(a) Bore-hole photography

Photographs of the bottom of each completed bore hole were made with a bore-hole camera, whose construction and mode of operation are described elsewhere (Reference Harrison and KambHarrison and Kamb, 1973, hereafter cited as "H & K"). To eliminate camera motion, which tends to occur when the camera is freely suspended, a stabilizer, consisting of a 40 cm-long cylindrical plastic brush of such a diameter (75 mm) as to bind lightly in the bore hole, was attached above the camera in 1976.

For studying conditions and motions at the glacier bed, photographs taken vertically downward, from distances of 4 to 70 cm above the bottom, were used. Features of the debris-laden ice above the bed were observed in photographs taken horizontally at various heights above the bottom. A selection of photographs of these types is shown in Figures 2–6; additional examples are given in H & K. The total number of photographs taken in each bore hole is listed in Table I. The scale for each photograph, determined by the methods discussed in H & K, is indicated in the figure captions by giving the actual distance that corresponds, at the level of the bottom of the bore hole, or (for side-looking photographs) at the bore hole wall, to the full diameter of each circular image. This distance is given after the symbol Ø in each caption. The white plastic ball visible in some photographs has a diameter of 9.5 mm. The photographs are shown in a consistent orientation, with up (for views looking horizontally) or magnetic south (for views looking vertically downward) toward the top of the page. The orientation is referenced to a compass needle in the camera, or, if this is absent, to features in the bore-hole wall whose orientation was determined in other photographs in which the compass needle was used. The compass arrow points toward magnetic south in the photographs, because the compass needle lies immediately below the film in the camera and the image of the external scene is therefore inverted relative to it. (The magnetic declination is 23° E.; true north lies 23° counterclockwise from the direction opposite the compass arrow.) The black circular dot in some of the photographs is the shadow of the steel ball in the optional inclinometer unit (H & K, p. 131). The captions give the original photograph number of each photograph, as a matter of record and for reference to the original logs. Photographs mentioned in the text but not reproduced in the figures (to conserve space) are cited by their original photograph numbers.

Fig. 2. Photographs of the bottom of bore hole V. For each photograph, the following caption gives: original photograph number (for reference), date, time, and, following the symbol Ø, scale of the photograph in terms of diameter of the circular field of view at the level of the bore-hole bottom.

• (a) No. 93, 18 August 1969, 16.05 h, Ø86 mm. The ice wall of the bore hole fills the lower left half of the picture. The ice is separated from the bed by several cm, as indicated by the shadow along the boundary. The lighter areas of the bed are silt in patches among the rock fragments.

• (b) No. 99, 19 August 1969, 18.20 h, Ø80 mm. Same as (a) but taken one day later. Motion of the ice with respect to the bed (1.1 cm/d ) is evident by comparison of (a) and (b). On left at the base of the bore-hole wall is a thin layer of debris-laden ice, forming a projecting ledge separated from the bed by 4 ± 2 cm.

• (c) No. 101, 22 August 1969, 9.55 h, Ø82 mm. Further motion has occurred, with appearance of new stones from beneath bore-hole wall.

• (d) No. 107, 22 August 1969, 12.20 h, Ø72 mm. A rounded cobble of uncertain origin now fills most of the picture, and prevents sliding velocity measurements. It remained in this position until 25 August, when we pushed it out of the way with a small cable t:0'.

• (e) No. 115, 25 August 1969, 18.45 h, Ø77 mm. The ledge of debris-laden ice seen in (a)-(c) has been partly removed, probably by the cable tool used to push away the cobble in (d). New debris-laden ice, apparently attached both to the bottom of the glacier and the bed, has become visible on the right.

• (f) No. 119, 26' August 1969, 15.50 h, Ø89 mm. The configuration of the new debris-laden ice has changed considerably in less a d 'y, and covers half of the originally visible bed. A pointed rock near the center of the photograph projects into the hole from a mass of ice that has formed below the level of the ice sole as it was in (e).

• (g) No. 137, 1 September 1969, 12.55 h, Ø86 mm. Some of the new debris-laden ice has been melted away by the hotpoint. The melting has opened a gap between the bed and the remaining debris-laden ice, which now forms two ledges.

• (h) No. 148, 5 September 1969, 10.00 h, Ø102 mm. The four circular objects near the periphery of the photograph are lamp/ reflector assemblies in the 24 cm viewing tube used. The two bright areas in the 10 lower part of the picture are the ledges seen in (g).

• (i) No. 154, 6 September 1969, 10.30 h, Ø93 mm. The motion in the day since (h) is obvious. The velocity is now 2.7 cm/d, more than twice that observed earlier. The compass needle here has stuck in a false orientation because of moisture in the camera.

• (j) No. 155, 6 September 1969, 13.20 h, Ø59 mm. Details of the debris-strewn bed are seen in this close-up view. In relation to (i), a small pebble has appeared in the lower left part of the picture.

• (k) No. 159, 7 September 1969, 10.15 h, Ø96 mm. The diameter of the white ball is 9.5 mm.

• (l) No. 161, 8 September 1969, 10.50 h, Ø92 mm. Photographs (k) and (l) are rotated 45° clockwise relative to (g)-(i), in order that they can be viewed as a stereo pair. A sliding motion of 2.9 cm/d is approximately parallel to the line connecting the pair.

Fig. 3. Photographs of([a-z]+) bore holes V, T, and X.

• (a) V, No. 158, 11 September 1969, 15.50 h, Ø72 mm. Side-looking picture taken with bottom of camera touching the bed. It shows ice-free debris extending at least 5 cm above bed. Viewing direction is toward 9 o'clock in relation to Figure 2k, and string is the one visible in Figure 2k–l.

• (b) T, No. 149, 5 September 1969, 10.50 h, Ø86 mm. View of bore-hole bottom. Most of the bottom consists of debris-laden ice ledge attached to the base of the glacier. A small, slightly lower area at top center is part of the actual bed.

• (c) T, No. 151, 5 September 1969, 15.20 h, Ø80 mm. Photograph taken 4.5 h after (b). Apparent motion of the bed in relation to the ice ledge, from comparison with (b), amounts to roughly 1 cm/d.

• (d) T, No. 172, 10 September 1969, 17.10 h, Ø86 mm. Bottom has changed greatly from that in (c) . Bright spots at left and lower center may be reflections from bare ice surfaces.

• (e) T, No. 176, 11 September 1969, 11.55 h, Ø86 mm. The motion between (d) and (e) involves jumbling and tilting of clasts, plus an apparently retrograde translation northward.

• (f) T, No. 184, 12 September 1969, 18.05 h, Ø72 mm. Side view, showing that bottom of the camera has sunk into mud.

• (g) X, B-36, 16 July 1970, 17.30 h, Ø102 mm. Close-up view of part of bottom before start of sequence in Figure 4. Large, subrounded rock on right is later visible in Figure 4a. Debris at top left appears cemented by ice because it has not collapsed down into hole at left center. Subsequent photographs (B-37, B-39, B- 44, Fig. 2a) show that collapse gradually occurs, hence the cementation must be weak.

• (h) X, B-75, 4 August 1970, 17.30 h, Ø160 mm. Close-up of bottom on day following Figure 4g. Steep debris bank above hole at left center again suggests ice cementation of debris. Progressive collapse of this bank is seen in the sequence of Figures 4f, 3h, 3i, 4g, 4h. Cobble at lower left is imbedded in ice of bore-hole wall and is also seen in Figure 4.

• (i) X, B-81, 6 August 1970, 15.10 h, Ø93 mm. Closer detail in field of (h), after further collapse of debris bank. Ball suspended on string is 11.1 mm in diameter.

• (j) X, A-67, 26 August 1970, 16.15 h, Ø72 mm. Side-looking picture. Lower edge is 21 cm above bottom of hole. Shows lightly debris-laden ice on left, and, at lower right, part of the cobble seen in bore-hole wall in (h).

• (k) X, A-40, 12 August 1970, 15.15 h, Ø72 mm. Side view, with lower edge 1 cm above bed. Shows upward transition from heavily to lightly debris-laden ice.

• (l) X, A-57, 15 August 1970, 14.27 h, Ø72 mm. Side view of heavily debris-laden ice at base of glacier. Bottom of camera was set 3 cm above bottom of bore hole, but bed appears to be visible at bottom edge of photograph.

Fig. 4. Sequence of photographs of bottom of bore hole X. Cobble embedded in the ice of the bore-hole wall at lower left serves as a reference mark for the motion of the glacier relative to its bed. The ice of the bore-hole wall ends with a clearly visible edge, below which is a gap between ice and subsole drift. Large clasts and finer debris pass across the bore-hole bottom from lower left to upper right as the glacier slides over its bed.

• (a) B-47, 18 July 1970, 10.10 h, Ø142 mm. Large sub-rounded clast in upper right was seen earlier in Figure 3g.

• (b) B-52, 20 July 1970, 19.50 h, Ø193 mm. Large clast has rotated so that face on left is nearly vertical. A crack is opening up in the finer debris mass to left of the large clast. Debris particles scattered in otherwise clear ice of bore-hole walls are clearly visible.

• (c) B-55, 21 July 1970, 16.35 h, Ø177 mm. Crack has opened further and partly collapsed as large clast moves out toward top right.

• (d) B-58, 25 July 1970, 18.30 h, Ø182 mm. Crack has widened greatly and become a gap between debris bank and large clast. Opening of this gap indicates that debris mass is being carried along by glacier to some extent, while clast remains behind. Motion between (a) and (d) corresponds to 0.7 cm/d.

• (e) B-67, 29 July 1970, 17.30 h, Ø134 mm. Clast visible in (a)-(d) has disappeared and gap has widened further. A smaller rock is just entering hole from left. Debris bank has moved toward upper right, showing that it is not solidly attached to the glacier.

• (f) B-73, 3 August 1970, 12.50 h, Ø184 mm. Light cable-tool drilling has produced the depressed circular area at right.

• (g) B-83, 8 August 1970, 14.30 h, Ø132 mm. From the left has appeared a natural cavity, in the subsole drift, the edge of which is seen in greater detail in Figure 3h and i. Motion between this and the previous photograph amounts to 0.6 cm/d.

• (h) B-87, 10 August 1970, 18.45 h, Ø170 mm. The cavity is now seen to be a gap between the debris bank on the right and a large angular rock that has entered from the left. This gap narrows between (g) and (h), showing that the debris mass is being partially dragged along by the glacier.

• (i) B-90, 13 August 1970, 11.04 h, Ø153 mm. Motion of the large rock corresponds to 1.4 cm/d. It has caught up with the smaller rock at upper right, which has come loose from the debris bank, perhaps by hanging up against the bore-hole wall.

• (j) B-98, 17 August 1970, 13.12 h, Ø140 mm.

• (k) B-135, 24 August 1970, 16.35 h, Ø140 mm. The large rock has become caught under the ice at top center and has begun to roll.

• (l) B-138, 26 August 1970, 09.52 h, Ø150 mm. Large rock has rotated further, while no longer moving forward as rapidly as before. Rock at left moved at speed 0.9 cm/d between (k) and (l). A new debris mass has appeared from lower left and has almost caught up with large rock at top right.

Fig. 5. Bottom photographs of bore holes ϒ and Z.

• (a) ϒ, B-114, 21 August 1970, 11.23 h, Ø83 mm. Low cloud of turbidity hugging bottom of hole partially obscures graywacke fragment at center.

• (b) ϒ, B-117, 21 August 1970, 16.56 h, Ø33 mm. Turbidity cloud has risen, obscuring almost completely the graywacke clast, which however remains faintly visible, and has moved to the right from its position in (a).

• (c) ϒ, B-122, 22 August 1970, 14.46 h, Ø82 mm. Cloud level has dropped and new clasts have appeared.

• (d) ϒ, B-125, 22 August 1970, 19.13 h, Ø82 mm. Cloud has dropped further and almost disappeared, at top. Rectangular clast has moved at about 1 cm/d since (c). Compass needle stuck in erroneous orientation.

• (e) ϒ, B-154, 1 September 1970, 16.30 h, Ø83 mm. Character of bottom has changed markedly since (d). It now appears to consist of ice (dark) almost completely coated with fine rock debris.

• (f) ϒ, B-156, 2 September 1970, 13.00 h, Ø83 mm. Visibility of dark markings, interpreted as exposures of ice, is improved. Markings have moved southward (toward top), indicating some sliding motion.

• (g) ϒ, A-80, 8 September 1970, 18.45 h, Ø86 mm. A debris-strewn bottom has reappeared.

• (h) ϒ, A-81, 9 September 1970, 09.00 h, Ø86 mm. A slight southward motion (toward top) has occurred, and a new clast has appeared at lower right.

• (i) ϒ, A-90, 10 September 1970, 17.11 h, Ø86 mm. Further southward motion, amounting to 0.5 cm/d, has occurred. The new clast appears to have jumped south-eastward (toward upper left) to a position at top center.

• (j) ϒ, A-91, 11 September 1970, 16.00 h, Ø86 mm. Further southward motion. No gap between bore-hole walls and bottom is visible in (e)-(j).

• (k) Z, A-14, 27 July 1970, 15.22 h, Ø143 mm. Large rock at bottom of bore hole, appearing like bedrock except that its edge is visible toward top. Subsequent cable-tool drilling penetrated the rock and continued a further 60 cm. Water was clear at level of rock, but turbid below.

• (l) Z, A-34, 8 August 1970, 17.08 h, Ø88 mm. Shows rock protuding from bore-hole wall 150 cm above bottom. This rock must have been intruded into the hole, because it blocked the hole to passage of the camera where earlier there was no obstruction.

Fig. 6. Photographs of bore hole C.

• (a) B-184, 16 August 1976, 17.02 h, Ø240 mm. Photograph was taken before cable-tool drilling. Water was already leaking rapidly from hole at bottom, so that there was no turbidity, and fines had been washed out of the subsole drift, leaving coarse sand and pebbles. There is no gap at the base of the bore-hole walls.

• (b) B-194, 20 August 1976, 14.50 h, Ø200 mm. After cable-tool drilling and bailing, the base of the bore-hole walls has been undermined by excavation of subsole drift. A pair of rocks at left, attached to the base of the ice, appears to have been intruded rapidly into the hole since it would not have survived the immediately previous cable-tool drilling.

• (c) B-196, 20 August 1976, 18.20 h, Ø200 mm. Bailing with sandpump has knocked away the intruded pair of rocks and has removed the two white plastic balls visible on the bottom in (b). The large, somewhat smooth rock on the left remains visible through the sequence (b)-(g).

• (d) B-198, 21 August 1976, 13.25 h, Ø240 mm. Hole contraction and intrusion rocks at base of ice is highly evident by comparison with (c).

• (e) A-125, 28 August 1976, 11.35 h, Ø166 mm. Movement southward of the distinctive light marking on the rock surface at left center, from (c) to (e), corresponds to a sliding motion of 0.3 cm/d, with some uncertainty due to possible modification of the bore-hole walls by extensive cable-tool drilling during this period.

• (f) B-214, 28 August 1976, 13.10 h, Ø200 mm. In spite of the previous drilling and bailing, the rock surface at left center (e) and (f) is more deeply buried by adjacent rock debris than it was in (b)-(d). Sharp rock at top left has apparently been intruded. White veinlets (probably quartz) visible on bottom in (e) and (f) suggest an underlying rock surface, but this does not seem confirmed in (g).

• (g) B-216, 28 August 1976, 18.45 h, Ø74 mm. Detail of field seen in (f), showing loose rocks and detail of veinlets exposed on rough rock surfaces. Edge of large rock surface is at left.

• (h) B-235, 4 September 1976, 11.15 h, Ø190 mm. After extensive cable-tool drilling and bailing subsequent to (g), the bottom of the hole is completely altered but the depth of the bottom appears unchanged. Large rock protruding into hole from under the ice at lower left appears different from rock seen in (b)-(g).

• (i) B-239, 4 September 1976, 13.50 h, Ø190 mm. In the short time since (h), a rounded pebble has appeared in upper center, just left of the black dot. Position of dot shows that hole is tilted 13° from vertical.

• (j) B-238, 4 September 1976, 13.05 h, Ø80 mm. Side view looking south-west at bottom. Shows subsole drift. Larger rocks appear to overlie finer debris.

• (k) B-242, 4 September 1976, 17.00 h, Ø80 mm. Side view looking north-east, taken 7 cm above bottom. Large rocks are probably those seen at lower left in (h) and (i).

• (l) B-245, 5 September 1976, 14.30 h, Ø80 mm. Side view looking north-east, with camera set 10 cm above bottom. The rocks are the same ones seen in (k), but they have shifted somewhat relative to one another.

In bore holes T, V, X, Y, and C, photographs of the bottom were generally taken at least once a day over a period of one to two months. To keep the bore holes open for passage of the camera during this period, the holes were reamed at least once a week with conical thermal drills of maximum diameter 62 or 71 mm. For water-free holes, the need for reaming is due simply to bore-hole contraction by ice flow. Closure also occurs for water-filled holes in temperate ice, owing to the refreezing process discussed by Reference HarrisonHarrison (1972). Because of changes that took place at the bottom of some of the holes during the period of observation it was necessary to redrill with the cable tool occasionally and in some instances repeatedly.

The main obstacle to bore-hole photography was turbidity due to suspended glacial flour. At the bottom of the bore holes, the water was initially almost opaque, especially after cable-tool drilling. Procedures used for overcoming this difficulty by air-lift pumping in 1969 and 1970 are described in H & K (p. 131). In 1976 a much more powerful (5 000 W), pump operating at the surface, was used to pump clean water to the bottom of the bore hole through 38 mm diameter mining hose. The pumping rate achievable was 6.5 1/s at a pressure of 3.8 atm. A volume of water equal to four times the entire bore-hole volume could be pumped to the bottom of the hole in 5 min, flushing out the hole thoroughly. This flushing was successful in removing turbidity temporarily from the bottom of the bore hole, so that photographs could be made immediately thereafter. Turbidity commonly returned later, particularly after renewed cable-tool drilling, so that repeated flushing was necessary. Once the water in a bore hole had begun to leak out from the bottom (see Section 5g) it was generally unnecessary to flush the hole to achieve clear conditions.

(b) Indirect methods

The performance of the cable-tool drill and the contents of the bailer provide information about conditions at and near the glacier bed, as discussed in Section 5b. A penetrometer, consisting of a sharpened steel rod (diameter 1 cm) on which a hollow cylindrical weight attached to the drilling cable) slides with limited travel, was used in 1976 to ascertain the penetrability of material at the bed. The 27 kg weight can be dropped a distance of 75 cm before striking the steel rod to drive it downward; the sharpened end of the rod, free to penetrate into the bed material, is 30 cm long.

The sliding velocities measured directly by bore-hole photography in bore holes X and C were checked by indirect determinations of the standard type based on bore-hole inclinometry and surface surveying.

(a) Motion

Evidence that the glacier bed was reached in holes T, V, X, Y, and C is lateral motion of the bottom with respect to the bore-hole walls, seen in successive photographs taken at intervals of a few hours to a week. The photograph sequences in Figs 2a–c, 2h–i. 2k–l, 5e–f, and 5g–j show such motions. The direction of motion of the ice with respect to the bottom, determined with the help of a compass needle in the camera, is consistently within about 20° of the slope of the glacier surface and the direction of ice flow at the surface. We interpret this translational motion as due to the sliding of the glacier over its bed. The quantitative features of the sliding motion are considered in Section 6. In the discussion below we refer to the "entrance side" of a bore hole as the side from which bed materials enter the bottom of the hole in the sliding process, and the "exit side" as the side toward which they disappear; these are respectively the down-stream and up-stream sides in relation to the How of the glacier.

(b) Bed materials and configuration

The glacier bed revealed in our photographs invariably consists of rock debris. In some examples, angular fragments 0.4 to 4 cm in size appear to be set in a pale-toned muddy or sandy matrix (Figs 2a, b, h; 3d, e, f; 4e, f). In others, the bottom consists of generally larger fragments (up to at least 10 cm, the approximate diameter of the bore hole at the bottom), with little or no matrix (Figs 3a, g; 4b, l; 6h, i; H & K, fig. 6a). Clasts of graywacke, argillite, and vein quartz are recognizable in the photographs as well as the bailer hauls; these lithologies are typical of the bedrock of the area. Clasts larger than about 1 cm in size generally show some indications of rounding or faceting, probably by glacier abrasion, and some are well rounded (Fig. 2d); smaller clasts are generally angular.

In no case do we observe any definite bedrock at the bottom of our bore holes. This finding is contrary to our original expectations, which were based on the abundance of massive, abraded and striated bedrock outcrops at the margin of the glacier near the area studied, and below the terminus. In an effort to expose any bedrock concealed at shallow depth beneath the visible debris-strewn surface, we used repeated and forceful bailing to suck up the loose debris from the bottom, both with and without alternate cable-tool drilling to penetrate the debris and break up the larger fragments. The bailer loads decreased progressively, from full loads (600 cm³) at the start to only a few cm³ toward the end. This gives the impression that the drilling and bailing is able to clean up the bottom of the hole, but in no case were we able to reach a point when no rock debris at all was recovered by the bailer. In spite of vigorous bailing, repeated as much as six times, subsequent photography always revealed a debris-strewn surface without any definite bedrock.

Figure 6e and f show our best example of what might be a bedrock surface underlying rock debris. The surface does not appear smoothed or striated by glacial abrasion as we might expect, but its uneven, fractured appearance might be the result of damage produced by earlier cable-tool drilling. However, the previous history of the bore hole argues for interpreting at most only part of the surface visible in Figure 6e as bedrock—specifically, the slightly raised part along the east (left) edge: this is a part of the same surface seen more extensively in Figure 6c, where deeper parts of it are exposed, showing that the material to the west (right) in Figure 6e is in fact rock debris covering the formerly deeper area. If the rock surface rising toward the north-east (lower left) in Figure 6c is bedrock rather than part of a large clast, then the bedrock surface must be much rougher and more irregular than typical glaciated bedrock outcrops are. The roughness is probably not due to drilling damage, because the part of the surface that remains visible in Figure 6e was not affected by the extensive drilling done between Figure 6d and e.

In the attempt to reveal bedrock, an important difficulty experienced in 1969 and 1970 was the long time (often several days) required to restore the turbid bottom water to a clarity-adequate for photography, after the churning action of the drill or bailer had rolled it up (H & K, p. 131). During this long time, the sliding motion could have displaced a freshly cleaned surface out of sight, fresh debris could have fallen from the bore-hole walls, and fines could have settled out from suspension. However, the flushing technique used in 1976 made it possible to take photographs within about two hours after the completion of bailing; also, the rapid loss of water from hole C after the first two weeks entirely eliminated the problem of water turbidity in that hole. Furthermore, the translational motion at the bottom of hole C was so small (see Section 6) that there was no possibility of displacement of a freshly cleaned surface out of sight by sliding. Yet the same failure to expose any definite bedrock was experienced, unless the rock surface seen in Figure 6c–e is in fact bedrock.

A second difficulty confronting our effort to reveal bedrock is the fact that the typical graywacke (sandstone) bedrock is inherently somewhat difficult to distinguish photographically from disaggregated sand derived from graywacke. Under the best photographic resolution the distinction is unmistakable: the individual grains in loose sand are resolved with greater sharpness and contrast than the grains in sandstone, owing to the sharp fine shadows that border the loose sand grains; the distinction is enhanced if the sandstone surface has been smoothed by abrasion. For example, the north (lower) half of the bore hole bottom in Figure 6a shows sand, whereas the north-east (lower left) quarter in Figure 6c shows a graywacke surface (discussed above). Photographs A-89, A-92, A-104, and A-105 show progressive covering of an initially clean graywacke surface (the top of a 6 cm clast) by a thin layer of sand that presumably settled out gradually from the bore hole. With poorer resolution, which often occurs because of technical problems, the distinction between rock surface and sand is less clear, and a number of our photographs present this problem to a greater or lesser extent. The most problematical example among the photographs in Figures 2–6 is Figure 5k; in this case, however, the surface is that of a large rock imbedded in the ice, as shown by the edge details seen toward the south (top) and by the subsequent drilling history (discussed later). In no case where this problem presents itself have we been able by subsequent photography to convince ourselves that we had seen a smooth bedrock surface; instead, it always appeared that we had seen a smooth patch of loose sand. An unmistakable feature of rock is the presence of light (quartz) veinlets, such as those seen in some of the clasts in Figure 6g, k, i, and l. Such features were never seen in the sand surfaces in question.

Although some of the loose debris seen at the bottom has probably fallen from the borehole walls, most of it was originally present on the glacier bed either within or outside the area exposed in the bottoms of the holes. This is evident from successive photographs in holes V and X, where the debris appeared from beneath the base of the bore-hole wall on one side of the hole and disappeared intact on the other side (Figs 2 and 4). In hole C, the debris-containing ice above the base, being only 20 cm thick and only lightly debris-laden, could have furnished only a small fraction of the volume of debris removed by bailing from the bottom of the hole (see below). We believe that most of the debris seen at the bottom of holes T and Y (Figs 3 and 5) was likewise present originally at the base of the glacier, although this is not proven from direct evidence in these holes.

Since our bore holes reveal rock debris rather than bedrock at the base of the glacier, it is important to estimate the thickness of this debris and the depth to bedrock beneath the base of the ice. For this we use three lines of evidence:

• 1. Performance of the cable-tool drill: with prolonged drilling, the maximum distance penetrated below the base of the ice (as revealed by bore-hole photography) was about 20 cm, and the drilling rate at this depth became negligibly slow. For example, drilling at the bottom of hole C produced an advance of about 15 to 20 cm during the first hour or so, and subsequent drilling, totalling some 5 h, produced a negligible advance beyond this depth. The negligible rate of drill advance is evidence that the drill is encountering bedrock at this depth. In tests carried out at the surface we find that a penetration rate of the order of 2 cm per minute is achieved when the drill is cutting moraine or loose debris, provided the hole is bailed frequently; when cutting bedrock the penetration rate is very low, 1 to 2 cm per hour. If the debris is loose and the hole caves, the rate of drill advance is progressively slowed as the hole widens, and becomes limited by the rate of bailing, but from our experience and the capacity of our bailer we judge that if we had been drilling in rock debris of unlimited depth we would have achieved a penetration substantially deeper than 15-20 cm after drilling for a total of 6 h, with frequent bailing. A direct indication of the ease of drill penetration in rock debris is given by Photograph B-72 and Figure 4f, which shows the visible effect of 10 min of light drilling (by hand) with a 2.5 cm star drill (considerably lighter than the cable tool). A circular depression several centimeters deep was cut into the debris by this operation; it can be seen by comparing the west (right) half of Figure 4f with the corresponding part of Figure 4e. We expect that substantially greater penetration would be achieved in the same time by the heavy, cat-head-powered cable tool. The fact that in hole C no such penetration was achieved between Figure 6d and e by 30 min of cable-tool drilling followed by sand-pump bailing, or between Figure 6g and h by two 30 min cable-tool-drilling operations, each followed by several bailer hauls, indicates to us that solid rock lies immediately below the debris-strewn surface seen in these photographs.

• 2. Recovery of debris by bailing: when drilling and bailing were done alternately, the volume of the successive bailer loads decreased progressively (though more slowly than when bailing was done without alternate drilling), and the grain size of the bailed debris decreased progressively also. This is what would be expected if, at the greatest depth reached, the drill bit encounters bedrock: the amount of available debris should become progressively limited, and the grain size should decrease as the drill smashes the available clasts against the underlying bedrock. Conversely, if bedrock were not reached, the volume and grain size of the recovered debris would not change markedly or progressively, whether or not the hole caves.

• 3. Penetrometer tests: starting from the bottom of bore hole C as seen in Figure 6a, the penetrometer (described in Section 4) could be driven down about 6 cm into the rock debris. After cable-tool drilling and bailing had deepened the hole to the extent seen in Figure 6b, the penetrometer was no longer able to penetrate an appreciable distance, more than 1 or 2 cm, into the bottom. The same result was obtained for the bottom seen in Figure 6e. In each of these tests the driving weight was dropped 30 times onto the penetrometer bit from a height of 70 cm, and the tests were repealed several times with the bit raised and relowered onto the bottom so as to test the penetrability in different spots. Tests of the penetrometer at the surface show that penetrations of 30 cm (full penetration) are readily achieved in both loose and compacted granular materials containing abundant pebbles up to 5 cm in size. Two or three strokes of the driving weight are sufficient for such penetration. The penetrometer is temporarily halted by 5 to 10 cm clasts, but with repeated impacts of the driving weight the granular material becomes loosened, the penetrometer bit works its way around or between the obstructing clasts, and penetration resumes. Large enough clasts will obviously stop the penetrometer and be indistinguishable from bedrock, but we find that in typical moraine at the surface, such clasts are rare. Hence we conclude that with high probability, the impenetrability of the bore-hole bottom in hole C implies that bedrock is present at a depth of at most a few centimeters beneath the bottom surface seen in Figure 6b and e.

From the above evidence we conclude that, in the area studied, the glacier is not underlain by a substantial thickness of rock debris, which would essentially constitute a ground moraine in place under the ice. Such a ground moraine also seems unlikely because the relatively steep slope (9°−12°) and fast flow of the ice in the area studied favor subglacial erosion rather than deposition. Instead, the bed consists of bedrock overlain by a thin layer of rock debris some 5 to 20 cm thick, intervening between the solid rock and the base of the ice. We will call this debris the active subsole drift, for reasons to be developed presently.

In bore-hole X the subsole drift exhibited distinct cohesion as shown by its ability to stand in vertical bands under water (Figs 3h, i; 4d, e, h, i, k). (Photograph A-60 shows a side view of this cohesive material.) The drift in the other holes appears loose and cohesionless (Figs 2i; 3a, e; 5h; 6a, i), but the particular conditions of sliding that led to formation of vertical debris banks in hole X were not duplicated in the other holes, hence it is possible that the gravel in those holes had some cohesion also. The evidence for caving of debris in hole C discussed in Section 5c, indicates little or no cohesion in this material. Some of the debris banks in hole X, such as the one created by drilling (in Fig. 4f) and the one in the center of Figure 3h (seen in more detail in Fig. 3h, i), collapsed gradually with time, again indicating small cohesion. The cohesion shown in hole X indicates that some cementation of the debris has occurred. The general looseness of the subsole debris suggested by the photographs implies that the cement is weak or present in only small amounts. Some cohesion of the sub-sole gravel can be attributed to its clay content: the clay-containing compacted till in nearby lateral moraines shows a similar ability to stand at least temporarily in steep or vertical banks, even under water. Ice, if present as a cement in the subsole gravel, occupies only a small fraction of the water-saturated interstitial void space. The typical subsole gravel contrasts visibly with the debris-laden ice ledges that are sometimes found at or very near the level of the sole, as described in Section 5D: these have a visible ice matrix and substantial strength. From the above considerations we conclude that the subsole gravel is primarily ice-free. Locally within the subsole gravel there do occur regions of partial or possibly complete ice cementation related to the basal ice ledges, as discussed in Section 5e.

(c) Contact or gap between ice and subsole gravel

In so far as the subsole gravel is ice-free, the boundary between it and the overlying glacier is the surface above which a continuous mass of ice, usually containing included rock debris, extends upward into the body of the glacier. This surface we call the glacier sole. In the borehole photographs taken looking vertically downward we recognize this surface as a level where the bore-hole walls appear to come to an end as traced downward. In holes V (Fig. 2),X (Fig. 4), C (Fig. 6), and T at an early stage (Photograph No. 132) there is visible a sharp, well-defined level of this kind, below which there appears to be a gap between the sole and the subsole gravel. Later in hole T (Fig. 3b–f), and in hole Y (Fig. 5a–j), the bore-hole walls disappear into the gravel without an apparent gap; in this case we cannot demonstrate visibly from the photographs that the sole has been reached, and must rely on the evidence from drilling and the observation of sliding motion.

Where there is no apparent gap, it is evident that the ice must be in intimate contact with the subsole drift. A side view of this situation in hole Y is seen in Photograph A-95, showing ice that is lightly debris-laden (except in the lowermost 2 cm, where it is clear) resting on fine debris.

Where an apparent gap is visible, it can be interpreted in two distinct ways: 1. No gap actually existed originally, but the process of cable-tool drilling into the subsole drift produced an enlarged hole there through caving of the loose debris, which undermined the base of the ice and produced a local gap around the periphery of the hole; this was the situation in hole C, as explained in a later paragraph. 2. An actual gap existed originally between the base of the ice and the top of the subsole drift prior to hole drilling; this was probably the situation at bore holes V and X.

The evidence for a true gap at the bottom of holes V and X is the emergence of rock debris from under the bore-hole walls and its disappearance under the walls by simple translatory motion with little disturbance such as would necessarily be caused by contact with the overlying ice (Figs 2 and 4). For hole X there is also confirmatory evidence from bore-hole deformation measurements (Section 6). A lateral view at the bottom of hole X, Photograph A-42, shows the gap but, because of the limited range of the camera lights, does not reveal how far away from the bore hole the gap extends. The visible width of the gap in this photograph is 1.5 to 3 cm. A 4 cm gap width in hole V was estimated by H & K (p. 133). The gap is narrow enough that the larger clasts, after passing across the hole, sometimes hang up on the "exit side" (see Section 5f). It is possible that a local gap was excavated initially as a result of hole enlargement by cable-tool drilling in holes V and X, and that such a gap could for a time have permitted the visible debris to move in simple translatory motion without disturbance; but the large total sliding motion (50 cm) in these holes would have carried away the initially enlarged hole and would have eliminated the gap if it had been only a local feature.

The gap represents the occurrence of ice−bed separation or subglacial "cavitation" (Reference KambKamb, 1970, p. 720). In contrast to the narrow separation gap seen in holes V and X, a cavity 1 to 2 m high was revealed by photography in a hole that penetrated a subglacial cavern in the ice fall 0.5 km up-stream from the present study area (H & K, fig. 7).

Fig. 7. Daily water-level soundings in bore holes.

Because of the long time (about 20 d) required for initial water clarification in holes V and X, it is possible that the gap developed only after the holes were drilled, as a result of cavitation caused by pressurization of the base of the ice under the pressure of water standing in the hole (see Section 5g).

Hole enlargement by lateral caving of subsole gravel in hole C is demonstrated by consideration of the volume of rock debris removed by bailing from the hole. In aggregate this volume amounted to 3 600 cm³. In a bore hole of average diameter to cm (estimated from Fig. 6b, f, and h and Photograph A-126), this volume represents a column of rock debris standing to a height of 45 cm. The actual maximum depth of penetration of the hole in the subsole gravel is only 15 to 20 cm, as measured in the course of drilling. (This depth is confirmed from Figure 6k and l, as follows: these pictures, taken with the base of the camera at an average height of 8 cm above the bottom of the hole, show loose rocks without ice up to a height of 13 cm above the bottom; from the compass needle we infer that the rocks seen in Figure 6k and l are the rocks seen in the north-east (lower left) part of the hole in Figure 6h, and from this we judge that the base of the ice (which was not captured in a horizontal photograph) lies no more than a few centimeters above the highest point seen in Figure 6k and l.) Thus at least half of the debris removed from the hole must have come from outside the visible area of the bottom of the hole. (The amount of debris contributed from within the ice above the sole can be neglected because the thermal drill was able to penetrate essentially to the level of the sole before being stopped by rock debris.) We infer that a process of enlargement of the hole by caving of loose debris from its walls occurred and resulted in the apparent gap between ice and subsole drift seen in vertical views (Fig. 6b–i). That the enlarged outer part of the hole, hidden under the ice in vertical views, has appreciable volume is indicated by our occasional experience of finding one or more of the white plastic balls to have disappeared from sight only to reappear later or be recovered in later bailer hauls. Loose debris forming the caved walls of the hole can be seen in side views (Fig. 6j–l). Independent evidence for caving is the partial filling of the bottom of hole C that occurred between the taking of Figure 6d and e, during a period when intensive cable-tool drilling and bailing was done: the deeper part of the large rock surface visible in the north-east (lower left) portion of Figure 6c and d is buried in Figure 6e. We infer that the pounding action of cable-tool drilling is able to shake down debris from the hole walls even when the bottom of the hole has essentially reached bedrock.

That there was no gap between ice and subsole drift in hole C is inferred from three pieces of evidence: (1) lateral views show debris rather than open space (however, a crucial view just below the level of the sole was not obtained); (2) bore-hole deformation measurements indicate that the ice is in contact with the bed (Section 6); (3) pressurization of the bed by water in the bore hole was low nearly from the beginning (Section 5g), hence pressure-induced cavitation is unlikely.

(d) Basal zone of debris-laden ice

The presence of rock debris in the ice immediately above the sole is shown by the slowing or cessation of thermal-drill penetration, by bailing, by bore-hole photography, and by recovery of ice cores containing debris (Reference Kamb and ShreveKamb and Shreve, 1963[a]). The debris ranges in size from large clasts to fine rock flour. Figures 4, 5k, l, and 6i show vertical views of clasts imbedded in ice of the bore-hole walls. Parts of the large clast in Figure 4 are seen in side view on the upper left in Photograph A-42 and on the lower right in Figure 3j. The central and left part of Figure 3j and the upper-right part of Photograph A-42 show the appearance in side view of ice laden with fine debris; the debris particles appear bright against a dark background of clear ice. Figures 2a–c and 4 show such ice as viewed from above. In Figure 2a–c it forms the rim at the bottom of the bore-hole wall on the east and north-east side (left and lower left). (An enlarged view of this material is shown on the lower left in H & K (Fig. 4).) In Figure 4 it is visible all around the lower part of the bore-hole walls, most clearly in Figure 4b and k. Some of the individual debris panicles seen in these photographs are probably aggregates of fine rock flour, which, as found from ice cores (Reference Kamb and ShreveKamb and Shreve, 1963[a]), tends to occur in lumps one to a few millimetres in size. These flour lumps are difficult to distinguish from sand grains except by very close inspection or by freeing the particles from the ice by melting. In side views under water near the bottom, the ice surface of the bore-hole wall is invisible, and the ice is made visible only by the debris lumps and air bubbles in it (Fig. 3a, j). The photographic distinction in side view between debris-laden ice (Fig. 3a, j) and subsole debris with little or no interstitial ice (Figs 3k, l; 6j; H & K, Fig. 6b) is somewhat subtle and becomes difficult as the debris content of the ice becomes large.

Estimates of the thickness of the basal debris zone are given in Table I, the zone being somewhat arbitrarily divided into an upper part with "light to moderate debris" content and a lower part with "heavy debris". These estimates are based on the experiences in drilling the bore holes. The top of the "light to moderate debris" zone is where appreciable slowing of thermal-drill penetration was detected, and this zone includes debris-laden ice that could be penetrated either by alternate thermal drilling and bailing or by cable-tool drilling with rapid penetration rate (>c. 1 m/h). Material that slowed the cable-tool drilling rate to ≈ 10 cm/h or less is called "heavy debris"; it includes both heavily debris-laden ice above the sole and the subsole drift, where reached. The zone of "heavy debris" was found to be <c 0.3 m thick; this is similar to the thickness of the subsole drift estimated from bore-hole photography and penetrometer tests. Hence we conclude that most of the zone of "heavy debris" is in fact the subsole drift. It follows that above the sole there is little if any basal ice so heavily loaded with rock debris that it impedes cable-tool drilling to an extent comparable to that caused by the subsole drift or that which fully debris-packed ice would. The zone of debris-laden basal ice is thus essentially equivalent to the material represented as "light to moderate debris" in Table I. This debris-laden ice zone is relatively thin (c. 0.1 to 0.3 m) in the northern part of the area studied (from hole X northward) and thick (2 to 16 m) in the southern part (hole T southward). Similar large lateral variations in thickness of the basal zone of dirty ice have been found by tunnel observations in the ice fall up-stream from the study area (Reference Kamb and LaChapelleKamb and LaChapelle, 1964, Reference Kamb and LaChapelle1968). This zone is more or less equivalent to the "basal ice layer" described by Reference Vivian and BocquetVivian and Bocquet (1973, p. 443) from tunnel observations.

The basal zone at hole Z contained a large rock (Fig. 5k) which reduced the cable-tool drilling rate to about 10 cm/h and might have been erroneously interpreted as bedrock or heavy basal debris if the cable tool had not succeeded in drilling past this obstruction and penetrating rapidly another 35 cm before encountering the "heavy-debris" zone at the bottom. We were unable to use bore-hole photography to determine whether this "heavy debris" was subsole gravel or debris-packed ice.

Bore-hole photography provides a check on the thickness of the basal zone of debris-laden ice in hole X. Figure 3j, a side view taken 21 cm above the bottom, and Photograph A-68, 24 cm above the bottom, show debris-laden ice, while Photograph A-69, 55 cm above the bottom, shows ice with a scattering of fine, bright specks that are probably air bubbles rather than rock particles. The bottom of the hole reached by the base of the camera was probably 10 to 20 cm below the sole because of the basal gap and because a deep cavity, probably large enough for the camera to enter, had opened up in the subsole gravel at this time (Fig. 4k, l). (The wall of this cavity is seen in Photograph A-60, taken at the bottom.) Hence the 0.1 m thickness of the basal debris-laden ice zone estimated from drilling (Table I) is roughly compatible with the height, bracketed in the range 0.2 to 0.5 m, to which debris in the ice extends above the bore-hole bottom as indicated by bore-hole photography. It appears to us intuitively from Figure 4b and similar photographs that the large clast. in the north-cast (lower left) side of the hole extends to a height greater than 10 cm above the sole, perhaps 20 cm above; this clast was probably not encountered in the original thermal drilling and probably became exposed by subsequent hole enlargement through reaming and cable-tool drilling.

A problem in determining by bore-hole photography the thickness of the basal debris layer is the difficulty of distinguishing photographically between fine debris particles and air bubbles. The distinction is clear when the hazy, mottled or banded appearance of irregularly bubbly or bubble-foliated ice is displayed (Photograph B-246; H & K, Fig. 8b). Comparison of side views taken near the bottom (as cited above) with side views at depths of about 50 m (Photograph Nos 17, 22, 58, and A-37) shows that the basal ice is much less bubbly than ice in the main mass of the glacier. This has been previously noted in ice cores (Reference Kamb and ShreveKamb and Shreve, 1966[b]) and in a tunnel up-stream from the study area (Reference Kamb and LaChapelleKamb and LaChapelle, 1968). Already at a height 2 m above the bottom in hole C (Photograph B-246) there is a marked increase in air content over that of the basal ice.

Fig. 8. Comparison of measurements of sliding velocity and water level in bore hole V. The water levels include only the early part of the data for hole V in Figure 7.

In none of our photographs, cither vertical or horizontal, have we seen in the basal ice just above the sole any structural features indicative of a regulation layer, such as has been observed in tunnels (Reference Kamb and LaChapelleKamb and LaChapelle, 1964, Reference Kamb and LaChapelle1968). The expected features are however, subtle, and could easily escape detection. In fact, no regelation layer was visible by direct visual inspection at the head of one branch of our 1967 tunnel in the Blue Glacier ice fall (Reference Kamb and LaChapelleKamb and LaChapelle, 1968), where the sliding velocity was 1 cm/d and the basal ice was air-free and debris-laden.

There is evidence suggesting that rock clasts in the basal ice zone near our bore holes were sometimes extruded from the bore-hole walls out into the bore holes. The evidence is that bore holes that were originally open and free to the passage of the camera, sand-pump bailer, and cable-tool sometimes later developed obstructions that caused one or more of these pieces of equipment to hang up when being lowered into the affected hole. In one such instance, in hole Z, the later obstruction was photographed and proved to be a pointed rock projecting out into the bore hole (Fig. 5l). The obstructions could usually be removed with the cable tool, as would be expected if they were projecting rocks. Because the obstructions often developed rather suddenly and independently of our reaming operations, we think that the projecting rocks were in many cases actually extruded rather than merely becoming exposed by hole enlargement through reaming. Some projecting rocks such as the clast in the northeast (lower left) side of hole X (Fig. 4), were definitely not extruded and remained stably in place for weeks. The lack of extrusion of such clasts may be a consequence of the gap between sole and subsole drift, which freed the ice locally from the pressure of the ice overburden except to the extent supported by water pressure, which was high in hole X. Conversely, obstructions formed frequently in hole C, where there was no gap and the water pressure in the hole was low. Expulsion of clasts from the sole of the Glacier d'Argentièrc has been reported by Reference Vivian and BocquetVivian and Bocquet (1973, p. 443) and by Reference Souchez, Souchez, Lorrain and Lemmens.Souchez and others (1973, fig. 4).

(e) Basal ice ledges

In hole V for a period of some ten days there were visible two ledge-like masses of debris-laden ice attached to the base of the bore-hole wall on the up-stream (north) side at the level of the sole, and projecting out over the bore-hole bottom at an appreciable height above the bed, so that they cast shadows on the bed. They are seen in Figure 2g, Photograph No. 140, Figure 2h and i, Figure 2k and l (H & K, Fig. 3a, b), and Photographs Nos 163, 166, 171, and 175. In the course of sliding, the subsole drift appeared without disturbance from beneath these ledges, showing that they were not mechanically supported by the bed, as is implied also by the presence of the gap between them and the bed. Their self-supported configuration indicates substantial strength, and we infer that they consisted of solid ice heavily loaded with rock debris. The debris gives them a generally bright appearance, which is enhanced by their closeness to the camera lights. Individual rock fragments can be seen to be set in a dark (clear) ice matrix in Figure 2g and Photograph No. 140, forming a distinctive lumpy texture.

The sequence of happenings in Figure 2 shows that these ledges developed in the following way. At an early stage, in Figure 2a–c, a rim of debris-laden ice was present at the base of the bore-hole wall on the north-west (lower left) side of the hole, in the form of a narrow ledge sticking out a centimeter or so from the wall. It was probably shaped into this form by earlier thermal and cable-tool drilling at the bottom of the hole. After three days' obstructed visibility due to the clast seen in Figure 2d, this original ledge is found to have been extended westward (to the right) around the base of the wall (Fig. 2e), and it is now seen to connect (or nearly so) to an apron of material similar in appearance that slopes down southward to join the bed (in the upper right part of Figure 2e). All of this material has the distinctive lumpy texture due to its content of debris. Apparently much of the ice in the apron and the lower part of the ledge is coated with light-colored mud (rock flour), so that ice is visible only in the few spots where this coating of mud has fallen away. The exposed ice appears as small, very dark patches. As time progresses to Figure 2f, the apron moves southward (up) with the general motion of the rocks on the bed to the left, and the ledge is carried with it though at a slower rate, so that both the apron and the ledge expand as they are extended southward. In Figure 2f a light-colored spine, probably a sharp rock, appears, apparently pushed out from below and behind. By the time of Photograph No. 122 the rock has dropped away; the extension and expansion of the apron and ledge continue. In this expansion many of the fine details in these objects change but some distinctive features such as dark ice patches remain recognizable. What is evidently happening in this sequence of photographs is that a mass of debris-laden ice that is in contact with, and to a large extent stuck to, the subsole drift is being carried across the bottom of the bore hole by the sliding motion. This mass also adheres to the debris-laden ice that forms the "ledge" above it, and pulls or shears this out across the bore hole. The expansion of ledge and apron thus represents the localized mechanical deformation of a debris-laden ice mass that is coupled simultaneously to the sliding sole and the fixed bed; it does not represent growth by freezing of ice. By the time of Photograph No. 129, the apron and ledge (which have now merged into a single feature) have expanded in this way to cover a large part of the visible bottom of the hole; the bed is seen darkly only in the upper left. The apron-ledge combination appears to have become coated with additional rock particles and mud, so that its previously recognizable surface features are no longer discernible. At this point the thermal drill was lowered to the bottom of the hole and operated at nearly full power for 5 min in an effort to remove the ice ledge. The drill apparently bottomed in the south-eastern (upper left) part of the hole, resting either on the subsole drift or on the southern part of the apron. As a result (Fig. 2g, h) the south-eastern part of the ledge and apron was melted away, leaving the northern part intact except for a fissure which now divided it into two pieces. Apparently the heat that was dissipated against the subsole drift spread to some extent laterally, severing the apron from the ledge and undermining the ledge by melting underneath, so that thereafter the two remnants of the ledge were no longer in contact with or coupled to the bed. The fissure actually did not appear until two days after the heating was done, showing that significant ablation of the ledge continued over an extended period; subsequent further ablation, causing widening of the fissure and retreat of the left-hand ledge, is visible in Photograph No. 140. Other than this, the two ledges did not change appreciably during the 12 d of observation following the heating.

The development of ice ledges in hole V is followed in detail in the above description because the photographs in this hole reveal clearly the occurrence of a process that also operated, in modified form, in three of the other holes, but that would be obscure there were it not for its graphic demonstration in hole V. At an early stage in hole T there was probably a gap between the ice and subsole drift. This is suggested by the rather gloomy and fuzzy views in Photographs Nos 132 and 134, which show a shadow cast on the bore-hole door by the ice rim above the gap; sliding motion is indicated by the appearance of a clast from under the ice in Photograph No. 134 on the north side of the hole. By the time (five days later) when a really clear picture was obtained (Fig. 3b), the gap at the base of the bore-hole wall had disappeared, but a small area of lower ground remained at the southern (upper) edge of the visible part of the bottom. Within this lower area a translational motion of about 1 cm/d was occurring in a southerly direction, indicating northward sliding, as shown by comparison of the upper parts of Figures 3b and c. What had happened was that a basal ice ledge had grown out from the north (bottom) side of the hole and almost covered the visible bottom. A few dark patches on the ledge, particularly near the wall, probably are exposures of ice, although the ledge is mostly covered with sand and mud. By five days later the visible part of the hole was completely filled by the ledge, and several clasts had appeared on its surface (Fig. 3e). Comparison of Figure 3d and e shows that these clasts were undergoing somewhat jumbled translational movement northward relative to the bore-hole walls, which is approximately opposite to what would correspond to downhill sliding. This retrograde motion represents either bore-hole closure (see Section 6) or a complex disturbance (such as rolling) at the ice ledge as a result of interaction with the bed underneath. The bright specks alone the north-east (lower left) side of the hole in Figure 3d and e possibly represent reflections from exposed patches of ice.

The ledge-like feature in hole X on the right edge of Figure 4j–l is similar to the ice ledges discussed above in that it evidently has some strength and perhaps even overhangs the debris below it to some extent, but it is not firmly attached to the base of the ice, as shown by its motion relative to the bore-hole walls (Fig. 4i–l). This feature is the remnant of a subsole mass of fine- and intermediate-sized debris whose leading edge advances south-westward across the bottom of the hole in the sequence of Figure 4b–f and whose trailing edge departs in the same direction in Figure 4g–l. In Figure 4l a second mass of debris enters the hole from the north-east, and in Photograph B-140 it develops a new ledge-like feature on the north side of the hole; this new feature moves faster than the first "ledge" and catches up with it in Photograph B-155. The first "ledge" also moves slower than adjacent large clasts as shown in the sequence of Figure 4c–i. The slower apparent motion of the first "ledge" implies that it is coupled to the glacier sole to some extent, while the second "ledge" is less well coupled. That these "ledges" may to some extent be cemented by interstitial ice is suggested by their partial similarity to the ice ledges in hole V, but unlike these, the "ledges" in hole X show no visible sign of an ice matrix (dark particles). Also, as argued in Section 5c, their rather weak cohesion implies at most only limited ice cementation. Their existence does however raise the possibility that interstitial ice may occur locally within the subsole drift. The mesa-like shape of the second "ledge" in Photographs B-152 and B-155 suggests that such cementation was present in a layer only a few centimeters thick at the top of the subsole drift.

A second manifestation of subsole ice related to ice ledges is recognizable in hole Y. The bottom of tins hole seen in Figure 5e and f is similar in appearance to the top surface of the basal ice ledge in hole T as seen in Figure 3b and c. Moreover, Figure 5e and f, and also Photographs B-133, B-139, B-150, and B-151, display dark markings very similar to the dark patches recognized in hole V as exposures of clear-ice matrix. It thus appears that during part of the observation period in hole Y, the glacier was sliding over a bed consisting of subsole drift impregnated with ice, similar to the material of the basal ice ledges but in this instance not adhering to the sole, at least not fully.

Freezing of interstitial water in the subsole drift can of course account for the development of ice in subsole drift that was previously ice-free. The foregoing evidence from bore-hole photography indicating the presence of ice masses immediately beneath the sole, in the subsole drift, or in the gap between gravel and sole, is reinforced by tunnel observations of subsole ice masses and of ice coating bedrock in subglacial cavities (Reference Kamb and LaChapelleKamb and LaChapelle, 1968; Reference Post and LaChapellePost and LaChapcelle,. [^e1971], p. 25; Reference Souchez, Souchez, Lorrain and Lemmens.Souchez and others, 1973, fig. 2; Reference Vivian and BocquetVivian and Bocquet, 1973, p. 441). A frozen mud layer 2 to 3 cm thick between bedrock and ice sole, only partly adhering to the sole, has been observed in a cavity at the base of the Glacier d'Argentière (Reference Souchez and LorrainSouchez and Lorrain, 1975, fig 1).

(f) Non-translatory motions

The presence of a basal gap between the sole and subsole gravel makes it possible for the debris-strewn bed to move past the bottom of the bore-hole walls in simple translator relative motion, with little disturbance of the loose debris. But tilting, shuffling, or re-arrangement of the clasts is also commonly visible.

In hole X this occurred notably when larger clasts that had traversed across the bottom became hung up on the "exit side" and remained there for a time, before moving on out of sight (Fig. 4k, l; Photographs A-142, B-145). Such clasts underwent a rolling motion (Fig 4a, b;j−l) in the manner appropriate to being caught between the moving ice and the fixed bed

Commonly the non-translatory motions consist of irregular shuffling or seething of the clasts (upper part of Fig. 3b and c; Fig. 3d and e; Fig. 4d and e; Fig. 5e–j). Shifting of clasts with respect to one another is seen in comparing Figure 6k and l. In hole X, irregular tumbling motions were mostly related to collapse of subsole debris banks (Fig. 4). The greatest seething or jumbling occurred in holes T and Y, where sliding was taking place in the absence of a basal gap; this makes sense mechanically.

There is little evidence that the subsole drift is intruded into the bore holes from under the glacier.Footnote * The partial filling of the bottom of hole C during the interval from Figure 6d to e might represent intrusion but is instead interpreted by us as the result of hole-wall caving of subsole drift during cable-tool drilling (Section 5c). The lack of notable gravel intrusion supports our conclusion that the subsole drift is a very thin layer, particularly if the arguments for subglacial till intrusion by Reference BoultonBoulton (1976, p. 293) are correct.

On rare occasions an individual stone can be seen to have moved several centimeters laterally while its neighbors remained relatively unchanged (stone on right in Fig. 5h reappears in upper center in Fig. 5i; stone and plastic ball with thread near south side in Photograph No. 163 are found in Photograph No. 166 to have moved north-eastward beyond stones that were near the north side in Photograph No. 163). More commonly, new clasts appear as if from nowhere (Fig. 2d; Fig. 2j, stone in lower left quadrant halfway out from center; Fig. 5h, stone near lower right edge at 4 o'clock; Fig. 6i, triangular stone with quartz vein to left of black dot). When such a stone appears near the "entrance side" of a bore hole in which sliding is in progress with no gap present (such as the stone partly exposed in finer debris near the edge at 8 o'clock in Fig. 5f, or the elongate clast near the north-west (lower right) edge of Fig. 5i), one can reasonably assume that the stone makes its appearance by being worked up into sight from among the generally seething debris around it. In other situations the source of the new stones is less clear. They may have moved laterally from within the bore hole outside the previous field of view or from the gap outside the hole. Or they may have fallen from the bore-hole walls.

The outstanding puzzle of this kind was the sudden appearance in hole V of the cobble seen in Figure 2d, blocking the view of the moving bed. It remained in this position for three days, rotating gradually because of the drag of the bed beneath it (Photographs Nos 106, 109, 110), until we pushed it aside with a sounding weight. For two reasons we consider unlikely the possibility that this cobble Tell from the bore-hole walls above: (1) in hole X, in a similar situation, a cobble of similar size in the bore-hole wall showed no sign of coming loose from the wall over a period of two months (Fig. 4); (2) the cobble in hole V was well rounded by abrasion, implying that it had been present at the bed. The triangular stone that appeared suddenly in hole C (Fig. 6i), as mentioned above, was similarly rounded. Probably these clasts rolled or were pushed into their positions in Figures 2d and 6i from somewhere else on the floor of the hole or from the gap between sole and bed. An event in hole X demonstrates the sudden protrusion of a clast from the gap under the bore-hole wall on the "exit side" where this would not be expected (Photographs A-84, A-87).

Lateral displacement of individual clasts could have been caused by lowering the airlift pump inlet or the camera down to rest on the bottom, as must occasionally be done to determine where the bottom is, so that the pump or camera can be set at the proper height to clarify the water or to take a picture. However, it seems that doing this would be more likely to produce a general disturbance of the loose debris on the bottom, rather than a large lateral displacement of an individual clast. Moreover, "sounding" the bottom in this way was done as infrequently and as gently as possible, specifically to avoid such disturbance and to avoid damaging the plexiglass window of the camera. According to the photograph log, no such "soundings" were made between taking the photographs in Figure 5g, h, and i, so that the appearance of the new clast in Figure 5h and its lateral displacement in Figure 5i should not have been due to camera disturbance.

From the above evidence and reasoning we conclude that clasts in the subsole drift occasionally roll or tumble randomly as a result of disturbances caused by basal sliding. Organized rolling motions occur when a clast becomes caught between the moving sole and stationary subsole drift. A general seething of the subsole debris goes on when sliding is occuring in the absence of a basal gap.

The presence of a bore hole must to some extent lead to the occurrence in the subsole drift of non-translatory motions different from those that would take place naturally in the absence of the bore hole. We cannot assess the difference directly from our observations, since they require bore holes, but we can recognize two main causes for a difference. (1) The spatial confinement of the subsole drift by the overlying ice in the absence of the bore hole, and the high confining pressure due to the ice overburden, will tend to inhibit rolling, tumbling, and seething motions that could readily occur under the free surface introduced by the bore hole; these confinement effects will be reduced or eliminated if a gap forms between sole and subsole drift or if the water pressure in the drift approaches the overburden pressure. (2) Clasts can be caught and rolled between moving sole and stationary bed only around the periphery of (or outside of) the bore hole, whereas in the absence of the hole this rolling process can happen anywhere. It therefore seems likely that in the undisturbed (and unobserved) subsole drift, rolling motions directly propelled by the sliding (in a manner analogous to the rolling of balls in a ball bearing) will tend to predominate over the more irregular motions frequently seen in our bore holes.

One can reasonably expect that such rolling motions should lead to rounding of the clasts in the subsole drift. The presence of many unrounded, sharp-edged clasts, such as the clast that is seen to roll in Figure 4j–l, indicates either that rolling is infrequent or that there is a large nearby basal source of freshly broken rock debris.

(g) Basal water pressure and flow

An assessment of the water pressure acting at the glacier bed and the associated water flow at the bed is provided by the behavior of water in the bore holes. The level of water standing in the holes was measured by sounding with a float, normally on a daily or nearly daily basis, and on occasion hourly. Daily sounding data for holes drilled in 1969, and for hole Z in 1970, are plotted in Figure 7, and a summary of results for all holes is given in Table II. Our observations are closely related to those recently reported by Reference HodgeHodge (1976) and Reference RöthlisbergerRöthlisberger (1976), except that we know which of our holes actually reached the glacier bed where the water pressure of interest is to be sampled.

During drilling, the water in bore holes in the study area, which is above the firn line, always stands initially at a nearly constant, relatively shallow depth near the base of the firn. The initial water levels for the various holes lie in the depth range 6 to 11 m (Table II column 5). We interpret this as the depth of the perched melt-water table at the base of the firn. Normally the water level remains at this constant initial depth without any detectable change until the bed is reached in the drilling and for some time thereafter. Ultimately, however, an abrupt drop in water level usually occurs, and this initiates a period of relatively deep, wildly fluctuating water levels, which may continue for many days (Fig. 7). The length (in days) of the initial period of constant, high water level in each of the holes, counted from the day when the bed was first reached (or, failing this, when the basal debris zone was reached), is given in Table II, column 3. If at a later time the water level returned to its initial height, column 4 gives this time in days counted from the same origin; if by the end of the observation period the initial level had not been recovered, the figure in column 4 is preceded by ">". The maximum depth to which the water level was observed to drop in each hole is given in column 6, and the minimum depth to which it later recovered is given in column 7.

The water levels dropped greatly from the initial depths in all holes but two. The magnitude of the drop shows that water at the bed has ultimate access to pressures substantially lower than the ice overburden pressure. The initial period of constant high water level is a period when the basal water has not yet communicated with the conduits of lower pressure. During this period the bed is being pressurized by water from the bore hole at a pressure several per cent greater than the ice overburden pressure, as shown by the ratios κ ₀ in Table II, column 9. Except in areas of sufficiently great basal stress concentration, this pressurization will cause the ice to separate from the bed and will thereby open up passageways along which water can leak away from the hole. Initially the permeability of the bed to such leakage is so small that the source of water in the firn is more than sufficient to maintain the water level. Ultimately the new passageways, spreading out from the bore hole, make a good enough connection with the natural conduits at lower pressure so that water then begins to leak away rapidly and the level cannot be maintained by inflow from the firn.

A clear example of connection to a low-pressure conduit was provided by bore hole U, which by chance bottomed very close to a subglacial stream. The evidence for this is as follows. The thermal drill was not slowed by dirty ice prior to reaching the bed, but stopped abruptly, and the water level then dropped immediately to a depth of 111 m, only 13 m above the bottom. By 5 d later, the water level had dropped all the way to the bottom. The sounding float did not come to a stop at the bottom, but instead continued to run out as far as we chose to let it, a distance of 65 m beyond the bottom of the hole. It was evidently being carried down along the bottom of the glacier in a subglacial stream. Upon being hauled in, it jammed irretrievably at the bottom of the hole, showing that the connection from the bottom of the hole to the subglacial stream was through a narrow passageway; this is consistent with the earlier observation that the water level did not drop all the way to the bottom initially. About five days later the water level rose back to near the surface, showing that the narrow passage had by then become sealed off. These observations provide direct evidence for the existence of a subglacial stream at essentially atmospheric pressure and for opening and closing of a narrow passageway through which bore-hole water gained access to the stream.

From hole C a connection was established to a low-pressure conduit in only 5 d, and the water level in the hole ultimately dropped all the way to the bottom. Since hole C was only 23 m from the original location of hole U, it is very likely that the conduit that was reached was the same subglacial stream encountered in hole U. In hole Z the water level dropped to within 20 in of the bottom. Running water could be heard in this hole, and air was drawn conspicuously down it, causing pronounced enlargement of the hole. This suggests that the hole connected via an intraglacial conduit to a subglacial channel at atmospheric pressure. In hole R the water level ultimately dropped almost to the bottom, even though this hole was not completed with cable-tool drilling and therefore probably did not penetrate all the way to the bed.

From the above evidence we conclude that the basal water pressure in subglacial water conduits under the study area was essentially atmospheric during the period of observation. The bore holes in which the water levels did not drop all the way to the bottom do not indicate higher basal water pressures, but instead show that the passageways that open up to provide a connection with the subglacial water conduits are often rather constricted, so that their water-carrying capacity is marginal and fluctuating. This is responsible for the wide fluctuations in water levels in these holes, and is consistent with the fact that the passageways sometimes seal up so that the initial water levels are recovered (Fig. 7).

Hole Y is the only hole that definitely reached the bed but did not experience any drop in water level. This shows that locally the bed can for practical purposes be impenetrable to water under a pressure significantly greater than the overburden pressure. The failure of basal passageways to open up by ice—bed separation under a water pressurization 5% greater than the ice overburden pressure could be the consequence of a stress concentration in the basal ice around the bore hole. Alternatively, the presence of ice in the subsole drift at hole Y (sec Section 5e) might have been responsible for an abnormally good "seal" at the bottom of this hole. This explanation is compatible with the behavior of hole D, which was not completed by cable-tool drilling to the bed, and which experienced no drop in water level during the period of observation. Holes Q and R were observed longer, and demonstrate that connections to the subglacial conduits can ultimately open up from holes not driven all the way to the bed by cable-tool drilling. This conclusion was also reached by Reference HodgeHodge (1976).

The marked though only partial correlation between water-level fluctuations in holes Q and R and again between holes T and V (Fig. 7) might suggest that these fluctuations reflect real patterns of pressure variation in the subglacial conduits. But this is made quite improbable by the great difference between these two pairs of holes, and between them and hole U, also nearby (Fig. 1b). Instead, we infer from the correlations that the water leakage pathways opened up by basal water pressurization from bore holes can extend out over distances 50 m away from the holes. Bore holes separated by such distances can thus become connected to subglacial water conduits via the same passageway system, so that their water levels, being controlled by the same constrictions of the passageways, will fluctuate synchronously. This is plausible if the subglacial streams are spaced c. 50 m or more apart.

Further insight into the behavior of water at the bed is provided by turbidity in the borehole bottom water. During an initial period in every hole, turbidity was a continuous problem for bore-hole photography: water-pumping with the air-lift pump had to be done before almost every picture in order to get a clear or even partly clear view. This was the situation in hole X for about a month, and in hole Y for about 15 d. Later the bottom water spontaneously became clear, and remained clear if the bottom was not subsequently disturbed, which indicates that by this time either a flocculation process of particle settling had become effective or there was an appreciable outflow of water into the subsole drift. This occurred after 12 d in hole T, 17 d in hole V, and only 5 d in hole C. Once the water level in the hole dropped, which in most holes occurred some time after the onset of spontaneous clarification, the bottom water was always clear, even after cable-tool drilling. These observations show that the water escapes from the holes at the bottom, either into the subsole drift or into the gap between ice and drift, if present. (Hole Z was an exception: photography indicated that water was leaking from the hole at a height of about 1 m above the bottom.)

Before spontaneous clarification begins, the subsole drift behaves as though it were extremely impermeable. This is particularly evident in hole Y, where pictures consistently show clouds of turbid water just above the bottom (Fig. 5a–d; Photographs B-108 to B-150). The flow of water down into the subsole drift must have been less than a centimeter or two per day, otherwise these clouds would have been carried down out of sight over the period of many days of observation. The permeability implied is much lower than would be needed only to explain high-standing water levels, because the water inflow from the firn is substantial. We can set an upper limit on the apparent permeability of the subsole drift around hole Y if we assume that the downflow velocity is less than 1 cm/d, that the subsole drift layer is 10 cm thick, and that the low-pressure conduits lie at an average distance of 50 m from the hole. The indicated permeability limit is <c. 10^-5 darcy (cm² bar^-1 s^-1). This is two orders of magnitude below the lower limit of about 10^-3 darcy observed for the most impermeable unlithified sediments (clay-rich sands), and corresponds to the most impermeable solid rocks (shales and crystalline rocks). For hole Y this can be explained by interstitial ice in the subsole drift, as noted above, but for hole X such an explanation is inapplicable. The subsole drift, there is obviously permeable because it displays visible openings and voids (Fig. 4), yet lingering turbidity remained a problem in this hole for a month despite repeated water pumping.

These observations can be rationalized by inferring that the bore-hole locations are encircled at a distance by strong permeability barriers, which normally block fluid communcation between the subsole drift and the subglacial conduits at low pressure. Interconnected areas of the bed where subsole drift is absent and ice is in direct contact with bedrock could provide such barriers.

We surmise that the leakage passageways that ultimately make a connection from the bore holes to the subglacial water conduits, through the sealed regions of the bed, open up initially by invasion of pressurized bore-hole water along routes across the bed where the compressive stress across the ice—bed interface is a minimum. They subsequently become enlarged by melting of overlying ice as a result of heat dissipation by water flow through them, and because of this enlargement, they tend to be carried down-stream by the moving ice, especially when the bore-hole water pressure drops to the point where it alone is no longer sufficient to keep the passageways open at their original location on the bed. The fluctuating capacity of the leakage passageways, and their eventual scaling up, result from changes in basal compressive stress and in healing due to water flow, there being a delicate balance between passageway enlargement by melting and closure by ice flow under the local compressive stress. This stress fluctuates but generally increases as the passageways are carried down-stream from their place of origin. The total displacement of the bore holes by sliding at the bottom during the period when their water levels were being monitored ranges from 6 to 70 cm for the different holes, hence significant fluctuations in basal stress appear to occur over these distances.

In hole Y the clouds of turbidity that were seen lurking just above the bottom and obscuring its deeper levels (Fig. 5a–d), during a period when air-lift pumping was repeatedly done to remove the turbid bottom water, suggest that turbidity was being continuously generated and introduced into the bore-hole water at the bottom. This was probably caused by internal motions in the subsole drift, caused by the sliding. Other holes showed such turbidity clouds only rarely and weakly (e.g. Fig. 4k, l), probably because the downflow of water into the subsole drift was generally greater than in hole Y.

While the water-level observations demonstrate that water pressures are low in the sub-glacial conduit system whose pressure influences the extent of basal cavitation (Reference KambKamb, 1970, p. 720), they do not provide a direct indication of the water pressure that exists in the pore space of the subsole drift prior to penetration of bore holes into it. If the inherent hydraulic permeability of the subsole drift were high, the natural pore pressure in the subsole drift would be the same as the pressure in the subglacial conduits, since only a small source of pore water is available in the subsole drift, from bottom melting. But the evidence (above) for very low permeability of the subsole drift, or for interconnecting permeability barriers in the ice—bed interface, allows the possibility that the natural pore pressure may be substantially higher and may approach the ice overburden pressure. A pore pressure of this magnitude could explain the otherwise very puzzling failure of the glacier ice to invade the subsole drift completely, down to the bedrock. This invasion should take place rapidly under the action of regelation if the full overburden pressure of the ice were borne by the subsole drift without the help of a nearly equal pore pressure.

(a) Quantitative results of bore-hole photography

Sliding velocities derived from bore-hole photography are given in Table III (columns 11-12). They are based on the displacements of individual bed features (mostly individual clasts) with respect to features at the bottom of the bore-hole walls, as seen in successive borehole photographs. The time intervals represented by the sliding velocities quoted are defined by the photographs used (Table III, column 13), which were taken at the times given in the figure captions.

The acccuracy with which a given object on the bed can be located with respect to reference features in the bore-hole walls is dependent on the scale, the photographic resolution achieved, and the sharpness of the features involved, but is generally 1 mm or better. In deriving velocities from pairs of photographs the main sources of error are the variation of scale from one photograph to the next, possible changing parallax due to the gap between the bottom of the bore-hole walls and the bed, and possible bore-hole contraction. The scale can be controlled by distances between reference points on the bed visible in both photographs, or between points in the bore-hole walls if near the bed and if contraction is not significant. The scale itself, which does not generally need to be known as accurately as the relative scales of the two photographs, is determined by the methods discussed by H & K. (p. 132). Our overall assessment, based on the foregoing factors, is that sliding velocities obtained over a time interval of one day have an accuracy of about 0.4 cm/d; the error decreases inversely with the time interval (given in Table III, column 14). Error in the direction of sliding is about 20° for an observed displacement of 1 cm, and decreases inversely with the displacement; individual error assessments are given in Table III, column 11.

Observed sliding velocities are in the range 0.3 to 3 cm/d; they average 1.0 cm/d for the five successful bore holes (Table III). These velocities are substantially smaller than the 6 cm/d that we originally expected on the basis of earlier deformation measurements in thermally drilled bore holes (Reference Kamb and ShreveKamb and Shreve, 1966), which suggested a sliding rate about half the surface velocity of ≈ 15 cm/d (Table III, column 2). The direction of sliding found by bore-hole photography (Table III, column 12) is generally within about 20° of the direction of surface motion (Table III, column 3), the maximum deviation being about 30°.

Although the errors of measurement are substantial, the differences among the sliding velocities observed in the different holes are significant. They represent both lateral variations in sliding velocity at a given time and also, probably, variations from year to year. The various observed velocities do not fall into a systematic pattern when viewed spatially (Fig. 1b). The highest velocity (near 3 cm/d) was seen in hole X, and the lowest in hole C (0.3 cm/d), which was located only about 20 m away (Fig. 1b). Independent evidence (to be published separately) suggests that the sliding rate in 1976 was unusually small, in agreement with the observations in the hole C. The difference between the velocity of 1.0 cm/d at hole T on 5 September and of about 3 cm/d at V over a period of about 15 d including 5 September is a real spatial variation between two points on the bed 28 m apart. On the other hand, holes X and Y, 60 m apart, showed essentially the same velocity within the accuracy of measurement.

In addition to the possible year-to-year variation suggested above, there is evidence for a time variation of sliding velocity at hole V over the period of observation in 1969. Velocities measured from successive pairs of photographs are plotted as a function of time in Figure 8. The initially observed velocity of about 1.5 cm/d increased sometime during the interval 21-25 August to about 3.0 cm/d and remained at this level for the remainder of the observation period. The increase occurred during the time when the bottom of the hole was hidden by a cobble (Fig. 2d), so that we could not monitor the velocity over this interval. The velocity increase correlates with the first incipient signs of drop in water level in the hole (Fig. 8). This correlation, if not accidental, could imply either that the increase in sliding velocity caused increased ice—bed separation which in turn promoted drainage of water from the bore hole, or, conversely, that pressurization of the bed by the bore hole caused increased basal separation which in turn resulted in an acceleration in sliding rate. The latter alternative would be especially noteworthy in representing a situation where the sliding velocity of a glacier was locally affected by an action of man (basal pressurization from the bore hole). However, doubt as to the causative role of basal pressurization is cast by the situation at hole T, where, although the water level dropped as it did at hole V, apparently no velocity increase occurred (since the sliding velocity was only 1 cm/d when measured on 5 September). In view of the observed lateral variations in sliding velocity, it is possible that the velocity variation in hole V was due to passage of the bore hole through a laterally varying sliding-velocity field rather than to a time variation, but we consider this unlikely because of the abruptness of the observed change in sliding velocity (Fig. 8).

