Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:22:47.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Diachronic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions in Old Swedish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2018

John D. Sundquist
John D. Sundquist*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
Department of German and Russian, School of Languages and Cultures, Purdue University, 640 Oval Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA, [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study provides an empirical analysis of light verb constructions in Old Swedish. These constructions contain a semantically light verb, such as giva ‘give’ or göra ‘make’, that may be paired with an abstract nominal object, as in giva radh ‘give advice’ or giva hiälp ‘give help’. Using a corpus of nine Old Swedish texts written in the 13th, 14th, and 15th centuries, I track the frequency of light verb constructions and analyze the range of transitive light verb + object pairings. I consider the effects of time, genre, and the type of modification to the nominal object in the quantitative analysis. The results contribute to ongoing discussions in crosslinguistic, diachronic research on the reasons for the increase in frequency of light verb constructions as well as the possibility that this construction exhibits characteristics of grammaticalization or lexicalization.

Keywords

complex predicateslight verbsgrammaticalizationOld Swedishlexicalization
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 260 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DATA SOURCES: Old Swedish

ÄVgL (Äldre Västgötalagen). Samling af Sweriges gamla lagar 2, ed. by Collin, Hans Samuel & Schlyter, Carl Johan, 1827 [15,010 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Birg (Birgittas uppenbarelser I: Bok 1–3; according to Holm A 33). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 14. 1, ed. by Klemming, Gustav Edvard, 1857 [106,740 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
BJ (Barlaam och Josaphat). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 28, ed. by Klemming, Gustav Edvard, 1887 [27,029 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
DUDS (Digitale Undersøgelser af Dansk Sprog [the Digital Study in the Danish Language]). Available at http://duds.nordisk.ku.dk.Google Scholar
Fornsvenska Textbanken [The Old Swedish Text Bank] corpus. Available at http://project2.sol.lu.se/fornsvenska/.Google Scholar
Iv (Herr Ivan Lejonriddaren). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 5, ed. by Stephens, G., 1849. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
KL (Konung Kristoffers Landslag). Samling af Sweriges gamla lagar 12, ed. by Schlyter, Carl Johan, 1869 [54,936 words]. Stockholm: Z. Haeggström.Google Scholar
Leg (Fornsvenska legendariet; according to Codex Bildstenianus). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 7. 1–2, ed. by Stephens, G., 1847 [124,907 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Medieval Nordic Text Archive. Available at http://www.menota.org.Google Scholar
Pent (Fem Moseböcker på fornsvenska: Pentateuchparafrasen efter MB I B). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 60, ed. by Thorell, O., 1959 [145,150 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
SkL (Skånelagen; according to Holm B 76). Samling af Sweriges gamla lagar 9, ed. by Schlyter, Carl Johan, 1859 [19,100 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Språkbanken [the Swedish Language Bank]. Available at https://spraakbanken.gu.se/.Google Scholar
Tröst (Själens tröst). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 59, ed. by Henning, Samuel, 1954 [145,473 words]. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
UL (Upplandslagen; according to Holm B 199). Svenska Fornskriftsällskapets Samlingar 70, ed. by Henning, Sam, 1967 [46,620 words]. Stockholm: Kungliga biblioteket.Google Scholar
Val (Namnlös och Valentin). Svenska fornskriftsällskapets skrifter 6, ed. by Klemming, G.E., 1846. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar

REFERENCES

Akimoto, Minoji, & Brinton, Laurel J.. 1999. The origin of the composite predicate in Old English. Brinton & Akimoto 1999, 21–58.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1995. Having a look at the expanded predicate. The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description, ed. by Aarts, Bas & Meyer, Charles F., 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allerton, David J. 2002. Stretched verb constructions in English. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Andersson, Roger (ed.). 2014. Heliga Birgittas texter på fornsvenska. Birgittas Uppenbarelser. Bok 2. Stockholm: Runica et Mediævalia.Google Scholar
Anward, Jan, & Linell, Per. 1975. Om lexikaliserade fraser i svenskan. Nysvenska Studier: Tidskrift för Svensk Stil-och Språkforskning 55. 77–119.Google Scholar
Asplund, Arvid. 2012. Att hålla nakna substantiv. Unpublished manuscript. Gothenburg University. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/2077/30658, accessed on January 20, 2016.Google Scholar
Bergman, Gösta. 1968. Kortfattad svensk språkhistoria. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston letters (1421–1503). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borin, Lars, Forsberg, Markus, & Roxendal, Johan. 2012. Korp—the corpus infrastructure of Språkbanken. Proceedings of LREC 2012, ed. by Calzolari, Nicolette, Choukri, Khalid, Declerck, Theirry, Dogan, Mehmet Ugur, Maegaard, Bente, Mariani, Joseph, Moreno, Asuncion, Odijk, Jan, & Piperidis, Stelios, 474–478. Istanbul: ELRA.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2008. The diachrony of complex predicates. Diachronica 25. 161–185.Google Scholar
Brandtler, Johan, & Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2010. Framväxten av obestämd artikel i svenska. Svensson och svenskan: Med sinnen känsliga för språk, ed. by Byrman, Gunnilla, Gustafsson, Anna, & Rahm, Henrik, 24–36. Göteborg: Intellecta.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. Where grammar and lexis meet. Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, ed. by Seoane, Elena & López-Couso, María José, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., & Akimoto, Minoji (eds.). 1999. Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2003. The light verb jungle. Papers from the GSAS/Dudley House Workshop on Light Verbs (Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9), ed. by Aygen, Gulsat, Bowern, Claire, & Quinn, Conor, 1–49. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. Complex predicates in cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Amberber, Mengistu, Baker, Brett, & Harvey, Mark, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam, & Lahiri, Aditi. 2013. Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua 135. 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinková, Silvie. 2009a. A contrastive lexical description of basic verbs. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 92. 21–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinková, Silvie. 2009b. Words that matter: Towards a Swedish-Czech colligational dictionary of basic verbs. Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague dissertation.Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word verbs in early Modern English: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1998. Support verbs and the argument rule. Studies in Valency IV, ed. by Durme, Karin van & Schløser, Lene, 63–88. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1999. Från OV-ordföljd till VO-ordföljd En språkförändring med förhinder. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 114. 151–232.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1992. A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dura, Ela. 1997. Substantiv och stödverb. Göteborg: Institutionen för svenska språket.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Lena. 1989. Gå till anfall och falla i sömn: En strukturell och funktionell beskrivning av abstrakta övergångsfraser. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Lena. 1993. Verbet ta i metaforisk och grammatikaliserad användning. Språk och Stil 3. 105–139.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion. 2013. The synchronic and diachronic status of English light verbs. Linguistic Variation 13. 48–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gárate, Teresa Moralejo. 2003. Composite predicates in Middle English. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Giry-Schneider, Jacqueline. 1987. Les prédicats nominaux en français: Les phrases simples à verbe support. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Håkansson, David. 2008. Syntaktisk variation och förändring: En studie av subjektslösa satser i fornsvenska. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick, Urbschat, Anne, & Gehweiler, Elke. 2006. German light verb constructions in corpora and dictionaries. International Journal of Lexicography 19. 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27. 529–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin, & Koops, Christian. 2008. A quantitative approach to the development of complex predicates: The case of Swedish pseudo-coordination with sitta ‘sit’. Diachronica 25. 242–261.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 1983. The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb: The evidence from some Old and Early Middle English texts. Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 1999. Verbal phrases and phrasal verbs. Brinton & Akimoto 1999, 167–206.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? What makes grammaticalization, ed. by Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus, & Wiemer, Björn, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Höder, Steffen. 2010. Sprachausbau im Sprachkontakt: Syntaktischer Wandel im Altschwedischen, vol. 35. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Achim. 1972. Die verbo-nominale Konstruktion—eine spezifische Form der nominalen Ausdrucksweise im modernen Englisch. Zeitschrift für Anglistik 20. 158–183.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin. 1991. The emergence of perfective aspect in Indo-Aryan languages. Approaches to Grammaticalization 2. 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin. 1993. Aspectogenesis and the compound verb in Indo-Aryan. Complex predicates in South Asian languages, ed. by Verma, Manindra, 97–113. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis. 2001. Composite predicates in Middle English with the verbs nimen and taken. Studia Neophilologica 73. 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles VI. Copenhagen: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1999. Collocational and idiomatic aspects of verbs in Early Modern English. Brinton & Akimoto 1999, 167–206.Google Scholar
Live, Anna H. 1973. The take-have phrasal in English. Linguistics 95. 31–50.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Erik. 2007. Gränsöverskridande koordination. Syntaktisk förändring i äldre svenska. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Malmgren, Sven-Göran. 2002. Begå eller ta självmord? Om svenska kollokationer och deras förändringsbenägenhet. Göteborg: Institutionen för svenska språk.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Meiko. 1999. Composite predicates in Middle English. Brinton & Akimoto 1999, 59–96.Google Scholar
Nickel, Gerhard. 1968. Complex verbal structures in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, Gertrud. 1996. Svenska språket under sjuhundra år: En historia om svenskan och dess utforskande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Polenz, Peter von. 1963. Funktionsverben im heutigen Deutsch: Sprache in der rationalisierten Welt. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Polenz, Peter von. 1987. Funktionsverben, Funktionsverbgefüge und Verwandtes. Vorschläge zur satzsemantischen Lexikographie. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 15. 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottelberge, Jeroen van. 2001. Verbonominale Konstruktionen, Funktionsverbgefüge. Vom Sinn und Unsinn eines Untersuchungsgegenstandes. Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1972. A note on aspect in English: The take a walk construction. Transformationelle Analyse, ed. by Plötz, Senta, 409–440. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rensky, Miroslav. 1964. English verbo-nominal phrases. Travaux Linguistique de Prague 1. 289–299.Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia. 2012. Make peace and take victory: Support verb constructions in Old English in comparison with Old Irish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronan, Patricia. 2014. Light verb constructions in the history of English. Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns, ed. by Davidse, Kristin, Gentens, Caroline, Ghesquière, Lobke, & Vandelanotte, Lieven, 15–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia, & Schneider, Gerold. 2015. Determining light verb constructions in contemporary British and Irish English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20. 32–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrzypek, Dominika. 2013. Textual origins of the indefinite article in Swedish. Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 15. 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrzypek, Dominika. 2014. Grammatikalisering av obestämd artikel i fornsvenskan. Studier i svensk språkhistoria 12: Variation och förändring, ed. by Bylin, Maria, Falk, Cecilia, & Riad, Tomas. Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.Google Scholar
Snyder, Patricia, & Lawson, Stephen. 1993. Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. The Journal of Experimental Education 61. 334–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Gabriele. 1991. The phrasal verb type to have a look in Modern English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 29. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2002. Morphosyntactic Change in the history of the Mainland Scandinavian languages. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2006. Syntactic variation in the history of Norwegian and the decline of XV word order. Diachronica 23. 105–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanabe, Harumi. 1999. Composite predicates in Middle English. Brinton & Akimoto 1999, 97–132.Google Scholar
Thompson, Bruce. 2007. Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools 44. 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999. A historical overview of complex predicate types. Brinton & Akimoto 1999, 239–260.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1990. Svenskans lexikala profil. Svenskans Beskrivning 17. 391–408.Google Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C., Ingason, Anton Karl, Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr, & Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2011. Icelandic Parsed Historical Corpus (IcePaHC). Available at http://www.linguist.is/icelandic_treebank.Google Scholar
Wendt, Bo-A. 1997. Landslagsspråk och stadslagsspråk. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1982. Why can you have a drink when you can't *have an eat? Language 58. 753–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollin, Lars. 1991. Två språk och flera skikt. Birgitta, hendes verk og hendes klostre i Norden, ed. by Nyberg, Tore, 407–434. Odense: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar