Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:13:08.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contact phenomena in language maintenance and shift: The Pennsylvania German infinitive construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Marion Lois Huffines
Marion Lois Huffines
Affiliation:
Bucknell UniversityLewisburg, PA 17837
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The formation of the Pennsylvania German dependent infinitive construction varies across Pennsylvania German speech communities. The use of zu to mark infinitives which do not complement modals is receding in all communities and has been replaced variably by far or far…zu. Younger nonnative speakers have grasped the (far)…zu construction as template for producing discourse. Sectarians (Amish and Mennonites) mark dependent infinitives less frequently than nonsectarians, and Amish speakers often avoid the construction by the progressive aspect. The influence of English on these developments is indirect. The loss of zu, the use of (far)…zu, and the sectarian omission of far and zu represent generalizations of different rules. The contact seems to have promoted generalization, but has influenced each group to generalize differently

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 1990 , pp. 95 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Buffington, Albert F., and Barba, Preston A. 1954, rev. 1965. A Pennsylvania German grammar. Allentown, PA: Schlechter.Google Scholar
Costello, John R. 1978. “Syntactic change and second language acquisition: The case for Pennsylvania German.” Linguistics 213:29–50.Google Scholar
Frey, J. William. 1942, rpt. 1981. A simple grammar of Pennsylvania German. Reissued with a new preface by C. R. Beam. Lancaster, PA: Brookshire Publications.Google Scholar
Haag, Earl C. 1982. A Pennsylvania German reader and grammar. University Park, PA.: The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Haldeman, S. S. 1872. Pennsylvania Dutch: A dialect of South German with an infusion of English. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Henn, Beate. 1980. Pfälzisch. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois. 1986. “The function of aspect in Pennsylvania German and the impact of English.” Yearbook of German-American studies 21:137–154.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois. 1987. “The dative case in Pennsylvania German: Diverging norms in language maintenance and loss.” Yearbook of German-American studies 22:183–181.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois. 1989. “Translation and the receding language. Paper presented at annual meeting of the International Linguistics Association.New York.Google Scholar
Louden, Mark L. 1988. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Pennsylvania German. Ph.D. diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Reed, Carroll E. 1948. “The adaptation of English to Pennsylvania German morphology.” American Speech 23: 239–244.Google Scholar