In some instances two separate velocities are observed simultaneously in a given pair of photographs. In Figure 4g and h, the large stone coming into view from the left is moving decidedly faster than, and is catching up with, the smaller clast near the top (south) and the gravel mass in which the latter is imbedded. The two velocities (1.3 and 0.8 cm/d) corresponding to these two translational motions are listed as separate entries in column 11 of Table III, opposite hole X. Obviously not both of these figures can represent the actual sliding velocity. The slower apparent motion of the gravel mass implies that this mass is being partially dragged along by the moving ice. In the interval from Figure 4h to i the large stone continues its relatively fast motion, but its apparent velocity has decreased to 1.0 cm/d. Later, in Figure 4j–l, the large stone hangs up on the "exit" edge of the bore hole, and a gravel mass moving in from the lower left begins to catch up to it.

From the observation of definitely different motions occurring simultaneously we are led to believe that the larger differences in motion among the entries for hole X in Table III (column 11) probably reflect real variations in observable motion rather than apparent variations due to fluctuating measurement errors. But they clearly raise a problem as to how the observed motions relate to the actual sliding motion.

There are two reasons for taking as the sliding velocity the largest of the apparent motions observed at a given time (or over a period of time if variations in sliding with time can be assumed not to occur during this period): (1) Dragging of basal debris along by the ice will reduce the apparent motions. (2) If clasts execute rolling motions while caught between moving sole and fixed bed, their apparent motion will be half the sliding velocity if judged by the motion of the sides of the clast, or zero if judged by the motion of the top of the clast. If such rolling motions are common among the larger clasts, in a "ball-bearing-like" mode of basal sliding, then masses of finer debris between the larger clasts will be constrained to move along at a speed of half the sliding velocity.

The directions of sliding motion seen in successive time periods at hole X (Table III, column 12) vary by about 25°. We consider this variation to be real, because individual azimuths of motion can be measured in this photographic sequence to a precision of about 5° on a relative basis. These variations represent either time variations in the sliding direction or differences in the coupling of the subsole drift to the moving ice. The two distinct motions seen in photograph pair of Figure 4g–h have directions that differ by 10°, which, though not large, is a real difference. It demonstrates that distinct alterations in the apparent direction of motion can be produced by changes in coupling of ice and subsole drift, and that the apparent direction of motion can be altered from the actual sliding direction. How this happens is not evident, although we can surmise that the asymmetric rolling of larger clasts of odd shape could be responsible.

On the basis of the experience in hole X we believe that the differences among the observed azimuths of motion of the various holes (Table III, column 12) are significant although doubtless affected by substantial scatter (±10° to 15°) due to measurement errors. In particular, the difference of 60° in observed azimuth between hole T and hole X is a real difference. It represents observations made only 15 m apart, in two successive years. From striations on glaciated bedrock surfaces, both around the periphery of Blue Glacier and quite generally in glaciated terrains (e.g. Reference ChamberlinChamberlin, 1888), it is of course well known that the direction of the sliding motion can change with time, and can change laterally over distances of as little as a few centimeters under appropriate flow constraints from bedrock topography. The change in direction from hole T to hole X seems nevertheless too large to be a time variation in sliding motion from one year to the next; it seems possible for a lateral variation if the bed has high roughness on a scale of ten meters or less.

The very low sliding velocity at hole C stands out as anomalous in relation to the other bore holes. The motion is so small that it cannot be recognized clearly in any photograph pairs except Figure 6c–e and, marginally, Photographs B-196-197. It is entirely possible that no sliding at all was occurring at times during the observation period. In several photograph pairs an apparently retrograde motion is seen, which is a falsification due to contraction of the bore-hole walls. Bore hole C closed at a rate of about 2 cm/d (contraction of diameter) near the bottom. The contraction can be seen by comparing Figure 6c and d, although the smaller scale of Figure 6d exaggerates the effect. For objects on the bed near the north-east side of the hole, which in some photographs was the only available reference for observing the sliding motion, the contraction results in an apparent retrograde motion (apparent sliding in a south-west direction) of about 1 cm/d. This large disturbing effect made it difficult to observe the small sliding velocity reliably over periods of a few days. Longer periods could not be used because, to offset the contraction, the hole frequently had to be reamed or redrilled, which disturbed or obliterated features in the bore-hole walls used for motion reference; also, attempts to reveal bedrock by cable-tool drilling and bailing repeatedly disturbed the bottom. The bore-hole contraction rate was much larger in hole C than in the other holes because of the consistently low stand of the water level in this hole.

(b) Tests by the indirect method

Because the sliding motions observed by bore-hole photography are anomalously low in relation to what was expected, and because the full sliding motion may sometimes not be displayed by bore-hole photography, as the foregoing discussion indicates, it is helpful to have an independent check on the sliding velocity. This is provided by bore-hole inclinometry in holes X and C. In hole X the measurements were made with an electrical inclinometer previously used by Reference RaymondRaymond (1971), while in hole C a new type of electrical inclinometer, designed and built by Phil Taylor at the University of Washington, was used. Figure 9 shows the results in terms of the deformation of the two bore holes: the horizontal components of displacement of the initially vertical bore holes are plotted as a function of depth below the surface. The displacements are shown in terms of displacement rates by dividing the observed displacements by the time interval between initial and final determinations of bore-hole configuration (64.5 d for hole X, 25.8 d for hole C). The components are resolved in the direction of the surface velocity vector and perpendicular thereto. The displacement rate at the surface relative to the bore-hole bottom is given in Table III, columns 6 and 7. The absolute flow velocity at depth is obtained by subtracting this relative displacement vectorially from the surface motion, measured by triangulation from bedrock during the period of borehole observations (Table III, columns 2-5). The results are given in Table III (columns 9 and 10) and also in Figure 9, where, by appropriate choice of origin, the plotted displacements represent absolute components of motion (relative to bedrock).

Fig. 9. Horizontal components of flow velocity at depth in bore holes X and C, obtained by combining surface-velocity measurements with integrated inclinometry data. Velocity component in a vertical plane parallel to the surface velocity vector are plotted on the left (labelld X₁ and C₁), and perpendicular to this plane on the right (X and C), triangles and circles respectively.

The absolute velocities derived in this way at the bottom of the bore holes should be the sliding velocities if the bore holes reached the bed, and should agree with the velocities determined by bore-hole photography if the full sliding motions were displayed at the bottom of the holes. The comparison is in Table III. There is general agreement in the sense that the sliding velocities found by both methods are small, much less than half the surface motion. Also, the larger sliding motion inferred from inclinometry corresponds to the larger motion observed by bore-hole photography. However, there is some disagreement in detail, particularly as to the azimuths of the sliding velocity.

To assess the significance of the disagreements, we give the estimated precisions of the velocities derived from surveying and inclinometry, indicated by the ± figures in Table III (columns 2-7). Because the inferred sliding motion is obtained as the difference of two nearly equal vectors, its magnitude and especially its direction are sensitive to errors in direction of these vectors. This is reflected in the relatively large errors given in columns 9 and 10, which represent the uncertainties due to random measurement errors. The inferred azimuth of sliding for hole C is completely undetermined, because the sliding rate is so small. For hole X we believe that possible systematic errors in the compass calibration are responsible for the large discrepancy between azimuths of surface velocity and inferred sliding. A systematic error of about 9° in compass calibration, which is readily admissible for the instrument, would account for the azimuth discrepancy. If the compass directions are corrected to eliminate this discrepancy, so that the inferred sliding azimuth becomes N63°E, then the inferred sliding velocity at hole X becomes 14.6—12.6 = 2.0±0.7 cm/d.Footnote * This is in tolerable agreement with the largest of the sliding motions observed in hole X by bore-hole photography (1.3 ± 0.1 cm/d).

We therefore conclude that the indirect method of determining the sliding velocity from surveying and inclinometry confirms the direct measurements of sliding velocity by bore-hole photography, to within the not inconsiderable errors involved in these methods. This confirms that the glacier bed, where sliding occurs, has indeed been reached in our drilling. From the comparison in Table III it is evident that the accuracy of sliding-velocity measurement achievable by bore-hole photography, even with the evident difficulties involved, is significantly better than that of the indirect method. Moreover, any non-zero sliding measured by the indirect method is inherently unreliable unless cable-tool drilling (or equivalent) has been done to reach the actual bed, and confirmation that the bed has been reached can only be obtained with bore-hole photography. Considering the range in the thicknesses of "light debris" encountered in our different bore holes (Table I, column 4), we can estimate from the bore-hole deformations (Fig. 9) that sliding velocities obtained by the indirect method would be too large by 0.1 to 9 cm/d because of failure to reach the bed by thermal drilling. The apparent sliding rate of about 6 cm/d (annual average) obtained in our earlier measurements by the indirect method in the same area (Reference Kamb and ShreveKamb and Shreve, 1966) was probably falsified at least to some extent in this way.

The detailed behavior of the bore-hole deformations in the vicinity of the glacier bed is shown in Figure 10, where the tilt measurements, expressed in terms of shear strain-rate parallel to the glacier surface, are plotted against depth beneath the surface, in a log—log plot. Leaving aside some irregularities in the data, the general trend of deformations in both holes X and C corresponds to shear strain-rates

increasing with shear stress τ (assumed linear with depth) in a power-law relation with exponent n ≈ 5. This is in agreement with earlier bore-hole deformation measurements in the vicinity (Reference Kamb and ShreveKamb and Shreve, 1966). Quite near the bed, however, some noteworthy anomalies occur (Fig. 10). In the lowermost 2 m of hole X, the tilt rate decreases dramatically, while in the lowermost 2 to possibly 6 m in hole C there is a marked increase in tilt rate above the general trend higher in the hole. These anomalies imply that the basal shear stress in the vicinity of hole X was relieved locally, while the basal shear stress near hole C was locally enhanced. Relief of basal shear stress around hole X could be accomplished by partial ice—bed separation, in agreement with our photographic observation of an ice—bed gap (Section 5c). The separation and relief of the basal drag stress should allow increased sliding, in conformity with the relatively high sliding rates observed in hole X (Table III). Conversely, enhancement of basal shear stress around hole C corresponds to greater ice—bed coupling and greater resistance to sliding, and hence conforms to the markedly low sliding velocity found in this hole. From the vertical extent of the anomalous strain-rates, we infer that ice—bed separation near hole X extended over an area of lateral dimensions τ 5 m, and the enhanced ice bed coupling or locally high roughness near hole C affected an area of dimensions τ 15 m.

Fig. 10. Double logarithmic plot of shear strain-rate

versus depth z; x is parallel to the surface, positive down-slope, and z is measured perpendicularly downward from the surface. At the top, distances above the bed (in meters) are given for reference.