Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:22:55.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grammatical Gender in Norwegian: Language Acquisition and Language Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Yulia Rodina*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Marit Westergaard*
Affiliation:
UiT–The Arctic University of Norway
*
University of Oslo, Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies / MultiLing, Postbox 1102 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway, [[email protected]]
UiT–The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Language and Linguistics/CASTL, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway, [[email protected]]

Abstract

Based on data from two experimental studies, this paper investigates the production of gender in a Norwegian dialect (Tromsø) by several groups of child and adult speakers. The findings show that gender is late acquired (around age 7) and, furthermore, that there are considerable differences between the groups, indicating an ongoing historical change that involves the loss of feminine gender agreement. However, the feminine declensional endings, such as the suffixal definite article, are retained. While there are sociolinguistic factors causing this change, we argue that the nature of the change can be explained by the process of language acquisition.*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderssen, Merete. 2006. The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø dissertation.Google Scholar
Anderssen, Merete, & Westergaard, Marit. 2010. Frequency and economy in the acquisition of variable word order. Lingua 120. 2569-2588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine, Rodina, Yulia, & Westergaard, Marit. 2010. The acquisition of apparent optionality: Word order in subject and object shift constructions in Norwegian. Variation in the input: Studies in the acquisition of word order (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 39), ed. by Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine, & Westergaard, Marit, 241-270. London: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine. 2000. “I like not it like du like it!” A case study of language transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø MA thesis.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Giulia. 2013. Gender in Italian-German bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16. 538-557.Google Scholar
Blom, Elma, Poliŝenska, Daniela, & Weerman, Fred. 2008. Articles, adjectives, and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research 24. 297-332.Google Scholar
Bull, Tove. 1990. Tromsø bymål. Den store dialektboka, ed. by Håkon Jahr, Ernst, 217-221. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Conzett, Philipp, Mette Johansen, Åse, & Sollid, Hilde. 2011. Genus og substantivbøying i nordnorske språkkontaktområder. Nordand Tidsskrift for Andrespråksforskning 6. 35-71.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2004. On the relation between gender and declension: A diachronic perspective from Norwegian. Studies in Language 28. 51-82.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein, & Vannebo, Kjell-Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, Annie. 2012. The fundamentals of language acquisition. Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Google Scholar
Gülzow, Insa, & Gagarina, Natalia (eds.). 2007. Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept (Studies on Language Acquisition). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Language conflict and language planning: The case of Modern Norwegian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York, NY: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Holger. 2012. Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research 29. 33-56.Google Scholar
Hovdenak, Marit, Killingbergtrø, Laurits, Lauvhjell, Arne, Nordlie, Sigurd, Rommetveit, Mage & Worren, Dagfinn. 1998. Nynorskordboka [Nynorsk dictionary]. Oslo: Det norske samlaget.Google Scholar
Jahr, Ernst Håkon. 1998. Sociolinguistics in historical language contact: The Scandinavian languages and Low German during the Hanseatic period. Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics, ed. by Håkon Jahr, Ernst, 119-139Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jahr, Ernst Håkon. 2001. Historical sociolinguistics: The role of Low German language contact in the Scandinavian typological split of the late Middle Ages. Lingua Posnaniensis 43. 95-104.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1983. Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 11. 166-182.Google Scholar
Kupisch, Tanja, Müller, Natascha, & Cantone, Katja F.. 2002. Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Comparing Italian and French. Lingue e Linguaggio 1. 107-149.Google Scholar
Kupisch, Tanja, Akpinar, Deniz, & Stöhr, Antje. 2013. Gender assignment and gender agreement in adult bilinguals and second language learners of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3. 150-179.Google Scholar
Levy, Yonata. 1983. It's frogs all the way down. Cognition 15. 75-93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lødrup, Helge. 2011. Hvor mange genus er det i Oslo-dialekten? Maal og Minne 2. 120-136.Google Scholar
Mills, Anne E. 1986. The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German grammatical development. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Müller, Natascha. 1990. Developing two gender assignment systems simultaneously. Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children, ed. by Meisel, Jürgen M., 193234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Müller, Natascha. 1999. Gender and number in acquisition. Gender in grammar and cognition (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 124), ed. by Unterbeck, Barbara & Rissanen, Matti, 351399. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nesse, Agnete, & Sollid, Hilde. 2010. Nordnorske bymål i et komparativt perspektiv. Maal og Minne 1. 139-160.Google Scholar
Plunkett, Kim, & Strömquist, Sven. 1992. The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, ed. by Slobin, Dan I., 457556. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rodina, Yulia. 2014. Variation in the input: Child and caregiver in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Russian. Language Sciences 43. 116-132.Google Scholar
Rodina, Yulia, & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. A cue-based approach to the acquisition of grammatical gender in Russian. Journal of Child Language 39. 1077-1106.Google Scholar
Rodina, Yulia, & Westergaard, Marit. 2013a. The acquisition of gender and declension class in a non-transparent system: Monolinguals and bilinguals. Studia Linguistica 67. 47-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodina, Yulia, & Westergaard, Marit. 2013b. Two gender systems in one mind: The acquisition of grammatical gender in Norwegian-Russian bilinguals. Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 1 (Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education), ed. by Siemund, Peter, Gogolin, Ingrid, Edith Schulz, Monika, & Davydova, Julia, 95126, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom. 2007. What frequency can do and what it can't. Gülzow & Gagarina 2007, 2348.Google Scholar
Rowlett, Paul. 2007. The syntax of French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stöhr, Antje, Akpinar, Deniz, Bianchi, Giulia, & Kupisch, Tanja. 2012. Gender marking in L2 learners and Italian-German bilinguals with German as the weaker language. Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies, ed. by Braunmüller, Kurt & Gabriel, Christoph, 153-170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne. 2005. The Nordic languages in the 19th century I: Phonology and orthography. Nordic languages. An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol. 2, ed. by Bandle, Oscar, Braunmüller, Kurt, & Jahr, Ernst-Håkon, 14251436. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trosterud, Trond. 2001. Genustilordning i norsk er regelstyrt. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 19. 29-57.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2013. Gender maintenance and loss in Totenmålet, English, and other major Germanic varieties. In search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, ed. by Lohndal, Terje, 77-107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi, & Hulk, Aafke. 2013. Grammatical gender and the notion of default: Insights from language acquisition. Lingua 137. 128-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon, Argyri, Froso, Cornips, Leonie, Hulk, Aafke, Sorace, Antonella, & Tsimpli, Ianthi. 2014. The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics 35. 765-805.Google Scholar
Vanvik, Arne. 1971. The phonetic-phonemic development of a Norwegian child. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 24. 269-325.Google Scholar
Venås, Kjell. 1993. On the choice between two written standards in Norway. Language conflict and language planning, ed. by Håkon Jahr, Ernst, 263-278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikør, Lars S. 1995. The Nordic languages: Their status and interrelations. Nordic Language Secretariat Publication 14. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2009. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12. 49-79.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit, & Bentzen, Kristine. 2007. The (non-)effect of input frequency on the acquisition of word order in Norwegian embedded clauses. Gülzow & Gagarina 2007, 271306.Google Scholar