Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:22:50.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Satzstruktur und Verbbewegung: Eine minimalistische Analyse zur internen Syntax der IP (Inflection-Phrase) im Deutschen. By Claudia Maria Schmidt. (Linguistische Arbeiten, 327.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1995. Pp. x, 285. Paper. DM 146,00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

John R. te Velde
John R. te Velde
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State UniversityDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures 309 GU Stillwater, OK 74078–1054 [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Fall 1997 , pp. 274 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Werner. 1994. Kaynes Asymmetriehypothese und die Abfolge im V-Komplex. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 37. 1–17.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. Scott. 1996. Shortest Move and object case checking. Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, ed. by Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel D., Thráinsson, Höskuldur, and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter, 97–111. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Lilian. 1993. Some speculations on argument shift, clitics and crossing in West-Flemish. Dialektsyntax, ed. by Abraham, Werner and Bayer, Josef, 131–60. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. (Linguistic Inquiry monograph 25.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1994. Subjects, adjuncts, and SOV-order in antisymmetric syntax. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 37. 227–46.Google Scholar
te Velde, John R. 1994. Feature checking and Germanic verb-second: Comparing Yiddish, German and English. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 37. 247–63.Google Scholar
te Velde, John R. 1996. Coordination and antisymmetry theory: Some evidence from Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 8. 135–75.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1991. Subject deletion in Dutch: A difference between subject and topics. Language and Cognition 1. Yearbook 1991 of the Research Group for Linguistic Theory and Knowledge Representation of the University of Groningen, ed. by Reuland, Mark Kas Eric, and Vet, Co, 333–50. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar