No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Scrambling and the Survive Principle. By Michael T. Putnam. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 115.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007. Pp. ix, 216. Hardcover. €105. doi:10.1017/S1470542708000081
Review products
Scrambling and the Survive Principle. By Michael T. Putnam. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 115.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007. Pp. ix, 216. Hardcover. €105. doi:10.1017/S1470542708000081
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- REVIEWS
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2008
References
REFERENCES
Ackema, Peter, & Neeleman, Ad. 2003. Context-sensitive spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21.681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko, & Takahashi, Daiko. 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29.347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-logical form: A radically minimalist theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1998. Projection and phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry 29.367–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Michael. 2002. On the status of representations and derivations. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, ed. by Epstein, Samuel D. and Seely, T. Daniel, 19–41. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chocano, Gema. 2007. Narrow syntax and phonological form: Scrambling in the Germanic languages (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, & van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1996. The position of the head and the domain of scrambling. Typology, prototypes, item orderings, and universals. Proceedings of the LP’96 Conference on Word Order, Prague 1996, ed. by Palek, B., 57–90. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP order and the typology of movement in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.369–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 1993. The return of the base generators. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36.1–74.Google Scholar
Frampton, John, & Gutmann, Sam. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, ed. by Epstein, Samuel D. and Seely, T. Daniel, 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans Martin, & Steinbach, Markus. 2003. What do reduced pronominals reveal about the syntax of Dutch and German? Part 1: Clause-internal positions. Linguistische Berichte 195.257–294.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2000. Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. Doctoral dissertation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality movement dependencies. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert, & Rosengren, Inger. 2003. Scrambling: Non-triggered chain formation in OV languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15.203–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation. Boston, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas, and Putnam, Michael T.. 2007. Surviving reconstruction. Phases at the Interfaces, ed. by Grohmann, K.. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 2001. Verb movement variation in Germanic and optimality theory. Habilitationschrift. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.Google Scholar