside Greenland and west Antarctica, a recent reference sample should be collected so as to represent net accumulated material from prior to 1952, or, if impossible, after 1970, assuming negligible fall-out of bomb-produced 32Si in the present decade. If only a short time interval of deposition can be represented, it must be a whole number of years. In all cases, any kind of solid matter present in the samples should be included in the chemical preparation to account for possible adhesion of 32Si to solid particles.

The apparent half life of 295 ± 25 years, suggested by the data in Figure 2, should be applied for dating of cold as well as temperate glaciers.

The true half life of 32Si is probably a little higher due to secular changes of the cosmic-ray flux and, therefore, of the natural 32Si production in the atmosphere. Unfortunately, the temporal change in the cosmic-ray flux is still an unsolved problem. However, short time variations (i.e. up to several hundred years) would show up in Figure 2, if essential. For example, one may expect that the 400 year oscillation observed in the 14C/12C ratio in tree rings (Reference Suess and OlssonSuess, 1970) would appear in Figure 2, if due to cosmic-ray flux variations, the more so as the 32Si fall-out is not subject to attenuation, as is the 14C/12C ratio in the atmosphere (due to CO2 exchange with the oceans). The reason why the data do not oscillate with a period of 400 years may be either that the corresponding variation in the 14C/12C ratio is not caused by varying cosmic-ray flux or that the cosmic-ray component producing 32Si varies much less than that producing 14C.

On the other hand, the slope of the line in Figure 2 may be influenced by the long-term variation (8 900 year period) in the cosmic-ray flux caused by oscillating geomagnetic moment (Reference Bucha and NeustupnyBucha and Neustrupny, 1967). During the last 700 years the geomagnetic moment seems to have decreased by 25% (Reference Bucha and OlssonBucha, 1970), which corresponds to a 10% increase of the 14C production, according to Reference Lal, Venkatavaradan and OlssonLal and Venkatavarandan’s (1970, fig. 4) calculations.

Let us assume that the production and fall-out of 32Si has also increased by 10%. This means that the half life of 295±25 years from Figure 2 is a little lower than in the case of the unchanged 32Si production rate. The corrected half life therefore appears to be 330±40 years, the higher uncertainty being used to account for the difficulty in estimating the correction term.

Acknowledgements

Several people have contributed to the completion of this work. First of all I wish to thank W. Dansgaard and S. J. Johnsen for unlimited help in all phases of the work. Thanks are also due to Claus Hammer. Kjeld Rasmussen, Jørgen Stougaard and Jørgen Wilhjelm (Copenhagen), to Peter Bucher, Markus Möll, Hans Oeschger, Heinrich Rufli and Bernhard Stauffer (University of Bern); Lyle Hansen, Chester Langway and Wilford Weeks (U.S.A. C.R.R.E.L., New Hampshire); Michel Pourchet (E.G.I.G.) and Ralph Lenton (Arctic Institute of North America), all of whom helped me in the field. Peter Fauslund (Danish Arctic Contractors) and Jørgen Mølgaard (Danish Liaison Officer) made it possible for me to work at Thule A.B. Financial support was granted by the Ministry of Greenland, the Carlsberg Foundation (Copenhagen) and the U.S. National Science Foundation (Office of Polar Programs, Washington).

References

Bucha, V. 1970. Influence of the Earth’s magnetic field on radiocarbon dating. (In Olsson, I. U., ed. Nobel Symposium 12. Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 50111.)Google Scholar
Bucha, V., and Neustupny, E. 1967. Changes of the Earth’s magnetic field and radiocarbon dating. Nature, Vol. 215, No. 5098, p. 26163.Google Scholar
Clausen, H. B., and others. 1968. Si32 dating of an Alpine glacier, by Clausen, H. B. and Buchmann, B. [and] Ambach, W.. Union de Géodésie et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale d’Hydrologie Scientifique. Assemblée générale de Berne, 25 sept.–7 oct. 1967. [Commission de Neiges et Glaces.] Rapports et discussions, p. 13540.Google Scholar
Crozaz, G., and Langway, C. C., jr. 1966. Dating Greenland firn-ice cores with Pb-210. Earth and PlanetaryScience Letters, Vol. 1, No. 4, p. 19496.Google Scholar
Dansgaard, W., and Johnsen, S. J. 1969. A flow model and a time scale for the ice core from Camp Century, Greenland. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 8, No. 53, p. 21523.Google Scholar
Dansgaard, W., and others. 1966[a]. Evidence for bomb-produced silicon 32, by Dansgaard, W., Clausen, H. B. and Aarkrog, A.. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 71, No. 2, p. 547477.Google Scholar
Dansgaard, W., and others. 1966[b]. The Si32 fallout in Scandinavia: a new method for ice dating, by Dansgaard, W., Clausen, H. B. and Aarkrog, A.. Tellus, Vol. 18. Nos. 2–3, p. 18791.Google Scholar
Geithoff, D. 1962. Über die Herstellung von Si32 durch einen (t, p)-Prozess. Radiochimica Acta, Bd. 1, Ht. 1, p. 36.Google Scholar
Honda, M., and Lal, D. 1964. Spallation cross sections for long-lived radionucleides in iron and light nuclei. Nuclear Physics, Vol. 51, No. 3, p. 36368.Google Scholar
Jantsch, K. 1967. Kernreaktionen mit Tritonen beim 30Si: Bestimmung der Halbwertzeit von 32Si. Kernenergie, 10. Jahrg., Ht. 3, p. 8991.Google Scholar
Johnsen, S. J., and others. 1972. Oxygen isotope profiles through the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, [by] Johnsen, S. J., Dansgaard, W., Clausen, H. B., Langway, C. C., Jr. Nature, Vol. 235, No. 5339, p. 42934.Google Scholar
Lal, D., and Schink, D. R. 1960. Low background thinwall flow counters for measuring beta activity of solids. Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 31, No. 4, p. 39598.Google Scholar
Lal, D., and Venkatavaradan, V. S. 1970. Analysis of the causes of C14 variations in the atmosphere. (In Olsson, I. U., ed. Nobel Symposium 12. Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 54969.)Google Scholar
Lal, D., and others. 1960. Cosmic-ray-produced silicon-32 in nature, by Lal, D., Goldberg, E. D. and Koide, M.. Science, Vol. 131, No. 3397, p. 33237.Google Scholar
Lal, D., and others. 1970. Si32 hydrology, by Lal, D., Nijampurkar, V. N. and Rama, S.. (In Isotope hydrology 1970. Proceedings of a symposium on use of isotopes in hydrology held by the International Atomic Energy Agency in co-operation with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in Vienna, 9–13 March 1970. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, p. 84768.)Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1970. Bristlecone-pine calibration of the radiocarbon time-scale 5200 B.C. to the present. (In Olsson, I. U., ed. Nobel Symposium 12. Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 30311.)Google Scholar
Turkevich, A., and Samuels, A. 1954. Evidence for Si32 a long lived β-emitter. Physical Review, Second Ser., Vol. 94, No. 2, p. 364.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table I

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Total counting rate (cph) of a phosphate sample isolated from the silicates. The net counting rate is due to the 32Si daughter 32P that is built up close to equilibrium after 2 months. The 32Si activity of the ice sample is calculated from the net counting rate for T = 0 after correction for counter efficiency, etc.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. The specific 32Si activity (disintegrations per hour per ton) of firn and ice samples plotted as a function of the time since deposition. Dating of old ice should be based on the apparent half life of 295 years and on the specific activity of a sample of recent deposits.