Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:12:40.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonetic Perspectives on West Germanic Consonant Gemination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Jeannette Marshall Denton
Jeannette Marshall Denton
Affiliation:
University of ChicagoDepartment of Linguistics 1010 E. 59th Street Chicago, IL 60637 [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution of geminates resulting from North and West Germanic consonant gemination suggests that velar obstruents were the segments most favored by the change, while r was least favored and blocked the operation altogether. In an attempt to account for this behavior, the phonetic characteristics of these sounds are examined in the context of the geminating environments. It is demonstrated that these preferences can be accounted for through coarticulatory and acoustic effects of the trigger on the preceding consonant and vice versa. Although many previous analyses have glossed over the details of consonant gemination in West Germanic, it is argued here that in order to understand sound change, coarticulation, perception, and allophonic variation must be taken into account.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Fall 1998 , pp. 201 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antonsen, Elmer. 1975. A concise grammar of the older runic inscriptions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bammesberger, Alfred. 1990. Die Morphologic des urgermanischen Nomens. (Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Grammatik der germanischen Sprachen, 2.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Barrack, Charles M. 1991. PGmc. *-VCiV-revisited. AJGLL 3. 119–44.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm, and Eggers, Hans. 1987. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 14th edn. (Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte, 5.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brosnahan, L. F., and Malmberg, Bertil. 1970. Introduction to phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston and Beckman (eds.), 283–333.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre, and Freeman, Donald C.. 1968. A dialect study of American r's by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics 44. 29–68.Google Scholar
Franck, J. 1883. Mittelniederländische Grammatik. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Franck, J. 1909. Altfränkische Grammatik. (Grammatiken der althochdeutschen Dialekte, 2.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gallée, Johan Hendrik. 1910. Altsächsische Grammatik. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, T. V. 1975. On the correlation of stops and fricatives in a phonological system. Lingua 35. 231–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1972. First grammatical treatise. 2nd edn.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian language structures. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Heffner, R-M. S. 1969. General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Heusler, Andreas. 1932. Altisländisches Elementarbuch. 3rd edn. (Sammlung germanischer Elementar- und Handbücher, 1.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Holthausen, F. 1921. Altsächsisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. 1976. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Robert B. 1991. Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues. (Linguistische Arbeiten, 253.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John, and Beckman, Mary E. (eds.). 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, D. H. 1991. Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Readings in clinical spectrography of speech, ed. by Baken, R. J. and Daniloff, R. G., 226–46. San Diego: Singular Pub. Group.Google Scholar
Kranzmayer, Eberhard. 1956. Historische Lautgeographie des gesamtbairischen Dialektraumes. (Studien zur österreichisch-bairischen Dialektkunde, 1.) Vienna: Böhlaus Nachf.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A course in phonetics. 3rd edn.Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, and Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lasch, Agathe. 1914. Mittelniederdeutsche Grammatik. (Kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte, 9.) Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona. 1985. The story of /r/. Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged, ed. by Fromkin, Victoria A., 157–68. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Loey, A. van. 1965. Middelnederlandse spraakkunst. Vol. 2: Klankleer. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Lutz, Angelika. 1991. Phonotaktisch gesteuerte Konsonantenveränderungen in der Geschichte des Englischen. (Linguistische Arbeiten, 272.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1971. La prononciation du français contemporain: Témoinages recueillis en 1941 dans un camp d'officiers prisonniers. 2nd edn. (Langue & cultures, 3.) Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1952. Jacob Böhme's uvular r. JEGP 51. 83–89.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 1986. Urgermanische Silbenstruktur und die westgermanische Konsonantengemination. PBB 108. 333–56.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. and Vennemann, Theo. 1983. Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic phonology. Language 59. 514–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1970. Altnordische Grammatik I: Altisländische und Altnorwegische Grammatik (Laut- und Flexionslehre) unter Berücksichtigung des Urnordischen. University: University of Alabama Press. (Reprint of 4th edn., 1923. Halle: Max Niemeyer.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. The production of speech, ed. by MacNeilage, Peter F., 189–216. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1989. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. Language change: Contributions to the study of its causes, ed. by Breivik, Leiv Egil and Jahr, Ernst Håkon, 173–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1990. The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In Kingston and Beckman (eds.), 258–75.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1995. The perceptual basis of some sound patterns. Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology IV, ed. by Connell, Bruce and Arvaniti, Amalia, 87–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Lautentwicklung und Formenassociation 4: Die westgermanische Consonantendehnung. PBB 7. 105–35.Google Scholar
Penzl, Herbert. 1961. Old High German <r> and its phonetic identification. Language 37. 388–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, J. M. 1980. The sounds of speech communication. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Runge, Richard. 1973. The phonetic realization of Proto-Germanic/r/. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 87. 228–47.Google Scholar
Schatz, J. 1907. Altbairische Grammatik. (Grammatiken der althochdeutschen Dialekte, 1.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Moritz. 1924. Historiese grammatika van het Nederlands. 2. druk. Zutphen: W. J. Thieme & Cie.Google Scholar
Sherman, Donald. 1975. Stop and fricative systems: A discussion of paradigmatic gaps and the question of language sampling. Working Papers on Language Universals 17. 1–31. Stanford: Language Universals Project, Committee on Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Shevelov, George Y. 1979. A historical phonology of the Ukrainian language. (Historical phonology of the Slavic languages, 4.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1878. Zur Accent- und Lautlehre der germanischen Sprachen III: Zum vocalischen Auslautsgesetz. PBB 5. 101–63.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth H., and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1989. Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 65. 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Seiichi. 1989. On determining the sonority value of /w/ relative to /r/ and /l/ in early West Germanic. Folia Linguistica Historica 10. 21–34.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1990. The dialects of England. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, Horst. 1972. Instrumentalphonetisch-auditive r−Untersuchungen im Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Voyles, Joseph B. 1992. Early Germanic grammar: Pre-, Proto-, and Post-Germanic languages. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismer, Gary. 1979. Sensitivity of voice-onset time (VOT) measures to certain segmental features in speech production. Journal of Phonetics 7. 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismer, Gary. 1980. Control of the voicing distinction for intervocalic stops and fricatives: Some data and theoretical considerations. Journal of Phonetics 8. 427–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbury, John R. 1983. Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73. 1322–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed