Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:07:50.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Phonology of Westphalian German Glides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2014

Tracy Alan Hall
Tracy Alan Hall*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Indiana University, Department of Germanic Studies, Ballantine Hall 644, 1020 Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-7103, USA, [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article investigates the patterning of glides in Westphalian German. One question to be addressed is the structure of onglides, for example, the in Nase ‘nose’ and the in ‘village’. I argue that surface onglides are in the nucleus and not in the onset. The proposed representation contrasts with the ones for onglides in related languages, that is, English and Frisian. I show that Westphalian German also possesses a labial approximant [υ]—also known as a consonantal glide—which is distinct from both the onglide and the fricative [v]. I argue that onglides are underlying short vowels, which are parsed as glides by syllabification. The approximant [υ] is argued to be derived from /v/. The proposed analysis is shown to be superior to one in which [υ] derives from /u/, as proposed by Wiese (1996) for New High German.*

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 323 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Josef, Ahrens, 1908. Der Vokalismus der Mundarten im Kreise Olpe unter Zungrundelegung der Mundart von Elspe. Borna-Leipzig: Noske.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Beisenherz, 1907. Vokalismus der Mundart des nordöstlichen Landkreises Dortmund. Borna-Leipzig: Noske.Google Scholar
Geert, Booij, 1989. On the representation of diphthongs in Frisian. Journal of Linguistics 25.319–332.Google Scholar
GeorgeN, Clements, 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, ed. by Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E., 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, George N., & Hume, Elizabeth V.. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Goldsmith, John, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Antonie, Cohen, Ebeling, Carl L., Eringa, Pier, Fokkema, Klaas, & van Holk, André G. F.. 1959. Fonologie van het Nederlands en het Fries. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
András, Cser, 1999. Diphthongs in the syllable structure of Latin. Glotta 75.172–193.Google Scholar
Stuart, Davis, & Hammond, Michael. 1995. On the status of onglides in American English. Phonology 12. 159–182.Google Scholar
Jacques, Durand, 1987. On the phonological status of glides: The evidence from Malay. Explorations in dependency phonology, ed. by Anderson, John & Durand, Jacques, 79–108. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Martin, Durrell, 1989. Westphalian and Eastphalian. The dialects of modern German. A linguistic survey, ed. by Russ, Charles, 59–90. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peter, Frebel, 1957. Die Mundarten des westlichen Sauerlandes zwischen Ebbegebirge und Arnsberger Wald. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Hubert, Grimme, 1922. Plattdeutsche Mundarten. Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Guerssel, 1986. Glides in Berber and syllabicity. Linguistic Inquiry 17.1–12.Google Scholar
Hall, Tracy Alan. 2002. Against extrasyllabic consonants in German and English. Phonology 19.33–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
W.Harris, James Harris, James, & Kaisse, Ellen M.. 1999. Palatal vowels, glides and obstruents in Argentinian Spanish. Phonology 16.117–190.Google Scholar
Bruce, Hayes, 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20.253–306.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, Holthausen, 1886. Die soester Mundart. Norden-Leipzig: Diedrich Soltau's VerlagGoogle Scholar
Elizabeth, Hume, 1994. Representing the duality of glides. Paper presented at Les Actes du Congrès.Langues etGrammaire 1. Available at http://ling.ohio-state.edu/~ehume.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2003. A theory of phonological weight. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hermann, Jellinghaus, 1877. Die Laute und Flexion der Ravenbergischen Mundart. Bremen: Krühtmann's Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Julius, Kaumann, 1884. Entwurf einer Laut- und Flexionslehre der münsterischen Mundart in ihrem gegenwärtigen Zustande. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D., & Lowenstamm, Jean. 1984. De la syllabicité. Forme sonore du langage: Structure des representations en phonologie, ed. by Dell, François, Hirst, David, & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger, 123–159. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudolf Ernst. 1961. German dialects. Phonology and morphology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kurka, Eduard. 1965. Zur Ausspprache der Lautkombination [kv]=qu im Hochdeutschen. Phonetica13.53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Susannah V. 2004. The representation of underlying glides. Seattle, WA: University of Washingtondissertation.Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah V. 2011. Glides. The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. by van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, & Rice, Keren. Oxford: Blackwell. Available at http://www.companiontophonology.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405184236_chunk_g978140518423617, accessed on February 21, 2012.Google Scholar
Juliette, Levin, 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Andrew, Nevins, & Chitoran, Ioana. 2008. Phonological representations and the variable patterning of glides. Lingua 118.1979–1997.Google Scholar
Hermann, Niebaum, 1974. Zur synchronischen und historischen Phonologie des Westfälischen. Die Mundart von Laer (Landkreis Osnabrück). Köln: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Hermann, Niebaum, 1977. Westfälisch. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Jaye, Padgett, 2008. Glides, vowels and features. Lingua 118.1937–1955.Google Scholar
Hermann, Paul, 2007. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. 25th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sarauw, Christian P. E. 1921.Vergleichende Lautlehre der niederdeutschen Mundarten im Stammlande. Band I. København: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Elmar, Seebold (ed.). 2011. Kluge. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25th edn. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. Language sound structure, ed. by Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard, 107–137. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Donca, Steriade, 1988. Review of George N. Clements &Samuel Jay Keyser, CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Language 64.118–129.Google Scholar
Fritz, Tita, 1965. Bublitzer Mundart. Marburg: N. G. Elwert Verlag.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Viëtor, 1887. Elemente der Phonetik und Orthoepie des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. 2nd edn. Heilbronn: Verlag von Gebr. Henninger.Google Scholar
Willem, Visser, 1997. The syllable in Frisian. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Richard, Wiese, 1996. The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Woeste, 1882. Wörterbuch der westfälischen Mundart. Norden und Leipzig: Heinrich Soltau.Google Scholar
Joseph, Wright, 1907. Historical German grammar, vol. 1, Phonology, word formation and accidence. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moira, Yip, 2003. Casting doubt on the onset-rime distinction. Lingua 113.779–816.Google Scholar