Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:05:21.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Probleme der Valenz- und Kasustheorie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Werner Abraham
Werner Abraham
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen/University of California, Berkeley.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , July 1993 , pp. 199 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Abraham, Werner. 1989. “Verbal substantives in German.” Syntactic phrase structure phenomena. Ed. Bhatt, Christa/Lobel, Elisabeth and Schmidt, Claudia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1984. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut. 1987. “Kasus im Englischen und Deutschen: Überlegungen zu einer Theorie des abstrakten Kasus.” Unpublished Habilitationsschrift. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut. 1988. “Kasusmorphologie und Kasusrelationen: Überlegungen zur Kasustheorie am Beispiel des Deutschen.” Linguistische Berichte 116: 275–310.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 1986. Untersuchungen zur Universalgrammatik am Beispiel des Deutschen. Studien zur Grammatik des Deutschen, 29. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1968. “The case for case.” Universal in linguistics theory. Eds. Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T.. (German translation ed. by Abraham, W., Frankfurt 1971.) New York.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 1986. “Parameter der Syntax.› Unpublished Habilitationsschrift. Wien.Google Scholar
Heringer, Hans-Jürgen. 1967. “Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–288.Google Scholar
Ickler, Irene. 1990. “Lexikalische Syntax.” Sprachwissenschaft 6: 1–23.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1963. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Heidelberg: Gross.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1933. Essentials of English grammar. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Keenan, Ed and Comrie, Bernard 1977. “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar.” Linguistic inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Olson, Sue. 1986. Wortbildung im Deutschen. Stuttgart: Kroner.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris.Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1978. “Valenz und freie Adjunkte.” Valence, deel case, and sentential functions. Ed. Abraham, Werner. Complementary series of studies in language, 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide. 1985. Der Dativ im Deutschen. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar